tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10292211445548754712024-02-19T04:55:24.958+03:00OSWALD FRAMED: CONVENIENT LIES AND COVER-UPSThe Kennedy Assassination: the official story is that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. The truth is the very key to what's wrong with our country today. Judyth Vary Baker places examples of how Oswald was framed to take the blame in this blog.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-14712871051878561572021-12-09T08:45:00.001+03:002021-12-09T08:45:14.086+03:00BACK TO THE FUTURE!It's taken a while to get back into my blogs, which were blocked for years. But
now I'm back, and will be updating all of them. Here is the updated version of ME & LEE -
LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND ME. You can obtain a first-printing copy of this 586 page hardccover deluxe updated book, which also has 8 color pages, by
sending $45 to PAYPAL to: jfkconference@yahoo.com. Be sure to add your address! MORE TO COME! CHECK OUT MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL: NIGHT WATCH with JUDYTH VARY BAKER, as it gets developed (where you are always welcome!).
<div class="separator" style="clear: both;">
<a
href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhoEm8QFKCh_NgXAXlZVHSaQKI4bns7DO9UZ-sUtHy0BgGdyF-lFCjt0C04KQAx6xO6gaageD3M8w4UAzjKjhlbm5lGu4gcVGx2PHUWyR90BStuvIg44g1hbDmENywmoht8KFRdHYctHsfXloeVpOnwzaufEIODSWhi3YLHBcq6Vd8YWmctzEVR12Olew=s2048"
style="display: block; padding: 1em 0; text-align: center; clear: left; float: left;"
><img
alt=""
border="0"
width="400"
data-original-height="1489"
data-original-width="2048"
src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhoEm8QFKCh_NgXAXlZVHSaQKI4bns7DO9UZ-sUtHy0BgGdyF-lFCjt0C04KQAx6xO6gaageD3M8w4UAzjKjhlbm5lGu4gcVGx2PHUWyR90BStuvIg44g1hbDmENywmoht8KFRdHYctHsfXloeVpOnwzaufEIODSWhi3YLHBcq6Vd8YWmctzEVR12Olew=s400"
/></a>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-23122210402892931722018-09-23T18:55:00.003+03:002018-09-23T18:55:36.754+03:00In 2013, as an alternative to the Lancer Conference, where I was banned from speaking, I founded the JFK ASSASSINATION CONFERENCE, not just so I could speak, but so many others could speak who also were not being invited. That first conference was held for one day in Arlington, TX, near Dallas, at a small venue. About 45 people attended, but considering how far they had to drive, that was a good showing! Since then, we have grown! We are now the biggest JFK conference of its kind in the world. We are now a 3-day conference with a total attendance of 300. On Nov. 16-17-18, 2018, the 6th Annual JFK Assassination Conference will be held at The Doubletree-Hilton, Market center, Dallas -- but because we have so many speakers who DESERVE to be heard, we have expanded the original three days to include THURSDAY for early-bird arrivals!<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitDV_O5P9kiSeSR2k0veBZCHz527WxGTl8ztaFk-PEB-EPDwihEW_iLXQblzJWz6AI8iDGqye2z7KeAzf4saqAF5Q28r3jCnqCAmtVt8_DTHX3aHppZO4sv8ESmO0_f4SNuHWNG51kml6r/s1600/speakers+dinner+2018.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" height="225" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitDV_O5P9kiSeSR2k0veBZCHz527WxGTl8ztaFk-PEB-EPDwihEW_iLXQblzJWz6AI8iDGqye2z7KeAzf4saqAF5Q28r3jCnqCAmtVt8_DTHX3aHppZO4sv8ESmO0_f4SNuHWNG51kml6r/s400/speakers+dinner+2018.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
While the first conference was free, one goal we had was to make sure that no matter how poor a speaker might be, if he or she had worthy information to divulge, we would make sure that they would get a hotel room, a plane flight, meals, whatever it took, to make sure they had a chance to speak up. The 'rival" conference (Lancer) where I was banned from speaking, did not provide hotels or travel expenses for their speakers, so they tended to have the same ones (and the same locals in Dallas) speaking over and over. We are glad that everyone has had an opportunity to hear them, thereby!<br />
<br />
HOW HAS THIS ALL BEEN FINANCED? By several ways: (1) all net royalties I receive from my book ME & LEE go to help support the Conference<br />
(2) We get donations! and we are so grateful for them! BUT <u><b>--</b></u>we do NOT accept donations from any GROUP. We only accept donations from small business owners, publishers, and individuals that we know are not connected to anyone who could infuence us.<br />
(3) I sell my paintings, of which I can only produce 2-3 per year, which sell for $5-6,000 each. They are made of only the finest of pigments , such as ground lapis lazuli and real turquoise for blues... even the gold in my paintings is 24K gold. My most recent paintings involved an Apache trading fish and baskets to an Arizona settler (an ancestor of the person commissioning the painting) in exchange for a little money, and one I'm working on at present, JFK and Jackie at Love Field, in art <i>noir</i> style.<br />
($) and of course, we sell tickets. If you would like to attend this historic conference, which this year has 40 speakers (!!!! nobody else has so many!!!) send $125.00 to jfkconference@yahoo.com using PayPal to get a guaranteed seat (this conference might sell out).<br />
<br />
We have speakers such as Dr. Cyril Wecht (our Keynote speaker), Robert Tanenbaum (HSCA), Edward T. Haslam (Dr. Mary's Monkey), Phillip Nelson (author: LBJ Mastermind), Richard Bartholomew, Roger Craig Jr (son of the courageous Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig), Dick Russell (author: The Man Who Knew Too Much), Edgar Tatro & Rick Russo (The Men Who Killed Kennedy series), Beverly Oliver, Hubert Clark (JFK Honor Guard witness who testifies that JFK's body was switched to a different casket so it coukd be altered), James Jenkins (Bethesda witness), Dr. David Mantik, Paul Schrade (was shot when Bobby Kennedy was shot, whotestifies that Sirhan Sirhan did not shoot RFK), and many others! I will also be speaking about the man I knew and loved --Lee Harvey Oswald -- who was framed and then murdered, and how new secret files that have been released now support a number of events I mentioned in Me & Lee for which little or no prior evidence existed.<br />
<br />
It would be a pleasure to meet you.<br />
<br />
JVB<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBRDMYaMRuYWy-OTH3Njuc-dCdc_hHclJj2Yc6495HhPzOa_Sb1dAirem58yTSUkb0oaTm3acCkFI7bUp8RMKlj6NU4nVq_Nfjh0QMH7tMzVDGYQ83145zq-g0bgRagbcC_AAX4eOfYFG1/s1600/speakers+dinner+2018.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBRDMYaMRuYWy-OTH3Njuc-dCdc_hHclJj2Yc6495HhPzOa_Sb1dAirem58yTSUkb0oaTm3acCkFI7bUp8RMKlj6NU4nVq_Nfjh0QMH7tMzVDGYQ83145zq-g0bgRagbcC_AAX4eOfYFG1/s320/speakers+dinner+2018.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-11098758840772576312018-03-21T19:29:00.001+03:002018-03-21T20:47:10.002+03:00THE VIDEO YOU MUST SEE TO UNDERSTAND THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATIONIMPORTANT: the video you are about to see is arguably one of the most
important videos ever made about the Kennedy assassination. Until now,
there was no safe way to publish this video without exposing my close
relationship to Lt. Col. Dan Marvin,a Green Beret and an assassin for
the CIA. Was working on his book and wanted to make sure I'd finish it,
in case I'd be terminated. There had been too many threats and not
enough supporters. That has changed. <br />
In this video, you will
learn how Dan was briefed at Fort Bragg, NC on who was responsible for
the death of the President. <br />
Dan sent me this video, filmed by <a class="profileLink" data-ft="{"tn":"-]"}" data-hovercard-prefer-more-content-show="1" data-hovercard="/ajax/hovercard/user.php?id=706410531&extragetparams=%7B%22fref%22%3A%22mentions%22%7D" href="https://www.facebook.com/JLWorcesterUSA?fref=mentions">Jeff Worcester II</a>,
shortly before he died, along with his many tape recordings, evidence
files, photos, military records, etc. after Jeff could no longer work on
Dan's new book. <br />
Dan says in one part of the video, in a very
casual way, that he had conducted assassinations for the U.S.
government. He also mentions getting invited by the Mafia to do hits
for a Don located in Boston. The turning point was when Dan became a
Christian and began speaking out about his past. I'll never forget how
sad and devastated he was when his wife basically rejected him, after
learning her husband had killed many people for the CIA. <br />
As
for this man's honesty, I am a living witness as to his truthfulness.
Dan never wavered, never changed his story, never embroidered a thing.
He had been sued by his own green berets for what he revealed concerning
his order for him and his men to kill Cambodia's Prince Sihanouk,
issued by the CIA. The idea was to blame the Prince's murder on the
North Vietnamese Communists, to give the US a valid reason to bomb
Cambodia.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjefj2-6ksFhitLWRkJ42Np5_HHYS7EJLQU12oxsmvYOiAx1HSo6i3jr8hgsU2IH3SEds-iYuR8NbVYme5bGsekafbbKISqIgeZxy7R-fcQ-d5BCrVgwP_fFOF9OmuhGRvU4m7zwWBVcbMw/s1600/captn+dan+marvin+then+and+now.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="1290" data-original-width="1600" height="258" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjefj2-6ksFhitLWRkJ42Np5_HHYS7EJLQU12oxsmvYOiAx1HSo6i3jr8hgsU2IH3SEds-iYuR8NbVYme5bGsekafbbKISqIgeZxy7R-fcQ-d5BCrVgwP_fFOF9OmuhGRvU4m7zwWBVcbMw/s320/captn+dan+marvin+then+and+now.bmp" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
The matter went to court and Lt. Col. Dan Marvin
won that case, since he had old tape recordings that proved he was
telling the truth. Trine Day Books was also sued for publishing the book
(The Expendable Elite), and the valiant publisher, Kris Millegan, is
still paying on the huge lawyers' fees involved, for in America, even if
you win a case brought against you, the cost of defending yourself can
destroy your life. The truth can be very costly (I know, I am a woman
without a country).<br />
Note that Dan mentions THE DEEP STATE years before this term was known to the public.<br />
Dan states his certainty that Jimmy Files was the grassy knoll
shooter. However, because of Jimmy's statements about killing my friend
David Ferrie (the character seen in the film JFK and the subject of my
book DAVID FERRIE: MAFIA PILOT) and Jimmy's saying he knew David Atlee
Phillips by his real name, as his handler (it took Lee a year to figure
out Phillips' real name, as that CIA leader used many fake names) have
been reluctant to support his claims. But after discovering that a
"respected": (should not be) researcher used faked evidence to try to
prove Files did not shoot at JFK, I can't decide. After all, Dan had
letters from Jimmy to which I was not privy. Lt. Col. Dan Marvin
believed Jimmy for some good reasons, one of which you will hear in the
video. <br />
Please share this important video with as many people as you can. It contains information that is accurate and vital.<br />
I'm working on the book. Please pray for me, that I can bring what
Dan entrusted to me to the world. The truth will set us free.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.blogger.com/video.g?token=AD6v5dxdo_JNLUXGfScp2508m9ao85G21LRnnEU5IlMoC2QpBVRK-rZOYI1YwDzkdQnb4SiQqsJM809tC77zB-EGPw' class='b-hbp-video b-uploaded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
Here is the Facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/Judyth.vary.baker/videos/10215962143311901/ Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-12476780323531765212013-06-21T02:45:00.001+03:002013-06-22T18:16:54.090+03:00THE TRUTH ABOUT ROBERT TANENBAUM, DAVID FERRIE AND JUDYTH BAKERI wish to apologize for font size problems, hacking problems, and even the removal of my PAYPAL site, here (hope it is back--this is the 3rd time it has been removed or made inoperable, in one year): Paypal allowed a reader to purchase my autographed book, ME & LEE. I've even had my medicine confiscated in the mail, though it was sent by my doctor. Please be patient with problems with this blog! I have had problems posting on Facebook for 3 months, taking up to an hour to make a single post, despite even professional help to stop hacking, blocking and blackouts. I guess whistle-blowers can't be choosers!<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: left;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: left;"><br /></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: left;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: left;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; text-align: left;">" </span><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large; text-align: left;">.</span> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgys5fli7gWU9sK2mAuPQ3C_LWzGw5QQQXn5QJ2-S27ouykKUhEfrCL__CLstK-NnycrR8lF2myZ7rh2cCeTIAcMdRPTk4Exzcwt19V1jyRreBTtWwBKeV8b6foALi6z2qhErcHYBk17bSx/s1600/close+up+david+ferrie+good+half+photo+of+head.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="272" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgys5fli7gWU9sK2mAuPQ3C_LWzGw5QQQXn5QJ2-S27ouykKUhEfrCL__CLstK-NnycrR8lF2myZ7rh2cCeTIAcMdRPTk4Exzcwt19V1jyRreBTtWwBKeV8b6foALi6z2qhErcHYBk17bSx/s400/close+up+david+ferrie+good+half+photo+of+head.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><div style="text-align: center;">
<b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">IF YOU'RE A WITNESS WHO SAYS DAVID </span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">FERRIE </b><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">AND LEE HARVEY OSWALD KNEW </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">EACH </b><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">OTHER,</b><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">YOU, TOO, MIGHT GET </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">CALLOUSLY </b><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">SMEARED BY "RESEARCH </b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">EXPERTS"</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> WHO </b><b style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">NEVER MET EITHER MAN.</b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>" 'Time is on my side.' That's what I've told friends, </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>researchers and the public since 1999. Yes, it's taken</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b> time, but slowly, researchers I respect are coming </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>around. For a decade, the "Oswald-did-it" group out</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b> there let loose with all they had. Then the book <i>ME </i></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><i>and Lee </i>came out. All they could do then was to </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>mount personal attacks. They couldn't tear down </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>the book. And now <a href="http://www.amazon.com/David-Ferrie-Participant-Anti-Castro-Assassination/dp/1937584542">my book about David Ferrie </a>has </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>been written. It will set to rest a lot of questions </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>about Ferrie's involvement in the Kennedy </b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>assassination." </b></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i> Judyth Vary Baker, witness</i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>You know there's a problem with censorship and </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>rewriting history when nearly every witness who has </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>said accused J</i><i>FK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald and </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>Mafia pilot </i><i>David Ferrie knew each other is either </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i>ignored, denigrated, or </i><i>called a liar or a fraud. </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">One of the keys to understanding the Kennedy</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">assassination and its consequences for millions</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">upon millions of Americans, and the world itself, is to</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">learn who Lee Harvey Oswald really was. That</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">information can be found in the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Me-Lee-Came-Harvey-Oswald/dp/1936296373/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1371750993&sr=1-1&keywords=me+and+lee">ME AND LEE</a></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
David William Ferrie was Lee Oswald's friend. Because<br />
Ferrie INITIALLY expressed hatred for Kennedy, and<br />
because of his many connections to Kennedy's enemies,<br />
when Ferrie acted suspiciously on the night of the<br />
assassination, he was immediately questioned. Later,<br />
New Orleans attorney Jim Garrison would learn so much<br />
more about Ferrie that he intended to arrest him as one<br />
of the conspirators in Kennedy's murder. But<br />
49-year-old Ferrie wouldn't live long enough to get<br />
indicted: within days, after telling a number of people<br />
that he feared for his life, David Ferrie, was pronounced<br />
dead "of natural causes."</div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
After reading<i> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/David-Ferrie-Participant-Anti-Castro-Assassination/dp/1937584542">David Ferrie:</a></i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/David-Ferrie-Participant-Anti-Castro-Assassination/dp/1937584542"> </a><i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/David-Ferrie-Participant-Anti-Castro-Assassination/dp/1937584542">Mafia Pilot</a>,</i> it is my hope that<br />
your eyes will be opened. </div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
DAVID FERRIE KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD</div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
Here's an example of how Warren Commission Huggers<br />
tried to hide the relationship: </div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
When questioned after the Kennedy assassination,<br />
David Ferrie understandably denied any relationship<br />
with Lee Oswald. How he could get away with that,<br />
due to our care, is explained in <i>Me & Lee</i>. Denying<br />
that he knew Lee in the CAP was more difficult.<br />
Though records had been stolen in 1960, Ferrie<br />
actually went looking for people who might have photos.<br />
Finding none, he felt safe in continuing to deny ever<br />
knowing Lee Oswald.</div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Researcher <a href="http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/25th_issue/shaw.html">Martin Shackelford wrote</a>: "<span style="background-color: white;">As late as 1993, </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">with the publication of Gerald Posner's book </span><i style="background-color: white;">Case Closed,</i><span style="background-color: white;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">Garrison's critics were denying that David Ferrie was in </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">the Civil Air Patrol in New Orleans at the same time at </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">Oswald (the mid-1950s), despite contrary witness </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">testimony. Shortly after the publication of Posner's book, </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">however, the PBS news program "Frontline<a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/oswald/">"</a> located </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">two photographs showing Ferrie and Oswald together at</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> a CAP barbecue; one, shown on the program "Who </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">Was Lee Harvey Oswald?," has since been widely </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">published. In addition, former Deputy Counsel </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><a href="http://www.assassinationweb.com/shack3c.htm">Robert Tanenbaum of the HSCA </a>has stated (2000) that </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">his staff located a film showing Oswald and Ferrie at an</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"> anti-Castro training camp near New Orleans in the </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;">summer of 1963." Tanebaum described seeing Ferrie</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: large;">and Oswald together in the film.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWumPH1yqXSLUdbXc3de6TdEB62YG-kDTPJQJ236QK6t6XkJFMLB8Nacb2RaqRGH6OnMflBFE0izKAh3OM5Tgyzp9STcMowgwMyX-XT4fCHPq5ACPnLCXlHjZy2ihs4RluLN3G5qpaLhgR/s1600/lee+CAP+with+Dave+Ferrie+ferrie-oswald.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="502" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWumPH1yqXSLUdbXc3de6TdEB62YG-kDTPJQJ236QK6t6XkJFMLB8Nacb2RaqRGH6OnMflBFE0izKAh3OM5Tgyzp9STcMowgwMyX-XT4fCHPq5ACPnLCXlHjZy2ihs4RluLN3G5qpaLhgR/s640/lee+CAP+with+Dave+Ferrie+ferrie-oswald.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Two other witnesses also said they saw the training film;</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> "HSCA staffer Jackie Hess" and military aide Col. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">William Bishop. (see p. 399, p. 48, <a href="http://books.google.se/books?id=r5FBPpDzj0cC&printsec=frontcover&dq=farewell+to+justice&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c1DDUfruBvTS4QSQ2YCABg&redir_esc=y">A Farewell to Justice)</a></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/98oFaLa2s5k">Here's what the Huggers say</a> (David Rietzes, of McAdams'</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"> camp, and "David Blackburst" the name Stephen Roy </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">uses when he posts at McAdams' newsgroup: </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Howard Platzman asked:</span></span><span style="font-size: 12.800000190734863px; text-align: center;">[</span><span style="font-size: large; text-align: center;">snip]</span><b style="font-size: x-large; text-align: center;">What's doing with the </b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large; text-align: center;">Tannenbaum film? </b></div>
</div>
</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Nothing. Tanenbaum made it up.</span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==NOTE THE OTHER TWO WITNESSES ARE IGNORED. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">BUT ROBERT TANENBAUM, HSCA LEADER, FORMER</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> MAYOR (TWICE) OF BEVERLY HILLS, A </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">WELL-REGARDED ATTORNEY, <b>IS CALLED A LIAR. </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">THAT'S HOW THESE </span><span style="font-size: large;">PEOPLE WORK.==</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES GOES ON TO SAYl</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> "Oh, I can't prove that, of course. But</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Tanenbaum's account places David Ferrie at the Mandeville</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> training camp in the summer of 1963, right?" </b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==<b><u>WRONG</u></b>. TANENBAUM DID NOT NAME THE TRAINING</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">CAMP. IN FACT, THERE WAS ANOTHER TRAINING </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">CAMP OUT THERE THAT SUMMER THAT REITZES </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">DOES NOT TELL THE PUBLIC ABOUT.==</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES: <b>"Along with Lee Harvey Oswald, Guy Banister</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> and David Atlee Phillips (!!!), right?"</b></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==REITZES THEN CALLS ON MCADAMS' DAVID FERRIE</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">EXPERT, MR. STEPHEN ROY, WHO CALLS HIMSELF </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">'DAVID BLACKBURST' ON MCADAMS' NEWSGROUP:==</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES: <b>"David Blackburst wrote in a newsgroup post </b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>that he'd interviewed Victor Paneque, the trainer at the</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> camp in 1963." </b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==WRONG CAMP.=</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>"Blackburst's notes "indicate that Paneque did all the </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>training, did not ever see Ferrie at the camp, and ascertained</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> [in 1967] that nobody else there had seen him. "In NODA </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>interviews," Blackburst continues, "Laureano Batista Falla</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> (2/5/67) said there were NO ENGLISH-SPEAKING </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>PEOPLE AT THE CAMP [emphasis added] </b></span><b style="font-size: x-large;">except </b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large;">Ricardo Davis and Fernando Fernandez. Angel Vega (2/5/67)</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large;"> said he never saw Arcacha or 'Lindbergh' (NODA code </b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large;">name for Ferrie) at the camp, that</b><span style="font-size: large;"> </span><b style="font-size: x-large;">the ONLY</b><span style="font-size: large;"> <b>OTHER </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>AMERICANS HE SAW THERE were the delaBarres"</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> [emphasis added].</b></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==ALL OF THIS CARRYING-ON MIGHT BE IM[PRESSIVE</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> TO AN IGNORANT READER WHO DID NOT KNOW </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">THERE WERE TWO CAMPS OUT THERE THAT SUMMER.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> I REPEAT, THIS IS THE WRONG CAMP. ==</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES THEN WRITES:</span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"></span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>"In response to allegations that Ferrie actually ran the camp</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> himself, Blackburst writes, "Ricardo Davis, who helped</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> organize the MDC camp, gave a joint interview with </b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Arcacha to Holland McCombs of Time (3/21/67). Both</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> told McCombs that . . . Ferrie did not run any training</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> camp . . . that Ferrie did not concentrate on any one</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> thing long enough to operate a training camp."</b></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">===LET'S IGNORE THE DEROGATORY STATEMENT </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">AGAIMST FERRIE. IT'S TIME TO READ WHAT </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3446">RICHARD BILLINGS, CRITIC AND INVESTIGATOR SAYS</a>:==</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">"Giant [Garrison] has talked to two Cubans who are</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> convinced there was a camp set up to plan and train</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> for Castro assassination . . . Camp was north of lake . . .</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> A spy was found in camp in August, driven to Miami and</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> questioned by Laureano Batista . . . CDP tried to turn spy</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> over to FBI, but Bureau had no jurisdiction . . . Giant </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">sends Fowler to see Batista . . . Another name attached</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> to camp: Ledovido Interam . . . </span><b style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u>Fowler points out there</u></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u> were two camps -- one CDP where the spy, Fernando</u></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u> Fernandez, was caught; another run by ultra </u></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u>conservatives .</u></b><span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> . . Turns out CDP camp didn't break up</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> when spy was caught (claim they knew he was there </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">all the time and kept him for protection against other </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">infiltrators) . . . </span><b style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u><a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3446">Camp broke up because of raid on </a></u></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;"><u><a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=3446">conservative camp</a></u></b><span style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"> </span><span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">. . . Davis ordered departure . . . </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"><b>CDP camp on land owned by Redemptorist Fathers,</b> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">later located by Oser with help of Angel Vega, one of </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">Cubans there . . . Ultra conservative camp reportedly </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;">on land owned by McLaney (see report on raid) . . .”</span></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;"></span><br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">(COMMENT AT SITE) So there were actually “two” </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">training camps outside New Orleans. One that got </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">raided by the FBI, and one that didn’t. According to </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">Billings, the Cuban exile group was training to </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">assassinate Castro. When the right-wing camp got </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">raided and dynamite seized, the Cuban exile group </span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
</span>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">broke up...</span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 22px;">
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
REITZES AGAIN CALLS ON BLACKBURST:</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">REITZES: "Blackburst concludes, "While [Carlos] </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Quiroga </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">and [Carlos] Bringuier were not directly involved in the </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">MDC camp, they both had heard that Ferrie had </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">nothing to do </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">with it. And there are other bits of evidence</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> to this effect, </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">which I will dig up."</span></div>
<div style="font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==REITZES THEN SLAMS TANEMBAUM FOR SAYING</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> THE FILM CA<b>ME FROM GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY==</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">REITZES: "And lastly, remember how Tanenbaum said</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> the HSCA got the film from the Georgetown Library? </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">John R. Woods tried to find some corroboration that the</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> library had ever possessed a film like this. He's exchanged</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> several e-mails with a librarian there named Barringer. </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The bottom line would seem to be Barringer's statement to</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> Woods of March 6, 1999: "Mr. Tanenbaum's recollection,</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">that he found film footage of Cuban exiles training in this</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;"> country at Georgetown, is mistaken." </span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Woods will be following this up a bit."</span></b></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==NOTE THAT THE KENNEDY FAMILY'S FAVORITE </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">PRIEST WAS RICHARD T. McSORLEY, S.J. AND </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">GEORGETOWN CENSORS ACCESS TO McSORLEY'S </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">DIARY THERE, SO DON'T EXPECT THEM TO ADMIT </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">TO EVER HAVING THE FILM. TANENBAUM IS NOT </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">ALONE AS A WITNESS, BUT BY FAILING TO TELL </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">US ABOUT OTHER WITNESSES, REITZES CAN SAY</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">TANENBAUM IS A 'FRAUD.'==</span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES: "<b>Once we understand that Tanenbaum is a fraud,</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> we understand why he's writing a </b><b>series of cheesy </b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>"thrillers" instead of doing something more productive</b></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> with his convictions. And, yeah, you can quote me on that."</b></span></div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; text-align: start; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">==WE <b>ARE</b>. OF COURSE, </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">REITZES CALLS ME A FRAUD, TOO. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I FEEL I'M IN GOOD COMPANY.==</span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Meanwhile, this attack by Mr. Reitzes, using Blackburst's material, shows how the reputation of a witness -- in this case not me, but the good man Robert Tanenbaum, is callously blemished.</span><br />
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><u><b>A LITTLE MORE: LEARN ABOUT GERALD POSNER, </b></u></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><u><b>WHO IS ADMIRED BY DAVID REITZES:</b></u></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">
</span>
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
</span>
</span><br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Despite evidence to the contrary, Gerald Posner in his </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">book <i>Case
Closed</i> ignored the fact that Ferrie was a</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">lecturer in direct contact with
CAP cadets at the Moisan</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> Airport CAP from June to August, 1955, at the same </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">time Lee Harvey Oswald attended. Posner
wrote:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> “He was not even in the Civil Air Patrol when Oswald</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> was a member in
1955.”</span> </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>POSNER (p. 143):
"[David] Ferrie...was not even in the Civil Air </b></span></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>Patrol when Oswald was a member in 1955."
"FRONTLINE: WHO WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD?" </b></span></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>(Nov. 16, 1993,</b></span><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;"> PBS):</b></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>A photo displayed on the program by two former</b></span></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b> members </b></span><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;">of the CAP shows Ferrie and Oswald</b></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;"> together at a CAP </b><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;">barbecue. According to "Frontline" </b></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;">reporter Gus Russo </b></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>(at the 1993 ASK conference in Dallas), the show's </b></span></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>producer decided to use only one of two such </b></span></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>photographs </b></span><b style="color: red; font-size: x-large;">they had."</b></pre>
<pre style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"></pre>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">The 1955 photograph provides evidence of Ferrie’s </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><u>additional</u> activities
that summer with CAP Cadets, </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;">including</span> </span><span style="font-size: large;">Oswald. The boys met Friday nights and Sunday afternoons, plus attending weekend-long bivouacs. The search-and-rescue bivouac at which the two photos were taken was held at Abita Springs, near Covington, LSA, </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">about 65 miles from Moisant (now Louis Armstrong) Airport. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">It is my hope that the reader will remember this article, </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;">should they come across any stories about David Ferrie (or what I</span> </span><span style="font-size: large;">say about David) written by <b>David Reitzes, David Blackburst</b> (<b>Stephen Roy</b>), <b>David Von Pein, David Perry</b>, or others who regularly post on John McAdams' newsgroup. His members infiltrate other newsgroups, as well. They </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">never move toward solving the case, and never will. Their intent is to discredit, mock, and destroy. They casually descend to name-calling and character assassination, </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">and, as can be seen here, use the ignorance of the reader</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> to their advantage. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>DAVID BLACKBURST/STEPHEN ROY: FERRIE EXPERT AND GATEKEEPER</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">In my book, <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">David Ferrie: Mafia Pilot </a>, I have had to rely on many files supplied by Mr. Blackburst, some of which over</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> the years proved to be in error (for example, the St. Charles seminary photo, Blackburst a photo of "David Ferrie at Saint Mary's seminary" labeled as such by him, has inadvertently caused that photo to be mislabeled across the Internet (it is even labeled that way in my book <i>Me & Lee</i></span>. ). </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2zI4Z-WNRzvnEtbtZ9z8goJ-WYzIcNahXrpK3n2gbnpdWa_27Z63-_wDU7xehmEKMIUMR6COmlmZWsgLhyurHdQ_iKIyGLcfETkYtPtEtaTlY3de0aLOIEdxnRxiQJjQS_QYB5ulrxzqc/s1600/david_ferrie+ST_charles_seminary.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2zI4Z-WNRzvnEtbtZ9z8goJ-WYzIcNahXrpK3n2gbnpdWa_27Z63-_wDU7xehmEKMIUMR6COmlmZWsgLhyurHdQ_iKIyGLcfETkYtPtEtaTlY3de0aLOIEdxnRxiQJjQS_QYB5ulrxzqc/s640/david_ferrie+ST_charles_seminary.jpg" width="344" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Mr. Blackburst later said the photo is of Ferrie at St. Charles Seminary. He also erred on David's income (I corrected him), erred by </span>saying David had no plane of his own that could fly on Nov. 22, and more.). </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> As most have done, for the gaps in Dave's history,I have had to rely on files, many of which were placed on the Internet by Stephen Roy/David Blackburst. He </span><span style="line-height: 27px;">has been writing a long-promised biography on Ferrie for decades. He</span> states he is entirely neutral about Ferrie and only wants the truth revealed. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Is that true?</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">I submit an example, from two 1998 posts to McAdams' newsgroup, made only days between each other.</span></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">On 22 Dec. 1998, Blackburst wrote:</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="Heading2Char"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> “</span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;">In 1958, Ferrie <b>weaseled his way back into the
Lakefront squadron</b>.” (From: blackburst@aol.com (Blackburst)</span></span><span style="line-height: 115%;">
REF: <span class="apple-style-span">Subject: Re: Shackelford Article</span> <span class="apple-style-span">Date: 22 Dec 1998 00:00:00 GMT</span> <span class="apple-style-span">Message-ID: </span></span><a href="mailto:19981222124033.01150.00000102@ng-ca1.aol.com"><span style="line-height: 115%;">19981222124033.01150.00000102@ng-ca1.aol.com</span></a><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;">. </span></span><a href="http://www.jfk-online.com/dbdfcapfile.html">http://www.jfk-online.com/dbdfcapfile.html</a>) </span></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;"><br /></span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;">Less than a week later, Blackburst altered the information:</span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoFootnoteText" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">“</span></span><span class="Heading2Char"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"> </span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;">March 1958-June 1960 - <b>DF is invited back </b>to
the New Orleans Cadet Squadron (Lakefront) as an instructor <b>by a </b></span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><b><span style="line-height: 115%;">sympathetic
former cadet who is now the commander</span></b></span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;">.”</span></span><span class="Heading2Char"><span style="color: white; line-height: 115%;"> </span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;">From: blackburst@aol.com (Blackburst)</span></span><span style="line-height: 115%;"> (<span class="apple-style-span">Subject:
Re: D.W. Ferrie August 1959</span> <span class="apple-style-span">Date: 28 Dec
1998 00:00:00 GMT</span> <span class="apple-style-span">Message-ID: </span></span><a href="mailto:19981228004429.01058.00002315@ng-cf1.aol.com"><span style="line-height: 115%;">19981228004429.01058.00002315@ng-cf1.aol.com</span></a><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="line-height: 115%;"> </span></span><a href="http://www.jfk-online.com/dbdfcapfile.html"><span style="line-height: 115%;">http://www.jfk-online.com/dbdfcapfile.html</span></a><span style="line-height: 115%;"> )<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">His patina of 'neutrality' was briefly exposed, </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: x-large;">before it was hidden </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 115%;">again.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span><span style="font-size: large;">ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF PROBLEMS WITH STEPHEN ROY/DAVID BLACKBURST MATERIAL:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"Ferrie <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.conspiracy.jfk/Dve8ZN2f2Xs">didn't have a plane at any time after his Stinson Voyager fell into </a></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.conspiracy.jfk/Dve8ZN2f2Xs">disrepair in 1962</a>." (2001)</span></span></div>
<div class="GGVPNNKCMDB" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div class="GGVPNNKCMDB" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;">A REPLY BY MR. VERNON: "Your statement was Ferrie DID NOT own a plane."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>BLACKBURST:</b> No, my statement was that: "Ferrie didn't have a plane at anytime after his </span><span style="font-size: large;">Stinson Voyager fell into disrepair in 1962." I have interviews with the people </span><span style="font-size: large;">who worked on the plane, I have the plane's log book, and I have the accounts </span><span style="font-size: large;">of the officers who checked out the plane after the assassination. Now what is </span><span style="font-size: large;">inconsistent about that?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</div>
<div class="GGVPNNKCMDB" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> <b>VERNON:</b> "Haven't seen any contrary evidence, just your opinions based on what you're read.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>BLACKBURST</b>: "What I've read" is evidence.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-top: 1em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
</div>
<div class="GGVPNNKCMDB" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><u>COMPARE TO</u>: (July 2005)</b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;">"His Stinson 150 was, according to him and others, out of</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"> commission. His
Taylorcraft L-2 was disassembled."</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;">(<a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4273&page=3">Reply to Lee Forman, </a></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4273&page=3">07July 2005 - 06:38 PM</a>)</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><u>COMPARE TO</u>: (Dec. 2005)</b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">I was noting that Ferrie's Taylorcraft L-2 was apparently</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">disassembled
in April 1963, at the time of the alleged </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Lambert/Diaz/Hidell flight plan. Here
is what I have: </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">He flew </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">the Taylorcraft on September 9, 1962, apparently in </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">connection with a funeral. Its certificate expired on December </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">31, 1962. </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">The
aircraft was towed to a service station "in early </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">1963" where its
engine was removed for work, performed by a </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">friend. On June 18, 1963 a student
took his test flight in </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">the Taylorcraft. In mid-1964, the plane was sold to the
station</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> owner. He was unsure of the date, but he said it was while </span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Ferrie owned
his own service station, between January 9 and</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> November 30, 1964.</span></span><span style="color: #282828; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 115%;">The record is sketchy, but it seems to indicate that the plane </span><span style="color: #282828; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 115%;">was flyable up
to about early 63, went down for repairs </span><span style="color: #282828; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 115%;">and was flying again by June 63, until
it was sold the next </span><span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">year." </span></span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">P</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">osted 04
December 2005 - 04:11 AM</span></span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">
<span style="color: #a4a4a4; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #282828; line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">QUESTION: DID DAVID FERRIE HAVE A FLYABLE PLANE ON NOV. 22, 1963? CURRENTLY MR. ROY/BLACKBURST PPOSTS THAT DABID FERRIE'S STINSON WAS NOT FLYABLE. HE DOES NOT MENTION FERRIE'S TAYLORCRAFT, WHICH PRESUMANLY WAS FLYABLE.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">My relationship to Dave was unique. As a female, co-researcher,</span><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> and a former Catholic who had wanted to become a nun, David, who had ardently wanted to become a priest, got it in his head that he could convert me, and set about trying to do just that. (I wish he could know that he did succeed in helping me return to a belief in a Supreme Being, and to trust in God again). Dave gave me much information about his past that has never been published, and that information </span><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">has helped guide me in attempting to sort out the vast amount of material that litters the Internet about him. So much is </span><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">disinfo, such as I have shown here.</span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">I WILL CORRECT ANY PROVABLE ERRORS IN </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">THE BOOK</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> Where I have erred, in the book <b><i>David Ferrie,Mafia Pilot</i></b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">it is because I have had to rely, as most have had to do, </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: large; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">on information published by the government and researchers, with the information supplied by Mr.Blackburst / Stephen Roy that has accumulated through</span><span style="font-size: large;"> his years of dedicated </span><span style="font-size: large;">inquiry. We owe Mr. Blackburst/ Mr. Roy a great deal for </span><span style="font-size: large;">providing these records. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> Nevertheless, it must be emphasized that Roy/Blackburst does have his prejudices (we all do) and I know of a certainty that he has chosen to edit or ignore material, based on his beliefs about Ferrie. Remember, he never met Ferrie, he never met Banister, he never met Lee Oswald, he never met Carlos Marcello, he never met Jack Ruby, and he never met me. He has his prejudices. He has stated to a newspaper that he suspects Lee Oswald was not an innocent man. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></span>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">"Kennedy's violent death stung Stephen Roy of Brockton, a former conspiracy </span></b><b style="font-size: x-large;">theorist </b><b style="font-size: x-large;">who now believes Lee Harvey Oswald may have acted alone. "It was
kind of </b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>like the </b><b>end of innocence, I thought," the 52-year-old
videographer said."</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">Knowing how much he <b>has </b>to know about the case, that boggled my mind. he also wrote:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">"BTW on Oswald, <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/FERRIE$20STINSON$20BLACKBURST$20|sort:date/alt.assassination.jfk/ZuLk6qv1epo/uzRzaPM4l2wJ">I still find it suspicious that he denied owning the MC rifle</a>,</span></b></span><b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">because I believe the evidence that he did own it, while again not definitive, </span></span></b><b><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">is very strong.."</span></span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">(12/17/04)</span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">This, despite much evidence that the rifle did not belong to Lee Oswald, such as can be found at: </span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm">http://www.giljesus.com/jfk/rifle.htm</a>,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">AND SEE MY SHORT YOUTUBE VIDEO HERE:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn-Gmrlpbh0</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;">(EVERY ATTEMPT TO POST THE VIDEO, HERE, WAS IMPOSSIBLE. CORRUPTED BY NOISE, IT WOULD NOT LOAD. PLEASE COPY THE URL AND GO TO YOUTUBE TO SEE IT--SORRY, JUST ANOTHER ROADBLOCK.</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">The prejudice of the "Ferrie expert" has affected what records and testimonies he has decided </span></span><span style="font-size: large;">to pursue, to select, to keep. He decided not to meet me. Decided not to meet Dr. Howard Platzman, who at that time was also investigating me for Sixty Minutes. Later, he actually posted that i refused to meet him. Dr. Platzman corrected that, but it was his word against Platzman's.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This is when I realized Mr.Roy/Blackbursdt could and would change the story.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Those who've met me for any length of time know I have been eager and willing to meet, to share files, information and data. Any time you read that I 'refused' to give information, you're looking at a lie. Period. I openly give out information on Facebook, when asked. And i gave my real name to the inquiring public.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> Told people he </span><span style="font-size: large;">gave me information, when he gave me nothing. He did </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">feed me disinformation, insisting that Dave wore rings and </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">persisting, after I said he did not, asking me to try to </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">remember (or else it meant I did not know Dave!...). </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> He called Dr. Howard Platzman a liar when i finally </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">described a ring that I saw in Dave's possession twice, </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">and he insisted Platzman had to have told me 'the answer.'</span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> I said it had a carved griffin on it. He said that was close</span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">enough to a 'gargoyle' but eventually refused to believe I wasn't told </span></span><span style="font-size: large;">any</span><span style="font-size: large;">details by Platzman, forgetting, I suppose, that at that time </span><span style="font-size: large;">Platzman had been hired by Sixty Minutes to investigate </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">me, and he was as strict with me as Blackburst had been.</span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> Next, </span>he claimed i waited too long to answer his question--</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">when I was, in fact, traveling to New York from Louisiana </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">to be interviewed by Sixty Minutes, and I had no cell phone</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> back in 2000. Nor did I have a computer to carry along. So</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> it took some three days to reply. Blackburst said I must </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">have been told by </span><span style="font-size: large;">Platzman that the ring was a 'gargoyle ring' -- </span><span style="font-size: large;">the so-called </span><span style="font-size: large;"> 'right answer.'</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>That was untrue.</b> Blackburst's accusation infuriated Dr. Platzman, who later also would be falsely accused of </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">offering to bribe one of my witnesses -- an accusation </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">McAdams had to remove from his website after it was proven Platzman never even met the man who reported it.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Blackburst initially said the ring existed. Here is an interesting newsgroup exchange demonstrating that fact,</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">quoting from my unauthorized book (it was printed by</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">researcher Harrison Livingstone without</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">allowing me to view its final edit, so I stopped its</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">publication. However, this section was absolutely correct:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> "</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Page 132:</span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"Dave brought out a variety of things for us to look at under the </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">black light. He had a fossil horse tooth, seashells, some flourite, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">uranium specimens, and various gem and rock samples. Dave also showed </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">us some rings: an aquamarine that belonged to his mother, a small ruby </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ring that glowed purple under the light, and, most interesting of all, </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">a very special ring that had an ugly, fanciful mythological creature </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">carved into its large globular form. Dave called it his "priestly </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ring." He sometimes wore it as a joke. It was symbolic of black magic, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">witchcraft, satanic rituals.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">He let me take up the unusual ring.(331) Dave said, in actuality, he </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">loved God, but this weird-looking ring was useful to him on rare </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">occasions. Dave described how he was able to penetrate any religious </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">group and get right into the center of religious cults. He knew about </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">every religion on earth, he said, and had even witnessed the rites of </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Santeria and Voodoo. His interest in hypnotism came from observing </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">that speaking in tongues, chants, and praying rosaries had the same r</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">esult: pacifying the participants, soothing their fears, assuaging </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">their grief, making them more suggestible and pliable..."</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">;From page 667:</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"FERRIE'S RING: Dave Ferrie's bizarre 'priestly ring' remained </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">fixed in my memories to the present day. When Ferrie expert David </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Blackburst asked me, through Dr. Howard Platzman, to describe a ring </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">of Dave's, to ascertain if I had actually known Ferrie intimately </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">enough to be aware of a certain ring (for he only rarely wore it), I </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">hesitated.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Not only did Dave have several rings, but at first, I was told </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Blackburst said it was not necessarily an unusual ring. So I </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">considered how best to respond. I was also afraid Blackburst would not </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">believe me if I mentioned this outlandish ring- it was possibly </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">unknown to Blackburst, since Dave rarely wore it. I was asked the </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">question just hours before I traveled to New York by plane. By the </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">time we landed, I decided to describe the special ring I knew about, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">in the presence of witnesses. It was Dr. Platzman who eased my mind by </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">saying that Blackburst did not necessarily mean it was not a special </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ring. I then described the unusual ring in full detail, in the p</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">resence of Sixty Minutes host Mike Wallace, and producers Don Hewitt, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">and Phil Scheffler, in response to Plat man's (sic) renewed inquiry. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Platzman was amazed when I told him what the ring looked like- I saw </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">his face.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I reluctantly conceded that Dave owned a ring with a </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">griffin-or-gargoyle-</span><wbr style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></wbr><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">like mythological creature with an ugly face and </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">wings carved in to the large stone. If Blackburst had never heard of </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">it, my goose was cooked. Blackburst eventually confirmed that my </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">description of the unusual ring was correct, though at this time only </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">two or three people alive still knew of the existence of that </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">particular ring, which he described as Ferrie's 'gargoyle ring.' </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">(Email in my possession)</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">I appreciated David Blackburst's caution and care, but I appreciated </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">more the fact that Blackburst finally did verify that Dave owned this </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">distinctive ring, since it shows I knew Dave Ferrie personally. The </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ring had never been mentioned in the literature, not had I contacted </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">anyone who had known Ferrie."</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">"Martin Shackelford" <</span><span style="color: #6611cc; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; cursor: pointer;"><a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/uhBQ6uVrykk%5B1-25-false%5D">msh...@concentric.net</a></span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.assassination.jfk/uhBQ6uVrykk%5B1-25-false%5D">&gt TEXT HERE</a>; wrote in message </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">news:e972ov$dvb@</span><wbr style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></wbr><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">dispatch.concentric.net...</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">."..<b>Judyth described a ring which she saw among Ferrie's belongings, to t</b></span><b><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">he best of her recollection--she recalled a griffin or similar beast </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">on it.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Blackburst came back asking if it could have been a gargoyle, saying </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">(based only on his imagination) that two witnesses had described it </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">as a gargoyle. Not certain of her description, she allowed as how it </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">might have been a gargoyle, though she remembered it as a griffin.</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The result: no progress in any direction.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">;Blackburst mistakenly assumed she was claiiming (sic) that he wore the </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">ring, and he said Ferrie never wore jewelry, but in her note to him, </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">she had said she saw it in a box of things belonging to Ferrie and </span></b><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>his mother, so there was no claim that he wore i</b>t...</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>Blackburst has apologized, in the manner of a gentleman.</b></span><br style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #500050; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Martin</span></span><br />
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>AMAZINGLY, A FEW YEARS LATER, BLACKBURST SUDDENLY DECLARED THERE WAS NO SUCH RING</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>AND THAT I HAD FAILED HIS 'TEST.'</b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> Blackburst waited several years before saying there was</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> never any 'gargoyle ring.' Before that, he told Platzman </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">and even me that he had witnesses that it existed. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Did a witness or two die, so that now he could make</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> the </span><span style="font-size: large;">proclamation that the ring didn't exist? </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"> Either way you look </span><span style="font-size: large;">at it, Blackburst was being deceptive.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> From then on, I knew what he was.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> He </span><span style="font-size: large;">was not neutral, and was skewing </span><span style="font-size: large;">the evidence.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> <span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Honesty means much to me. When Mr. Roy (Blackburst) next demanded me to describe something hanging in the </span></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">separation between dining room and living room, in Dave's</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> apartment, I told him there was nothing hanging there,</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;">wondering what was up his sleeve now.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> He then produced a photo of a toy monkey, with spring legs, clinging to</span> </span><span style="font-size: large;"> the separating wall.in Dave's apartment. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><u>He told the </u></b></span><b><u><span style="font-size: large;">newsgroup that the monkey proved </span><span style="font-size: large;">I'd never been </span></u></b><b><u><span style="font-size: large;">inside Dave's apartment in 1963.</span></u></b></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"> It would be a couple of years before I learned the photo </span></b></span><b style="font-size: x-large;">was taken on or just after Feb., 1967 -- some 42 months after I'd last</b><b style="font-size: x-large;"> been in Dave's apartment. </b></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large;"> I was n ow certain that this expert's information about</b></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<b style="font-size: x-large;">witnesses and photos could not be trusted 100%. In subtle ways, Mr. Roy was rewriting Ferrie into somebody else, and he had the cooperation of some of Dave's</b><br />
<b style="font-size: x-large;">former friends, had recorded them. It was no consolation to know that, because Mr. Roy is an expert in editing audio and video. His very AKA-- "Blackburst" --is a rather esoteric term in audio technology. </b></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-size: x-large; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglxoXzZ8zGMkibTOC7x7XFznGajv5QFCGJQ6oHKkmS7s9AIriWNeLXpAMT0b7iva48YarYp7uRwRjKdlac5Cfz-FFsUASfA8RFatnLc_AhP8nElu0qaT4xmRe-vQ-PAQs4zDlzjV3vH4cs/s1600/Ferrie+Dead3+monkey+living+room.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEglxoXzZ8zGMkibTOC7x7XFznGajv5QFCGJQ6oHKkmS7s9AIriWNeLXpAMT0b7iva48YarYp7uRwRjKdlac5Cfz-FFsUASfA8RFatnLc_AhP8nElu0qaT4xmRe-vQ-PAQs4zDlzjV3vH4cs/s640/Ferrie+Dead3+monkey+living+room.jpg" width="632" /></a></div>
<br />
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<i><span style="font-size: small;">The infamous monkey photo.</span></i></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"> </span><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> A while later, I posted that the monkey made sense, </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">because we had been working with monkey viruses, and </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Mr. Roy took offense, saying he had provided the photo, </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">and now I was taking advantage of that. </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> But why would Dave have a monkey hanging there? </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">Mr. Blackburst has assured others that he will find people</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">who will give him the answer. And of course, it will have </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">nothing </span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">to do with the New Orleans Project, which he </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">denies ever existed.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> That means he has to deny a great deal more, because </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">we have two witnesses on audiotape and one on film, and </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;">of course, Edward T. Haslam's <a href="http://www.doctormarysmonkey.com/">Dr. Mary's Monkey</a> goes into excruciating detail as to the monkeys we had to use.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> The final straw, for me, was Mr. Roy's stating that he had told me Dave had an old car in 1963, and I USED THAT INFORMATION IN ME & LEE. I repeat that Mr. Blackburst never told me a single detail about David Ferrie.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> Oddly, Dave's car in 1963, that was repossessed, was actually a newer model, not an old car.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: large;"> Here is a McAdams newsgroup post about the 'car' problem:</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> <b> <span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> First book, pg 299, Judyth
wrote: </span></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"When I got back to the car, Dave was working under the hood,
cursing </span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">(602). It was just a stuck carburetor but Dave grumbled that he was ready for a new vehicle and deserved one, for all the work he was putting in for everybody." <o:p></o:p></span></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 12pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">This one does support the
argument that Judyth was talking about a car Ferrie owned as opposed to one he was using. What is '602'? <o:p></o:p></span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">==JVB: OH REALLY? THEN WHY DID HE SAY HE 'DESERVED' A NEW VEHICLE?==</span></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">Post writer: "Yes, I agree. 602 is the footnote,
which I provided below.</span></b></span><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> (602) on page 682: </span></b><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> "Dave's car kept breaking down all summer. He finally got a
better </span></b><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">vehicle - a station wagon (source: researcher David Blackburst), but </span></b><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">by that time, I no longer lived in New Orleans."</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 12pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">is footnotes, not finding
this one... <o:p></o:p></span></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">602 is a footnote on page 682. Right
hand column, about 1/3 of the way down. Her footnotes text is so tiny and so squished together, it's all but impossible to read. <o:p></o:p></span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">==JVB: THIS BOOK WAS AN UNAUTHORIZED EDITION WITH FLAWS SUCH AS TOO-TINY A PRINT. THERE ARE ALSO ERRORS I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO EDIT OUT.==</span></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">There are other references
... in both her first book as well as in her latest tome. </span></b></span><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Another factor per Blackburst
seems to be that he informed Judyth of </span></b><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">the documentation he had regarding the repossession of the car prior </span></b><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">to the publication of this book and she left this in. Why? </span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 12pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">==ANSWER: I LEFT IT IN BECAUSE DAVE REALLY <u>WAS</u> DRIVING THIS OLD CAR! No matter how much trouble that would mean with Blackburst, i described what happened as it happened. </span></b></span><b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">For those who assume Dave was totally friendless and that he would not have had access to a car, after his was hauled away, we must ask why friends gave him access to their planes, to their office spaces, let him make free long-distance calls on their dime (G. Wray Gill, who complained to Garrison that the calls nearly bankrupted him!) and even let Dave use their university dorm rooms -- documented facts. </span></b><br />
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> These people and Blackburst fail to note that i mentioned Dave also had a motorcycle that summer. I never rode on it, so didn't mention it in the book, but it's in my emails. As a 19-20 year old, I did not know the car was borrowed. Of course it must have been. Dave's wild driving is evidenced the speeding tickets he acquired. I believe Dave didn't drive much because of all his speeding tickets, and this might be why he didn't use the car for joy rides with his friends. </span></b><br />
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> It's not true that Dave drove me and Lee "all over New Orleans." There were a couple of discrete drop-offs to our apartments, a ride to a Trade Mart Warehouse on the docks, and that critical final day when we saw each other face to face for the last time. Several times, while Dave was present, I had to get a cab to go home because he had no car to drive me back. I just never thought about it. Some cab rides are shown in the book. </span></b><br />
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<b style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"> NOTE: <i>The car was </i>not<i> his very recent model that had been repossessed. it was old. Battered. And that's why Dave had said, cursing, that he<u> deserved</u> a new (or better) vehicle, for all that he was doing for everybody.</i></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 12pt;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">Unfortunately, by calling it "Dave's car" I opened myself up to a lot of criticism. Imagine my surprise to find out that Dave's repossessed car (March 1963, just before i met him) was pretty new. Not a junker. Even so, Roy said he had told me Dave's car was 'old' -- though Shackelford and Platzman are witnesses that he never volunteered information. He just questioned me. Hust as Howard Platzman and Martin Shackelford were doing.</span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;">Blackburst/Roy and the newsgroup call my saying Dave had an old junker car for his use that spring and summer "Judyth's lie." </span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"><b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b></span>
<br />
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;">As for Blackburst, he kept everything close to his vest and only asked questions by email. His present contention (is it based on his anger that I told the public he was using two names?) is that I never even met David Ferrie (it is well known that Mr. Blackburst never did).</span><span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> It is my hope, of course, that by speaking out, the innocent Lee Oswald will be exonerated. David Ferrie's story will help. I believe the reader, after perusing the evidence I present, will agree that <b>David William Ferrie was murdered.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> Dave's body wasn't claimed for days. Imagine how afraid everybody was, and how much his brother, by then, loathed him, thinking he might be connected to the Kennedy assassination, or, at the least, was a homosexual who had embarrassed and shamed the Ferrie family.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b> If David's family will read this book, they may feel less shame and more pride.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span>
<br />
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
<i>REMOVING DAVID FERRIE FROM THE EQUATION IS ONE</i><br />
<i>OF THE BEST WAYS TO KEEP THE COVER-UP</i><br />
<i>IN PLACE, BECAUSE NEW EVIDENCE AND </i><br />
<i>WITNESSES ABOUT FERRIE HELP PROVE</i><br />
<i> LEE'S INNOCENCE.</i></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
The goal has been to subtly downplay the role<br />
and magnitude of the person David William Ferrie. His<br />
passionate crusade against communism, his fierce<br />
devotion to freedom, and his impact on what we know<br />
about the Kennedy assassination are all downplayed<br />
and minimized wherever possible by that stable of<br />
characters I call "Warren Commission huggers."<br />
I think of how loggers come to cut down trees,<br />
and how desperate environmental advocates will<br />
"hug a tree" to stop it from being cut down.</div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
In this case, the "loggers" are out to cut down the huge<br />
tree of disinformation, lies and cover-ups known as the<br />
Warren Commission. </div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
The mountain of evidence that proves Lee Oswald was<br />
innocent erupted when Lee Oswald was conveniently shot,<br />
in the presence of 70 Dallas police, by a well-known<br />
Mafia bagman and police-fixer, Jack Ruby. The Warren<br />
Commission tried to say Ruby had no connections with<br />
organized crime. Then came the Zapruder film, showing<br />
Kennedy's head thrown violently backward by a shot from<br />
the front (Oswald was behind Kennedy's car, not in front<br />
of it). The mountain of truth, exonerating Oswald,<br />
grew higher as certain evidence turned out to be planted,<br />
false or misinterpreted. And that mountain grew to the size<br />
of Mount Everest when the film <i>JFK</i> prompted a public<br />
outcry that forced the eventual release of faked autopsy<br />
photos and other evidence, exonerating the hapless<br />
Oswald for all time. </div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-size: x-large;">
Amazingly, the desperate Warren Commission tree-huggers<br />
are still trying to fool us. I consider their efforts treasonous,<br />
since today we know the US government is the only force<br />
that stands between Lee Oswald's exoneration and true<br />
justice for President John F. Kennedy, whom high-placed government entities such as Lyndon Johnson, J. Edgar<br />
Hoover, and the CIA's nearest and dearest knew<br />
would be executed and allowed to be executed. They then<br />
protected the executioners and rewarded those who<br />
covered up the crime of the century. As JFK's brains<br />
were blown out in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, on November 22,<br />
1963, a new form of government came into power.<br />
Nobody can deny that.</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I feel it is my duty to speak for those who have died. I will continue to speak the truth to the people. I stand in the gap for my murdered friends. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I ask you to help me bring justice to both Lee and to our great fallen President, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1439193886">John F. Kennedy</a>.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: medium; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> It behooves you to learn the truth about David Ferrie, a talented, remarkable and amazing individual, from a witness who knew him. Who cared about him.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: xx-small; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="font-size: large;"> Who wants you to know the man I knew</span>.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"> <b> JVB </b></span></div>
<div style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br /></span></div>
</div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-29251620163396691552013-01-06T12:20:00.000+02:002013-01-06T12:26:18.649+02:00 Lee Harvey Oswald Was an American Hero!Lee Harvey Oswald was a HERO.<br />
Hard to believe, if you look at the government versions of things.<br />
After all, he gave a "Communist salute" and carried a smirk on the day kennedy died.<br />
That's what the media wants you to believe.<br />
In fact, I've seen "Oswald smirks" showing up that aren't even smiles, but it's being labeled that way!<br />
Look at this, for example:<br />
At <b>http://www.flickr.com/photos/monado/5345583186/?reg=1&src=comment</b>, you will see an arrest photo of Lee Harvey Oswald that was taken August 9, 1963, more than three months before <a href="http://www.bestchaos.com/index.php?/topic/29-conspiracy-theory-with-jesse-ventura-jfk-assassination-s2-e5/">the Kennedy assassination</a>. Lee Oswald isn't smirking in this photo, but that not how it's captioned.<br />
<h1 class="photo-title" id="title_div" property="dc:title" style="background-color: #fefefe; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3em; margin: 12px 0px; padding: 0px;">
"Assassin's smirk: Lee Harvey Oswald</h1>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<b>Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President John Kennedy in 1963 and looked very smug about it in every picture afterwards."</b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/93e6fe8867.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/93e6fe8867.jpg" width="248" /></a></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">Oh, really?</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">The so-called "smirk" has been used as just one of a host of ways <a href="http://22november1963.org.uk/katzenbach-memo-moyers-warren-commission">to influence public opinion about Oswald</a> from the very first photos that reached the newspapers. </span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">Back then, TV films couldn't be retouched quickly, so we find a definite contrast between the <a href="http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/faulty.htm">retouched photos used to besmirch Oswald</a> in the newspapers and those that were taken at the same time by TV cameras, or by independent photographers.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">Note that you'll see no "Oswald smirks" in live camera footage shown on TV.</span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">However, we the people could look again and again at <b>photos in the newspapers,</b> and there, Lee Oswald was presented as an evil man gloating over the murder of the president.</span></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipttwpMUMqYoTFTnOu7gdldMEvrbn0t7oWRJqCdMqt_uptcmh_Fn3EFbthMxaNMzEaNF0XS531ghiQ68xTrW19Kb5I-geB1MYdA4dnt0regWxGMZgb-R0Bqw9RpzQyBffBdA0VBY1NwYVr/s1600/lee+oswald+lho+retouched+with+smirk.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipttwpMUMqYoTFTnOu7gdldMEvrbn0t7oWRJqCdMqt_uptcmh_Fn3EFbthMxaNMzEaNF0XS531ghiQ68xTrW19Kb5I-geB1MYdA4dnt0regWxGMZgb-R0Bqw9RpzQyBffBdA0VBY1NwYVr/s640/lee+oswald+lho+retouched+with+smirk.jpg" width="392" /></a><br />
<br /></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Note that lines were drawn upward at the ends of Oswald's mouth,<br />
covering up the downturn of his mouth. <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">This photo is shown constantly to the people, complete with a retouched "smirk" guaranteed to create dislike for Oswald.</span></div>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<br /></div>
And here is another one: </div>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2f4VmDW5REJJHQkMJa4dn3qmASJMeSDLRsgERVCspmkLpNE9h9jIhNi8Tdn4vyB512IlPizsROusWQ7w6FVy66NKYnePVG9rvqTau1xS-YW101esThuL8gmzMZCbXVd2WizSu_Y04l-d4/s1600/photo+retouched+to+enhance+smirk+arrested+lee+oswald.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi2f4VmDW5REJJHQkMJa4dn3qmASJMeSDLRsgERVCspmkLpNE9h9jIhNi8Tdn4vyB512IlPizsROusWQ7w6FVy66NKYnePVG9rvqTau1xS-YW101esThuL8gmzMZCbXVd2WizSu_Y04l-d4/s640/photo+retouched+to+enhance+smirk+arrested+lee+oswald.jpg" width="506" /></a></div>
<div class="photo-desc" id="description_div" style="background-color: #fefefe; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; width: 562px;">
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
Now look at a photo of Lee Oswald that flooded the newspapers, when he has been asked by a reporter if he is in handcuffs. </div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
(Oswald is in pain from his recent beating by the police, which included their slamming his head violently against the police car as they thrust him inside the vehicle, causing the large cut on his forehead. Both his hands are in fists, as he deals with his pain.)</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
When Oswald quickly raised his handcuffed wrists to show that he is indeed handcuffed --the only one brought into the police station who was manacled-- photographers snapped the photo. Oswald's quick gesture (as can be seen on film) was immediately called a "Communist salute" in the newspapers, and the 'smirk' was added at the same time, through retouching, as can be seen here:.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6HNVmg4OI3a5qulAuZAUo3a97F4Ud8mkDTb93iSQwtfmHuOWm_d3-NcOfINtC_nxQ9n5tKk2RQtwhAVcHtgyb8NYe6sUFwGt4NmTzwYgM63ktmF_36xwoUlqM9ZUBS4DJzcZCHbveR61V/s1600/lee+brown+shirt+showing+handcuffs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6HNVmg4OI3a5qulAuZAUo3a97F4Ud8mkDTb93iSQwtfmHuOWm_d3-NcOfINtC_nxQ9n5tKk2RQtwhAVcHtgyb8NYe6sUFwGt4NmTzwYgM63ktmF_36xwoUlqM9ZUBS4DJzcZCHbveR61V/s640/lee+brown+shirt+showing+handcuffs.jpg" width="630" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;">Though Lee's mouth can be seen <b>downturned</b>, shading <b>upward</b> created the effect of a smirk. A drop of what may be white-out appears in the blow-up of the retouched photo above. Contrast that photo with the rare one below, which was not promoted in the newspapers and which was not retouched. It was taken the same moment, from a different camera. But there is no trace of a smirk in this photo:</span></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia67bF53hw1Z0K1vz-DqThs5dX6k4d6hbPUreIAa38FIAbmDHjylI9ZBhLwdWJWwMqhaNCSl_rLyrhocpyTrLPpWdK1kBo3zQZLB4FyR44-rUrVCSWh8OJ2hSw5pDVth4PZnL_V33Dfz-s/s1600/lee+oswald+ring+in+handcuffs+commie.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="448" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia67bF53hw1Z0K1vz-DqThs5dX6k4d6hbPUreIAa38FIAbmDHjylI9ZBhLwdWJWwMqhaNCSl_rLyrhocpyTrLPpWdK1kBo3zQZLB4FyR44-rUrVCSWh8OJ2hSw5pDVth4PZnL_V33Dfz-s/s640/lee+oswald+ring+in+handcuffs+commie.jpg" width="640" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">There is no trace of a smirk in this rare photo that did not reach the nation's newspapers.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.pcp.pt/partido/congresso17/album/fotografias/slides/DSC_9919.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="416" src="http://www.pcp.pt/partido/congresso17/album/fotografias/slides/DSC_9919.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
HERE IS WHAT A "COMMUNIST SALUTE" LOOKS LIKE. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b><span style="font-size: small;">BUT HERE IS WHAT LEE OSWALD <u>ACTUALLY DID</u> THAT MOMENT-- GO TO 4:10 -- AND SEE FOR YOURSELF THAT LEE JUST RAISED HIS HANDCUFFS A MOMENT--THAT WAS ALL--AS HE WAS BEING WHISKED THROUGH THE HALLWAY:</span></b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://3.gvt0.com/vi/OGD_bPvbEMs/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OGD_bPvbEMs&fs=1&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OGD_bPvbEMs&fs=1&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">At 4:10 -4:11 There was no "Communist salute." Those who tell you that it was, or that they are "not sure" should not to be trusted in other statements they make about Oswald. They haven't done their homework, or they are perpetrating the lie on purpose.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">When <a href="http://www.jesseventura.net/">Jesse Ventura</a> met me, recently, at the Drake Hotel in Chicago, he and I discussed, among other things, Lee's heroic refusal to say, "I was hired by the CIA!" In the YouTube video below, Marrs explains that Lee carried some very interesting items with him the day he was arrested. One was a list of all the schools he had attended, and a list of all the Marine bases he had served at. Lee also had a boxtop in his pocket. Just the kind of information one would give to a contact whom you'd never seen, to prove who you were. For Lee didn't stay nailed to a seat in the Texas theater where he was arrested. In the fine book about the Kennedy assassination, <i>JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters</i>, author <a href="http://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1439193886">James Douglass</a> describes how Lee moved from seat to seat seeking someone-- not the actions of someone who had just shot the President and would not want to draw <a href="http://books.google.es/books?id=NfvkfM8IbBsC&pg=PA292&lpg=PA292&dq=oswald+sat+next+to+texas+theater&source=bl&ots=pQpM5USIwM&sig=qdogmh7Bf3OF0HzAF5R5ewXSFdM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o0TpUJD5O4T-4QSC6YCYCw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=oswald%20sat%20next%20to%20texas%20theater&f=false">attention to himself.</a></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"> </span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">In the video clip below, you can see that <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Lee Oswald</a> has no trace of a smirk on his face. Look at him and listen to him. Then listen to what <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0550285/">Jim Marrs</a> has to say about who the REAL LEE OSWALD was:</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://3.gvt0.com/vi/1w8zWI_K2RM/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1w8zWI_K2RM&fs=1&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1w8zWI_K2RM&fs=1&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">I spent the end of the year in America, for the first time since 2007, on a tour dedicated to telling the people the truth about Lee Oswald. </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/exT6H9Hsvh0?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">As the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination approaches, I am challenging those who know that Lee Oswald was innocent to join those who know that Lee Oswald actually tried to save Kennedy's life, at the ROSE HILL CEMETERY OUTSIDE DALLAS, where Lee is buried. We will be taking photos there on November 22, 2013, of the flowers placed on Lee's grave.</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEQmxB09j8z5_OfObLLqpLZggYhHlt7AOA4qBZmAJHGdHN1u7XvBgvTLJymTqSl9GDih8PtgbVdp_UMFRHL2L6pkrhDLjPAZn-FNC1k2IxjLKm58XmFPARqS8_xd7761OVqsIsSKims0op/s1600/LEE+GRAVE+ROSES+NOV+2011+001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="295" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiEQmxB09j8z5_OfObLLqpLZggYhHlt7AOA4qBZmAJHGdHN1u7XvBgvTLJymTqSl9GDih8PtgbVdp_UMFRHL2L6pkrhDLjPAZn-FNC1k2IxjLKm58XmFPARqS8_xd7761OVqsIsSKims0op/s400/LEE+GRAVE+ROSES+NOV+2011+001.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Learn the full truth about Lee Harvey Oswald in <i>ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD.</i> You can purchase an autographed copy by special arrangement by donating $50 for the book, which includes the cost of shipping and handling from Europe, at this website. Thank you for your interest and support!</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmgeJR3SPPGZMRaYYN4YCBJrIZbL3oOy9TINx5BCv00OLEj7F-rOjFjOZzlVxIa5Z2M8HaRvi7ncokQJRoE-vI-TpC5shNFERsDYi6F6uPRqoh1jZi5z-BndiqZFuP3XO7WR7AGFs50bV1/s1600/Singer+Ventura+Judyth++drake+2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="248" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmgeJR3SPPGZMRaYYN4YCBJrIZbL3oOy9TINx5BCv00OLEj7F-rOjFjOZzlVxIa5Z2M8HaRvi7ncokQJRoE-vI-TpC5shNFERsDYi6F6uPRqoh1jZi5z-BndiqZFuP3XO7WR7AGFs50bV1/s320/Singer+Ventura+Judyth++drake+2012.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">JFK Researcher Phil Singer, Judyth Vary Baker (author of ME & LEE), and Gov. Jesse Ventura met in Chicago recently</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 1.3em; margin-bottom: 10px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: small; line-height: normal;"></span></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-53831700806116452652013-01-04T06:18:00.003+02:002013-01-04T08:29:14.685+02:00Lee Harvey Oswald: Convenient Lies and Cover-Ups Continue <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.patspresidentialplaces.com/kennedy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://www.patspresidentialplaces.com/kennedy.jpg" width="208" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">This article provides useful information about the framing of <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a>, accused assassin of President John F. Kennedy, and why a cover-up took place.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>The Cover-Up Continues</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">What does the ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA and WIKIPEDIA have in common? They have become the judge and jury of Lee Harvey Oswald, labeling Oswald "assassin" rather than "accused assassin."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
Let's get one thing straight: IF a government disposes of its leader through assassination, and THAT government then conducts an investigation, the investigation will be dishonest.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Did you know that the new President, Lyndon Johnson, is known to have <a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Assassinations_page/LBJ_Mastermind_JFK_Assass.html">escaped a possible prison term</a> by becoming President? View the facts HERE:</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/27RGsdtuRkA?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Here are a few photos to further remind you of the kind, gentle new President:</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/assets/Image/Nieman%20Reports/Images%20by%20Issue/spring09/LBJ-dog(earslifted)-large.sub.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="315" src="http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/assets/Image/Nieman%20Reports/Images%20by%20Issue/spring09/LBJ-dog(earslifted)-large.sub.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTL10p553QAeSFE-If6pFW3bCY657SQrWIYyOas-OYdwVto3S34bFQI2pJnI0Jzc42OBBJBMUxiKD95_PITusEUHjrfbs0HQ_E_5ifWPaTTj_esqpThUd7CHS9w09kCmAn_fU0bwkA6w/s400/POOCH+64+Lyndon+B+J++Her+by+ears+and+Him+critics.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTL10p553QAeSFE-If6pFW3bCY657SQrWIYyOas-OYdwVto3S34bFQI2pJnI0Jzc42OBBJBMUxiKD95_PITusEUHjrfbs0HQ_E_5ifWPaTTj_esqpThUd7CHS9w09kCmAn_fU0bwkA6w/s320/POOCH+64+Lyndon+B+J++Her+by+ears+and+Him+critics.jpg" width="264" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">And famously, LBJ's interaction with the winking Albert Thomas, a grieving Jackie Kennedy almost insensate at LBJ's side:</span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTlCyV9hqD8a9gR9m5ZxtnpIIn3tpk5KD-a0lgNAZjHg6_IRAHq" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="454" src="https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTlCyV9hqD8a9gR9m5ZxtnpIIn3tpk5KD-a0lgNAZjHg6_IRAHq" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">When President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, an investigation was immediately conducted by the FBI. However, the Director of the FBI, John Edgar Hoover, who <a href="http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/suspects.htm">despised JFK and his brother Bobby</a>, had declared that Lee Harvey Oswald was the ONLY suspect and the ONLY person involved in the assassination THE SAME DAY Kennedy was killed. Here's Hoover's memo to that effect, written to his agents in Dallas who wanted to look into any other possibilities:</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQlhvhujfMq15UqoLYKKG7hg0iynp8z3vEwLK9Lyzh_8IubA7WeVwKij11CME5JMvrdxHES2_VEFrOR6oYoUnBy7mF_hmhouBcXBP7TrmPOZyXCyjloOnV7kl3ttZqW2EWvx70UNuqWSKW/s1600/lee+murderer+Hoover+says+22+nov+no+need+look+more.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQlhvhujfMq15UqoLYKKG7hg0iynp8z3vEwLK9Lyzh_8IubA7WeVwKij11CME5JMvrdxHES2_VEFrOR6oYoUnBy7mF_hmhouBcXBP7TrmPOZyXCyjloOnV7kl3ttZqW2EWvx70UNuqWSKW/s640/lee+murderer+Hoover+says+22+nov+no+need+look+more.jpg" width="482" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>"Not necessary to cover as true subject located" </b>-- signed Jn (John) H (Hoover).</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The memo was signed before any evidence had reached FBI laboratories. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4638275/ns/dateline_nbc/t/secrets-j-edgar-hoover/">What power Hoover had</a>! With this single memo, all efforts to locate any other suspects ceased. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Hoover received his reward: Lyndon Johnson made J. Edgar <a href="http://www.sources.com/SSR/Docs/SSRW-Hoover_J_Edgar.htm">Hoover Director for Life</a>, whereas Kennedy would have forced Hoover to retire at age 70. Today, in the face of Hoover's overwhelming power, FBI Directors are limited to ten year terms.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Consider that the <a href="http://history-matters.com/archive/contents/contents_hsca.htm">HSCA </a>(a government-funded House Committee) declared, in its findings, that <a href="http://history-matters.com/archive/contents/hsca/contents_hsca_report.htm">a conspiracy existed</a>, though they still blamed Oswald as JFK's assassin. But the HSCA was winding down and failed to look into that matter deeper. Nor did they castigate Hoover for his swift and outrageous shutdown of any investigation as to any other suspects.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Now, if a government kills its leader, that government will not be expected to conduct a fair investigation into the killing. That's common sense. </span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">The American people were immediately shown photos of Johnson being sworn in, legitimizing Johnson as the new President in their eyes. The stunned people knew that Lyndon B. Johnson, the new President, was the one who appointed the members of the Warren Commission, but they meekly accepted the lie that Johnson was SORRY that the event happened. Look at this film and decide for yourself if the new President is really grief-stricken over the sudden violent, barbaric execution of his predecessor. LBJ had just 58 words to say, when he took over the country:</span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://0.gvt0.com/vi/-gSO7xqy0_g/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-gSO7xqy0_g&fs=1&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-gSO7xqy0_g&fs=1&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-size: large;">LBJ's Warren Commission was composed of Johnson's most trusted Congressional cronies and those with special interests in making sure the truth would never surface, such as Allen Dulles, described by Wikipedia thus, in its opening words: </span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><em style="background-color: white; font-style: normal; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></em></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><em style="background-color: white; font-style: normal; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></em></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><em style="background-color: white; font-style: normal; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;">Allen</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"> Welsh </span><em style="background-color: white; font-style: normal; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;">Dulles</em><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"> (April 7, 1893 – January 29, 1969) was an American diplomat</span><wbr style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"></wbr><span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;">, lawyer, banker, and public official..."</span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><span style="color: #222222;"><span style="line-height: 14.666666984558105px;">The next sentence in the article tells readers that Dulles was "</span></span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> the longest-serving (1953–1961) </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_Central_Intelligence" style="background-color: white; background-image: none; color: #0b0080; line-height: 24px; text-decoration: initial;" title="Director of Central Intelligence">Director of Central Intelligence</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> (de facto head of the U.S. </span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency" style="background-color: white; background-image: none; color: #0b0080; line-height: 24px; text-decoration: initial;" title="Central Intelligence Agency">Central Intelligence Agency</a><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;">)..." </span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 24px;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></span></div>
<h4>
<span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;">And guess who ended Dulles' career?</span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px; text-decoration: underline;"><br /></span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<u><span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;">KENNEDY.</span></span></span></u></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;">Yet here he is, the former head of the CIA</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;">, appointed by Lyndon Johnson to 'investigate'</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;"> the assassination, with the express purpose of </span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;">verifying the FBI report conducted by Hoover</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;"> that was made within mere days of the</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; font-size: large; line-height: 24px;"> assassination. Wikipedia tells us:</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;">"Although Dulles' involvement in</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> the Bay of Pigs endeavor gained</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> him enough ill repute to be fired</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> from the CIA during Kennedy's</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> administration, he didn't let this</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> stifle his ambition. Somehow he</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> found himself reinstated and was</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> allowed to serve on the commission</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> to investigate the murder of the</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;"> very man who fired him." </span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 24px;">(REF: </span><span style="line-height: 24px;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Welsh_Dulles accessed Jan. 4, 2013)</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;">"Somehow" indeed! Who was better suited to</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> make certain that nobody connected with</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> Dulles' precious CIA would be linked to the</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> assassination?</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> </span></span><br /><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;">I have written elsewhere of the other members of</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> the Warren Commission, what compromised</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> them, and how several of the more neutral</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> members were unhappy with the conclusions</span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> made by the Commission. </span></span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal; line-height: 24px;">They should have been.</span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;">Here's a list of errors made by the Warren</span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> Commission, as compiled by researcher Martin</span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> Shackelford, a conservative researcher who, for</span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> example, doesn't believe the Zapruder film was</span></span></h4>
<h4>
<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;"><span style="line-height: 24px;"> altered. </span><span style="line-height: 24px;"><a href="http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/report35.html"> He writes: </a></span></span></h4>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
</div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="background-color: white; color: black; width: 99%px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="TOP" width="83%"><b><span style="font-size: large;">Warren Commission Errors by Martin Shackelford (9-22-99)</span></b><br />
<b><u><span style="font-size: large;">At Work:</span></u></b><br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">1. No staff of investigators; near-total dependence on information</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">gathered by others, while claiming to conduct "an independent</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">investigation." In its "Forward to the Report," it openly boasts that it</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">had the power to grant immunity, but never used it.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2. Too much emphasis on getting it over with, at the expense of leads</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">which even their own staff thought important, while claiming to conduct</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">a "thorough" investigation.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3. The decision not to request access to the autopsy photos and X-rays,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">much less not to request evaluation by qualified forensic pathologists.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">4. The decision not to question Jack Ruby away from Dallas.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">5. The decision to assume Oswald's guilt at the outset, and the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">adversarial attitude toward witnesses who didn't assume it.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">6. The failure to aggressively pursue records held by less cooperative</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">agencies, like the military, the CIA, etc.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">7. The decision not to make its evidence files available for study by</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">scholars, and instead to seal them until 2039, and the small printing</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(5000) of the volumes of evidence that were released, with no allowance</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">for a second printing based on demand.</span></blockquote>
<b><u><span style="font-size: large;">The Report:</span></u></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The Narrative: How the Commission Wanted You to Look at the Evidence</span></b><br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-size: large;">1. Secret Service agent Clint Hill didn't push Mrs. Kennedy back into</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the rear seat; she was returning to the seat before he reached her. (after she reached</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">a piece of her husband's head that went to the rear of the limo.)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">2. Although they precisely indicated the location of the wound in the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">front of the neck, all they said about the head wound was that it was "extensive,"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">thus evading the Parkland doctors, reports that it was in the rear of</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the head.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">3. In a misleading statement, the body reportedly "was given a complete</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">pathological examination." From the standpoint of forensic pathology,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">this is utterly false. Even from the standpoint of hospital pathology,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">it is questionable.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">4. It implies that the head wound described in the autopsy report</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">matches the descriptions from Parkland, when in fact it didn't even match most of</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the descriptions by Bethesda personnel.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">5. It ascribes accounts of shots from locations other than the Texas</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">School Book Depository to "evident confusion at the outset," and suggests that</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the actual sole source, the Depository, was identified "within minutes." The</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">House Select Committee on Assassinations found witnesses and evidence</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">that supported a shot from the grassy knoll"some of them known to the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Warren Commission, but disregarded or subjected to hostile questioning.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">6. "Several eyewitnesses," it said, reported a rifle being fired from</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the Sixth Floor window. In fact, only one, Howard Brennan, reported seeing it</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">fire.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">7. They report the suspect description broadcast by Dallas Police was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"based primarily on Brennan's observations," though it included details</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Brennan could not have known.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">8. They give Oswald extra time to get down the stairs, saying "Not more</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">than 2 minutes had elapsed since the shooting" when Officer Baker and</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">TSBD supervisor Roy Truly dashed up the stairs. In fact, no more than a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">minute and a half, and possibly less, had elapsed by the time Officer</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Baker confronted Oswald in the second floor lunchroom. This kind of</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">shading of facts in the direction of a conclusion resembles a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">prosecutor,s brief more than the objective analysis claimed by the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Commission.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">9. "On the bus was Mrs. Mary Bledsoe, one of Oswald's former landladies,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">who immediately recognized him." They fail to note that she reported the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">elbow of his shirt was "torn out," which wasn't accurate, and the bus</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">driver later suggested the passenger may not have been Oswald, but a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">young man who was a regular on that run of the bus, Milton Jones.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">10. They noted that Oswald took a cab, but omit that he offered it to a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">woman who arrived after he did, as the narrative is slanted to suggest</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Oswald was in a big hurry.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">11. The narrative has Oswald talking with Officer Tippit through a car</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">window that was rolled up, not down.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">12. Reporting that Domingo Benavides called the shooting in at 1:16,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">they imply that this was done almost immediately, which wasn't the case.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The shooting could have occurred as early as 1:10, but that didn't leave</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">enough time for Oswald to get there from his rooming house.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">13. Neutrally, we are told "The assailant ran into the lot, discarded</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">his jacket and then continued his flight west on Jefferson," but not</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">that no one had any success connecting the discarded jacket to Oswald.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">14. In describing Oswald's teenage years, no mention is made of the fact</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">that his family was deeply enmeshed in the Marcello crime organization;</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">his uncle worked for Marcello, and his mother dated Marcello employees.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">An odd man with Mob and intelligence connections, David Ferrie, headed</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the unofficial Civil Air Patrol unit that Oswald joined. The "loner"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">also belonged to an Astronomy Club.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">15. The second description of Oswald as a "loner" comes in the summary</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">of his Marine career. Anyone who believes that should read his friend</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Kerry Thornley's novel based on their time in the Marines, "The Idle</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Warriors," or read the accounts of his Marine buddy Nelson Delgado. The</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Commission account is fiction by selection.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">16. He spent time overseas, we are told, "most of it in Japan." That's</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">all we learn about that unusual period, where he frequented the Queen</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Bee, an expensive nightclub out of the price range of a simple Marine.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Also avoided is any mention of the Atsugi base at which he was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">stationed, a center of both U-2 and MKULTRA CIA operations.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">17. The Commission implies that Oswald could shoot well, and explains</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">his low rifle test scores as an indication that he wasn't interested in</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">them.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">18. The highly unusual circumstances of his discharge are glossed over.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">He was released to care for his mother, on whom several boxes had fallen</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">at work months before. It's true that she was injured, and had a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">difficult time for a while, but she was doing better by the time he was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">discharged, and he only spent three days with her before leaving for</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Russia.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">19. The Commission mentions the odd fact that Oswald applied for a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">passport, saying he intended to go to Russia, before he left the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Marines. What is not said is that his superior officer. Lt. Ayers, was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">aware of this, as he signed a form which included that intended</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">destination.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">20. There is mention that he entered the Soviet Union via Finland, but</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">not that he somehow knew that Helsinki was the easiest entry point.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">21. There is no mention that he told the U.S. embassy he intended to</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">give the Russians information he had learned in the Marines. Perhaps</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">this made it easier for them in not having to explain why the State</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Department later loaned him money for his return.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">22. His time in Russia is also quickly skipped over, thus no mention of</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the circle of friends "the loner" developed there. His wife seems to</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">come out of nowhere.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">23. In it's rush to emphasize the Dallas Russian-speaking community,s</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">dislike for Oswald, the Commission completely omits any mention of</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">George DeMohrenschildt, a worldly sophisticate who is often described as</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"Oswald's best friend."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">24. The Commission flatly states that Oswald tried to kill General Edwin</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Walker, despite the fact that the bullet recovered from the scene was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">not compatible with his rifle. It only "became compatible" after the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">assassination, when it turned out to be a different kind of bullet than</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Dallas Police had reported it to be in April.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">25. We learn that Oswald returned to New Orleans,</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">but not that he returned to the milieu of the Marcello crime family.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">We are also not told of the many employees of right-wing private detective Guy Banister<br />who remember Oswald as another Banister "employee"</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">or the students at Lousiana State University who recall seeing Banister and Oswald visiting<br />the campus together,</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">or the editor of a CIA-supported newsletter on Central America<br />who reported seeing them on the street, and in Mancuso's<br />Restaurant (in the same building as Banister,s office. David Ferrie<br />also worked with Banister.</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">26. We're told that he visited the Mexico City embassies of Cuba and the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Soviet Union,</span><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">but not that someone continued to pretend to be him after he left, in a call<br />to one embassy.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: large;">One of the rumors the Commission doesn't debunk (or mention) is the<br />possible affair Oswald had with the Cuban embassy's Mexican secretary,<br />though in this case they had the documents reporting it. Not the sort of<br />thing a loner would do, apparently.</span></li>
</ul>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">27. In mentioning that Oswald rented a room from Mary Bledsoe briefly,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">it restates (again probably incorrectly) that she saw him on the bus after</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the assassination.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">28. Although the summary said Ruth Paine phoned the Texas School Book</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Depository about a job for Oswald "at the suggestion of a neighbor," but</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the neighbor had told her she didn't think they were hiring.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">29. The Commission implies that Oswald had not visited his wife at the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Paine home on a Thursday, prior to November 21, but in fact this was his</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">second Thursday visit in the relatively short time he had been back in</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Dallas.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">30. The Commission says Oswald left "his wallet" with $170 for his wife</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the morning of the assassination, but it wasn,t his wallet. He had put</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">money into HER wallet. His wallet was in his pocket at the time of his</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">arrest (a detail the narrative omits, presumably to avoid contradicting</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">itself). The falsehood adds to the picture of finality the Commission</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">seeks to paint. The reality is much less clearcut.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">31. The Commission's Oswald placed "a long, bulky package" in the rear</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">of Buell Wesley Frazier's car, but neither Frazier nor his sister, who</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">also saw it, described it as long enough to carry even the disassembled</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">rifle, and it seemed light enough that Frazier, who had worked in a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">department store, believed Oswald's statement that the package contained</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">curtain rods.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">32. The Commission says Frazier saw Oswald carry the package into the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Depository, but that's not true. The only employee who actually saw</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Oswald enter the building, Jack Dougherty, said Oswald wasn,' carrying</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">anything.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">33. The Commission says that "positive firearm identification evidence</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">was not available at the time," failing to add that there was never a</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">ballistics match made between Oswald's pistol and the bullets fired at</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Officer Tippit. Lamely, they report that the pistol was of a type that</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">could have fired the bullets.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">34. Of details given the press by the Dallas Police, the Commission</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">dismissively stated: "Some of the information divulged was erroneous."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">The same could be said of the Commission.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">35. Jack Ruby, we learn, was in the crowd of newsmen shouting questions</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">at Oswald that Friday night. We aren't told that he knew more about</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Oswald's political activities than did District Attorney Henry Wade, at</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">whom he shouted a correction. Of course, Ruby probably spent more time</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">in New Orleans than Wade, and he got his strippers from the Marcello</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">circuit there. Maybe he didn't need to rely on the news media for</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">information about Oswald.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">36. We are told that numerous threats against Oswald were called in to</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">police. We aren't told that Officer Billy Grammar, who took one of the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">calls, identified the caller as a familiar voice, Jack Ruby. He stalks</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Oswald, he makes a phone threat, and then, on a "sudden impulse," he</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">shoots Oswald. What a coincidence!</span></blockquote>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The Conclusions: What The Narrative Was Preparing You to Believe</span></b><br />
<blockquote>
<span style="font-size: large;">1. We hear again that "witnesses" saw a rifle being fired from the TSBD</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">window.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">2. We're told that a bullet matching Oswald,s rifle was found at</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Parkland Hospital on Governor Connally,s stretcher, but it was in fact</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">found on the stretcher of an injured little boy, Ronald Fuller,</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">according to the man who found it.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">3. We have here the false claim that the Single Bullet Theory "is not</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">necessary to any essential findings of the Commission," though without</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">it a lone assassin would be impossible.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">4. Though no one saw the Mannlicher-Carcano in Oswald,s possession</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">after he left New Orleans, the Commission informs us that it was "was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">owned by and in the possession of Oswald" on the day of the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">assassination. Producing evidence of this is apparently also "not</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">necessary to any essential findings."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">5. Also on no evidence, we are told that "Oswald carried this rifle</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">into the Depository Building on the morning of November 22, 1963."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">6. And we have only the word of Howard Brennan that "Oswald, at the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">time of the assassination, was present at the window from which the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">shots were fired."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">7. We are told that "the improvised paper bag in which Oswald brought</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the rifle to the Depository was found close by the window from which the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">shots were fired." How unfortunate that none of the witnesses who saw</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the bag Oswald actually carried recognized the bag reportedly found on</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the Sixth Floor.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">8. The claim that Oswald attempted to kill General Walker is here</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">repeated.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">9. Oswald is convicted as Tippit,s killer, partly based on a match</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">between cartridge cases in evidence and Oswald's pistol, but the Officer</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">to whom the cases found at the scene had been given was unable to find</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">his initials in the cases matched to Oswald's pistol. Damningly, we are</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">told that Oswald owned the pistol that was found in his possession</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(duh!). Then we,re again told the falsehood that "Oswald's jacket" was</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">found abandoned.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">10. We are told that Oswald was given the opportunity to obtain</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">counsel. We aren't told that he asked for an ACLU attorney, and the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">Dallas Police turned away an ACLU attorney, telling him that Oswald</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">didn,t want his assistance.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">11. Oswald's opportunities to speak directly to the press in the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">hallway of the Dallas Police Department are described as "harassment"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">that shouldn,t have been permitted, as it failed to protect his rights</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">to an "orderly interrogation."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">12. The Commission found no evidence of a conspiracy, because it</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">couldn't tie Oswald or Ruby to one or to each other, it said.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">13. The Commission couldn,' figure out a motive for killing the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">President, either, so it offered a list of possible "contributing</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">factors."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">14. One of these is "His inability to enter into meaningful</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">relationships with people." At the time, people who had known Oswald</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">well were living in fear that they would be accused of being</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">accomplices. As time went on, we,ve learned about more of these</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"meaningful relationships" he supposedly didn,t have.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">15. The Walker shooting, now taken for granted as an Oswald act, is</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">used to show his "capacity for violence."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">16. Apparently the Commission's finding "that the FBI took an unduly</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">restrictive view of its role in preventive intelligence work prior to</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">the assassination" is another way of saying the FBI failed to pass on</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">reports of Mob threats against Kennedy to the Secret Service" <span style="color: red;">oops</span>, the</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">FBI didn,t tell the Commission about them, either. They didn't really</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">come out until the late 1970s.</span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: large;">What we find is that the Commission's presentation of evidence was no more objective than the much criticized Oliver Stone film "JFK," but in a different direction. The narrative is slanted to support the conclusions, and the conclusions often rely on errors made in the narrative, and on statements for which there is no evidence, or evidence pointing in a different direction.</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<center style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-family: Arial;"><img align="BOTTOM" alt="bluebar" border="0" height="17" src="http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/images/bluebar.GIF" width="461" /></span></center>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<center style="background-color: white;">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="width: 450px;"><tbody>
<tr><td width="73%"><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<br />
<center>
<span style="font-size: large;">
<b><span style="color: #000099; font-family: Arial;">Read these thought provoking quotes on the Warren Commission .</span></b></span></center>
</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</center>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<center style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">compiled by Martin Shackelford</span></b></center>
<div style="background-color: white;">
</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<img align="LEFT" alt="26 Volumes" border="0" height="272" src="http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Evidence/26Volumes.GIF" width="94" /><span style="font-size: large;">John A. McVickar, Assistant Counsel, U.S. Embassy, Moscow, 1959:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"Oswald was following the pattern of behavior in which he had been tutored by person or persons unknown...that he had been in contact with others before or during his Marine Corps tour who had guided him and encouraged him in his actions."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Henry Luce at a dinner party, 1961:<br />"We can't afford to make a mistake in America. So if this young Kennedy makes a mistake, he's got to be impeached immediately. We can't wait for a second."<br />(quoted by Mort Sahl, who heard it, in "Heartland")</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Kennedy aides Kenny O'Donnell and Dave Powers:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"The president's orders to reduce the American military personnel in Vietnam by one thousand by the end of 1963 was still in effect on the day he went to Texas. A few days after his death, during the mourning, the order was quietly rescinded."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(from "Johnny, We Hardly Knew Ye")</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Dave Powers:</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"If the bullet that wounded the president was not the same bullet that wounded John. Connally, and I testified that it wasn't, and John Connally testified that it wasn't, then there would have had to be more than one assassin."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(May 13, 1976, interviewed on WGBH-TV, Boston)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry:<br />"We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle. No one has been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand."<br />(November 5, 1969, United Press International)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Marina Oswald's initial reaction:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"I love Lee. Lee good man. He didn't do anything."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(November 29, 1963, LIFE magazine)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Robert Oswald, Lee's brother, after visiting Lee in jail:<br />"All the time we were talking I was searching his eyes for any sign of guilt or whatever you call it. There was nothing there--no guilt, no shame, nothing."</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">H.R. Haldeman, on a panel to investigate Watergate, March 27, 1973:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"If you want Earl Warren, he'll do it." (said to Richard Nixon)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Sen. Richard Russell, Warren Commission member:</span></b><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"They [the FBI] have tried the case and reached a verdict on every count."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(January 27, 1964 Warren Commission Executive Session)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"So much possible evidence was beyond our reach."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(September 29, 1964, Atlanta Constitution, upon the Report's release)</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"We have not been told the truth about Oswald."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(Letter to critic Harold Weisberg)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Hale Boggs, Warren Commission member, on the Single Bullet Theory:<br />"I had strong doubts about it."<br />(quoted by Edward Jay Epstein, "Inquest," the first study with access to<br />Warren Commission members and staff)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">John J. McCloy, Warren Commission member:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"It was important to show the world that America is not a banana republic, where a government can be changed by conspiracy."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(quoted by Epstein, "Inquest")</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Sen. John Sherman Cooper, Warren Commission member:<br />"We had to lift the cloud of doubts that had been cast over American institutions."<br />(quoted by Epstein, "Inquest")</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Allen Dulles, Warren Commission member, fired by JFK as CIA Director:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"But nobody reads. Don't believe people read in this country. There will be a few professors that will read the record...The public will read very little."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">(September 6, 1964, Warren Commission internal memo)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">J. Lee Rankin, Warren Commission chief counsel:<br />"We do have a dirty rumor [Oswald was an FBI informant] that is very bad for the Commission...and it is very damaging to the agencies that are involved in it, and it must be wiped out insofar it is possible to do so by this Commission."<br />(January 27, 1964, Warren Commission Executive Session)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">"At this stage, we are supposed to be closing doors, not opening them."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(July 1964 response to staff counsel Wesley Liebeler's request that a conspiracy lead (Silvia Odio) be pursued, quoted in Epstein, "Inquest")</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">"They [U.S. intelligence agencies] could have conspired all together to try to conceal it [information] from us...It's been very rare in our history that any of these agencies have come forth and said 'we made a mistake'."<br />(May 1975, WRR Radio "Allen Stone Show," Dallas)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Burt W. Griffin, Warren Commission co-counsel:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"I don't think some agencies were candid with us. I never thought the Dallas police were telling us the entire truth. Neither was the FBI."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(April 24, 1975, Rolling Stone)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Associated Press dispatch:<br />"Washington, D.C..--An agent [James Hosty] who investigated the assassination of President Kennedy testified today that he flushed down the drain a note that Lee Harvey Oswald had delivered to the Dallas office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation."<br />(December 12, 1975)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Waggoner Carr, Texas Attorney General (former FBI agent):</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"All of the records were in the hands of the two agencies [FBI and CIA] and, if they so desired, any information or files could have been destroyed or laundered prior to the time the Commission could get them."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(September 2, 1975, Houston Chronicle)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Senate Select Committee to Study Government Operations with Respect to<br />Intelligence Activities (Church Committee):</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">"On two separate occasions...[FBI] Director Hoover asked for all derogatory material on Warren Commission members and staff contained in the FBI files."<br />(1976 "The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Performance of the Intelligence Agencies," report by Sen. Richard Schweiker and Sen. Gary Hart subcommittee)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Sen. Richard Schweiker:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"Had Oswald been convicted twelve years ago, he would be entitled to a new trial today based upon the FBI and CIA coverup."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(June 23, 1976 statement)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Sen. Richard Schweiker:<br />"Now I don't know who killed cock robin, but we do know Oswald had intelligence connections. Everywhere you look with him, there're fingerprints of intelligence."<br />(December 15, 1975, Village Voice)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Victor Marchetti, former Executive Assistant to the Deputy Director of the CIA:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"The more I have learned, the more concerned I have become that the government was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(April 1975, True magazine)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Lyndon Johnson, on being handed the first copy of the Warren Report:<br />"It's, uh, very heavy."<br />(September 24, 1964)</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Jack Ruby:</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">"The Warren Commission! What the hell do they know? Did they learn anything you couldn't read in the papers the next day?"</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">(Letter quoted in Argosy magazine, September 1967)</span><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">"I do not want to die. But I am not insane. I was framed to kill Oswald."<br />(to psychiatrist Werner Teuter, quoted in London Sunday Times, August<br />25, 1974)....</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">So when you read -- in the Britannica and in Wikipedia-- that Lee Harvey Oswald was found to be the "Lone assassin" by three (sometimes they say four) government investigations, remember this one fact: WHAT ELSE COULD A GOVERNMENT, WHO TOOK OVER POWER BY KILLING ITS OWN LEADER, TELL THE PEOPLE?</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The American Dream died with Kennedy on November 22, 1963.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Since then, America has become a nation that wages war across the globe.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">never intending to actually win any of these wars, because they are not based on principles, but on obtaining money for the military-industrial complex.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">When Congress votes to continue raising military spending, while cutting back essential government services for you, the American citizen, just remember it is YOU who have blindly accepted the 'fact' that Oswald killed Kennedy, when, in fact, Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for a murder for which our own government was ultimately responsible.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The government that pillaged Social Security and put every American into debt framed Oswald.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The government that conducted WAR ON CANCER, WAR ON DRUGS and WAR ON POVERTY made everything worse. But WAR is their motif</span>.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The government that lied about THE GULF OF TONKIN was led by Lyndon Johnson.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The government that brought you WATERGATE and forced the resignation of "tricky Dick" Nixon was handed to Nixon by Lyndon Johnson.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">And Nixon gave us Gerald Ford--<a href="http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h3560.html">an appointed Vice President</a> (because Nixon's Vice President, Spiro Agnew, was forced to resign due to his corruption!). teach your children that our government was taken over from within, and those who helped frame Oswald got their rewards: GERALD FORD, NEVER ELECTED AS VICE PRESIDENT, TOOK OVER THE PRESIDENCY FROM NIXON. Ford was a member of The Warren Commission.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Ford was the first and only President and vice President who was never elected to either position by the people. Ford also later admitted that as a member of the Warren Commission, he altered evidence in the JFK murder case. What did he do? FORD DELIBERATELY MOVED THE BULLET HOLE LOCATION IN KENNEDY'S BACK UP TO THE NECK TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THE 'MAGIC BULLET' USED TO FRAME LEE OSWALD COULD HAVE EXITED THE NECK.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Amazingly, Wikipedia, which helps continue the cover-up with its editors, who immediately remove all corrections made in oswald's defense, says this about the moved bullet hole:</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy">"Claims that anyone on the commission "</a></span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy"><em style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;">moved</em><span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"> the wound" are subject to</span></a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: large; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy">discussion." </a></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Read the truth <a href="http://www.jfklancer.com/Ford-Rankin.html">HERE</a> (with emphasis in bold face added):</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">"The signed autopsy sheet, including the placement and description of the back wound, was verified by Admiral George Gregory Burkley, personal physician to the president who directed the autopsy at Bathesda. </span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Burkley filled out and signed John F. Kennedy's official death certificate on November 23rd, 1963. He verified the location of the back wound and signed the Kennedy autopsy sheet at Bethesda on November 24th. <b>That death certificate revealed the back wound to be, in the Admiral's own words, at the president's<span style="color: navy;"> <a href="http://assassinationresearch.com/v1n1/img/figure4.gif">"third thoracic vertebra."</a></span>The neck has seven CERVICAL vertebrae, and this observed and verified wound was described as three THORACIC vertebrae lower than the neck itself.</b> <b>A wound in the back, exactly where the official autopsy sheet and the coat and shirt placed it. </b>Warren Commissioner Gerald Ford was one of the key people responsible for misleading the U.S. public about the facts of the JFK assassination. The single bullet theory and the lone assassin fiction are only possible if we believe Gerald Ford's terrible fiction."</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Here's the location of the third thoracic vertebra:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://assassinationresearch.com/v1n1/img/figure4.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="234" src="http://assassinationresearch.com/v1n1/img/figure4.gif" width="400" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
It has been well-established that no bullet could have penetrated all the bony protuberances involved with the vertebrae in either back OR neck and yet emerge from the throat, as falsely claimed by the Warren Commission, to then hit John Connally and smash his rib, bones in his wrist, and leave a piece of bullet in his thigh, all the while emerging relatively pristine and unscathed.</div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhokuxIbkfCFdLzArUpQFIUZSBqTeG58l7oueB0kKTCtULLHWSvv19u4PS-r9cGIvdClJtkhcWzLy8a0VoKy9IyAUgqKHhlTitEjzdkl63WNG72UMaXWZC8dXtZGTf2A0j_XkT23RTZOkyy/s1600/MAGIC+BULLET+IN+EVIDENCE.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhokuxIbkfCFdLzArUpQFIUZSBqTeG58l7oueB0kKTCtULLHWSvv19u4PS-r9cGIvdClJtkhcWzLy8a0VoKy9IyAUgqKHhlTitEjzdkl63WNG72UMaXWZC8dXtZGTf2A0j_XkT23RTZOkyy/s400/MAGIC+BULLET+IN+EVIDENCE.gif" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">The "Magic Bullet"<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #e1ebf2; color: #333333; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; text-align: start;">Mark Lane says:</span><br />
<br style="background-color: #e1ebf2; color: #333333; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: start;" />
<blockquote class="uncited" style="background-color: #ebeadd; background-image: url(http://forum.jfkmurdersolved.com/styles/prosilver/theme/images/quote.gif); background-position: 6px 8px; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; border: 1px solid rgb(219, 219, 206); color: #333333; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 0.5em 1px 0px 25px; overflow: hidden; padding: 25px 5px 5px; text-align: start;">
<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: small;">We knew that Dr. Shaw, who is the physician who attended Governor Connally. The bullet was, of course, found about 2 o'clock in the afternoon, by Darrell Tomlinson, an engineer at the Parkland Hospital. But two and a half hours after that bullet was found, Dr Shaw was on television and he emerged from the operating room to say that the Governor was in rather good shape, that he's not in critical shape. He'll be all right. Described his wounds, <span style="font-weight: bold; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #0000bf; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">and then concluded by saying that the bullet which did all of the damage is still in Governor Connally's left thigh</span></span>. It is still there now; he has not yet removed it. </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="uncited" style="background-color: #ebeadd; background-image: url(http://forum.jfkmurdersolved.com/styles/prosilver/theme/images/quote.gif); background-position: 6px 8px; background-repeat: no-repeat no-repeat; border: 1px solid rgb(219, 219, 206); color: #333333; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; margin: 0.5em 1px 0px 25px; overflow: hidden; padding: 25px 5px 5px; text-align: start;">
<div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-weight: bold; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: red; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Yet the Commission would have us believe that the bullet which was found two and a half hours prior to this time was, in fact, the bullet which did the damage</span></span>." </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="background-color: #ebeadd; color: #333333; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: small; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; text-align: start;">Ref: </span><a href="http://forum.jfkmurdersolved.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2815" style="background-color: #ebeadd; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium; line-height: 18.200000762939453px; text-align: start;">http://forum.jfkmurdersolved.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2815</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">The Magic Bullet is a fairytale, and Gerald Ford told it to the American people.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">But how else could the innocent Oswald be framed? (Well, many other lies were also created.)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Overwhelming forensic evidence today proves that Kennedy's neck wound came from the front, but common sense can show anyone that this wound is in the BACK, not the NECK (the neck is to the left)</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Ford-Rankin/JFKbackwound.GIF" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="630" src="http://www.jfklancer.com/photos/Ford-Rankin/JFKbackwound.GIF" width="640" /></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The Cabell Matter</span></b></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/AAcabell4.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="285" src="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/AAcabell4.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/CIAcabell.htm">CIA career photos of Cabell</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/cpcabell.htm">General Charles Cabell</a>, also CIA, was <a href="http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~hbf/missile.htm">fired by Kennedy</a> over the Bay of Pigs fiasco, as was Allen Dulles. Charles Cabell's career was thus destroyed by JFK. On November 22, 1963, Kennedy was murdered in Dallas, where Charles Cabell's brother, Earle, was Mayor. As a former long-time resident of Texas, including Dallas, I found it sinister, indeed, that Jackie Kennedy was handed RED ROSES in a state where THE YELLOW ROSE OF TEXAS is the usual bouquet, symbolizing <a href="http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/1984-04-01/primer">the state's independence and its celebration of courageous womanhood.</a> Jackie herself wondered that she was given red roses:</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white;">
<span style="font-size: large;">Everytime we got off the plane that day, three times they gave me the yellow roses of Texas. But in Dallas they gave me red roses. I thought how funny, red roses— so all the seat was full of blood and red roses."</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;">- <a href="http://www.quoteid.com/Jacqueline_Kennedy_Onassis.html">Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis</a></span></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><b>Jackie received red roses from Mrs. Earle Cabell:</b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.veezzle.com/photos/images/9X3Py-_x_YETfpVF1WRJaLoj_gtOcA-qS.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="http://www.veezzle.com/photos/images/9X3Py-_x_YETfpVF1WRJaLoj_gtOcA-qS.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #222222; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; line-height: 14.666666984558105px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-size: large;">Mrs. Lyndon Johnson, the soon-to-become First Lady, was the FIRST one honored with roses in Dallas, in a betrayal of protocol. The future First Lady was given a bouquet of yellow roses BEFORE <a href="http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/Life-of-Jacqueline-B-Kennedy.aspx">Jackie Kennedy</a>, who would be the outgoing First Lady, was given her bouquet of RED roses by <a href="http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/cabell_mrs.htm">Mrs. Earle Cabell. </a>Think about that.</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">For those interested in why I am so deeply involved in fighting for justice for John F. Kennedy, and why I crusade for the exoneration of the innocent Lee Oswald, please view THE LOVE AFFAIR, shown in 2003 on the History Channel: </span><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/3rluPItXdPA?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: large;">Due to threats, I must live overseas in remote areas. I made a recent, quick tour of several states this past December, and was pleased to receive personal support from Jesse Ventura, Robert Groden, and others who are experts in the Kennedy assassination research community:</span><br />
<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRzd0Rp8MYsHMH7ZMdScI0FtUZLQN9rPPEnFIpdpvdwF_1qw8Jcjj308p_ozl5haIugeQO02O5qppmnc0S30H2dv45hCTeJvxOzMIHEuy2D4HSNKc4QzvVr2X1sT62-I84sLJZZov4A0Hi/s1600/jesse+Ventura+judyth+drake+2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="325" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgRzd0Rp8MYsHMH7ZMdScI0FtUZLQN9rPPEnFIpdpvdwF_1qw8Jcjj308p_ozl5haIugeQO02O5qppmnc0S30H2dv45hCTeJvxOzMIHEuy2D4HSNKc4QzvVr2X1sT62-I84sLJZZov4A0Hi/s400/jesse+Ventura+judyth+drake+2012.jpg" width="400" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Judyth Vary Baker and Gov. Jesse Ventura on Oswald's Side</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7iVd-NturJ-xVD5BeqBgIBk7t04PVkdAV9Z0T9nrFADubthHUCZ0CrBh3wdDbaCxWuM9NsWoBoaP06beTanSoqAbktIRBGwMc75r5hrgaxTg_rIphL421u2sMqO8n275b1BcEcgiAePHX/s1600/Robert+groden+judyth++drake+2012.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="307" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj7iVd-NturJ-xVD5BeqBgIBk7t04PVkdAV9Z0T9nrFADubthHUCZ0CrBh3wdDbaCxWuM9NsWoBoaP06beTanSoqAbktIRBGwMc75r5hrgaxTg_rIphL421u2sMqO8n275b1BcEcgiAePHX/s320/Robert+groden+judyth++drake+2012.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Robert Groden and Judyth Vary Baker on Oswald's Side</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
SUPPORT ME IN MY FIGHT TO CLEAR LEE OSWALD'S NAME. PROTEST THE USE OF 'ASSASSIN' RATHER THAN 'ACCUSED ASSASSIN' BY WIKIPEDIA AND OTHER SO-CALLED 'RELIABLE' REFERENCE SOURCES. EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN.<br />
<br />
TEACH THEM THE TRUTH.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-32213400945072170042011-11-28T16:28:00.000+02:002011-11-28T16:36:01.473+02:00Conquering Cancer and Its Connection to the Kennedy Assassination:Interview with Judyth Vary Baker<a href="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAkennedyP.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 161px; height: 250px;" src="http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/USAkennedyP.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><div><br /></div><div>This interview, part Two,was conducted during our November remembrances for President Kennedy. Hear Kennedy's speech,below, as it opens this 2nd part of my interview with Carolyn Rose Goyda...<a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a>, an innocent man,spied on the biological weapon development against Castro being conducted while acting as my bodyguard and a courier for The Project. Read <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">ME & LEE</a> for more information. </div><div><br /></div><div>The interview is badly recorded due to interference--sometimes significant--that made it difficult for us to communicate. Other interviews made during this period of Nov. 22-23-24 were totally blocked. Thanks to Carolyn for managing--somehow--to get this interview recorded! </div><div><br /></div><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/type1radioloungenetwork/2011/11/23/jfk-sessions-pt-2-more-on-judyth-baker-bush-connection#.TtNOJEGiamE.facebook">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/type1radioloungenetwork/2011/11/23/jfk-sessions-pt-2-more-on-judyth-baker-bush-connection#.TtNOJEGiamE.facebook</a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-18543361557645375132011-11-20T02:06:00.000+02:002011-11-20T05:38:24.265+02:00OSWALD-DID-IT MYTHS EXPOSED: Kennedy did NOT Order Bubble Top Off Car --and Oswald Didn't Shoot Before Zapruder Film Began!<a href="http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/images/news/limo_nyt_112207.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><br /></a><br /><a href="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTkfC3CYPy9BLyaxTSUn6611VFT35y9rFuuxOfiA-bH3hjdKTgY1w" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 281px; height: 179px;" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTkfC3CYPy9BLyaxTSUn6611VFT35y9rFuuxOfiA-bH3hjdKTgY1w" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><b>Oswald Did Not Kill Kennedy!</b></div><div><br /></div><div>Vincent Palamara, admittedly the nation's expert on the Secret Service, has a lot to say about the Kennedy detail--those agents assigned to protect the President at all costs. Only, on November 22,1963, </div><div>Kennedy's Secret Service agents failed to do just that.</div><div><br /></div><div>In addition, they want to blame KENNEDY for his own death, falsely claiming he ordered the Bubble-Top off -- and ALSO ordered Secret Service agents OFF his then-unprotected car. Many of us have seen the YouTube film showing how agents who WANTED to climb onto the back of Kennedy's car for his protection were ordered off:</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><u><br /></u></span></div><div><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C6OWcujJSCU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div><div>So --did KENNEDY order the agents off his car? Look at this:</div><div><iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Kc0PJ7WRtws?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div><div>and this...</div><div><iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VLZIGGCjCDk?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div><div>You can see Palamara's full investigation proving Kennedy was betrayed by treasonous secret service agents <a href="http://vincepalamara.blogspot.com/">HERE.</a></div><div><br /></div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><a href="http://www.ctka.net/reviews/kennedydetailreview.html" style="color: rgb(85, 136, 170); text-decoration: none; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">http://www.ctka.net/reviews/kennedydetailreview.html</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> </span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">SEE ALSO</strong><a href="http://ctka.net/reviews/slick_propaganda.html" style="color: rgb(85, 136, 170); text-decoration: none; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">http://ctka.net/reviews/slick_propaganda.html</a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">Vince Palamara: called a Secret Service expert by The History Channel, C-SPAN's Brian Lamb, Vince Bugliosi, The Assassination Records Review Board, and many countless authors and researchers.</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> As former J</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">FK Secret Service agent Joe Paolella proclaimed: "You seem to know a lot about the Secret Service, maybe even more than I do!" Unlike Th</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">e Kennedy Detail, I don't profit from the death of the man I was sworn to protect. </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">JFK NEVER ORDERED THE AGENTS OFF HIS LIMOUSINE, AS MANY FORMER AGENTS & WHITE HOUSE AIDES ADAMANTLY TOLD ME</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">! Don't believe th</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">e 47-year-old lies told by those seeking to profit from the man they failed to protect. For his part, Blaine seems to be afraid of me and worried about my major influence over countless people around the world via my online writings and so forth-he </span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">talks about me falsely in his book but doesn't dare name me (</span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">page 360</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">), had his attorney send me a threatening letter, and then had the temerity to state on television that I'm, quote, "not credible." I, myself, believe Blaine to be very credible, but </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">ONLY</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> regarding the statements he made to myself in 2004-2005, NOT the new, revis</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">ed ones he is now espousing in his book.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">Remember: Blaine's colleagues did nothing to prevent JFK from getting killed and, by his own admission, Blaine himself damn near killed yet ANOTHER president, ole LBJ.</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> LBJ himself said it best: </span><em style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">"I’ll get Hoover to send me over a couple of twenty-one-year-old accountants and they’ll probably do as good a job!"</em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> Amen. God Bless the </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">modern </strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">Secret Service: a million times better than The Kennedy Detail. Don't let their crocodile tears fool you: </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">many despised JFK (<em>for his morals</em>) AND LBJ (<em>for his manners</em>) and some are reaping huge financial rewards over his death.</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> My deep respect and admiration for the late, great President John F. Kennedy moves me to defend and protect him in </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">deat</strong><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">h</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">...as The Kennedy Detail miserably failed to do so regarding his </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">life</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">. </span></span></div><div><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></strong></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">A "postscript"</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">: Blaine makes much of President Kennedy allegedly calling him and his colleagues</span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">"charlatans."</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> This is quite an embarassing "admission</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">" on Blaine's part---here is the definition of a </span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">charlatan</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">: "</span><strong style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">A charlatan (also called swindler or mountebank) is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money, fame or other advantages via some form of pretense or deception."</strong><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "> Ouch.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); " >---</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); " ><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); " ><b>MAX HOLLAND AND JOHAN RUSH PUSH THEIR NOT-NEW THEORY AS 'FACT' --AND THE MEDIA OBEDIENTLY SWALLOWS IT!</b> (What else is new?)</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: center; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); " ><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" >Every November, the usual suspects trot out their enhanced (and corrupted) photos, computer studies and new ideas to try to convince th</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" >e people that Lee Oswald killed Kennedy,when ample evidence exists that Kennedy was killed with the help of of the government. </span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" >This year, longtime <a href="http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/2011/11/cia-defends-max-holland-historian-who.html">CIA writer and CIA award-winner and asset Max Holland</a> has announced that enhanced films show Lee in the TSBD window,when actually, only a figure can be seen in the window and Holland presumes to tell readers that it is Oswald. </span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span">Further,he and his co-author, Johann Rush, add FIVE SEC</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); ">ONDS to the total time Lee Oswald was supposed to have to shoot the President--this latest desperate promotion of their discredited theory perhaps prompted by the fact that even former </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); ">Navy Seal Jesse Ventura couldn't fire the miserable weapon --an Italian-made Carcano=--in the time shown on the Zapruder film.</span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" >The way Holland and Rush get around this problem is to tell everybody that after 48 years nobody thought that maybe Lee Oswald started shooting BEFORE the Zapruder film began in its 'second' section (a portion has been removed from the film--some say Zapruder stopped the film for a few seconds). </span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span"> Holland and Rush want us to believe that now we know the </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); ">theory, we can believe that Lee Oswald had plenty of time to shoot. However, they forgot one small detail-- they ignore witnesses who do not agree with them.</span></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" >And they are important witnesses.</span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">The claim made by Max Holland and Johan Rush that Lee Oswald made a shot --and missed--five seconds before the Zapruder film began -- is being treated as a 'new' discovery as of November, 2011, <b><i>but even Oswald-did-it aficionados posted objections due to conflicting evidence</i>, as early as 2007:while Dale Myers firmly believes Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy, he and co-author Todd Vaughan don't accept Holland and Rush's theory (which Holland and Rush are proclaiming, this November, 2011, is the FINAL NAIL in Oswa</b></span><b style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">ld's coffin):</b></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Trebuchet, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: 3px; line-height: 22px; text-transform: uppercase; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Trebuchet, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: 3px; line-height: 22px; text-transform: uppercase; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2007</span></div><div class="date-posts" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><div class="post-outer"><div class="post hentry" style="margin-top: 0.5em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-bottom-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-bottom: 1.5em; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 18px; "><a name="1482632859278265404"></a></span><h3 class="post-title entry-title" style="margin-top: 0.25em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 4px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 25px; font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.4em; color: rgb(0, 102, 153); ">Holland Déjà Vu</h3><div class="post-header" style="font-size: 18px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><div class="post-header-line-1"></div></div><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1482632859278265404"><div style="font-size: 18px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; "><span style="color: rgb(102, 102, 102); font-size: 18px; "><span style="font-family: arial; ">by DALE K. MYERS with TODD W. VAUGHAN</span></span></div><div style="font-size: 18px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; "><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">"...</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> if the first shot occurred...</span><em style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">before</em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> Zapruder began filming, as Holland and Rush theorize, then the Secret Service Follow-up Car would still have been in the process of rounding the corner from Houston onto Elm. We known this for a fact because five lesser-known amateur films of the Kennedy motorcade capture the period of time immediately before Zapruder began filming. And from these films we can see that the Secret Service Follow-up Car hadn’t begun to travel down Elm Street at the time of Holland and Rush’s theorized first shot. How then can Holland and Rush claim the testimony of the three agents as supportive?"</span></span></div></div><div><div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "><b>Part of the article mentions eyewitness testimony:</b></span></div><div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">"According to Holland and Rush, their theory is supported by eye and ear-witnesses to the shooting (including Amos L. Euins, the only one named in the </span><em style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">New York Times</em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> article) and explains why Oswald missed his first and clo</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">sest shot."</span></span></div><div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "><b>But Myers and Vaughan disagree:</b></span></div><div style="text-align: justify; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">"Nowhere in their November </span><em style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">Times</em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> Op-Ed piece (or in their companion article, "11 Seconds in Dallas; Not Six", </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">now posted on Holland’s ‘washingtondecoded.com’ website) do Holland and Rush address or respond to the multitude of factual inaccuracies pointed out about their early-shot thesis back in June...</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">In order to convince readers of their</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> </span><em style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">New York Times</em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; "> </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">Op-Ed piece that Euins’ testimony supported their theory, Holland and Rush were very selective in their citation. For instance, Holland and Rush didn’t mention that Euins said he ‘watched the car [go] on down the street’ before th</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Arial; ">e car neared the black and white sign and he heard a shot. Nor do Holland and Rush mention that Euins was standing across the street from the Book Depository front entrance – directly across from the traffic light pole that supposedly intercepted Oswald’s first shot.</span></span></div> <span class="Apple-style-span"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; font-family: Arial; ">Of course, those two crucial pieces of information completely alter what Euins is saying – namely tha</span><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; font-family: Arial; ">t the presidential car was not in front of him at the time of the first shot, as Holland and Rush imagine, but had proceeded down the street some unknown distance before the first shot was fired.</span> <span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; font-family: Arial; ">Holland and Rush’s complicity in this obvious deception is no better illustrated than in their use of a 1963 Secret Service re-enactment photograph <span style="color: rgb(0, 66, 132); ">[Figure 1]</span> which they said shows “...the president’s limousine would have passed <em>a black and white sign</em> before Zapruder restarted his camera...” just as young Amos Euins described. [emphasis added]..."</span></span></div><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1482632859278265404" style="font-size: 18px; "><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 18px; text-align: justify; font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></div><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1482632859278265404"><span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-align: justify; "><div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-1482632859278265404" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia, serif; text-align: left; font-size: 18px; "><img src="http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/images/news/limo_nyt_112207.jpg" border="0" alt="" style="font-size: 20px; color: rgb(0, 0, 238); text-decoration: underline; float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 480px; height: 332px; " /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: Arial; "><br /></div><div style="font-family: Arial; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span>To be more accurate, Holland and Rush should have said that the limousine would have passed <em>a cluster of small highway signs</em> – not a singular black and white sign, as Euins suggested. This fact might have taken on much more significance had Holland and Rush revealed that there was more than one cluster of small black and white highway signs along Elm Street – or better yet, that there was a singular highway sign further down Elm Street.</span><br /><br /><span>In fact, the very next highway sign, which appears to have been black and white, was the R.L. Thornton Freeway sign located 100 feet further west on Elm Street – the same R.L Thornton Freeway sign that T.E. Moore referred to as the approximate location of the president’s car at the time of the first shot. <span style="color: rgb(0, 66, 132); ">[Figure 2]</span> The R. L. Thornton Freeway sign also had several smaller highway markers attached to it, the same kind of markers referenced in the photograph that Holland and Rush mention....</span></span></div><div style="font-family: Arial; "><span>But, how in the world would anyone know any of this from reading the Holland and Rush article?"</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>These Oswald-did-it writers have much more to say:</b><br /></span><br /><span style="font-family: Arial; ">"Holland and Rush urge their readers to discard the assumed “illusion” that the Zapruder film depicted the assassination in full and embrace their theory that Oswald fired a shot much earlier than anyone ever thought before. But, <em>their</em> theory is the illusion – concocted from a half-dozen cherry-picked, eyewitness accounts that don’t hold up under even the most basic examination."</span><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial; "><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left; "><span class="Apple-style-span">Their article displays how dishonestly Holland and Rush were proceeding in 2007. In 2011,the two continued to trumpet the same theory,still dishonestly contending that their eyewitnesses support their theory.</span></div><div style="text-align: left; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left; "><span class="Apple-style-span">The truth does not require year after year of half-baked theories presented to prove beyond all doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. The American people now realize that lying to cover up evil doings by government-sponsored 'experts' is unfortunately a common fact of life. The same government experts who tell us that waterboarding is not torture and is legal, the same media who refuse to acknowledge new witnesses and new evidence in the case, are not going to deliver the truth to you on a golden platter. Truth will come humbly,but her power persists. The people there is more to the story than that <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald </a>killed Kennedy. And if their IQ is more than double-digit, they'll know that the government was behind it and framed an innocent man.</span></div><div style="text-align: left; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="text-align: left; "><span class="Apple-style-span">I, Judyth Vary Baker, am a living witness to that fact. Please read the following books to get the truth, rather than propaganda: JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE, <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">ME & LEE</a>, CROSSFIRE, LBJ MASTERMIND, INSIDE THE ARRB, and THE GIRL ON THE STAIRS. Thank you.</span></div></span></div></div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-4721609228585777922011-09-27T03:32:00.000+03:002011-09-27T03:59:09.465+03:00<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald on the Internet: an Introduction<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">by Judyth Vary Baker<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">A timeline (“Interactive Timeline of the Life of Lee Harvey Oswald”) written by Tracy Parnell, and sponsored by John McAdams, the Warren Commission apologist, asserts “facts” about Oswald that are unproven or have been disproven. In addition, “facts” are presented as determined by the Warren Commission as if they are true and proven when they are merely speculative. For example, the timeline asserts as “fact” that Oswald shot at General Walker.<span> </span>Though Lee Oswald never told <a href="http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com">the author</a> anything about the Walker incident itself, as to his participation, he did tell me that he feared for his safety due to the incident, when he was ordered to pass out pro-Castro flyers soon after the incident took place. His undated note to Marina about his possible arrest or being killed is supposed to be ‘evidence’ that he participated in the Walker shooting incident, but Lee told me he had advised Marina on what to do if he should be arrested or killed because he feared what Dallas police might do to him by creating a pro-Castro scene only five days after the Walker incident.the kennedy assassination,JFK,Kennedy,oswald<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">The undated note for Marina tells her how to get help, etc. if Lee happened to get arrested or killed in Dallas (Lee told <a href="http://www.meandlee.com">this writer</a> that he feared being arrested or shot by riled-up Police after the Walker incident occurred). <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com">Lee</a> was ordered to conduct a pro-Castro demonstration on the streets of Dallas five days after the Walker incident. This event is on record:<o:p></o:p></span></p><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 16px; "><b><br /></b></span></span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHS0GoprUgRuFbEwP3nZQZbimw6Nx4ChRO5Wd_DncDEb0M-lI3CBk5SnRAd1ZgI3qfUPfAfPu8lMKH_yBbtniR0A8qlIGglzZpN-h4yV8qD9gAR7CH4fpGjx2dBynBL1rhhnrYHd_TBK1O/s400/Oswald-Walker-Note.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5656833631489134962" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 262px; height: 400px; " /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; "><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12pt; "> </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">The note…(undated) used to damn Oswald.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; "> In the chronology given to me by Mary Ferrell, a date has been falsely ascribed to this note because Marina said she got it before Oswald shot at Walker, even though she also said she was horrified to learn of the event after it happened:</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";letter-spacing:-.15pt">In his April 10 note to Marina, Oswald says, "...the money from work will probably be coming. The money will be </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";letter-spacing:-.15pt">sent to our post office box." (WC Vol 16, p. 1)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";letter-spacing:-.15pt"><br /></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";letter-spacing:-.15pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span" >This is a very important statement. When did Lee Oswald get his very last check from Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall? <span> </span>Its date, and the date it was cashed, can tell us a lot about when the note itself was actually written.</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12pt; "><o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span style="letter-spacing: -0.15pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></span></p> <h1 style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in; margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; letter-spacing: -0.15pt; "><o:p> </o:p></span></h1> <h1 style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in; margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; letter-spacing: -0.15pt; ">And here –shockingly –or maybe not, since this is often the case concerning evidence and Oswald--we find that the check has been tampered with, as explained by author-researcher Harrison E. Livingstone on p. 12 in his book <o:p></o:p></span></h1> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="1044" style="width:626.25pt;mso-cellspacing:0in;mso-yfti-tbllook:1184;mso-padding-alt: 0in 0in 0in 0in"> <tbody><tr> <td valign="top" style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">The Radical Right and the Murder of John </span></i><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning:18.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bold">F. Kennedy: </span></i><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Stunning Evidence</span></i></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><span> </span>in the Assassination of the Presiden</span></i><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">t (</span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"">Trafford, 2004):</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman""><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:531.6pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:531.6pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><span> </span>“Oswald’s last check at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall, #5811, issued on April 10,<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><span> </span>1963, shows possible tampering…there are two “paid” stamps on the face,<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">One dated April 12, and one dated March, 1963…”</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; "><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKvgIhQY-_6gUYG22CIikGrCoSDAFxSQvgqZnUwis03KY-QBPKvhiR8nv_ExQ6A-ply2BFIZbREt8iii4fj_2WoZNudyOj8vc6NKjYxL6K_DMci-j5SyHBZSJC8imCPYEFG3f4dd0Vnuqx/s400/livingstone+jcs+check+april+10+002.JPG" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5656831701530513250" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 138px; " /></span></p><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; "><br /></span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14px;"><b><br /></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%">(photoshot from computer screen)</span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%"><br /></span></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal;mso-outline-level: 1;tab-stops:459.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px; "><b><span >Oswald’s last check was stamped as cashed on April 12 AND in March. That’s not possible, so we can’t conclude that Oswald’s signature is on the check or that check #5811 was ever issued to Oswald. What if Oswald had been issued a check at a later date?</span></b></span></p></td></tr></tbody></table> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span ><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span" >If Oswald’s check was actually cashed after April 15, when Oswald made the pro-Castro demonstration, it might have noticed that the note actually referred to the dangers Oswald feared due to being ordered to put on the Pro-Castro demonstration so close to the Walker incident. That would wipe out the value of the “Walker note.”<span> </span>As it is, two stamps are on this “Oswald check”-- once for March (!) and once for April:</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; "><o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; "><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOlUNPzfHA1u03-gpOxLSY9KeDhk9sbIxfgYV-17mwuch8VGKj_s0FJUlu3TtY86JK_h_uQ2UY20NEeg7gOebzCV5BHR_tkN1mofsz4PGF4KAqK6le22OOBesn5tDhqz8CWzokBCyQXj6X/s400/jcs+check+5811+lee.JPG" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5656832598254248242" style="float: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 226px; " /></span></p><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 20px; "><br /></span></div></span><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px;"><b><br /></b></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"">Note two “cashed” stamps (left & center)</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><br /></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><o:p> </o:p></span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><span> </span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span >Note “April 12” stamp—meaning the check was cashed April 12,<span> </span>as well as a stamp for March 1? on Oswald’s so-called April 10 paycheck. Somebody boo-boo’d. <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span ><br /></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><b><span ><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:12.0pt"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span> </span>The HSCA used Marina’s testimony to conclude Oswald shot at Walker, largely based on the undated note:</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12pt; "><o:p></o:p></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 12.0pt"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";letter-spacing:-.15pt"> </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><a href="http://www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/pdf/HSCA_Report_1A_LHO.pdf">http://www.historymatters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/pdf/HSCA_Report_1A_LHO.pdf</a> (p 61)<o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">“This undated note, although it did not mention General Walker, clearly indicated that Oswald was about to attempt an act during the course of which he<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">might be killed or taken into custody.” </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; ">But there’s the report of Oswald’s pro-Castro demonstration that he told me he faithfully performed, despite danger to himself, <b>only 5 days after Walker was shot at</b>, which was ignored:</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:1.0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">“</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; letter-spacing:-.15pt">April 15, 1963 (Monday) - Oswald passes out Fair Play for Cuba Committee literature on Main Street in Dallas. Oswald had a 'Viva Castro' sign around his neck. The police report (<u>5/15/64</u>) says this happened in late spring or early summer at Main and Ervay in front of H. L. Green store entrance. (WC Vol 22, p. 796; WC 23, p. 477; WC Vol 25, p. 681; <u>Dallas Times Herald</u>, 12/9/63; <u>Life</u>, 2/21/64, p. 76) “ (Ref: Ferrell Chronology)<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; " >These revelations are ignored by the Oswald-did-it folks, even though Lee’s note was not dated and Marina’s information cannot be relied upon for accuracy concerning the Walker incident. For example, Marina claimed Lee hid the rifle under his raincoat as he walked (one version) or rode (another version) a bus to Walker’s house—though Lee never did own a raincoat. She said he buried the rifle (one version) or hid the rifle in bushes (another version) before (in one version) and after using it. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; " ><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; "><span class="Apple-style-span" >This writer, a witness who knew Oswald in New Orleans, never saw a rifle in Lee’s possession, and there has been no believable explanation of how “Lee’s” rifle made it unseen to Dallas from New Orleans.<span> </span>Nosy neighbors in New Orleans never reported seeing any rifle, though Marina said Lee dry-fired it for hours on their very visible screened porch at 4905 Magazine Street, which at the time had no bushes hiding the porch from full view. Neighbors instead reported seeing Lee reading for hours on the porch, even when they had unkind things to say about the accused assassin.</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12pt; "><o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; "><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">The Interactive Timeline Revisited<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; " >With these considerations in mind, it is time to look at the “Interactive Timeline” which is (unfortunately) quoted so frequently by students, teachers, researchers and others, straight from the internet<b>.<o:p></o:p></b></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="color: black; " ><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="color: black; " >The “Interactive Timeli</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">ne” comes up immediately when seeking Lee’s biography. Not only does it assert that Lee shot at Walker: it also offers as “fact” that Lee ordered a rifle and a revolver, despite massive evidence we now know exists that decry such statements. <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">One portion of this carelessly assembled timeline, concerning the ordering of a rifle and a revolver, as if by Oswald, offers dates between January 28, 1962 (sic) and March 25, 1963 for these events.<span> </span>It is an excellent example of how the Timeline is being used to frame Oswald to this very day. Here are the entries:<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br /><b><u>January 28, 1962</u> (sic)</b>: LHO orders a .38 caliber Smith and Wesson revolver by mail.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">February 13, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: The Oswalds attend a dinner party at the home of the De</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">Mohrenschildts.</span><span style="font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">February 22, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: The Oswalds attend a dinner party at the home of Everett Glover,</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"> </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">where they meet Ruth Paine.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 2, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: The Oswalds move to 214 West Neely Street.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 9-10, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: LHO takes photographs of the home of General Edwin Walker, a right-wing activist.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 11, 1963</span></u></b><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family: "Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">:</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"> The Militant, a prominent left-wing publication, publishes a letter signed</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black"> </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">L.H., probably written by LHO.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 12, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: Ruth Paine visits Marina at the new apartment. Also that day, LHO</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"> </span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">orders a rifle from Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 20, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: The rifle and the revolver are shipped.</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">March 25, 1963</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">: LHO picks up the weapons</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">First of all, before even looking at evidence that casts serious doubts on Oswald’s having ordered a revolver and a rifle, let’s use some common sense.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">According to the Timeline, Oswald ordered a revolver on January 28, <u>1962.</u> This is a typo. Parnell means 1963. Right away, we should question Parnell’s (and McAdams’) dedication to accuracy and detail about the Timeline. The typo ‘1962’ has been on this site since at least 2002, when I first copied it. As of Sept. 26, 2011, the typo has remained as ‘1962.’<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Setting that aside, we assume Parnell means ‘1963.’<span> </span>Now we get to the gist of the matter.<span> </span>According to the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald ordered a revolver on January 28, 1963.<span> </span>He ordered a rifle on March 12, 1963. The Warren Commission tells us that both of Oswald’s weapons were shipped on March 20, 1963 and that he picked up both weapons 5 days later, on March 25, 1963.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Let’s use some common sense and logic.<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The revolver</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""> was supposedly ordered January 28. It was shipped on March 20. That’s 4 days for January, 28 days for February, and 20 days for March = 52 days. <u>It took 52 days to fill the order. <o:p></o:p></u></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><u><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The rifle</span></u></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Arial","sans-serif""> was supposedly ordered March 12. It was shipped on March 20. <u>It took 8 days to fill the order.<o:p></o:p></u></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">We are supposed to blindly believe that <b>both</b> weapons, <b>though they were ordered 44 days apart from each other,</b> nevertheless were <b>shipped the same day</b>, both <b>arrived on the same day</b> and both <b>were picked up on the same day</b>.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Seems that people mean and low enough to plant evidence against Oswald were also not very bright.<span> </span>For more information on how Oswald was framed, on just THIS issue, please see these essays at SCRIBD:<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:.75in;mso-add-space:auto; text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Arial;color:black"><span>1)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span></b><!--[endif]--><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black;background:white">The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald: Oswald’s Handwriting Examined on Rifle/Revolver Order Forms</span></b><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/40814330/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Oswald-s-Handwriting-Examined-on-Rifle-Revolver-Order-forms">http://www.scribd.com/doc/40814330/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Oswald-s-Handwriting-Examined-on-Rifle-Revolver-Order-forms</a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 0in;margin-left:.75in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-add-space:auto;text-indent: -.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family: Arial;color:black"><span>2)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span></b><!--[endif]--><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald: Oswald’s Handwriting,<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The Sloppy Order Form, and Suggestions of Forgery<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/41200551/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Envelope-of-Oswald-s-Order-Form-for-a-Rifle-Suggests-Forgery">http://www.scribd.com/doc/41200551/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Envelope-of-Oswald-s-Order-Form-for-a-Rifle-Suggests-Forgery</a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left:.75in;mso-add-space:auto; text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:Arial;color:black"><span>3)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span></b><!--[endif]--><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">The Framing of Lee Harvey Oswald: Envelope of Oswald’s order form for a rifle Suggests Forgery<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/41200551/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Envelope-of-Oswald-s-Order-Form-for-a-Rifle-Suggests-Forgery">http://www.scribd.com/doc/41200551/The-Framing-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Envelope-of-Oswald-s-Order-Form-for-a-Rifle-Suggests-Forgery</a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><o:p> </o:p></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left:.75in;mso-add-space: auto;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><!--[if !supportLists]--><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:Arial;color:black"><span>4)<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span></b><!--[endif]--><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Lee Harvey Oswald and the Italian Rifle<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/39479174/Lee-Harvey-Oswald-and-the-Italian-Rifle">http://www.scribd.com/doc/39479174/Lee-Harvey-Oswald-and-the-Italian-Rifle</a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">To view only a few more examples of the many errors and evidence of overt prejudice in the Parnell timeline for Lee Harvey Oswald, which are read daily by trusting (we hope not) students, teachers and citizens of the world, presented, as it is, as a reference tool, please read this:<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Interactive Timeline of Lee Harvey Oswald: an Analysis<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/52670400/Interactive-Timeline-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-an-Analysis">http://www.scribd.com/doc/52670400/Interactive-Timeline-of-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-an-Analysis</a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Why It’s Important to Clear Oswald’s Name<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com">Lee Harvey Oswald </a>was accused of killing President John F. Kennedy. The media and Internet have been keeping that old lie alive. Evidence to the contrary is ignored, minimalized, declared unimportant. But it <b><i>IS </i></b>important. Clearing Oswald’s name means that these old lies will be seen for what they are, and that those who actually killed Kennedy, protected by the government and the media, will then be recognized. Since these people illegally and violently took over America, uncounted millions have suffered wars and financial disasters worldwide that can be traced to the radical changes in US policies and monetary practices.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:12.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><span> </span>It is our obligation to trace the handoffs of power. It is our obligation to stand tall on November, 2013, and fight the “official story” that is still being used to hide the taking of America from the people.<o:p></o:p></span></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-70987449840852434522011-08-25T20:50:00.001+03:002011-08-25T21:07:12.191+03:00THE MAN WHO SAW THE TRUTH ALTERED: ROY SCHAEFFER<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; background-color: rgb(217, 217, 217); "><h1 style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 16px; ">A GOOD MARINE WHO LEARNED THE STUNNING TRUTH</h1><h1 style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 16px; ">
<br /></h1><h1 style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica; font-size: 16px; ">Roy Schaeffer</h1><div class="content_right" style="float: right; "><div class="callout_box" style="display: block; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 6px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-left: 6px; "><div class="css_gray_white" style="border-top-color: rgb(102, 102, 102); border-right-color: rgb(102, 102, 102); border-bottom-color: rgb(102, 102, 102); border-left-color: rgb(102, 102, 102); border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 2px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; width: 130px; "><div class="box_content" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 6px; padding-right: 6px; padding-bottom: 6px; padding-left: 6px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-align: left; "><a href="http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/126454.pdf" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 204); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; ">List of Materials </a>
<br /><a href="http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/143640.pdf" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 204); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; ">List of Videos </a>
<br /><a href="http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/143642.pdf" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 204); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; ">List of OK City materials</a></div></div></div>
<br /></div><div class="content_main"><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><table width="530" border="0" cellpadding="1"><tbody><tr><td width="177" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "><img src="http://www.baylor.edu/content/imglib/145826.jpg" /></td><td style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">Roy Schaeffer served in the Marine Corps during the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations (1960-1962). After graduating from Aviation Electronics School in San Diego , he was assigned the same job<a href="http://WWW.LEE-HARVEY-OSWALD.COM"> Lee Harvey Oswald </a>had previously done at El Toro AFB.</p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">He was working for the<em> Dayton Daily News</em> (DDN) the weekend of the Kennedy assassination. On the morning after JFK was assassinated, Schaeffer was asked to retrieve two wire photos for the Sunday Edition of the DDN. Seeing those photos would one day start him on a journey investigating the Kennedy assassination, though before that time he had no reason to <a href="http://youtu.be/iHwbOWLs82M">question the Warren Commission's findings</a>.</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">
<br /><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">Fourteen years later, Schaeffer saw the wire photos as they were published on that Sunday and knew both photos were altered before the paper went to press. After finding more possible film alterations, studying the Warren Commission's report and recognizing two Marines' names in official reports, Schaeffer knew he had some insights, that by pure chance, no one else had.</p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">In 1986 he wrote <a href="/http://www.amazon.com/Trail-Assassins-Jim-Garrison/dp/0446362778">Jim Garrison</a> about an extra 8mm Zapruder film made during the <a href="http://www.history-matters.com/archive/contents/garr/contents_garr_trial.htm">Clay Shaw trial</a>. About a year later he received a copy from Fay Turner, a detective who questioned Oswald shortly after his arrest. By studying the Zapruder film in great detail, Schaeffer was able to make a composite blink-rate chart by plotting the emergency blinking lights on the front grill of the Presidential limousine frame by frame. By examining the blinking-light pattern, he concluded that Zapruder's camera ran at a faster speed than 18 frames per second, thus providing film-tampering evidence. Schaeffer testified before the <a href="http://insidethearrb.livejournal.com/">Assassination Records Review Board</a> in Dallas in 1994.</p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; "></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">Schaeffer co-authored a chapter entitled, "The Case for Zapruder Film Tampering" in Assassination Science, Experts Speak Out about the Death of JFK with Mike Pincher, Esq. and edited by <a href="http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2009/12/doug-horne-inside-arrb-part-1.html">James H. Fetzer</a>. Schaeffer has been researching the Kennedy assassination for more than 30 years and is now placing his research material at the Poage Library.</p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">
<br /></p><p style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; line-height: 14px; ">SEE MORE ABOUT SCHAEFFER <a href="http://www.baylor.edu/lib/poage/jfk/index.php?id=78510">HERE</a>. To read the full story about the real Lee Harvey Oswald, read the book<a href="http://www.meandlee.com"> ME & LEE</a>.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-4814820261899666682011-06-29T01:44:00.000+03:002011-08-29T03:40:55.850+03:00OSWALD'S INNOCENCE AND DISAPPEARING MINOX<a href="http://www.pimall.com/nais/nl/images/minoxsmall.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 224px; height: 168px;" src="http://www.pimall.com/nais/nl/images/minoxsmall.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>
<br />OSWALD'S INNOCENCE AND DISAPPEARING FILES<div>
<br /></div><div>Dr. Howard Platzman wrote an article about "The Minox Camera" after I told him I had seen <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a><a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">'</a>s Minox--and even seen Lee take a photograph with it. But that article, as have many defending <a href="http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com/">Oswald</a>, has vanished from the Internet.</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I first gave detailed information about the Minox to Platzman and to Martin Shackelford. Later, I repeated it to <i>Sixty Minutes </i>investigators in the presence of Dr. Platzman, Mike Wallace, Don Hewitt and Phil Scheffler.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">I will be asking Dr. Platzman to send me a copy of his article, so it can be published again. Meanwhile, some information about Lee's Minox can be found on the Internet, such as offered by Ralph Thomas, below. I have added a few comments of my own to this article.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">WE NEED TO ASK: WHAT WAS THE MINOX CAMERA LIKE, AND WHY IS IT SIGNIFICANT THAT THE </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; font-size: medium; ">'PENNILESS' OSWALD OWNED ONE?</span></div><div>
<br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">In his fine article,"<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; ">The History And Evolution Of Spy a</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; "><span>nd Investi</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">gative Photography"</span></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; "><span>by Ralph Thomas (see the article <a href="http://www.pimall.com/nais/nl/spyphotography.html">HERE</a>) we quickly learn that a Minox was</span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; "><span> a SPY CAMERA:</span></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><table width="680" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="4" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><tbody><tr><td width="462"><a href="http://www.pimall.com/nais/pivintage/minox.html" target="_blank" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">Minox Spy Camera 1940's, 1950's,1960's</a>
<br /><span class="Apple-style-span">Known throughout the world as the subminiature camera to have, the Mi</span><span class="Apple-style-span">nox spy camera
<br />was in the hands of almost all intelligence agents and spies in the 1940's, 1950's and
<br />1960's. The camera was very good at taking close up document photography.
<br />The camera was so small and so good for it's hay-day that it had restricted sales
<br />to governmental and military intelligence agencies in many parts of the world such
<br />as the United States. In the late 1960's through the 1980's if you were a private-eye
<br />and had one, you had the very latest high tech subminiature camera on the market.
<br />They were also very expensive.</span>
<br /></td></tr></tbody></table></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">Minox Spy Cameras stayed king of the subminiature camera world and released an endless </span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> selection of options including a high end light meter, various flash attachments, a subminiature </span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> tripod, telephoto lens and a right angle lens."</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> Ralph Thomas leads the reader to his logical analysis of the infamous</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> "b</span>ackyard photos" and why they are faked. You can read about his analysis <a href="http://www.pimall.com/nais/news/backyard.html">HERE.</a></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> Thomas goes on to say: "What's even more revealing is that Oswald himself owned a Minox Spy Camera. It was found among his possessions after the assassination, inventoried by the Dallas Police and then quickly <b>c</b></span><b>overed up. </b></div><div>
<br /></div><div>Some claim that the photo does NOT reveal a Minox Spy Camera, only a Minox Spy Camera Case and an Exposed Minox Light Meter. Ok, I will concede that fact! You can not see the camera. However, I have yet to know one person who would have had a Minox spy camera case and a light meter without the camera. Aside from the Minox, the photo (below) reveals a number of other interesting objects including other cameras, film, various small binoculars and other spy type photo and optic equipment. All owned by a man who was a minimum wage inventory clerk who lived in a rooming house. Yea right!"</div><div>
<br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">He shows us the offici</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">al photo made by</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; "> the Dallas </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">Polic</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 6px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 6px; font-size: medium; ">e:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></span></div><img src="http://www.pimall.com/nais/nl/images/oswaldevidence.jpg" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 583px; height: 467px;" border="0" alt="" /><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div>
<br /></div><div><b>Minox camera case,Minox film cassettes, light meter and other camera cases</b>...w<b>ith cameras inside, of course...these are expensive cameras--so why did Oswald supposedly have his photo taken with a cheap, inferior dime-store camera (Imperial Reflex)?</b> </div><div>
<br /></div><div>Could it be that the police didn't realize that Oswald, who was known to be employed at a low hourly rate, would not have been able to afford an expensive camera? How wrong they were! Lee Harvey Oswald was making $400 a month working for the FBI and the CIA, as he indicated to me himself when he gave me his income for an entire month ($400 in $20 bills) so I would have funds to meet him in Mexico, should plans go as expected (they didn't). That's equal to $2,880 in 2011 funds, $34,560 income "on the side" --since Oswald typically held low-paying jobs to have a visible source of income. </div><div>
<br /></div><div>But I digress. What the writer, above, failed to mention is that a Minox camera did show up in the Paine garage weeks later, in January, that detective Gus Rose insisted that he had indeed found a Minox with film in it inside Lee's seabag in that garage, and that he knew the difference between a camera with film in it, and a light meter.</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><p>Around 1978, an article written by Earl Golz gives us pertinent information about the Minox. Researcher A. J. Weberman had successfully petitioned to get the photos the FBI held that had come from "Oswald's Minox." Here is a portion of that article:</p><p><b>OSWALD PICTURES RELEASED BY FBI PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SMALL SPY CAMERA REVEALED AFTER ALMOST 15 YEARS</b></p><p>By EARL GOLZ</p><p>Photographs developed from Minox spy camera film found among Lee Harvey Oswald's personal possessions have been released by the FBI after being suppressed almost 15 years. About 25 images shot in foreign countries on two rolls from the miniature German-made camera were made available by the FBI under a Freedom of Information Act request by Alan Weberman, an independent assassination researcher in New York City.</p><p>More than 20 prints developed from one roll show civilian scenes apparently in Europe. Five shots from the other roll were military scenes either in the Far East or Central America. A Minox camera with a cassette film roll inside disappeared from Oswald's possessions after the FBI took custody of the property in 1963 from Dallas police, The News earlier had disclosed.</p><p>THE BUREAU LATER TRIED UNSUCCESSFULLY TO PRESSURE POLICE INTO CHANGING THEIR INVENTORY LIST TO READ MINOX LIGHT METER, NOT CAMERA, according to detective Gus Rose who said he found the camera in Oswald's seabag at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Michael Paine in Irving. The FBI had indicated the two rolls it developed were found separately in tin containers with ribbons tied around them. House Assassinations Committee investigators recently interviewed a former FBI agent who had custody of the Oswald property when the camera with film INSIDE DISAPPEARED, The New has learned. The former agent, Warren de Brueys, monitored Oswald's activities in the summer of 1963. He came to Dallas for two months to assist the Warren Commission investigation of the assassination.</p><p>"Monitoring is a word I would be reluctant to use," de Brueys told The News. "I never personally met him (Oswald), never knowingly personally talked to him. And I say that advisedly because - who knows - I don't think it happened. He may have called on the phone and made an inquiry one time without identifying himself."</p></span></div><div>=<b>==Note: de Brueys lied. He knew Lee personally.===</b></div><div><b>
<br /></b></div><div><b>Near the end of the article, we read this:</b></div><div>
<br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><p>TWO MONTHS LATER, ON JAN. 27, 1964, FBI AGENT THOMAS W. LENIHAN IN WASHINGTON TOLD J. GORDON SHANKLIN, AGENT IN CHARGE OF THE DALLAS FBI OFFICE, THAT DE BRUEYS' INVENTORY OF NOV. 26, 1963, SHOWED A MINOX CAMERA AMONG OSWALD'S POSSESSION, ACCORDING TO A LENIHAN MEMO. "I advised Shanklin that our laboratory claims that they did not have a Minox camera and that this item should be a Minox light meter," Lenihan's memo stated. "I requested that DL (Dallas FBI office) resolve whether or not a Minox camera was among the effects of Oswald. "</p><p>On 1-28-64 Shanklin advised Inspector Moore (Dallas police detective H.M. Moore) that Oswald did not have a Minox camera; that this was a Minox light meter." Two days after Lenihan told Shanklin the camera was a light meter, FBI agents visited the Paine home in Irving where Oswald's personal possessions were found and located a Minox camera in a coffee can in the garage. Mrs. Ruth Paine identified the camera as her husband's. The camera, which Michael Paine considered "unworkable" because of shutter damage, was forwarded to the Washington FBI office with "other evidence," according to an FBI teleprinter message dated Jan. 31, 1964. The message said Dallas police were "aware that no Minox camera (was) obtained in search" of the Paine residence and garage on Nov. 22-23, 1963. Detective Rose, however, remains adamant he found a Minox camera with film in it in Oswald's seabag when he made the initial search at the Paine home.</p><p><b>==Among Rose's many statements that he had indeed found a Minox is his mention of Ruth Paine watching him as he searched through Lee Oswald's possessions in the garage:</b></p></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">MORIARTY - This Minox camera. Was that with Ruth Paine's camera equipment?
<br />ROSE - No, it was in the sea bag.
<br />MORIARTY - Oh, in the sea bag.
<br />ROSE - Ruth Paine explained to me, she stood, she stood right there while we searched. And she explained that everything in that sea bag and a couple of boxes that were there was Oswald's and she never had any objection to any search of that. The only time she objected was when we searched her bedroom where a lot of her camera equipment was. She did not object when we searched Marina Oswald's bedroom, the one she used.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><b>===McAdams says that Officer Rose just doesn't know a camera from a light meter, even though Rose described removing a roll of film from the Minox. The Minox light meter is a box with a dial, but no openings. McAdams tries to explain the disappearing Minox like this (I've placed in bold face the most important part of his argument):</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">"The camera and the case were listed in the original DPD list, but only the case is visible, so the camera but not the case has to disappear for the photograph.<b> Also a light meter that is not on the DPD list at all has to appear from nowhere for the photo.</b> After the photo is taken the FBI and DPD make their joint inventory list. <b>The light meter has to disappear again </b>along with the camera case, but the Minox camera itself would have to reappear for the FBI/DPD inventory list. Now on the way to the FBI in Washington, the camera has to disappear again, while the light meter and camera case have to reappear. <b>If the assumption that the FBI made originally that the Minox light meter was mistaken for a camera is correct, then there would be no need for this convoluted scenario."</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><b>==The assumption, of course, forces us to say officer Rose was extremely stupid, for not once, but twice, the camera is listed in police inventory, and Rose simply refused to be bullied by the FBI to say it was a light meter. The easiest solution is not that an experienced detective would make such an error, but that the FBI substituted a Minox light meter for the Minox camera. Then they could do as they pleased with the photos, which might have been, for all they knew, spy photos, until analyzed. Can't have Oswald linked to spying, now, can we?</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "> <b>==now, back to the excerpted article...where Michael Paine steps forth to try to claim the camera is his, but will NOT take responsibility for any of the photos found...====</b></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><p>
<br />Michael Paine told The News he recalled taking photos in Korea while he was in the army in the early 1950s and later on a trip to Europe, but not with a Minox camera. He couldn't remember taking a photo of a tanker anchored offshore mountainous terrain, he said.</p><p><b>==Of course Mr. Paine couldn't remember taking such a photo, even though he has to claim the camera as his own. That camera will later disappear, according to Paine, stolen from him along with other cameras. In the National Archives, a Minox camera appears, but it -==just like the "Paine" Minox, is damaged! Damaged in the same place, too--so that the serial number cannot be seen. What a coincidence! How remarkable! The serial number of the Minox Michael Paine claimed belonged to him happened to be quite unique, as explained below:</b></p></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b><em style="font-style: normal; ">The Minox</em> III <em style="font-style: normal; ">camera</em>, <em style="font-style: normal; ">serial number</em></b></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b> 27259, was turned over to the FBI on January</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px;"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b> 31, 1964 by Michael Paine (found, he said, in a coffee can in his</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b> garage) ... ...yep, folks, the same garage which police had thoroughly searched --</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b>several times---the same garage where Lee's brother, Robert, also in January,</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b> "found" ... the cheap Imperial Reflex camera -- the one that finally linked</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b> the backyard photos to Lee (thanks to Robert's search of the garage!).</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px;"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: georgia; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: medium; "><b> </b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>
<br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Here's the receipt for the fortuitous, convenient, discovery of the missing Minox:</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: small; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: small; ">
<br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 9px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-size: small; ">.</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><p><img src="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/FBI13164cu.gif" /></p><p>
<br /></p><p><b>Warren Commission apologist John McAdams, who says Oswald did it, and calls anyone who comes to a different conclusion a "conspiracy buff," published this comment about the Minox and its serial number:</b></p></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">"The serial number reported by the FBI is controversial for several reasons. This camera is purported to be in the National Archives today, but the camera has been damaged and can not be opened. The serial number can only be viewed when the camera is open. The question then is how did the FBI report a serial number, when the number can not be seen. In addition the Minox III was a newer version of the Minox II. The serial number for the Minox II from 20379 to 31500 while Model III serial numbers started with 31275 and ended with 58499, so the 27259 number can not be the number on a model III. The question then becomes where did the FBI get this 27259 serial number?"</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; "><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>===Perhaps the number itself was reported for Lee's Minox before it was decided a substitute Minox was needed, a Minox III. Was the number then attributed to the Minox III that "belonged" to Michael Paine? Problem: if the camera is opened, the serial number could be seen to be different.</b></p><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>But Paine's camera was ''broken' and could not be opened. Nevertheless, the FBI is comfortable assigning the serial number to it--and even showing the camera that belonged to Michael Paine later to Lee's wife, Marina, to see if she could identify it. Not surprisingly, she could not/would not.</b></p><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>The Minox on display in the National Archives is damaged so we cannot see its serial number. </b></p><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>The other option -- McAdams' -- is that the FBI pretended to make up a serial number for the camera. Or for another camera, now lost. Every way it's examined, the FBI doesn't come up smelling like roses in this matter (as usual, when trying to dig up the truth about the Kennedy assassination)==</b></p><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>I'M A WITNESS</b></p><p><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>In my book,<i> Me & Lee</i>, I speak of the Minox. I encountered Lee's Minox when Kerry Thornley took a Polaroid photo of us, which Lee immediately destroyed. Kerry commented that Lee "still" had the camera, which means Lee had the camera when they were both based at El Toro, California. That's also where Gerry Hemming mentioned seeing Lee, and he, too, said Lee had a Minox, though his story of how Lee got it is very strange, indeed. In 1963, Xerox machines were few and far between. Lee told me he used the Minox to copy documents. He said he developed his own film.</b></span></p><p><b><span class="Apple-style-span">Witness: "Lee's Minox that made 150 photos at once." (No way!)</span></b></p><p><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>Lee also said something that I simply must have misremembered. I thought Lee told me that his Minox could take over 150 photos at once. I now know this is clearly impossible, unless somebody out there has heard of a radically modified Minox. Martin Shackelford, a researcher who knows his photos, corrected me when I stated this in 1999: that was impossible, he said. It's an example of memory failure on my part: I've been accused of having too good a memory, but in this case, memory failed me. However, maybe Lee had told me he had taken 150 photos at one time with the Minox, using the required rolls of film to do so. I, knowing nothing about the Minox except what it looked like, just misunderstood.</b></span></p><p><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>However, I saw Lee's Minox on several occasions. Both Shackelford and Dr. Howard Platzman received this information by email, in 1999, and Shackelford printed it out.</b></span></p><p><b><span class="Apple-style-span">
<br /></span></b></p><p style="font-size: medium; "><b>
<br /></b></p><p style="font-size: medium; ">
<br /></p><p style="font-size: medium; ">
<br /></p></span></div><div>
<br /></div><div></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-39958263659000522632011-06-12T20:17:00.000+03:002011-06-12T20:27:00.288+03:00THE FRAMING OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD: OSWALD, RECENTLY A MARINE, DID NOT TIE THE STRING ON THE BLANKET THAT SUPPOSEDLY HELD THE “KILLER” RIFLE<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="color:black">THE FRAMING OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD: OSWALD, RECENTLY A MARINE, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">DID NOT TIE THE STRING</i> ON THE BLANKET THAT SUPPOSEDLY HELD THE “KILLER” RIFLE<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black">by Judyth Vary Baker<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">The blanket that held the “killer” rifle was used to “prove” <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a> shot President John F. Kennedy. Persons who were known to have seen and touched the blanket are Lee Harvey Oswald, his wife Marina, their baby daughter June, Michael Paine (estranged husband of Ruth Paine and an “Oswald’ lookalike) and Ruth Paine (stepped on the blanket to show it was empty, to the [police—but how did she know it was empty?).<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">The blanket supposedly looked like this when tied up with the rifle inside:</span></p><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggrjvldLCMQWn7F8puEbWzcpDmsi3Z2ddZlJ68ZQVUuXrVmvbP-MFHXFsRWtP2HrRhJEw8-pg7C8jaRQmri75sYXnOD7Q-qfghmSar8kyI3yItkJ-Ag0yoOBC06RV9F42pk-HJtBF_Tqsc/s400/string+killer+rifle+blanket+lee+bottom+end.jpg" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 194px; height: 260px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5617384172798094466" /> <p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><br /></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Photo shows blanket tied at both ends with string.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"></span>The knot used was a “granny knot” plus a “bowtie” (shoestring) knot, difficult to see in the WC photo.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Oswald was a Marine who passed all his training, which included tying knots properly –importan</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px; ">t for anyone in the Navy or the Marines</span></p> <p><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">Eventually the Warren Commission questioned FBI experts about the blanket and the string that tied up the blanket at both ends.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>In the testimony below, the important parts are in bold face and underlined <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>like this</u></b>:<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p align="center" style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">TESTIMONY OF PAUL MORGAN STOMBAUGH beginning at 4H56...<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">The CHAIRMAN. The Commission will come to order. The purpose of today's hearing is to take the testimony of Paul Stombaugh and James O. Cadigan. Mr. Stombaugh is a hair and fiber expert with the FBI, and Mr. Cadigan is a questioned documents expert with the FBI. They have been asked to provide technical information to assist the Commission in its work.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><snip><o:p></o:p></snip></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">Mr. EISENBERG. Did you notice anything else about the blanket which you would like to relate, Mr. Stombaugh?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. The blanket exhibited much wear.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;text-align:center;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">58</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"> <hr size="3" width="100%" align="center"> </span></div> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">[NOTE <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>BY JVB: below, the “granny knot” is made to look—unless you are alert—as if it is a hard knot to untie instead of being a very easy knot to untie. This is either an accident of the stenographer or a deliberate misrepresentation. The word “not” has been added to make the information correct, below, as indicated by <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">[not]</b> ].<br /><snip><br />Mr. EISENBERG. In your opinion, would the blanket have made a secure package wrapped in the way and manner that it appeared to you?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes, sir; it would have. With the crease at fold "A," had it been folded down, it would have made a very snug and secure package containing some type of item in it.<br /><snip><br />Mr. EISENBERG. Any distinctive accidental markings on it?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. No; I found none. <o:p></o:p></snip></snip></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black">Mr. STOMBAUGH. No; I found none.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>What kind--was it tied in a knot?</u></b><br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>Yes, sir; it was tied in a granny knot, and also a bow knot</u></b>.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. Could you illustrate that for us? You are holding up a piece of string?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. This is another piece of string, not the original.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. Not the original.<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>A granny knot is a common knot, tied with two simple thumb knots.</u></b> It is [<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>not ]</u></b><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>a very hard knot to open as opposed to the boy scout knot, or the square knot rather, which is tied in this manner. This knot is very easy to open because all one has to do is to pull one free end of it and the other free end slides out.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. You are referring to the so-called "boy scout" knot?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. It is actually not a boy scout knot but a square knot.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. And you tie that left over right, right over left, is that the formula<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">? [E. refers to square, not granny knot]<br /></b>Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes; left over right and right over left.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. How do you spell that, by the way?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. G-r-a-n-n-y.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>The granny knot, Mr. Stombaugh, is this a common or an uncommon knot?</u></b><br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>It is a very common knot. I believe that knot is tied more than any other knot because it is right over right, right over right, and it is usually used by people wrapping packages who want it tied securely so the package will not come open.</u></b><br />Mr. EISENBERG. Did you say there was also a bow knot?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes, sir.<br />Mr. EISENBERG. Could you illustrate that?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>This is the type of knot we use when we tie our shoe strings. It is made by forming a loop with the one free end, and wrapping the other free end around it and pulling it through.<br /></u></b>Mr. EISENBERG<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>. Is that a hard or an easy knot to slip out, Mr. Stombaugh?</u></b><br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>This is very easy, because you just take one of the loose ends and pull it and the knot falls apart.<br /></u></b>Mr. EISENBERG. What was the relationship between the granny knot and the bow knot?<br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. I don't know. I have seen this numerous times, on numerous different occasions when one would either tie a granny knot or a square knot and follow it up with a bow knot. The granny knot would be to secure the package so it would not come loose. The bow knot is a temporary knot tied by one who wants the string to come off easily.<br /><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><u>Now why they would tie a granny knot and follow this up with a bow knot I don't know, unless they had some long loose ends which they wanted to slacken up, shorten up, rather, so as they would not be hanging down. </u></b><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:black"><br />Mr. EISENBERG. The Exhibit Paine No. 2 is tied into a knot at this point. Can you tell us what kind of a knot that is?<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto;text-align:center;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">59</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:center;line-height:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"> <hr size="3" width="100%" align="center"> </span></div> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black"><br />Mr. STOMBAUGH. This was a simple bow knot which I put into it. <!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">In the above statements, we clearly see that the ends of the string were still long, so whoever tied the ends then made a bowknot to bring the ends shorter. Mothers who tie their children’s shoelaces do this, of course, so the child will not trip. Ruth Paine had a young son who wore laced shoes. Those interested in reading more about Ruth Paine and the blanket are invited to read my blog entry of June 3, 2011 at:<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif""><a href="http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/2011/06/lee-harvey-oswald-and-blanket-bag-and.html">http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/2011/06/lee-harvey-oswald-and-blanket-bag-and.html</a><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif"">Ruth and Michael Paine’s connections with the blanket are established and suspicious.</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">The question: did Lee Harvey Oswald tie the knots in the string?<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:black">Answer: </span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">Every Marine learned to tie <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">the Square Knot, Bowline, Figure-Eight Retrace</b>, and the <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Round Turn with Two Half Hitches. People who have not been in the Navy or Marines may not know how to tie a reliable knot and are most likely to use the granny knot.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span><o:p></o:p></b></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif"">What is a granny knot?<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 15.0pt;mso-outline-level:2"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Arial Unicode MS";mso-bidi-font-family:"Arial Unicode MS"; color:black">granny knot</span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 15.0pt"><b><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:#333333">–noun</span></i></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";color:#333333"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height: 15.0pt;background:white"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:#333333">an incorrect version of a square knot in which <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/the"><span style="color:#333333">the</span></a> bights cross each other in the wrong direction next to the end, so as to produce a knot that is insecure.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif"">(http://dictionary.reference.com/)<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:black">Wikipedia: “The reef knot is commonly taught as</span></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"> </span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">left over right, tuck under</span></i></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"> </span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">then</span></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"> </span></span><span class="apple-style-span"><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%; font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">right over left, tuck under</span></i></span><span class="apple-style-span"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height: 115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">. The granny knot is the first step repeated twice,</span></b></span><span class="apple-converted-space"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black"> </span></b></span><span class="apple-style-span"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><i><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">left over right, tuck under</span></i></b></span><span class="apple-style-span"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:black">. <u>This is a very common mistake made by people learning to tie a reef knot</u>.”<o:p></o:p></span></b></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">I knew Lee Harvey Oswald.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>And I knew Lee knew how to tie a reef knot: as mentioned in my book, <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"><a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Me & Lee</a></i></b>, he had tied string across the two posts of my bed at 1032 Marengo, upon which he had hung balloons and a “welcome home” sign written in crayon.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>He used reef knots: he did not use granny knots.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>I’m the one, after all, who finally had to untie the string and take the sign down! I had training of my own in tying knots after years in Girl Scouts.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>The knots Lee tied were reef knots.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>So, when I came across the testimony (above) while researching the blog that eventually became a paper about the blanket, that <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>“granny knot” information took a few days to sink in. Then I realized that I was looking at evidence—real evidence—that Lee had been framed.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; color:black">NO Marine would have used granny knots to tie that blanket.<o:p></o:p></span></b></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:black">We had already established in the blog article that Lee, who adored his little girl June, would not have used the blanket Marina said Junie “loved to play with” in which to wrap a rifle.<o:p></o:p></span></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family: "Georgia","serif"">Knots are so important in the Navy, Marines and CAP (Civil Air Patrol) that everyone enrolled is expected to learn them. Lee Harvey Oswald was taught how to properly tie knots when a young teen.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>He was in the CAP and learned knot-tying there even before he entered the Marines and got yet more course instructions on knot tying, which is used on boats and ships as well as in rescue and search and rescue operations.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>The USNSCC manual has an entire chapter (#7) devoted to knots.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Lee Harvey Oswald tied knots under military-style supervision for more than three years and was barely 24 in November, 1963.</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";color:#333333"> </span><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif""><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span class="apple-style-span"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; line-height:115%;font-family:"Georgia","serif";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:black">Other names for the granny knot show it’s the kind of knot an uninstructed person uses:<o:p></o:p></span></span></p> <table class="MsoNormalTable" border="1" cellspacing="5" cellpadding="0" width="415" style="width:248.7pt;mso-cellspacing:3.0pt;margin-left:12.0pt;background:#F9F9F9; border:solid #AAAAAA 1.0pt;mso-border-alt:solid #AAAAAA .75pt;mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184;mso-padding-alt:2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt"> <tbody><tr style="mso-yfti-irow:0;mso-yfti-firstrow:yes;height:44.8pt"> <td valign="top" style="border:none;padding:2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt;height: 44.8pt"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 6.0pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:18.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">Names<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </td> <td valign="top" style="border:none;padding:2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt;height: 44.8pt"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 6.0pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:18.0pt"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">Granny knot, False knot, Lubber’s knot, Calf knot, Booby knot<o:p></o:p></span></p> </td> </tr> <tr style="mso-yfti-irow:1;mso-yfti-lastrow:yes;height:61.1pt"> <td valign="top" style="border:none;padding:2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt;height: 61.1pt"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 6.0pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:18.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">Caveat<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> </td> <td valign="top" style="border:none;padding:2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt 2.4pt;height: 61.1pt"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom: 6.0pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:18.0pt"><span style="font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; color:black">Should not be used as a bend. Inferior to reef knot for binding purposes, it can release suddenly and unpredictably.<o:p></o:p></span></p> </td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;line-height:115%">(Wikipedia)<o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Conclusion: yet another indication that <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a> was framed for the murder of JFK, in this instance with the help of someone who did not know how to make a proper knot -- possibly a woman.<o:p></o:p></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-78871202213376845022011-05-06T02:29:00.000+03:002011-05-06T05:56:01.899+03:00When Witnesses Are Attacked by TheoristsPosted 12 April 2011 - 04:11 PM<br />I realize that people are tired of this - I sure am, but this deserves a more detailed response. My comments in caps for clarity.<br /><br /><b>When Witnesses Are Attacked by Theorists:</b><br /><br />Somebody has a theory, but an inconvenient witness stands in the way of the theory, the book and the reputation of the theorist. The Theorist never met the person he has studied. The task of the theorist, in order to proceed, is to destroy the credibility of the witness.<br /><br />In the matter of the Kennedy assassination saga, we have both credible and non-credible witnesses, of course, but a large number of witnesses who have defended the innocence of Lee Harvey Oswald in one way or another have been murdered or otherwise silenced.<br /><br />When a witness is supported by other witnesses who verify what the witness says, it is then necessary to discredit or ignore the other witnesses.<br /><br />In my case, witnesses who have verified my relationship with Lee Oswald ---Anna Lewis,Mac McCullough, and Charles Thomas ---have been either disparaged or ignored. After all, they verify that I knew Lee Harvey Oswald and was his confidante. Shame on <i><b>them</b>, </i>right?<div><br /></div><div><b>How inconvenient that the witness has witnesses.<br /></b><br />But when a witness is <b>also </b>recognized by a researcher who has gathered evidence for years supporting what the witness has stated, atop his own personal experiences, it is then necessary to also discredit the researcher.<br /><br />In my case, Edward T. Haslam,a native of New Orleans who has presented his private experiences and research in two books, must be disparaged --or ignored. Haslam, whose reputation for honesty and personal presence in New Orleans are twin towers of credibility,must have his reputation hijacked and shot down. Shame on <b><i>him</i></b>! Right?<br /><br />I note that one way to attempt to discredit Haslam is to offer the almost religious belief that linear particle accelerators are incapable of vaporizing human tissue and bone. Haslam has kept to himself proof positive that this event has, in fact, occurred, having interviewed persons who have reported such an event. Haslam has wisely accumulated much supporting evidence for his statements,but does not ask the reader to accept his conclusions. He only asks that they be considered.<br /><br />Oh, and we are somehow supposed to have colluded--met somehow--to agree on what Haslam wrote in his book, though Haslam's name was unknown to the critics now scrambling to poke holes in what Haslam has always presented as the most reasonable explanations for what he discovered. I do not see Haslam presenting anything as "set in stone" except what he has personally experienced.<br /><br />Haslam saw for himself that the remnants of Guy Banister's files were inexplicably in the hands of INCA years after Banister's death.<br />Haslam was present in classrooms when various events were discussed But now, Haslam is supposed to be lying about his personal experiences?<br /><br />These critics and researchers who have tried over the years to heap the blame on Lee Harvey Oswald for Kennedy's death have had to call dozens of decent, good, honest people --including Haslam--liars and connivers.<br /><br />And so we enter the vapid world of Stephen Roy--AKA David Blackburst--who assures everyone that a man he never met --David William Ferrie-- never met me! He relies on the accounts of friends of Ferrie -- all of whom I had avoided at all costs. When necessary, he denies what Jim Garrison or others say (yes, they are either lying, or mistaken).</div><div><br /></div><div>He has replied to my sincere but necessary essay about how he manipulated facts to try to entrap me, a humble witness who simply is telling it like it is. Mr. Roy is not stupid. He is aware that for years he has portrayed Ferrie in a particular way. he has described him as a broken, impoverished man at the end of his life, and will not consider that Ferrie, still in his forties when deceased, might have not died of natural causes.<br /><br />I hoped that Mr.Roy/Blackburst would be able to see the David Ferrie I knew -- a brighter, funnier, deeper and far more intelligent man than Mr.Roy/Blackburst portrays.</div><div><br />Mr.Roy's/Blackburst's following has been created largely because he has posted almost everything known about Ferrie from official records, with his private observations supported with comments from ever-anonymous 'friends. ' From the beginning, though Mr. Roy/Blackburst apparently scoured the earth to meet "all" of Ferrie's friends, he never met me.<br /><br />Being a witness was never a position I wanted to be in. But there was no help for it. After 3.5 decades,the bad guys seemed to be winning. Lee Oswald's children were grown up and never knew all that their father had done to try to save Kennedy. It was time to tell them. And you.<br /><br />Edward Haslam did not know about me or find me when he wrote his first book. <i>Sixty Minutes</i> told him about me, and he was skeptical and dismissive. Fine. Understandable. The story I had to tell was complex.</div><div><br /></div><div>But then, over a period of years, after much research, Haslam understood the big picture. A complex picture. One that needed to be totally discredited, especially by the people who assert or imply (as does Mr.Roy/Blackburst) that Oswald killed Kennedy. Atop that, Haslam's personal experiences verifying that big picture have to be called outright lies, of course.<br /><br /> Haslam's is an important voice telling the American people the truth about the polio vaccine's link to cancer-causes monkey viruses, and the New Orleans milieu that produced it.<br /><br />And so we enter the arguments that Mr.Roy has placed (in "CAPS") in what I have had to speak about,concerning Mr.Roy's/Blackburst's handling of me as a witness.<br /><br />Let's look at what he has to say.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">STEPHEN ROY, AKA DAVID BLACKBURST, "TAKES THE GLOVES OFF"</span><br /><br /><br />DAVID FERRIE: WHY HE IS IMPORTANT IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION -- AND EFFORTS BEING MADE TO HIDE IT<br /><br />Judyth Vary Baker<br /><br />David made a joke about me and Mary Sherman and himself when we three met for the first time. “Dr. Mary, Dr. Ferrie, and Dr. Vary!” he laughed. He repeated “Mary, Ferrie and Vary” a few more times that summer. It was an example of Dave’s wit and affability.<br /><br />I GUESS A REAL DOCTOR LIKE SHERMAN HAD NO PROBLEM BEING COMPARED TO TWO NON-DOCTORS. WHAT EVIDENCE DO WE HAVE THAT THIS JOKE (OR THIS ENCOUNTER) EVER TOOK PLACE?</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Mr. Roy/Blackburst is the one who has to present evidence that this encounter did not take place. ===</span></b></div><div><br />Today, efforts are being made to erase all traces of David Ferrie as an active anti-Castro CIA asset in 1963 who knew many details about who killed John F. Kennedy, and why. Almost desperate means are being used on the Internet, in rigged computer re-enactments, and in media statements of “fact” to train the public to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed the president and that our government had nothing to do with it. Most of those who fight the truth emerged after the film "JFK" revived America’s attention concerning Lee Oswald’s innocence or guilt.<br /><br />Hundreds of thousands of documents have been forced from government files since then. I have always said “Time is on my side” since I spoke out in 1999 that Lee tried to save Kennedy’s life. Today, we have Abraham Bolden and James Douglass and Douglas Horne and Edward T. Haslam and any number of other intrepid writers/witnesses who stand with me on that fact and others, that were initially mocked or discarded when I first asserted them.<br /><br />The role of David Ferrie was important in the Kennedy assassination. Efforts to recreate David Ferrie into a dumbed-down version – one who never knew Lee Oswald or me – have been strenuous and persistent and ongoing to this day.<br /><br />I KNEW DAVID WILLIAM FERRIE<br /><br />Lee and I both thought it interesting that “David” was our favorite male name, while “William” was my father’s middle name and “Ferrie” rhymed with “Vary” (my maiden name). We saw it as a kind of confluence of coincidences – a confluence that extended broadly into our daily lives in other directions, as well. Certainly, David Ferrie was not someone who could easily be mistaken for anybody else.<br /><br />WHAT IS THIS FIXATION WITH ALLEGED SIMILARITIES?</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===In Mr.Roy's/Blackburst's world. describing what friends have in common --a way to show why we liked each other--is a "fixation."===</span></b><br /><br />David W. Ferrie is probably best known today through his portrayal by Joe Pesci in Oliver Stone’s film "JFK". Ferrie was taller and had a deeper voice,<br /><br />ABOUT WHICH BAKER SAID NOTHING UNTIL I POSTED IT ON THE INTERNET.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Mr. Roy.Blackburst errs. In 1999, I responded to questions about the film "JFK" asked by investigators at Sixty Minutes, and soon after, by Shackelford and Platzman.===</span></b><br /><br />but Pesci did a good job of showing Ferrie’s level of high energy, his intelligence, and his feelings. I know, because I knew David Ferrie.<br /><br />WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS, FALL BACK ON "THE EVIDENCE THAT IT'S TRUE IS THAT I KNOW IT FROM MY OWN KNOWLEDGE." I DON'T BELIEVE BAKER EVER KNEW FERRIE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Mr. Roy/Blackburst expresses an opinion: "I don't believe," he says. I express that I knew David Ferrie. It is a statement of personal experience that Mr.Roy/Blackburst cannot match, since he never met Ferrie.===</span></b><br /><br />There are some people in New Orleans who knew him, too. One “Ferrie expert” claims that, since these men (most of whom were homosexuals)<br /><br />THAT'S NOT TRUE. BUT IT'S INTERESTING HOW YOU USE THE WORD.</div><div><br /></div><div>===The reason given by Mr. Roy/Blackburst, repeatedly, for not naming "Ferrie's friends"is that they are homosexual. But even when seeking "witnesses," Mr.Roy/Blackburst uses a sifting system that will only accept certain kinds of witnesses--<b>the kind he wants</b>--as evidenced here:</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.spiderwww.com/lost.htm">http://www.spiderwww.com/lost.htm</a></div><div><dl style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><dt><b>Date:</b></dt><dd>July 26, 2003</dd><dt><b>Time:</b></dt><dd>02:43 PM</dd></dl><h3 style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">comments</h3><p style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">MSY/HOU employees info: email: blackburst@aol.com submit: \ Date: Monday July 28, 2003 Time: 08:43 AM</p><p style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">comments:</p><p style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">I am on the staff of a college; I am very interested in a controversial EAL pilot named David Ferrie, who served at MSY 1951-1961. There is a lot of exaggerated information about him, but I am trying to find out what he was really like, to set the trecord straight. I will eventually write it all up for publication. I am looking for people who knew him, flew with him (mostly MSY-HOU) any available pictures, and the like. This is a serious effort, not sensationalist at all. Confidentiality will be assured if requested. Thank you!</p></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Note that witnesses who might have known something remarkable about Ferrie might not respond, since their information might be considered 'exaggerated.' He wishes to 'set the record straight' --so if a witness knew something that might make Ferrie look weird or odd, or make the witness sound like a 'sensationalist,' that witness would not be likely to respond. This clever method sifts out most who might have dared speak of extraordinary or unusual things about Ferrie. While we want truthful witnesses, we must accept all for inspection,not cull out those who do not suit our theory. Those 'ordinary responses' can skew the results,as any statistician knows.=====</span></b><br /><br />did not see me with Ferrie, therefore I am to be dismissed as a witness. As I pointed out long ago, when this was not a generally known fact, Ferrie was bisexual,<br /><br />AGAIN, I WAS THE FIRST TO POST THIS ON THE INTERNET. THIS IS ONE REASON WHY I AM SOMETIME RELUCTANT TO POST ANY NEW INFO ABOUT FERRIE - IT IS THEN RECYCLED.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Mr.Roy/Blackburst declares that he is the 'first' to post this on the Internet, but I spoke of this long before I knew he existed. I suppose Mr.Roy/Blackburst thinks I did a lot of research on the Internet.If so,why did I expose myself to JOHN McADAMS' NEWSGROUP, that attacks witnesses? Why did I try to reason with that group so long? I did not know. I knew nothing of what Mr. Blackburst posted. I had to get a university professor to tell me where to go on the Internet. Be that as it may, Dave was bisexual.===</span></b><br /><br />though his proclivity to seduce teen-age boys is what’s best known about him – except for his sometimes alarming looks, due to how he tried to handle his alopecia problem. Alopecia is a hair loss condition that can be recurrent or permanent. The hair loss can extend to all parts of the body, including even eyelashes.<br /><br />ANYTHING CAN BE LOOKED UP ON THE INTERNET, CAN'T IT? </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==This is information, of course, that readers needs to know about Ferrie.===</span></b><br /><br />Dave didn’t lose all of his hair, but for all practical purposes, he was bald enough to need to wear a wig. I saw an old wig that was much smaller than the one he usually wore in 1963. I concluded from our talks that Dave had not one, but several bouts with alopecia, where some hair grew back again before he finally lost most of it.<br /><br />AGAIN, I FIRST POSTED THIS ON THE NEWSGROUPS IN THE LATE 1990s.</div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Everyone knows I had no access to Internet without buying time with special cards at the university.My daughter used a computer, but I was not computer savvy until 1999. I did not know how to access a thing, as my daughter and all my friends know. Shackelford taught me the existence of google and how to log on using aol, as I was automatically logged on when I presented a student number at the university, and sat down at a "Sun system"computer. It had a time limit. Didn't even know who "Blackburst" was.===</span><br /><br />None of his wigs looked natural. As for his eyebrows, they did not exist: his “made up” eyebrows were thickly penciled in. On many occasions, bits of fuzz were carefully stuck on these drawn-on eyebrows in an attempt to look more natural. It was a futile attempt.<br /><br />But appearances meant little to me compared to being in his presence and soaking up what he had to say. He was a true “Renaissance man” with considerable knowledge in a wide range of fields. His success for a considerable time in the role of leading and teaching teen-aged boys in the Civil Air Patrol deserves to be emphasized, since efforts have been made to downplay Dave’s charismatic qualities.<br /><br /><b>NOT BY ME</b>. HE IS REMEMBERED BY THOSE WHO REALLY KNEW HIM AS BRILLIANT, BUT SOMETIMES NOT PUT TO GOOD USE.</div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" ><br /></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==In Mr.Roy's/Blackburst's own words: "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">While Ferrie is admired by his friends for his intellect, humor and unselfishness, there is an unsavory side to him. He imposed his sexuality on underage boys. He had a big mouth and said things that later came back to haunt him. He did not take care with his personal cleanliness. He was drawn to pornography and may have experimented with drugs. For these reasons, Ferrie made (and still makes) an easy villain/victim."</span></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">From: blackburst@aol.com (Blackburst)<br />Subject: Re: Jack Martin & Dean Andrews<br />Date: 25 Aug 1999 00:00:00 GMT<br />Message-ID: <19990825093221.09318.00003559@ng-ca1.aol.com></span></span></b></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "></span>===</span></b></div><div><br />A now-famous photo shows Ferrie and Lee Harvey Oswald in the same camp-out.<br /><br />AGAIN, A SARCAP EXERCISE, TAKEN IN AUGUST 1955, 8 YEARS BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION, WHEN OSWALD WAS 15.</div><div><br /></div><div>=<b><span class="Apple-style-span" >=A bivouac, typically lasted all weekend.===<br /></span></b><br />I wish to say without equivocation that Dave Ferrie would not have forgotten that Lee was in this small group,<br /><br />FERRIE SAID THAT, OF HUNDREDS OF CADETS AND SCHOOL STUDENTS, HE DID NOT RECALL OSWALD'S FEW WEEKS IN THE CAP.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Ferrie, under examination by the FBI, was being asked about the accused assassin the weekend of the assassination and would never have admitted knowing Lee.===</span></b><br /><br />even if an incident had not occurred between them that at first soured, but eventually secured, their mutual respect and friendship.<br /><br />AN INCIDENT THAT ONLY BAKER CLAIMS HAPPENED, AND HAS BEEN CHALLENGED FOR ITS TIME ACCURACY.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==It happened.===<br /></span></b><br />Much has been said by anti-Oswald “Ferrie experts” that Ferrie was involved in CAP with over a thousand teen-aged boys and had not known him personally; David, of course, denied ever knowing Lee when questioned by authorities after the assassination.<br /><br />ANTI-OSWALD? ALL I HAVE SAID IS THAT I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT OSWALD WAS TOTALLY INNOCENT. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===Those who read your posts with care understand what I mean.===</span></b></div><div><br /></div><div>AS FOR WHAT FERRIE FIRST TOLD THE AUTHORITIES: "FERRIE CLAIMED THAT ONE PHOTO [OF OSWALD] LOOKED LIKE SOMEONE HE MAY HAVE KNOWN. FERRIE STATED THAT OSWALD COULD HAVE BELONGED TO THE CIVIL AIR PATROL WHILE HE WAS CONNECTED WITH THAT ORGANIZATION BUT HE HAD NO INDEPENDENT RECOLLECTION OF THIS." THIS IS A BIT DIFFERENT THAN WHAT BAKER SAID, AND NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE PHOTO SHE CITES AS PROOF THAT HE LIED.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===David Ferrie knew that somebody likely remembered seeing him with Lee Harvey Oswald, and it was best to show some inkling of 'remembrance' to cover his rear.===</span></b><br /><br />Moreover, Ferrie’s friends, in general, gave untrustworthy testimonies (and those who are alive probably still do) rather than have the whisper of suspicion that they might have been associated with somebody who could have been involved in a plot to kill the President. It is highly unlikely that any of Ferrie’s friends would ever change their stories and thus prove they had committed perjury or lied to government officials. They will stick to their original stories.<br /><br />FIRST, SOME OF THE PEOPLE I'VE SPOKEN WITH WERE FERRIE'S FRIENDS, BUT OTHERS WERE ENEMIES, CASUAL ACQUAINTANCES, BUSINESS ACQUAINTANCES, ETC. SOME TESTIFIED OR GAVE STATEMENTS IN THE PAST, BUT MOST DID NOT. FOR WHAT REASON WOULD THEY ALL BE TELLING COORDINATED LIES, MORE THAN 40 YEARS LATER? SO, WE SHOULD DISREGARD PEOPLE WITH PROVEN RELATIONSHIPS WITH FERRIE, TO BUTTRESS THE UNPROVEN CLAIMS OF BAKER? ARE YOU SERIOUS?</div><div><br /></div><div>=<b><span class="Apple-style-span" >=They are 'anonymous.' Largely and consistently,you do not name these people. And they 'all'seem to 'agree' with whatever you say. You have said, when asked, that they do not wish to be known because it could hurt their careers, etc.===</span></b><br /><br />In my case, however, I am pledged to telling exactly what the situation was. I don’t care how many “Ferrie experts” come out of the woodwork declaring that Ferrie’s friends never saw any mice (which were used as subjects in our bio-weapon research), or never knew about the technical scientific research that Dave was conducting in 1963. I even remember quite clearly asking Dave, at the only party I attended at his apartment, “Where are the mice?”<br /><br />“I don’t want anybody messing with my mice,” he replied.<br /><br />He had moved them – probably a block down the street – where hundreds (perhaps thousands) of mice were being inoculated with a cancer-causing monkey virus that had been roasted with deadly radiation. I saw a “crusty old rat” that Dave had in his apartment the first few times I visited there. Later, I saw cages, too, housing about 50 mice. These mice were all white, with red eyes – lab mice – and they were quite young. They were actually being killed and replaced constantly but, since they all looked alike, nobody would have guessed.<br /><br />BALONEY. I HAVE NEVER FOUND ANY PERSON WHO SAW MICE IN THAT APARTMENT AT THAT TIME. SOME OF HIS FRIENDS LIVED THERE FOR PERIODS OF TIME. FERRIE'S APARTMENT WAS A HANGOUT FOR A GROUP OF PEOPLE. HOW DID HE HIDE 50 OR MORE MICE, SHERMAN, OSWALD AND BAKER FROM THEM, CONSISTENTLY, ALL SUMMER?</div><div><br /></div><div>=<b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Ferrie was working hard on the Marcello case and on his Eastern Air Lines matters. And more. Also was out of town to Miami, etc. That's why he needed help. Read the book to see how the mice were handled.===</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Stephen Roy (who calls himself "David Blackburst" in the John McAdams’ newsgroup, where all kinds of anti-Oswald mischief is carried on) has presented himself as a person who has been deeply interested for decades in David Ferrie. One might ask why, since Mr. Roy has absolutely nothing in common with Ferrie – except the ability to play music.<br /><br />I BECAME INTERESTED IN FERRIE MANY YEARS AGO, OBSERVING THAT HE PLAYED A MAJOR ROLE IN ASSASSINATION LITERATURE, BUT THAT VERY LITTLE RELIABLE BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION HAD YET EMERGED. I ACQUIRED A BUNCH OF DOCUMENTS AND DID INTERVIEWS, AND REALIZED THAT I HAD ENOUGH FOR BOOK (ON WHICH I CAN ONLY SPEND A FEW HOURS A WEEK). BUT YES, I DO HAVE SOME MUSICAL SKILL.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >--A few hours a week for twenty years is a lot of hours. You have done well. But it doesn't match knowing the person 'in person.' Any more than hearing about what a hamburger tastes like listening to others, and never eating one.==</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Roy has recently declared that Lee Oswald had probably killed Kennedy,<br /><br />I FIND IT HARD TO DISMISS ALL OF THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AS PHONEY, BUT I'M NOT CLOSED-MINDED.</div><div><br /></div><div>=<b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Mr.Roy/Blackburst is probably the most intelligent and non-mendacious of all the LNers.===</span></b><br /><br />following in the footsteps of several others in McAdams’ newsgroup, who remind me of Gary Mack (someone who wants all my readers to know that he does NOT make a six-figure salary as the Curator of The Six Floor Museum).<br /><br />SURE, SET UP MACK AS THE DEMON, THEN ASSOCIATE ME WITH HIM.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Sorry.Maybe I should have said John McAdams, David Reitzes, Ken Rahn,Dave Perry and David VonPein. ===<br /></span></b><br />Mr. Roy has been busy compiling statements from Dave’s former friends and accumulating data, purportedly for a long-awaited biography of him.<br /><br />PURPORTEDLY? NOW SHE'S ACCUSING ME OF HAVING A SECRET AGENDA. SHE SHOULD TALK WITH STEVE TYLER, WHO HAS READ MOST OF MY MANUSCRIPT.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Steve Tyler's "He Must have Something" is a film that shows Jim Garrison had "nothing." "Purportedly" because some two decades have passed and only a few pages have been revealed.===</span></b><br /><br />For years now, he has not wavered in his efforts to create the impression of a David Ferrie who was very different from the man I knew, a man whom Mr. Roy never met.<br /><br />THE REASON FOR THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT I'VE RESEARCHED DOCUMENTS AND DONE INTERVIEWS WITH PEOPLE WHO REALLY KNEW HIM, NOT WITH SOMEONE WHO NEVER MET FERRIE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===Though you have met a wide assortment of people who claimed to have known Ferrie, you never met me -- a serious flaw in your record, considering that you have tried to meet everybody you can--yet you avoided meeting me from the very beginning. I do believe Ferrie acted differently around me because he knew I had wanted to become a nun--a Sister of St. Francis--and could pray the whole Latin mass right along with him. Perhaps because we talked so much about religion,I saw a side of him that his boyfriends did not.===</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Roy’s David Ferrie is described as a broken man in 1963 who had lost his dream job with Eastern Air Lines, and whose life and prospects had deteriorated to a point of no return. His considerable past activities in the anti-Castro movements had all but ceased, according to Mr.Roy. All he was interested in was getting his job back and piloting flights for the godfather, Carlos Marcello. He had moved into a crummy little apartment and was going nowhere with his life. His life had come to a screeching halt, to hear Mr. Roy tell it.<br /><br />SEE MY EARLIER POST. FERRIE'S MORALS ARRESTS CAUSE HIM TO LOSE HIS JOB, HIS STANDING WITH THE ANTI-CASTRO MOVEMENT, HIS HOME AND HIS FALCON SQUADRON. AND IN A ROUNDABOUT WAY, HIS MOTHER.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==But he went back to associating with the CAP after the Falcons split up, which I do not see you mentioning. Sergio Smith lost his standing, too, but that movement folded at the same time. Layton Martens said Dave successfully sued Eastern over the arrests and got a settlement, as the arrests never led to convictions, the three boys retracted their accusations, and so on...not that Ferrie was an angel. We have Ferrie still in the same apartment, has a car, is still flying for the Marcellos, is an official in a company registered in the state (Professional Research, Inc.,March, 1965), and his income was almost double above the poverty line, according to the US census stats.===</span></b><br /><br />To consider Ferrie as intelligent enough to do cancer research or to be involved in plots to kill Castro or Kennedy or, for that matter, to have any interest whatsoever in his former pursuits, is, according to Mr. Roy, not remotely plausible, since Ferrie’s former – and, by the way, always un-named – friends all deny. Mr. Roy concedes that Ferrie once ‘did’ have lots of mice, though he doubts that they were used for research: apparently the same man who had a human skeleton set up with its own electrified circulatory system (a teaching tool for young cadets) would keep hundreds of mice merely as pets!<br /><br />AGAIN, SOMETHING I POSTED HERE 6 YEARS AGO.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===Yes, you did. So,nobody else was ever bout all the stuff he had, when he talked about all he'd done as a 'doctor' to anybody who'd listen? The HSCA heard from Dr. Yager, to whom Ferrie spoke 30 minutes about his expertise in science, medicine and psychiatry.==</span></b></div><div><br /></div><div>When I spoke out as a witness in 1999, I immediately identified David Ferrie – just as Jim Garrison had done so some 30 years earlier – as a primary figure in the case. Efforts to discredit me have often rested on disagreeing with what I’ve said about David Ferrie concerning his considerable medical expertise. I have spoken out that David Ferrie was actively involved in cancer research activities in the summer of 1963. Mr. Roy has stated that Ferrie’s friends have claimed they saw “nothing” that remotely seemed like cancer research going on and that they never saw me.<br /><br />AND THAT'S WHERE THE EVIDENCE STANDS: A BIG PILE OF TRUE EVIDENCE VS. BAKER'S CLAIMS. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===Name them.I will confront them. But you do not name them. You will wait until they're dead. And don't count Al Beauboeuf,who does not want to commit perjury, who will stick to his story, who, by the way, corresponds with you.===</span></b></div><div><br /><br />Forget the fact that Dave worked daily for Marcello’s attorney downtown and that I was regularly in his apartment several afternoons a week<br /><br />A FACT? SHE'S CITING HER UNSUPPORTED CLAIM AS A FACT?</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===My point was that I was present in Dave's apartment when nobody was there. the 'fact' was that Dave was at work, and therefore there were no witnesses. However, I have proven by other means that I had been there.===</span></b><br /><br />– and knew how to “clean up and put away.“ I have described the kind of work that was being done at his apartment and how much of the equipment would not have seemed special to untrained eyes, such as a Waring blender and what looked like a pressure cooker – an autoclave that they would never have identified as such, because of their lack of technical knowledge.<br /><br />SURE. THE PEOPLE WHO LIVED AND PARTIED THERE SAW NO EVIDENCE OF THIS. INCLUDING MEDICAL STUDENTS MO BROWNLEE AND TOMMY COMPTON. AND I POSTED PICTURES HERE OF FERRIE'S KITCHEN IN 1967. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===1967 -- Mary Sherman was dead almost three years by then, and I had been gone since early sept.1963. You keep doing that.===</span></b><br /><br />Microscopes and science paraphernalia were also present, which “Ferrie’s friends” supposedly saw. At the very least, however, we have a description of Ferrie’s activities that summer as filtered through Dr. Isadore Yager and reported by Australian researcher Greg Parker, who wrote – in July 2003 – about David Ferrie and his activities with regard to the medical arts in 1963:<br /><br />“Dr. Isadore Yager was the representative of the local medical association. In 1961, David Ferrie came to his attention due to reports of Ferrie practicing medicine without a license, in particular, members of his "Falcon Squad", which I believe was a quasi-CAP group he had formed.<br /><br />"Dr Yager, in recalling his discussion with Ferrie before the Grievance hearing held by Eastern Airlines in Miami during July, 1963, stated: "He told me he had several Ph.D.s and that he was on the faculty at the Tulane Medical School and he was doing some research in the department of physiology of a very highly secretive nature, that if this works out well, it would really help us in all sorts of fields of medicine, and this went on for something like 30 minutes."<br /><br />AGAIN, THIS HAPPENED IN AUGUST 1961. AND IN HIS 1963 TESTIMONY, YAGER WENT ON TO SAY THAT HE HAD CONNECTIONS AT TULANE AND CHECKED, AND FERRIE WAS LYING. AND THAT FERRIE WAS UNQUALIFIED TO PRACTICE MEDICINE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===The HSCA said, "many friends did erroneously believe he was a medical doctor and a psychologist." Ferrie's knowledge was actually considerable. I might add that I have considerable medical knowledge myself, but am not qualified to practice medicine.===</span></b><br /><br />Thirty minutes in 1963 – or even today – would be a considerable time to discuss something that, according to Mr. Roy, David Ferrie wasn't doing in 1963, which he claims to know because “Ferrie’s friends" said so. Indeed, about 15 years later, the HSCA would report, contrary to Mr. Roy's insinuations, that,<br /><br />"Ferrie spent considerable time studying medicine and psychology,(28) especially the techniques of hypnosis which he frequently practiced on his young associates.(29)<br /><br />BOTH TRUE.<br /><br />Ferrie had even set up a laboratory over his garage,<br /><br />ON ATHERTON DRIVE, SOME TIME EARLIER, WHEN HE WAS TEACHING CAP CADETS.<br /><br />(30) where he claimed he lost his hair, alternately attributing it to a radiation experiment, chemical explosion, and cancer research experiments.(31)<br /><br />THAT WAS GOSSIP. FERRIE KNEW HE HAD ALOPECIA SINCE JANUARY 1944.</div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===But he was referring to scientific projects that he KNEW would be believed because he was engaged in so many different scientific endeavors, including cancer research. He had possession of an unpublished 'treatise' that was useful only to someone who grew cancer cells in vitro in order to work with viruses.===</span></b><br /><br />He listed his name in the telephone book as "Dr." David Ferrie;(32)<br /><br />HE SAID IT WAS BECAUSE OF HIS DEGREE IN PSYCHOLOGY.<br /><br />many friends did erroneously believe he was a medical doctor and a psychologist. (33)<br /><br />AND THAT'S WHY YAGER CALLED HIM IN.<br /><br />This veneer of respectability and achievement could be the reason Ferrie referred to his Ph.D. degree as his 'most prized possession.'(34)".<br /><br />HE SAID THIS AT AN EASTERN AIR LINES HEARING, WHEN THE COMPANY WAS CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF THE ITALIAN CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOL DEGREE. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==So? We should at least agree that Ferrie conducted scientific experiments.===</span></b><br /><br />The committee based these findings on statements by John Johnson, Robert Morrell, Karl Koster, John Irion, Al Landry, Landry's father, Larry Adams, and Dr Yager, whom its members regarded as reliable sources.<br /><br />SEVERAL OF WHOM I'VE SPOKEN TO AND OBTAINED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM! </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==At last,some names.===<br /></span></b><br />An Overheard Conversation<br /><br />Researcher Robert Harris, who has some unusual theories himself, has had some wise words to say about Mr. Roy, too, which bear repeating, since they involve a sighting of David Ferrie in Canada. I was present when Dave Ferrie, a Latino, a man called “Lambert” [whom I knew to have been Clay Shaw] and Lee flew early one evening at sunset to Toronto, so there is no doubt in my mind that David Ferrie might have been seen in Winnipeg, Canada, at some later date.<br /><br />BALONEY. SORRY, BALONEY.<br /><br />(LONG SEQUENCE WITH BOB HARRIS SNIPPED FOR BREVITY, BUT IT CAN BE READ IN ITS ENTIRELY IN MY POST #31 ABOVE. BOB AND I PROFOUNDLY DISAGREE ABOUT THIS, BUT THE DISCUSSION TOO QUICKLY DESCENDS INTO ACCUSATIONS OF DISHONESTY. IN 1964, LONG BEFORE HE EVER SAW A PICTURE OF FERRIE, GIESBRECHT DESCRIBED THE MAN AS WHITE MALE, ABOUT 48 YEARS OLD, ABOUT 175 LBS AND SLIGHTLY ON THE STOUT SIDE, WITH DARK HAIR, BUSHY EYEBROWS AND HEAVY RIMMED GLASSES. HE THOUGHT THE MAN MIGHT BE FROM THE EASTERN UNITED STATES. I'VE WRITTEN ABOUT 3 PAGES ON THIS MATTER IN MY MANUSCRIPT.)</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==But now people can't read Mr.Harris' very telling words about your failure to offer a correct date, thus dumping another witness who implicated Ferrie. That after being corrected, that you wrote you don't 'believe' it was Ferrie, dismissing the witness again, without cause.===</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Roy describes his book as a biography and not as an “assassination evidence book” – and I have to agree that Mr. Roy is likely to exclude anything that might even remotely connect David Ferrie with the Kennedy assassination.<br /><br />What would that mean?<br /><br />Those who would read the biography he is writing would surely wonder why David Ferrie was ever considered to have been involved in the assassination. If they don’t find ‘evidence’ in the biography, they may falsely believe that it doesn’t exist, since so much other data will be there.<br /><br />WRONG. I INCLUDE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM, WITH VERY LITTLE JUDGMENT. WHY WAS FERRIE INVOLVED? I DO A DETAILED (ALMOST HOURLY) PRESENTATION OF HOW THE INVESTIGATION OF HIM UNFOLDED IN THE DAYS AFTER THE ASSASSINATION. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Readers need to scroll back up to Mr. Roy's/Blackburst's ad to find witnesses who will not tell unwelcome stories about Ferrie...===<br /></span></b><br />But if potentially “false data” is collected – such as if a former “Ferrie friend” refuses to allow his name to be made public but asserts that he drove David to Cleveland – if this is in the biography without any mention of his having been sighted in Winnipeg – that witnesses had observed a person who looked like Ferrie who had talked about involvement in the assassination – then the possibility that Ferrie was in Winnipeg has been removed by stealth, which is not an honest practice for someone posing as a biographer of Ferrie’s life. Unless he addresses the data he wants to discount, the author would have to be suspect as a shill for the official account of the death of JFK.<br /><br />The problem is that Mr. Roy has decided whom to choose as “Ferrie’s friends.” He has chosen some who are not in the record, as he himself admits, since he refuses to disclose their names. But he has also refused to include me as a witness. Despite his stating that I “refused to meet" with him, a claim he later changed to indicate that I would if I had a car available (which is also untrue), everyone who knows me knows that I have been willing to travel great distances to see Gerry Hemming, for example, among others. Mr. Blackburst (as I knew him at the time) simply didn’t have time for me.<br /><br />I DON'T WANT TO GO BACK OVER THIS AGAIN. I WANTED TO MEET HER. DUE TO MONEY (HOTEL) AND TIME ISSUES (RECOVERING FROM OPERATION), I WANTED TO FLY INTO NO INTERNATIONAL, SPEND A FEW HOURS WITH HER, THEN FLY HOME. WE WERE UNABLE TO FIND A DATE THAT WORKED FOR BOTH OF US.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==I asked to come to Mr. Roy/Blackburst (Dr.Howard Platzman has verified) at a later date, but he refused to give me his address. I thought he was still friendly, as he then sent me a photo of his two cute little daughters. So I offered to send him lecture notes I took when Dave lectured me--and Lee- all night. No reply. Offered them again, six years ago. No reply. ===</span></b><br /><br />When I offered to send Mr. Blackburst copies of notes I made in May 1963 – of two lectures given to me and Lee by David Ferrie – he ignored the offer.<br /><br />BECAUSE THEIR AUTHENTICITY COULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Can't establish authenticity without even deigning to look at the papers. ===</span></b><br /><br />He has also done other things that he should not have with regard to me. He has written that, to “test” me as having been in Dave’s apartment, I ought be able to describe an object hanging between the dining room and the living room on the door jamb. Try as I might, I could remember nothing hanging there, and told him so. Mr. Roy then announced to a newsgroup that I 'failed his test’ – since a toy monkey had been hanging there and that I should have remembered such an object. He claimed a photo existed showing the monkey hanging there. I have a photographic memory. I can remember where everything was in Dave’s living-room and dining room. There was no monkey. Then the photo was published on the Internet:<br /><br /><br /><br />The “monkey photo” shows a toy monkey<br /><br />The “monkey photo” was made the day David Ferrie died – on February 22, 1967. Mr. Roy knew that. He also knew that the last time I had been inside David Ferrie’s apartment was at the end of August 1963 – three-and-a-half years before! This is the kind of contrived – better, rigged! – “test"’ that Mr. Roy used on me and then announced to the newsgroup that I had failed. He dishonestly did not mention the date that the photo had been taken.<br /><br />THE REAL TEST, WHICH I WAS INVITED TO GIVE, WAS THE GARGOYLE RING TEST. BUT I DON'T SUPPOSE SHE WANTS TO TALK ABOUT THAT ANYMORE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===If you go there, I will bring forth people from Sixty Minutes who KNOW I did not speak to Dr.Platzman before speaking about the ring. I was en route on a plane to New York and you objected to the 'delay' when I had to drive all the way to New Orleans to catch a plane, was on plane, landed, washed my face, and went straight to CBS building by cab. Entered interrogation room, Platzman came in after and had been with Liebengood, then asked me the question and i said it was a carved Griffin, a mythological creature.You took several years to then say I was mistaken, though you referred to a "gargoyle ring" before that,AFTER I had spoken of this ring I only saw twice.Your sneaky question was "What ring was it that Ferrie always wore, according to...?" When I said he didn't wear a ring,that wasn;t good enough for you, I was told. That you said he 'frequently' wore this ring. I had seen a ring made form an eastern Air Lines pin that he wore the first day i met him--never saw it again. the only other ring was this 'priestly ring' he said he wore when he was investigating 'cults.' You gave me no credit whatsoever for saying he simply didn't wear rings. I will, if necessary, get witnesses to prove I had no concourse whatsoever with Dr.Platzman, aside from the email he sent asking me your sneaky question, since you stated he wore this ring a lot, and I knew this wasn'tso, but worried that one of your 'witnesses' had lied and you would believe the lie over my statement. That's what having 'anonymous witnesses' on your side does to intimidate a legitimate witness. The reason people at Sixty Minutes would remember this is because Dr.Platzman about fainted. "He said it was a GARGOYLE!" he said, excitedly. "A griffin is close enough!" Everyone thought it was great that 'you' had corroborated, to a great extent, what I said. only, when i asked you to make a statement, you refused. Then, years later, you said you made it all up. Well, Dave Ferrie had a ring with a griffin on it. He did NOT wear it 'often' as you slyly said he did. I had to think back decades to all I could recall and remembered this ring I had seen twice, just ONCE on Ferrie's hand. When this is looked at, and the monkey question, and your refusal to meet me or to look at the Ferrie lecture papers, what am I to think of you?===</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Roy has also claimed that nobody noticed any mice in Dave’s apartment when he had his birthday party there in 1963.<br /><br />IT WASN'T HIS BIRTHDAY. IT WAS SOMEBODY ELSE'S.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Well, whatever. I do know at the only party I attended that Dave had removed the mice. He didn't want anybody messing with his mice, he siad.==</span></b><br /><br />Dave’s birthday was March 28, 1918. He was born the same year as my father, so the date is easy for me to remember. But the part of the project involving the ring of secret labs – which also included Dave’s house and a house nearby – did not start until April 1963, as I explained in my book, ME & LEE. Mr. Roy asserts that only Garrison’s aide, Gurvich, who was later discovered to be corrupt, had reported mice – in 1957 – with which Dave had been working.<br /><br />Mr. Roy reiterates often that no mice were seen anywhere in 1963. But that has meant that he also has to claim that Jim Garrison was lying – or, at the very least, had a seriously distorted memory – when Garrison wrote this in his book, ON THE TRAIL OF THE ASSASSINS:<br /><br />YES, I'M TRYING TO RECONCILE WHAT OTHERS SAID VS. WHAT GARRISON SAID. HOW CAN ONE SMELL MICE, SEVERAL YEARS LATER AND BE ABLE TO DISTINGUISH THEM FROM THE SMELL OF FERRIE'S DOG?</div><div><br /></div><div>=<b><span class="Apple-style-span" >=He mentioned empty mouse cages. Mentioned the musty smell of mice associated with the cages.. BTW, noticed that a lot of books were missing from Ferrie's 1967 death scene photos, that CAP photos were gone from the wall (maybe removed after events of '63)and wonder what else was hauled off?The inventory list shows guns missing, too.===</span></b><br /><br />Garrison states that he was at Ferrie’s apartment the same day Ferrie was found dead, but that the body was gone. When Mr. Roy had asked me, back in 1999, "What was the first thing [I] noticed on entering Dave’s apartment?", I had told him at once: the smell! The smell of animals – mice – in Dave’s apartment! Mr. Roy alleged that Ferrie’s friends reported no such smell. But Jim Garrison had also noticed it. Years later, in 2011, Mr. Roy posted this:<br /><br />“Having spoken with many people who knew Ferrie (and some who spent a great deal of time at the Louisiana Avenue Parkway apartment), I have not been able to find anyone who recalls seeing mice THERE in 1963 or any other time. Some say there were never any at that apartment, to their knowledge. The police and coroner's reports and pictures from the time of Ferrie's death, as well as interviews with some of the officers, show no indication that there were mice there on February 22, 1967.”<br /><br />So if what Mr. Roy is asserting is true, then Garrison is a liar. And if what Garrison is saying is true<br /><br />THIRD OPTION: I THINK HE WAS MISTAKEN.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==You cannot be 'mistaken' about 'mouse cages.' The photos were taken after a liot of things had been removed,IMHO, as that apartment was not very 'cluttered' and sure not as much as in 1963.===</span></b><br /><br />– which I know on the basis of having been there<br /><br />BALONEY.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Name calling doesn't mean you win. One thing I can state: YOU were never there in 1963.===</span></b><br /><br />– then the one perpetrating the deception is Mr. Roy, who appears to be employing the method of selection and elimination: selecting the evidence that agrees with a predetermined point of view and eliminating the rest!<br /><br />OR: IGNORE ANY EVIDENCE CONTRARY TO BAKER'S CLAIMS.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===Just tell me who your 'anonymous' witnesses are. And if they would be in seen to be lying if they changed their story after what they told the FBI, when things looked very serious for them, indeed.==</span></b><br /><br />The “established local doctor” whom Jim Garrison mentions, by the way, was Dr. Mary Sherman. Mr. Roy claims no witness has ever stated that Ferrie and Sherman knew each other. That is false, since I have made that assertion.<br /><br />BUT SHE IS NOT A WITNESS!!!!</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Because Mr. Roy/Mr.Blackburst says I am not a witness, this is supposed to suffice for all time.===</span></b><br /><br />but Mr. Roy accepts only certain witnesses. Jim Garrison has as well, but Mr. Roy accepts only certain people’s statements. Author John Davis has, but Mr. Roy accepts only certain authors. Davis mentions that Ferrie and Sherman knew each other in MAFIA KINGFISH on page 372. (Davis’ book is also loaded with important information about how the Mafia was being used by the CIA.)<br /><br />Ferrie’s Car<br /><br />Mr. Roy has inspired the members of two newsgroups to conclude that I had lied when I had said that David Ferrie "owned" a car during the time I knew him (late April-early September 1963). It’s another instructive example of how my simple and honest statements have been distorted and then described as “lies.”<br /><br />THAT WAS NOT MY PHRASE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Shall I p0st it, to your shame?===</span></b><br /><br />Mr. Roy, in contrast, has told everyone that Dave Ferrie had NO car during the period I knew him:<br /><br />"She vividly describes she and Oswald being driven all over the<br />New Orleans area during the summer months in Ferrie's car. Not a<br />rental or a loaner, but Ferrie's owned car, which she describes in<br />colorful terms. But primary research shows that Ferrie did not have a<br />car that summer. He had a car repossessed (sic) in March 1963 and<br />he did not have another until he purchased one in November."<br />(http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=2230&tab=posts)<br /><br />The truth is that I never thought to ask David if he owned the car or not. The car was there and he and Lee used it. Mr. Roy initially stated that Dave Ferrie “had no car that summer” and the reader is left to think that he had no access to one at all. That made me look bad. But later, Mr. Roy acknowledged that a “neighbor” had lent Ferrie a car. Why should I have been expected to have ASKED Dave Ferrie if the car belonged to him when he was using it? People don’t do that. The fact is, Mr. Roy falsely implied that Dave Ferrie had NO ACCESS TO A CAR at the time I said he was using a car, which was his basis for implying that I had lied.<br /><br />I never said any such thing. I said – in the unauthorized book published by Harrison Livingstone – that David had complained that he “deserved better” than the car he was using. At my young age, I had no idea if the car belonged to him or not. I simply knew he had a car. At no time did I say that he owned a car. I describe the car’s mechanical problems in ME & LEE and David’s prayer to get the engine started, for example; but again, I did not know if the car belonged to him. I simply assumed it, as anybody might.<br /><br />Mr. Roy says that he told me in early 2000 that David's car had been repossessed. But he did no such thing. This was a man that told me very little. I was offering him information, while he was tight-lipped. At any rate, Mr. Roy has finally acknowledged that David had had access to a neighbor’s car. I was surprised to see the comment sent to me under a heading of “Judyth's Lie About Ferrie's Car”, when I should have been commended instead as a witness for remembering that Dave had access to a car as proof I had been there that summer, rather than condemned, as later Blackburst-Roy would acknowledge that Dave had had access to a neighbor’s old car. I described Dave driving an old car four times, as I recall, and Lee driving it once.<br /><br />FERRIE'S CAR WAS REPOSSESSED IN MARCH 1963, AND HE BOUGHT ANOTHER IN NOVEMBER 1963. AT THAT TIME, NEIGHBORS SAID HE HAD NO CAR, AND USED A MOTORCYCLE THAT SUMMER. </div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >===You have changed your story from what you posted, when you said a neighbor loaned him a car to use, after first saying he had no car.You also said I said he owned a car, when I never said any such thing.I simply described the car he had use of. Time for you to start citing, and naming names, since it is you who keep changing your story. Now it's a motorcycle. ===</span></b></div><div><br /><br />The Final Word<br /><br />Jim DiEugenio is a good researcher who does not believe my testimony (but he has never met me personally). I hold no grudges against a researcher simply because of that. I feel that if he met me, he’d be persuaded otherwise. DiEugenio, who published DESTINY BETRAYED: JFK, CUBA, AND THE GARRISON CASE in 1992, has rather important things to say about Blackburst-Roy’s methodology, especially concerning composing a biography about Ferrie that takes Ferrie’s friends’ words at face value. Here is what he has to say:<br /><br />Garrison mentions the mice in both his Playboy interview and the cages in his book. Its pretty clear that Garrison had decided to reinvestigate the Sherman murder when he discovered the things Ferrie was doing, plus the treatise he had in his posession. The treatise is kind of fascinating since Ferrie could not have written it. It was much too sophisticated.<br /><br />So to say that somehow Garrison screwed up a document pertaining to 1957, with 1967, is a real stretch. And what Stephen actually means by this is elusive: I mean did Gurvich know Ferrie in 1957? Or is the source for the year 1957, Ferrie himself.<br /><br />Further, to say that Gurvich is controversial is an understatement. There is little doubt in most objective minds that Gurvich was an infiltrator in Garrison's camp, as so many others were. And from private sources I developed, there is little doubt at all he was CIA. Garrison came to look askance at everything he did afterwards, when he defected to Sheridan and Shaw's lawyers with munificent copies of Garrison's files. So if this is Ferrie filtered through Gurvich, the info is, to put it mildly, suspect.<br /><br />I also find it odd that Stephen would believe Ferrie's buddies. They have all been faithful to Ferrie and were all too eager to attack Garrison, especiailly when Sheridan and Aynseworth came in and swooped up people like Layton Martens and Al Beabouf. I mean all you have to do is look at what they told Gus Russo for his pathetic book.<br /><br />Speaking of which, Russo covered up one of Ed's most powerful discoveries which showed why these guys could not be trusted: When the secret war against the Contras began in the eighties, Martens and Butler joined up forces for local rightwing talk radio in support of it. Ed did some PR for them and discovered that Butler had boxes of Guy Banister's files in his office. Interesting to speculate how he got them and if he shipped them to California when he learned Garrison was on his and Ochsner's trail in 1968.<br /><br />Finally Chetta's son is also on record here. I find Chetta much more credible than the police department who, as Garrison said, he did not have a brotherly relationship with due to his crackdown on their kickbacks in the French Quarter B girl scandals. In fact, you can see this in how Garrison went over them and he requested State Trooper help from McKeithen, and also how the city police helped Shaw's lawyers during Shaw's trial.<br /><br />Stephen's reliance on these kinds of sources worries me. If you go all the way with these people then why not go into Shaw's lawyer's records and offices? There you will learn things like Garrison never tried a case when he was an assistant DA and the CIA never helped Shaw's defense. These are both provable lies. But this is what his lawyers told me. You will also hear the same from Ferrie's buddies, and Russo printed it.<br /><br />This post has been edited by Jim DiEugenio: 31 March 2011 - 02:44 AM<br /><br />SEE POST #31. I DISAGREE WITH JIM ON THE SHERMAN ISSUE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Of course you do.You disagree with Edward T. Haslam, who even knew Sherman. Whose father worked with her. Whose research has covered as many years as your own--only he lived in New Orleans. A man tough and strict for the truth. Try to find a better man.===</span></b><br /><br />Although Jim Fetzer, who has edited three books on the death of JFK, has had differences with Jim DiEugenio across a spectrum of issues, he received DiEugeio's commentary in this matter very warmly and responded to it with the following remarks:<br /><br />SNIPPED. HE WOULDN'T ALLOW MY COMMENTS ON HIS BLOG. I DISAGREE PROFOUNDLY WITH FETZER ON THIS.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Wonder what you said? Did you provide evidence, citations, or just your personal opinion (again)and 'anonymous' 'friends of Ferrie' to back you up?===</span></b><br /><br />I greatly appreciate their observations about Mr. Roy and his methods, which includes attempts to distort the available evidence about David Ferrie up to and including not only my own position but even that of Jim Garrison. Robert Harris and the HSCA witnesses have highlighted a crucial aspect of the divide that separates us, which seems to me to cast light upon Roy's dupicitous methodology, where I would like to believe that those who read and understand the issues dealt with here will gain a deeper appreciation of the convolutions of JFK research and of the necessity to exercise one's critical faculties in appraising sources who may not be what they seem.<br /><br />OK. BAKER CLAIMS THAT I AM DISTORTING THINGS TO EXCLUDE HER, OR FOR SOME OTHER NEFARIOUS PURPOSE. I COUNTER THAT SHE IS MAKING THESE CLAIMS IN AN EFFORT TO PRE-EMPTIVELY DISCREDIT MY DISBELIEF OF THE FERRIE PORTIONS OF HER STORY. SO BE IT, LET THE READER BEWARE.</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" >==Every honest person reading this exchange will see what you have done.===</span></b><br /><br />I GUESS THE GLOVES ARE OFF. </div><div><br /></div><div>===In eleven years, this man has not met me. Now he says the gloves are off. Why doesn't he just publish his book and let people decide for themselves who the real David William Ferrie was? Wouldn't that be nice?or is he waiting for his witnesses to die so he, the sound expert,can fiddle with the ape recordings and have them say whatever he likes? After all,I have seen him change his own words about the car just now--and so have you, the reader.===But here's one more bit which everyone should read, I think:</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; "> From: Judyth Vary Baker<br /> To: Robert Vernon<br /> Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:07 am<br /> Subject: Re: EXPLAIN<br /> To all who are interested in whether or not researchers in the JFK<br />research community should use fake names: from Judyth Vary Baker<br /> ===========================================<br /> I have been told that David <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b> (Stephen Roy) has posted on the<br />Education Forum, but I cannot seem to find the post.<br /><p> I read his post here, and now reproduce that post here, with my<br />comments.<br /></p><p> Before going any further, I would like to say that I regret having<br />made Mr. Roy feel uncomfortable about telling people about his other name. I<br />didn't do it to be mean to Mr. Roy.<br /></p><p> Since Mr. Roy has said he has even used both names at the Lancer<br />Conference, I do not wholly understand why he is upset with me for<br />mentioning his fake name now. He also said he would be publishing his book<br />under his real name, so again, I do not understand why he is upset with me<br />at revealing his true name to you here.<br /></p><p> I brought out Mr. Roy's real name on this forum because I believe that<br />we must be frank and open with each other if we are to work in harmony<br />together and in trust.<br /></p><p> Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, below, wrote that he believed we were friends.<br /></p><p> I concur.<br /></p><p> BUT -- Mr. Roy NEVER told me his real name all the years we were<br />"friends."<br /></p><p> I had to discover by accident that he was Mr. Roy.<br /></p><p> Mr. Roy was at the 2000 Lancer Conference, for example, but Mr.<br /><b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, my friend, apparently did not attend, for he was cc'd about my<br />concerns and did not mention that he was a panelist there.<br /></p><p> Mr. Roy did not bring up my name at the Conference, whereas my friend,<br />Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, had he attended the Conference, would surely have done so,<br />for he knew how impoprtant it was to me to tell people that I believed Lee<br />Oswald was an innocent man.<br /></p><p> Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, my friend, had he attended the conference, would have<br />asked me if I would have wanted to have my name mentioned. In fact, he<br />already knew that I would have preferred it, because it was new information<br />for those who came to the conference, and they had the right to know that a<br />new witness was presenting. After all, I had already been known to Mr.<br /><b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, my friend, for a year by then. And I had communicated in private<br />emails that I was even thinking of attending the conference myself. I was<br />dissuaded from doing so by my friends.<br /></p><p> When I told Debra Cionway I suspected that she instructed the panel on<br />which Mr. Roy sat not to mention my name, Mr. Roy wrote back to Lancer and<br />said he had not been so instructed. My friend, Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, would have<br />comforted me at this time and perhaps given me advice on how to handle the<br />situation. But only Mr. Roy was involved at Lancer....<br /></p><p> Even as late as 2005, my friend, Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, never told me in<br />private what went on. I had to learn from the post of Mr. Roy, today, what<br />my friend, Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, really was thinking at the Conference.<br /></p><p> This is just the kind of thing that has to stop.<br /></p><p> We must be frank and open.<br /> We must not play the old games.<br /></p><p> We can continue to go in circles, or we can be upfront and honest.<br /></p><p> My friend, Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>, treated me fairly.<br /> Mr. Roy, who never admitted to being my friend or to even knowing me,<br />did not.<br /></p><p> ==========================More below==========<br /></p><p> For those who wish to read any more (I do not, but feel I must<br />continue....My comments are interspersed with Mr. Roy's =====like this====<br /></p><p> I would also like to say that I have never experienced any problem<br />with Mr. Roy personally, except that I feel he was not entirely candid with<br />me, as I have indicated above, and I shall note below.<br /></p><p> I did indeed feel we shared a friendship until I realized that he was<br />not treating me entirely honestly. If I have been in error concerning this,<br />I will certainly be happy to apologize. But please come with me to Mr. Roy's<br />post. There are always two sides to every story.<br /></p><p> Best Regards, Judyth Vary Baker ====comments below=====<br /></p><p> ==================================================<br /> Stephen Roy Today, 05:00 PM Post #51<br /></p><p> > New Member<br /></p><p> > Group: Members<br /> > Posts: 2<br /> > Joined: 7-January 05<br /> > Member No.: 2230<br /></p><p> > A big thank you to John Simkin for allowing me to pop in here an<br /> > clairify a few points. I have been in touch with Judyth Vary Baker<br />since<br /> > about 1999, and we have had a on-again/off-again private<br />correspondence.<br /> > For some reason, Baker chose to go public with it in this forum over<br />the<br /> > past week.<br /></p><p> ======= ======================================<br /></p><p> No, Stephen, I have not gone public with your correspondence, which is<br />voluminous. I have mentioned only a very small part of the matter, as also<br />have you. I have not posted your emails except as it touched upon using a<br />false name on forums concerned with the JFK assassination, while using your<br />real name elsewhere. You also used your real name at Lancer, so still I<br />cannot understand why you are so upset that I have told people that these<br />two people happen to be the same person. =========more below========<br /></p><p> >ROY/<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">BLACKBURST</b>: I came onto the internet in the mid-90s under a<br />variant of my given<br /> > name, and I engaged in discussion on some JFK newsgroups. One day<br />while I<br /> > was at work, a scraggly 40-ish man came to my door and said<br />something to<br /> > my wife about me "perpetuating the coverup." She excused herself,<br />called<br /> > me and the police, but the man walked away. My wife insisted and I<br />agreed<br /> > to adopt a "screen name", something a bit more anonymous. I tried<br />several<br /> > possibilities but AOL said they were already in use. AOL allows up<br />to 10<br /> > characters, so I tried a TV term, "<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">blackburst</b>" (the signal to which<br />all<br /> > video devices are synchronized in a TV studio), and AOL accepted it.<br />I<br /> > became known as a David Ferrie specialist in the JFK groups. When<br />people<br /> > would ask my first name, I arbitrarily chose "Dave" (after Ferrie).<br /></p><p> =====================================<br /> This is all fine and good, except that you, Stephen, are not just<br />'anybody.'You have been declared THE expert on David W. Ferrie. YOU have<br />been the one who is, in fact, quoted everywhere.<br /></p><p> But the name people quoted as THE authority was NOT the name that you<br />recently said would be listed as author of the book on Dave Ferrie. So,how<br />would anyone not in your inner circle know this?<br /></p><p> You said you were my friend, but you never told me, for example, that<br />you were really Mr. Roy.<br /></p><p> I am sorry if your wife was frightened, and I can understand your<br />decision to use the false name. However, since you used your real name at<br />the Lancer Conference, I believed, and I think quite reasonably, that you<br />were no longer afraid to use your real name since you had come forth and<br />presented yourself in person using your real name.<br /></p><p> Meanwhile, we have identity problems -- a number of people use<br />multiple names and support their statements by writing to themselves and<br />praising themselves...just one example of how false names create the<br />illusion of many behind one, when that is not the case.<br /></p><p> -- I felt it imperative to begin to identify those who have used false<br />names. My special concern with you remains that you are not just anybody.<br />YOU are THE expert on Dave Ferrie. As such, everyone needs to know that you<br />use two names in the research community--<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b> and Roy.<br />=========================more below ============<br /></p><p> ROY/<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">BLACKBURST</b>:<br /> I explained publicly on a number of occasions that <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b> was a<br /> > pseudonym, and why I chose it. I also explained this by email to<br />several<br /> > people. Eventually, I did share research with a few folks, which<br /> > necessitated using my real name, but in a spirit of privacy.<br /></p><p> ========================-==================<br /></p><p> In other words, Stephen, you have been posting information on the<br />Internet publicly under a fake name, but sharing research with a few people<br />privately using your real name. We have had a lot of that going on in the<br />research community.<br /></p><p> ===================more below===================<br /></p><p> >ROY/<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">BLACKBURST</b><br /></p><p> In late 1999 or early 2000, I was contacted by Baker and her<br /> > associates and we had numerous exchanges. I had a clear impresson<br />that<br /> > Baker wanted to keep these exchanges private at that time. I also<br />wanted<br /> > to remain on her bulk email list so that I could get the details of<br />her<br /> > account.<br /></p><p> ================================================<br /> This is not quite correct, Stephen. I did not contact you.<br /> Dr. Howard Platzman did, and after awhile, I received copies of your<br />emails ABOUT me. I finally wrote to you because I did not like being talked<br />ABOUT when I felt it would be better if we could speak to each other<br />directly. I began to cc you on a large list on contacts after that.<br /></p><p> ================more below========================<br /></p><p> >ROY/<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">BLACKBURST</b><br /></p><p> In the summer of 2000 I signed on to the JFKLancer Forum, but the<br /> > rules required that I use my real name. I never used "<b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>" on<br />my<br /> > few posts on that forum.<br /></p><p> =============================================<br /> But Stephen, how would anybody know that MR ROY and MR <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">BLACKBURST</b> were<br />one and the same on the forum? How did they know that if they asked you<br />qwuestions about Dave Ferrie that YOU would be able to answer them, whereas<br />hardly anyone else in the world could do that? But they had no idea you were<br />that same expert, Mr. <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102); ">Blackburst</b>.<br /></p><p> ==================more below========================<br /></p><p> Debra Conway invited me to speak at the Lancer<br /> > NID2000 conference, and the topic of my 30-minute talk was agreed<br />upon ...</p><p><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/dc8d7bd15b0c0e4a?&q=blackburst" target="_top" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204); "><b>read more »</b></a></p></span></div><div><br /></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-16845512158003654442011-03-15T18:02:00.000+02:002011-03-15T20:40:05.326+02:00LEE HARVEY OSWALD --PATSY--WAS FRAMED: QUOTES TO REMEMBER<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT3yesSDeOb-GeSvCL4TqIISvLm5FkXJs88JPkg_QBF63-6m7RRdjhp_aiVaPQPwE82pE0yBgKZZ05zkJnfMdH1UOsJQhXiMOGBJYrBb-D3RNlP2yoBehKftQzBNX2rfk9cob_3mvgi5xr/s1600/LEE+PARADED+BEFORE+MEDIA.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 342px; height: 383px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT3yesSDeOb-GeSvCL4TqIISvLm5FkXJs88JPkg_QBF63-6m7RRdjhp_aiVaPQPwE82pE0yBgKZZ05zkJnfMdH1UOsJQhXiMOGBJYrBb-D3RNlP2yoBehKftQzBNX2rfk9cob_3mvgi5xr/s400/LEE+PARADED+BEFORE+MEDIA.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5584338413289891138" /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></a><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; "><b><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiT3yesSDeOb-GeSvCL4TqIISvLm5FkXJs88JPkg_QBF63-6m7RRdjhp_aiVaPQPwE82pE0yBgKZZ05zkJnfMdH1UOsJQhXiMOGBJYrBb-D3RNlP2yoBehKftQzBNX2rfk9cob_3mvgi5xr/s1600/LEE+PARADED+BEFORE+MEDIA.jpg">Lee Harvey Oswald — The Patsy</a></b></span>(adapted from this source: <a href="http://oswaldpatsy.tripod.com/">http://oswaldpatsy.tripod.com/</a>)<br />"The thing I am concerned about, and so is [Deputy Attorney General Nicholas] Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin." --FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, speaking on the telephone to Johnson aide Walter Jenkins two hours after Oswald was murdered by Jack Ruby, HSCA Report, vol. III, pp. 471-73. (The Warren Commission -- charged with determining the truth in the JFK assassination -- relied upon Hoover's FBI as its primary investigative arm.)<br /><br />"At the first meeting of the newly constituted Warren Commission, [former CIA Director] Allen Dulles handed out copies of a book to help define the ideological parameters he proposed for the Commission's forthcoming work. American assassinations were different from European ones, he told the Commission. European assassinations were the work of conspiracies, whereas American assassins acted alone." --Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK<br /><br />"We have not been told the truth about Oswald." --Senator Richard Russell, former Warren Commission member, conversation with researcher Harold Weisberg in 1970, <i>Whitewash IV</i><br /><br />"Lee Harvey Oswald is a question mark to history. The debate is often raised: 'Was Lee Harvey Oswald alone as the assassin, or was he part of a conspiracy?' The question is never raised: 'Is it possible he didn't do it at all?'" --Robert Groden, assassination researcher, interviewed in the documentary, <i>The Men Who Killed Kennedy</i>: Part 4<br /><br />When Oswald was interviewed by the news media after his arrest, he declared, "I'm just a patsy."<br /><br />The following transcribed text is from the documentary, <i>The Men Who Killed Kennedy</i>: Part 4.<br /><br />NARRATOR: One person with no illusions about Oswald's role [as a patsy for JFK's real killers] launched his own investigation into the Kennedy assassination in 1967, the former District Attorney of New Orleans, Judge Jim Garrison.<br /><br />GARRISON: [Oswald] was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency and was obviously drawn into a scapegoat situation and <b>made to believe ultimately that he was penetrating the assassination</b>. And then when the time came, they took the scapegoat -- the man who thought he was working for the United States government -- and killed him real quick. And then the machinery, disinformation machinery, started turning and they started making a villain out of a man who <b>genuinely was probably a hero.</b><div><br /></div><div>===NOTE BY JVB: GARRISON, SMACK IN THE CENTER OF NEW ORLEANS, WAS CORRECT THAT LEE HAD PENETRATED THE ASSASSINATION RING. GARRISON WAS WELL AHEAD OF HIS TIME WHEN HE STATED THAT LEE OSWALD WAS 'PROBABLY' A HERO===<br /><br />NARRATOR: Six months before the assassination,</div><div> Oswald had taken a mundane job [in New Orleans] with the Reily Coffee Company. But it seems his real activities were centered a few blocks away. From a small office on the corner of Lafayette and Camp Street, Oswald managed a local chapter of the pro-Castro Fair Play For Cuba Committee. Operating from an adjoining office was a sinister figure named Guy Banister.<br /><img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjl4uFmsSDNo2sz17fTbpz4YWsaOjz6bJQx94YD2IZI-h8o-bEtJYhQuS5zrSv7z6sXAGpjMAUkZKGxV2v6-Y6qCu-5uch_v5c64WnEMiV1bocK6Gsy8X_NKmDLIrRZ0oWGO3RH4JGfwGqo/s400/GUY+BANISTER+ONE+RARE+PHOTO.jpg" style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 179px;" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5584340488064055154" /><br />Guy Banister -- Former</div><div> FBI Agent and Naval</div><div>Intelligence Operative. Also a Member of the Minutemen, the John Birch Society, the Louisiana Committee on Un-American Activities, and Publisher of the Racist Louisiana Intelligence Digest<br /><br />GARRISON: Guy Banister -- it's difficult to say much about him, because he always stood in the shadows and pushed someone else to the front. He was a strongly disciplined man, perhaps the outgrowth of his many years as a special agent in charge of the Chicago office of the FBI. But he was a key man in the assassination, and that's clear from the fact that Oswald's "sheep-dipping" -- his being portrayed as a Communist -- was done out of Guy Banister's office. So he was sheep-dipped for months as a Communist by giving literature: "Lee, hand this out today. This is your assignment."<br /><br />I came across the fact that Oswald, a private in the Marines, had taken a Russian examination. And I knew that privates did not take Russian examinations unless they were connected with intelligence. So that caused me to be curious about 544 Camp, which was the address stamped on one circular that he gave out one time before, obviously, Banister told him, "Lee, no more addresses." It turned out that was a side address of Guy Banister's private detective agency.<br /><br /></div><div>===Note by JVB: Later, Lee had a room on the 2nd floor where he processed films and kept posters, etc. -- see <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Me & Lee: How I Came to Know,Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald</a> -- for more details: Lee eventually put his post office box number on the handbills, as well as '4907'-- where Mr.Eric Rogers had moved in. Rogers was hired to 'take the heat' if any anti-Castro agitators dropped by. Rogers' utility bills and rent was paid for by Lee--Rogers had no employment until the end of September when Lee left town, as the FBI reported. The Warren Commission documented Lee as living at 4905, yet stated Lee failed to pay 'his' utility bill for mid-September through October at the Rogers' residence,making Lee look like a deadbeat. ===</div><div><br />Oswald distributing pro-Castro literature in front of Clay Shaw's International Trade Mart at 124 Camp Street, a stone's throw away from Guy Banister's 544 Camp Street office, August 16, 1963.<br /><br />Well I went down there to look at it, and I found myself not merely outside of Guy Banister's office, but across the street from Naval Intelligence, across the street from Secret Service, around the corner was the Crescent City Garage, the garage for the intelligence community and then, two doors away, the Reily Coffee Company. I used to be in the FBI. I knew people in Naval Intelligence and they were either across the street, around the corner -- the whole intelligence community was there, and right in the middle of it was Guy Banister having Oswald sheep-dipped as a Communist....<br /><br />When the President ends up being assassinated and the scapegoat grabbed by the federal government, and killed before anything can be done to help him, turns out to be the man that Guy Banister had been the tutor of all the time, you have to conclude that Guy Banister was a key man in the assassination, and possibly the most important man that we encountered in our whole investigation. But he's been dead so many years it's a little hard to question him.<br /><br />===Guy Banister was found dead one month before <a href="http://www.doctormarysmonkey.com/">Dr. Mary Sherman </a>was murdered. ===<br /><br />Was Oswald a spy? After reviewing all available evidence, the answer to the question seems to be a resounding "yes." The following is a quick look at some of the evidence pointing to Oswald's involvement with spy work:<br />His childhood -- a bright loner who read a wide range of books and was drawn to unpopular ideas, attracted by spy stories (<a href="http://www.judythbaker.blogspot.com/">the TV show "I Led Three Lives"</a> and Ian Fleming's James Bond novels were among his favorites) -- perfectly fits the profile of persons most desired for intelligence work.</div><div><br />Oswald's Marine career is checkered with inconsistencies and unexplained events that suggest secret intelligence training.</div><div><br />His assignment to Atsugi base in Japan, which housed a large CIA facility.</div><div><br />Oswald's incredible ability with the Russian language. Several Russians, including his wife, said he spoke like a native, yet this high-school dropout reportedly taught himself Russian from books.</div><div><br /></div><div>==note by JVB: Lee practiced his Russian frequently, as I know myself from personal experience with him. He had flash cards for Russian, Spanish and German, which can be found listed among his possessions.====</div><div><br />The fact that several persons -- including a former CIA paymaster, Oswald's Marine roommate, and fellow Marine Gerry Patrick Hemming -- have suggested that Oswald worked for U.S. intelligence.</div><div><br /></div><div>==Note by JVB: Gerry Hemming recommended that Nigel Turner should meet me. ==</div><div><br /></div><div>The manner in which Oswald traveled so easily in and out of Russia as well as the unaccounted-for funds he used suggests intelligence guidance.<br />The ability of this American "defector" to leave the Soviet Union with his Russian-born wife at a time when most Russians were being denied exit permits.<br />The ease with which this would-be defector obtained passports both in 1959 and 1963.<br />The fact that Oswald wrote a lengthy report on his activities in Russia and, later, made a detailed report to the FBI concerning his Fair Play For Cuba activities in New Orleans.<br />Oswald's notebook contained the word "microdots," a common spy technique of photographically reducing information to a small dot.</div><div><br />Oswald's nonbinding "defection" to Russia fits perfectly the profile of an Office of Naval Intelligence program to infiltrate American servicemen into the Soviet Union during the late 1950's.</div><div><br />One of Oswald's closest contacts, George DeMohrenschildt, was himself an intelligence operative, first for the Nazis and later for the CIA.</div><div><br />One of the strongest pieces of evidence for Oswald's involvement in spy work concerns a small Minox camera found among his effects by Dallas Police. Information developed by the Dallas Morning News in 1978 revealed the camera was not available to the public in 1963. It may have been spy equipment issued to Oswald. This evidence was so explosive that the FBI tried to get Dallas detectives to change their reports regarding the camera and also kept photos taken by Oswald hidden for nearly fifteen years.... <b>Detective Rose told the Dallas Morning News: "[FBI agents] were calling it a light meter, I know that. But I know a camera when I see it</b>.... <b>The thing we got at Irving out of Oswald's seabag was a Minox camera. No question about it. They tried to get me to change the records because it wasn't a light meter. I don't know why they wanted it changed, but they must have had some motive for it."</b> </div><div><br /></div><div>The motive may have been that the existence of the camera pointed to Oswald's intelligence connections.... The three-inch-long German-made camera was famous for being used by spies on both sides during World War II.<br />Note: The above text is excerpted from the book, <i>Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy</i> by Jim Marrs<br /><br />"The Report of the Warren Commission infers that Oswald somehow must have learned Russian on his own, ostensibly in preparation for his forthcoming defection. Actually, Oswald was taught Russian by the United States government, as is indicated by Lieutenant Colonel Folsom's testimony during which he happened to refer to one of Oswald's grades in a U.S. Armed Forces Russian examination (Volume VIII, p. 307). </div><div><br /></div><div>The formal designation for this Russian examination was "Department of the Army, Adjutant General's Office, PRT-157." Oswald took the Russian examination on February 25, 1959, while stationed at El Toro Marine Base in California." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, Press Release, 21 February 1968<br /><br />"On at least two separate occasions, Banister employees saw Oswald handing out pro-Castro literature and reported it to their boss. In one instance Banister simply laughed, and on the other, he told his secretary Delphine Roberts: 'Don't worry about him.... He's with us. He's associated with the office.' Roberts also said she saw Oswald at 544 Camp Street, and that he filled out one of Banister's 'agent' application forms. She later told author Anthony Summers: 'Oswald came back a number of times. He seemed to be on familiar terms with Banister and with the office.'" --Jim Marrs,<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><span new="" roman=""> <i>Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy.</i></span></span></div><div><i><br /></i>"They are the most ruthless motherf---ers there are and if they want to get somebody, they will. They will do their own people up." --<b>David Sanchez Morales,</b> talking about the CIA, (Morales was the Chief of Operations at the CIA station in Miami -- JM/WAVE -- and a consultant to the Deputy Director of the Joint Chiefs), cited by Gaeton Fonzi, T<i>he Last Investigation.<br /></i><br />"We do know Oswald had intelligence connections. Everywhere you look with him, there're fingerprints of intelligence." --Republican Senator Richard Schweiker, member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, <i>Village Voice,</i> 15 December 1975<br /><br />"The question of whether Oswald had any relationship with the FBI or the CIA is not frivolous. The agencies, of course, are silent. Although the Warren Commission had full power to conduct its own independent investigation, it permitted the FBI and the CIA to investigate themselves -- and so cast a permanent shadow on the answers." --Walter Cronkite, CBS News anchor, 28 June 1967<br /><br />"I think the [Warren] report, to those who have studied it closely, has collapsed like a house of ca<b>rds ... the fatal mistake the Warren Commission made was </b>to not use its own investigators, but instead <b>to rely on the CIA and FBI personnel,</b> which played directly into the hands of senior intelligence officials who directed the cover-up." --Republican Senator Richard Schweiker, member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, speaking on the CBS News program <i>Face the Nation</i>, 27 June 1976<br /><br />"If he had it to do over again, he would begin his investigation of the Kennedy assassination by probing 'Oswald's ties to the Central Intelligence Agency.'" --Richard Sprague, first staff director and chief counsel to the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, statement to Sam Anson of <i>New Times </i>magazine, cited by Gaeton Fonzi, <i>The Last Investigation.</i><br /><br />"[Lee Oswald's mother] Mrs. Marguerite Oswald frequently expressed the opinion that her son was recruited by an agency of the U.S. Government and sent to Russia in 1959, but she stated before the Commission that 'I cannot prove Lee is an agent.'" --Warren Commission Report, Appendix XII: Speculations and Rumors, Oswald and U.S. Government Agencies, p. 660<br /><br />"It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.... Right after the President was killed, people in the Tokyo station were talking openly about Oswald having gone to Russia for the CIA. Everyone was wondering how the agency was going to be able to keep the lid on Oswald. But I guess they did." --<b>interview of Jim and Elsie Wilcott</b>, former husband and wife employees of the Tokyo CIA Station, <i>San Francisco Chronicle</i>, "Couple Talks about Oswald and the CIA," 12 September 1978<br /><br />"[Former CIA Director Richard] Helms told reporters during a break that no one would ever know who or what Lee Harvey Oswald ... represented. Asked whether the CIA knew of any ties Oswald had with either the KGB or the CIA, Helms paused and with a laugh said, 'I don't remember.'" --Richard Helms, chatting with the <i>Washington Post</i>'s George Lardner and other reporters in 1978, during a recess of the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, cited by Gaeton Fonzi, The Last Investigation<br /><br />"After the assassination the public was burdened with no quandary. Wherever the guilt really lay, the man identified as killing President Kennedy was stamped as a disciple of the extreme left. Rightly or wrongly, the political left was implicitly convicted along with Oswald. Was that verdict just, or were Oswald and his apparent heroes victims of a vicious double-cross by forces of the extreme right?" --Anthony Summers, <i>Not in Your Lifetime</i><br /><br />"I no longer believe that we were able to conduct an appropriate investigation of the [Central Intelligence] Agency and its relationship to Oswald.... I do not believe any denial offered by the Agency on any point. The law has long followed the rule that if a person lies to you on one point, you may reject all of his testimony.... We now know that the Agency withheld from the Warren Commission the CIA-Mafia plots to kill Castro. Had the commission known of the plots, it would have followed a different path in its investigation.... We also now know that the Agency set up a process that could only have been designed to frustrate the ability of the committee in 1976-79 to obtain any information that might adversely affect the Agency. <b>Many have told me that the culture of the Agency is one of prevarication and dissimulation and that you cannot trust it or its people. Period. End of story. I am now in that camp.</b>" --Robert Blakey, staff director and chief counsel for the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, statement from 2003.<br /><br />"I have felt, I always felt, a sympathy for Oswald, and I just don't feel it's right that he would be, or his children should be, stuck with that stigma, that's all." --<b>Chauncey Holt</b>, CIA contract agent and Mafia associate (also identified as one of the "three tramps" photographed in Dealey Plaza), video interview, 20 June 1997<br /><br />"Lee Oswald was totally, unequivocally, completely innocent of the assassination. And the fact that history -- or in the rewriting of history -- has made a villain of <b>this young man, who wanted nothing more than to be a fine Marine</b>, is in some ways the greatest injustice of all." --Jim Garrison, District Attorney of New Orleans, interviewed in the documentary,<i> The Men Who Killed Kennedy</i>: Part 4.<br /><br />Guy Banister's 544 Camp Street address. The building also housed the Cuban Revolutionary Council -- a militant anti-Castro organization created by the CIA.<br /><br /></div><div><br /><br /><br /></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-16629293024997398382011-02-25T19:36:00.000+02:002011-02-25T20:01:06.443+02:00THE LEGACY OF GERALD FORD: EVIL BY THE ARMLOAD<span style="font-weight:bold;">Bob Fox 3:34pm Feb 25</span><div><span></span><b><br /></b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Gerald Ford has quite a legacy. That is...a legacy of lies and also his associations with some of the most evil men in United States history.</span> The damage this man has done to the United States is incalculable.<br /><br /><br /></div><div>Ford helped promote the biggest lie of the Warren Report by his actions. </div><div> <span class="Apple-style-span" > Gerald</span> <span class="Apple-style-span" ></span></div><img src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQjVwzW5xOjttGJ8i5Q-urDL042AZmf3YekXEfNfK4xjo6ltVcN" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 230px; height: 219px;" border="0" alt="" />That is the single bullet theory, a ridiculous claim that people like Vincent Bugliosi think is plausible. Really? It's not plausible at all, unless Ford made the deceitful changes he did to the report. <div><br /></div><div>Ford's lie made it possible to place the blame on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmShDlQo7rU">Lee Harvey Oswald</a>. Oswald did not shoot John Fitzgerald Kennedy on 11/22/1963, but he became a patsy, instead of the hero he actually was. </div><div><br /></div><div>But Ford wasn't done yet. </div><div><br /></div><div>Go forward to Watergate. Richard Nixon has to resign as President because of that sordid affair. That makes Gerald Ford the new President. </div><div><br /></div><div>Okay, after Ford becomes President, he pardons Nixon and also makes Poppy Bush the new CIA Director. Why? First, he didn't want any more investigations about the Watergate situation. Because all roads led to Dealey Plaza. </div><div><br /></div><div>Also, the HSCA was investigating the JFK and MLK assassinations. Poppy stops any and all cooperation of the CIA to the HSCA. In this same time frame, key witnesses are being murdered. Witnesses like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIOnFpZaDcw">Roger Craig</a>, Sam Giancana, Johnny Roselli, Chuck Nicoletti and George DeMohrenshildt (Nicoletti and DeMohrenshildt were killed on the same day). </div><div><br /></div><div>In addition, Ford brings in Dick Cheney as his Chief of Staff and Donald Rumsfeld as his Secretary of Defense. </div><div><br /></div><div>It all comes full circle when the Supreme Court (led by Scalia and Thomas) coronated W Bush as President, as Cheney and Rumsfeld helped bring us the events of 9/11 and wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq. </div><div><br /></div><div>Poppy Bush had this to say about Ford at his funeral a few years back, "After a deluded gunman assassinated President Kennedy, our nation turned to Gerald Ford and a select handful of others to make sense of that madness," said Bush. "And the conspiracy theorists can say what they will, but the Warren Commission report will always have the final definitive say on this tragic matter. Why? Because Jerry Ford put his name on it and Jerry Ford’s word was always good." Poppy said that while he smirked and smiled. </div><div><br /><br /><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nNheVODT8Mg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Hopefully, the people who continue to search for the truth about the JFK assassination will have the last laugh.<div><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">Gerald Ford changed wording of Commission Report</span></div></div><br /><br /><br />HERE'S THE DOCUMENT WHERE FORD CHANGED "BACK" TO "BACK OF NECK" --OTHERWISE, THE ANGLE WOULD HAVE BEEN WRONG TO BLAME <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com">LEE HARVEY OSWALD</a>.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.jfklancer.com/docs.maps/ford1.gif"><img style="float:center; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 447px; height: 612px;" src="http://www.jfklancer.com/docs.maps/ford1.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />FORD IS ALSO HOW WE GOT THE WONDERFUL MEN CHENEY AND RUMSFELD INTO AMERICA'S --AND THE WORLD'S --AFFAIRS.<br /><br />YET <span style="font-weight:bold;">FORD WAS NEVER ELECTED VICE PRESIDENT</span>--HE WAS APPOINTED BECAUSE NIXON'S CORRUPT VICE PRESIDENT, SPIRO AGNEW, AS FORCED TO RESIGN.<br /><br />AND <span style="font-weight:bold;">HE WAS NEVER ELECTED PRESIDENT</span> --HE TOOK NIXON'S PLACE WHEN NIXON WAS FORCED TO RESIGN.<br /><br />NO WONDER EMPEROR BUSH SMILED--JUST THINKING ABOUT IT ALL, AS "THE SHRUB" -- BUSH'S SON-- CONTINUED T0 DESTROY WHAT HIS PREDECESSORS BEGAN....Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-52194411054990294612011-02-23T00:18:00.000+02:002011-02-23T01:03:25.477+02:00EXILEDONLINE TELLS YOU ABOUT MEDIA COVER-UPS AND SELF-CENSORSHIP--TO AMERICA'S DETRIMENT<span class="Apple-style-span"><span style="font-weight:bold;">A BRIEF HISTORY OF MEDIA COVER-UPS & SELF-CENSORSHIP: WHO’S AFRAID OF RUSS BAKER’S “FAMILY OF SECRETS”</span><br /></span><br />By Matt Harvey<br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span">(note: This essay outlines the massive prejudice of the media and one book's exposure of how, since the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald, the media has made every possible effort to present Oswald as guilty, despite ever-more evidence proving that Oswald was innocent. The connections between media bias, and the CIA who puts reporters and media managers in high places, and the resuls of media bias and the influence of the Bush dynasty are worth copying and placing on your own blogs. (Some links have been added that can link new readers to my Youtube videos.)</span><br /><br />ARTICLE SOURCE: http://exiledonline.com/a-brief-history-of-media-cover-ups-self-censorship-reviewing-family-of-secrets/<br /><br />On February 17, 1967, the newspapers ran stories about a sensational new investigation into JFK’s assassination, headed by a New Orleans DA named Jim Garrison, who called into question the “lone gunman” theory laying all the blame on Lee Harvey Oswald. Five days after the news story broke, the prime target of Garrison’s investigation, David Ferrie, a right-wing pilot linked to the CIA, was found dead of a “cerebral hemorrhage.”<br /><br />Public opinion was polarized over JFK’s assassination. Forty-six percent of Americans doubted the Warren Commission’s finding that Oswald “acted alone;” Garrison was becoming more vocal about Oswald’s alleged CIA connection; and independent journalists were asking potentially embarrassing questions. Nerves in Washington were frayed.<br /><br />Then on April 1, the CIA circulated an extraordinary memo instructing agents how they could play the mainstream media in order to discredit all the speculation of CIA involvement. The top-secret memo—marked PSYCH for psychological warfare—read in part: “Employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”<br /><br />So the CIA instructed its media assets to plant book reviews designed to debunk conspiracy theorists. And lo and behold, almost five decades after the assassination, mainstream media reviewers in the daily and weekly press are still carrying out the CIA’s orders, willingly or unwillingly. The New York Times has been especially zealous in this respect. The <span style="font-style:italic;">Village Voice </span>ran a detailed report in 1992 on how the <span style="font-style:italic;">Times</span> has managed the JFK assassination story; what they found is that over the years, in the rare instance of a reporter trying to file a dissenting opinion on the JFK assassination, the piece was either killed, or drastically altered. (A meticulously researched 14,000 word piece published in 1972 by <span style="font-style:italic;">Reason Magazine</span>, “How All the News About Political Assassinations in the United States Has Not Been Fit to Print in The New York Times,” documented the august daily’s unwillingness, all the way back to the day of the assassination, to brook any alternative to Oswald’s sole guilt.)<br /><br />Now, in response to a flurry of new books dealing with issues related to JFK’s November 22, 1963, assassination, the mainstream media have gone back to defending the “coincidence theory” consensus, but oddly enough they’re even more aggressive now than before —going so far as to question the sanity of people who doubt that Oswald “acted alone.”<br /><br />The Times is again at the fore, using reviews of fiction, obituaries and even television coverage to smack down “lone gunman” doubters. On February 17, hipster-in- residence, Dave Itzkoff, sneered at Oliver Stone’s “opinionated — some would say imaginative — takes on notable American events and figures.” The December 7 obituary of Malcolm Perry, the surgeon who performed a tracheotomy on the dying president —a procedure that made it much more difficult to forensically identify the wound—speculated as to why Dr. Perry refused to speak to the press: “[P]erhaps because he regretted contributing, however inadvertently, to the various conspiracy theories that have sprung up despite the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald acted alone,” the Times man mused. But through it all, as urged in the CIA memo, book reviews have stuck to the coincidence-theorist program.<br /><br />The <span style="font-style:italic;">NY Times</span> doesn’t only carry the CIA’s water in covering the JFK assassination aftermath. Frances Stonor Saunders’ highly respected history of the CIA’s influence on American arts and letters during the 1950s and 60s, <span style="font-style:italic;">The Cultural Cold War</span>, singles out the Times‘ book review page being specifically prone to Agency influence. “Sometimes reviewers of books in the New York Times or other respected broadsheets were penned by CIA writers under contract,” she writes.<br /><br />Those who try to question the assassination “lone-nut” consensus could find out about the Times’ unwritten editorial policy the hard way. The paper’s first edition, on December 1st 1970, carried a provocative, mostly positive, review of Jim Garrison’s book Heritage of Stone—by then newly minted critic, John Leonard. Citing a string of hard-hitting forensic questions about the assassination raised by Garrison, Leonard strongly implied that the DA might have been on the right track. He wrote: “Something stinks about the whole affair.” But immediately after it ran, the newspaper pulled it, scrubbed it, and ran an altered version of review in subsequent editions, which was much more keeping in the spirit of the consensus. Leonard was promoted to editor of the Sunday Book Review, but the incident left a sour taste in his mouth. From then on, Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, a thoughtful purveyor of the Warren findings, who had panned Mark Lane’s Rush to Judgment, handled assassination books.<br /><br />“The only reason I continued to review assassination books was because they fascinated me,” Lehmann-Haupt wrote me. “It did not reflect any policy of the paper whatsoever.” But he admits Times editors made their opinions known about a range of subjects in more indirect ways, which still affected coverage. In 1977, a still rebellious John Leonard filed a piece on the book My Story,by Kennedy mistress and Mafia moll Judith Exner. (She made waves in 1975 when the Church Committee investigating CIA crimes subpoenaed her.) Managing editor Abe Rosenthal–a notorious Agency suck-up– killed it.<br /><br />Kennedy assassination references materialized in Lehmann-Haupt’s fiction reviews as well. The protagonist of <span style="font-style:italic;">The Magician</span>, by Sol Stein, was portrayed as, “one of those `types,’ like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLFNpc8IOgo">Lee Harvey Oswald </a>and James Earl Ray, who are born to lead, but lacking the equipment to do so, must assassinate the true leaders.” Coincidentally, Stein, an intellectual Cold Warrior, had served as Executive Director of the American Committee for Cultural Freedom, an Agency-backed operation, in the 1950s.<br /><br />In 1993, Lehmann-Haupt championed serial-plagiarist Gerald Posner’s Case Closed–still considered the definitive defense of the Warren Commission’s version of events. Described—in one of the Times’ more tepid critiques of his work— as, having “built his literary career in no small part on debunking popular conspiracy theories,” Posner has never wanted for space in the <span style="font-style:italic;">Times</span>. One of his pro-Establishment Op-ed page contributions was “Single Bullet, Single Gunman,” published February 2007. And it’s continued until recently: In December 2009, Bryan Burrough, writing in the <span style="font-style:italic;">Book Review</span>, praised Posner’s latest piece of non-fiction <span style="font-style:italic;">Miami Babylon</span>. But last month, Posner’s luck ran out. After being caught plagiarizing pieces he filed for the <span style="font-style:italic;">Daily Beast</span>, it was quickly discovered that long passages of <span style="font-style:italic;">Miami Babylon</span> were lifted from another Miami history, Frank Owen’s <span style="font-style:italic;">Clubland</span>. So now it turns out that the chief propagandist promoting the Warren Commission’s theory has been outed as a liar and a fraud—or in Posner’s own words, “Yeah, I’m a thieving cocksucker.”<br /><br />Burrough is positioning himself as the Times‘ next-generation debunker-cop: In 2007, he handled the review of Vincent Bugliosi’s 1,612-page Reclaiming History, a much denser and more rigorous defense of the Warren Commission than Gerald The Thieving Cocksucker could manage. But once again, Burrough’s review was so full of over-the-top praise that it verged on bad parody. Lauding the doorstop as a “public service,” Burrough stood up and saluted it: “It’s time we marginalized Kennedy conspiracy theorists the way we’ve marginalized smokers.” And then there’s the Times‘ chief critic, Michiko Kakutani, who wields considerable might in the publishing world: she too has been equally enthusiastic in hurling brickbats at lone gunman skeptics. In a February 15 review of Voodoo Histories, an epic put-down of a wide range of conspiracy theories by British neocon columnist, David Aaronivitch, Kakutani lays it all on the table. Repeating Aaronivitch’s reference to a poll that found 40% of Americans believe in “a Kennedy conspiracy,” she cracks: “It’s enough to make the characters from X-Files… Proud.”<br /><br />In fact, it’s even worse than Kakutani lets on. An ABC poll taken in 2003 found that “7 in 10 Americans think the assassination of John F. Kennedy was the result of a plot.” Not to mention the 1979 the House Select Committee on Assassinations which found that there was a “probable conspiracy” to kill Kennedy; or the real-life CIA conspiracies documented in the 1975 hearings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence–including a scheme to supply anti-Castro Cuban dissidents with a rifle equipped with a telescope and silencer. Perhaps Kakutani avoids referring to these facts because they run counter to Aaronovitch’s overarching thesis that modern conspiracies are fantasies cooked up by civilization’s discontents.<br /><br />Into this vortex of institutional skepticism and editorial consensus steps Russ Baker, an investigative journalist who has been published in just about every heavyweight publication, including the New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and the New York Times. His contribution to the JFK controversy is a 500-page, a massively footnoted history of the rise of the Bush family, titled Family of Secrets. Not only does Baker challenge the conventional wisdom that Oswald “acted alone,” he argues forcefully that the JFK assassination was a successful coup pulled off by a “globally reaching, fundamentally amoral, financial-intelligence-resource apparatus.” At the center of this anti-democratic clique, which operated feverishly in Dallas around the assassination, was a 39-year-old deep-cover CIA operative named George “Poppy” Bush. Since then, with the help of its planted assets in the media, the power of the financial-military-intelligence elite has only grown. And with it, the power of the Bushes, who, like some tribe of malign Zeligs, were present at virtually every pressure point in our recent history, including Watergate.<br /><br />The country’s collective image of “Poppy” Bush has been shaped by a few broad biographical strokes: genial patrician who, after flying a fighter in the Pacific and a political career of ups and downs, finally lucked his way into the presidency in 1988. (His brief stint as the CIA’s “first civilian director,” in 1977, when the agency was under fire from Congressional investigators—the Church Commission in the Senate, and the Pike Commission in the House– might be referenced in passing.) An unwitting illustration of just how pervasive is Bush’s benign if bumbling public persona came from stand-up comic– and fierce Warren Report critic– Mort Sahl in 2004. Deadpanning that Bush had once asked him who he would get to run the CIA, Sahl quipped: “Why don’t you get the guy who ran it when you were ‘running’ it?”<br /><br />Yet the public record has long held clues that hint at a darker reality. Baker cites an FBI memo from November 29, 1963, in which FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover reports having briefed “Mr. George Bush of the [CIA]” after the JFK assassination. While the memo proved a mild Beltway curiosity in 1988, when the <span style="font-style:italic;">Nation</span> first broke it, Bush was able to duck the issue by denying he was that George Bush. A different “George Bush” was identified who had worked as a clerk in the CIA—but it was found to be implausible that Hoover would have contact with someone as low-ranking as the other George Bush, and the mystery remained.<br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bush-456x550.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 456px; height: 550px;" src="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bush-456x550.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />The FBI memo recording George Bush’s “I was in Tyler” alibi<br /><br />One of Family of Secrets’ most tantalizing threads centers on Bush’s long-time relationship to George de Mohrenschildt, a mysterious right-wing White Russian who was <a href="http://WWW.MEANDLEE.COM">Lee Harvey Oswald</a>’s “mentor.” Bush has long stated that he does “not recall” where he was on the day that Kennedy was killed, making him one of the only Americans who was an adult at the time not to remember that day—but his lapse of memory becomes even more strange when one considers Bush’s similar evasions on Iran-Contra.<br /><br />Baker cuts through the multiple layers of noise (he would say disinformation) to establish once and for all Bush’s whereabouts on that fateful day.<br /><br />The timeline of Bush’s movements are almost impossible to read without raising suspicions:<br /><br />1. George Bush Sr. spent the night of November 21—and early the next day morning—in Dallas at the Sheraton Hotel. The next day, November 22, Bush flew out of Dallas on a friend’s private plane to nearby Tyler, Texas, around 12:30 PM, the time of the shooting.<br /><br />2. Surfacing in Tyler around 1 PM, he begins a scheduled talk to a local Kiwanis club. After being interrupted with the tragic news, he stoically halts the speech. At 1:45 he calls the FBI in Houston to claim that a local [Dallas] GOP employee, James Parrott, was acting suspiciously and might be JFK’s shooter. Parrott turns out to be harmless and childlike.<br /><br />3. Later that same day he flies back to Dallas again, but leaves immediately—on a civilian flight—to return to Houston, where he lives.<br /><br />Unsurprisingly, Bush “does not recall” making the FBI call from Tyler, which Baker sees as a transparent ploy to establish an alibi. Barbara Bush has added another layer of doubt by admitting, in her vaguely sketched memoir, “Barbara Bush: A Memoir,” to spending the 22nd with the wife of Al Ulmer, a CIA “coup expert.” While Baker may be too quick to interpret these facts in the most damning possible light—that Bush was directly involved in the assassination—Bush’s actions certainly cast doubt on his claim to “not recall” where he was on that momentous day. Which raises the truly serious question of what he is trying to hide.<br /><br />Baker reveals that in addition to Bush, a dazzling line-up of powerful players, who each harbored hatred of Kennedy—including Richard Nixon, who gave a speech to a beverage convention—were in Dallas on or around November 22. Allen Dulles, who had been purged by Kennedy from his CIA directorship in 1961 after the Bay of Pigs fiasco, spent time in Dallas in late October, ostensibly on a book tour promoting his tell-nothing memoir, “The Craft of Intelligence.” <span style="font-weight:bold;">(Baker does not mention the fact that Dallas’s mayor, Earl Cabell, was the brother of Air Force General <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb46jE6xHrs">C.P. Cabell</a>—the CIA’s Deputy Director under Dulles.)</span><br /><br />While Baker admits that all of these facts could amount to nothing more than an incredible series of coincidences, at the very least his portrayal of the elite’s powerful and coordinated behind-the-scenes machinations to consolidate power – which reached critical mass at the time of Kennedy’s assassination, and culminated in George W. Bush’s stolen election in 2000 – reminded me of the Roman Republic’s transition to empire as described in Edward Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.” Indeed, Baker’s W. seems eerily reminiscent of Gibbon’s Augustus, who “at the age of nineteen [assumed] the mask of hypocrisy, which he never afterwards laid aside.” Augustus, Gibbon adds, “was sensible that mankind…would submit to slavery, provided they were assured that they still enjoyed their ancient freedoms.”<br /><br />**<br /><br />In the fall of 2008, as the publication date for “Family of Secrets” approached, establishment reviewers signaled growing interest. Michiko Kakutani of the <span style="font-style:italic;">New York Times </span>asked for a reviewer’s copy. Professing enthusiasm about the book to its publisher, Bloomsbury, <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span> magazine’s Lev Grossman floated the possibility that Baker could make his case to <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span>’s readers in an online op-ed. Understandably, Baker began to feel his book might become an “an instant blockbuster.”<br /><br />The first review of “Family of Secrets” appeared in Time’s December 17, 2008, issue, the same one that named Barack Obama “Man of the Year.” But the review was only 164 words long–leaving Grossman with just enough space to blurb Baker’s two most shocking assertions: “The prodigiously industrious investigative journalist Russ Baker has drawn [dozens of connections] between President No. 41 and the assassination of President No. 35,” he writes. “He also connects the dots between the Bushes and Watergate.” So there you have it: Credibly sourced claims that “Poppy” Bush was involved in two acts of high treason – charges laid down by a seasoned mainstream reporter and duly noted in the leading journal of the midcult establishment. Major media names like Bill Moyers, Dan Rather and Gore Vidal lent their praise to Baker’s book. Surely, Meet the Press and Hardball would come knocking on Baker’s door next—and the Bush family would be rocked back on its heels. Says Baker sadly, “That’s how it would have played out if the system worked,” he told me in an interview.<br /><br />Baker—a Columbia j-school grad who trained Serbian journalists for the State Department in the 90s—found out very quickly that the system did not work. After it became clear that his book was being ignored by the majority of the mainstream media, Baker fell back on Plan B. By late January 2009, he had embarked on a low-rent talk-show circuit, comprised of public access TV shows and Internet radio programs. (When New World Order-obsessed phony-preacher Alex Jones asked Baker if he was afraid of being murdered, Baker replied dryly: “No, my health is just fine.”) In blurbing the book, Bill Moyers had commented: “A lot of us look to Russ to tell us what we don’t know.” Yet this magnum opus of one of America’s brightest and hardest working reporters had been pushed to the fringes of American consciousness by the collective spokes-apparatus of the Establishment. I wanted to know why."<br /><br />After several attempts to penetrate the sheer volume of its reporting, “Family of Secrets” hooked me in. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Baker pulls no punches in exploding the myth that the CIA performs covert operations only on foreign soil.</span> In chapter after chapter he offers a glimpse of how power is really exercised in this country—and has been since the 1950s, when the seeds of a covert-police state were laid. While I’m not willing to swallow every connection Baker makes, there are hundreds and hundreds of well-documented and carefully footnoted facts that deserve a fair hearing. So far, they have received nothing of the sort.<br /><br />In hindsight, <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span>’s review—printed in a comically slim sidebar found to the far right of a full-page pictorial, “History of the Times Square New Year’s Eve Ball”—was rife with clues as to what the establishment had in store for “Family of Secrets.” No one, least of all Baker, should have been surprised that <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span>’s editorial brass made it a point to literally marginalize—and scoff at—Baker’s work.<br /><br /> Prescott Bush’s “close friend and fellow Bonesman,” Henry Luce, <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span>’s founder, makes numerous appearances in the book using the Time-Life empire to provide cover for the CIA. He put up capital for “Poppy” Bush’s first spy-fronting business, a murky off-shore oil company named Zapata; he threatened John F. Kennedy with <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span>’s wrath; he purchased Abraham Zapruder’s famous color film of the assassination and kept it hidden from public view for over a decade, until it was pried out and finally released, shocking the country with visual evidence strongly suggesting that one shot hit Kennedy’s head from the front.<br /><br />Grossman didn’t respond to my attempts to get him to explain just how his piece wound up edited down to such a tiny blurb. <span style="font-style:italic;">Time</span> has a long-standing caste system, favoring unseen rewrite men at the top. Conspiracy-minded readers might be forgiven for wondering if Grossman, known as something of a stylist, would voluntarily mar his prose with a made-up adjective, “farfetchedly,” especially when it seems to undercut his thesis.<br /><br />But the sleaziest attempts to undercut Baker’s book came from the <span style="font-style:italic;">Los Angeles Times</span> and the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post</span>—the papers notorious for their campaign to discredit and destroy Pulitzer Prize journalist Gary Webb–the heroic <span style="font-style:italic;">San Jose Mercury</span> reporter who exposed the CIA’s connection to the ghetto crack epidemic in 1996. Their campaign worked—Webb was eventually demoted and finally committed suicide. <br /><br />With Baker’s book, the <span style="font-style:italic;">Los Angeles Times</span> and the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post</span> went back to work discrediting their colleagues who dare to get out of line. Tim Rutten, a bearded <span style="font-style:italic;">LA Times</span> metro-desk tool, filed his handiwork on January 7, 2009. After framing his attack by quoting long passages of Richard Hofstadter’s 1964 book <span style="font-style:italic;">The Paranoid Style in American Politics</span>, Rutten goes after Baker with bizarre language that reads like some fanatical Bolshevik.<br /><br />He decries the very existence of <span style="font-style:italic;">Family of Secrets</span> as a “reprehensible calumny” and denounces Baker’s reliance on “mind-numbing accretion of names, dates and places”– in other words, too many facts. <span style="font-weight:bold;">That any American would even question the findings of the Warren Commission makes Rutten sputter with rage:</span> <span style="font-weight:bold;">“I regard the belief that <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">Lee Harvey Oswald</a> acted alone as an important indicium of mental health,” he writes.</span> Two months earlier, Rutten had been the proud recipient of the Anti-Defamation League’s Hubert H. Humphrey First Amendment Freedoms Prize. The last time I looked, the First Amendment was about encouraging freedom of speech, not vilifying the bearer of unpopular opinions<br /><br />“Rutten actually did me a favor.” Baker says, a rare smile passing over his face. “It was so over the top that people in LA started to pay attention.”<br /><br />Writing in the January 11 issue of the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post</span>, former Spy-editor Jamie Malanowski refused to even consider the possibility that the elder Bush would lie to protect his cover; that is, to deny he was a part of the CIA until 1977, when he became the agency’s first “civilian” director. Citing a 1988 denial by “a spokesman for the then-vice president,” Malanowski dismisses the memo from J. Edgar Hoover linking “Mr. George Bush [CIA]” to a November 29, 1963, briefing on the assassination. (Oddly, the <span style="font-style:italic;">Post</span>’s hawk-eyed proofreaders nodded when Malanowski referred to Baker as “Smith.” Former Slate media-critic Russ Smith is a nearly universally despised figure in journalism.)<br /><br />It’s hardly surprising that the <span style="font-style:italic;">Post</span> review fails to disclose Baker’s damaging exposes on the Washington Post’s well-documented links to intelligence and domestic propaganda. “Family of Secrets” offers a trove of evidence that calls into question Bob Woodward’s—and by extension his editor Ben Bradlee’s and the Post’s—trustworthiness. The Watergate myth (enshrined by Hollywood in the movie “All the President’s Men”) tells the underdog story about how a plucky pair named Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein cracked Nixon’s complicity in the break-in, and how the two reporters managed to do it all with only shoe-leather and a conveniently voluble insider-informant (or in fiction terms, a “cheap literary device”) known as “Deep Throat.”<br /><br />But Baker raises evidence that Woodward, who served five years in Naval Intelligence in the 1960s, as a long-time deep-cover intelligence operative advancing his handlers’ hidden agendas. Of course, the <span style="font-style:italic;">Post</span> will argue that any reporter who says that Naval Intelligence counted Ben Bradlee in its ranks during WWII, and that Paul Ignatius, the <span style="font-style:italic;">Post</span>’s president until 1971, was secretary of the Navy under Lyndon Johnson, suggests an addiction to “mind-numbing” facts that raises questions about the author’s mental health. Better to de-numb the mind with fewer facts.<br /><br />Demonstrating just how convoluted the real-world machinations of the intelligence community can be, Baker has dug up an undated memo from Charles Colson, then Nixon’s Special Counsel, that reads, in part: “The CIA has been unable to determine whether Bob Woodward was employed by the CIA.” This extraordinary document goes on to say that the CIA director had gotten the message to Woodward—who was reportedly “incensed” that his murky connections were being looked into.<br /><br />No one today doubts that George W. Bush transformed the country for the worse, in ways that won’t be fully understood for decades. By the time W. and his cabinet hunkered down in the White House for their final days, however, elements of his legacy had emerged: <span style="font-weight:bold;">a politicized Supreme Court ever willing to curtail civil liberties and protect corporate interests; a never-ending war at home and abroad against a sketchily defined, shape-shifting supranational enemy; a highly concentrated and virtually unregulated banking elite, which in the process of amassing unheard-of fortunes left a great recession in its wake.</span> (Even Bob Woodward, who earlier in W.’s first term penned an admiring volume about Bush 43’s administration, had become highly critical by the end of his second term.) The disaster we’re now in deserves more investigations with more open minds—the very opposite of what the establishment will allow. Back in December 2008 the besieged mainstream media—busied with breathless blanket coverage of Barack Obama—was in no position to even raise the key question, namely: <span style="font-weight:bold;">How did this dyslexic princeling, son of a one-term president, steal an election, start two endless wars, wreck the financial system—and get away with it?</span><br /><br />Seemingly alone among American journalists, Baker had the guts – and smarts – to at least try to answer this question without falling into the mainstream trap of self-censorship. <span style="font-weight:bold;">Explaining to me how he wound up getting pushed out into mainstream Siberia, he says: “You can’t even ask if the conventional surface explanation is adequate, let alone totally wrong.”</span><br /><br />I’m sitting with Baker in an upscale East Village café, listening to him argue his case. Middle-aged, with preternaturally youthful features, hooded eyes, and short graying hair, he wears the uniform of a typical middle-aged professional: glasses, white designer tee shirt and leather jacket. His voice barely rising above a whisper, he says: “I’m as shocked at the stuff in my book as my readers.”<br /><br />“Poppy” Bush has long been on his radar.<br /><br />On September 21, 1991, Baker published a scathing feature in the <span style="font-style:italic;">Village Voice</span>, entitled “CIA: Out of Control.” Baker’s article argued that the Agency was scrambling to find new “bogeymen to vanquish” after the collapse of the Eastern Bloc, and amid this scramble for a new enemy, Baker wrote, “Bush has worked unceasingly to weaken the checks and balances that were instituted following a string of White House-connected scandals in the 1970s.”<br /><br />Even Reagan’s would-be assassin John Hinckley was tied to the Bush family.<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hinckley-photo1-470x431.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 470px; height: 431px;" src="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hinckley-photo1-470x431.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Above: Hinckley poses for future newspaper reports. Below: Houston Chronicle report on Scott Hinckley’s assassination-day dinner date with Neil Bush.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hinckley-article.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 928px; height: 465px;" src="http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hinckley-article.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Baker himself is a man without definable qualities, except for hints of an East Coast formality inconsistent with the vibe of the town where he grew up: Venice Beach, California. You can easily come away from a long conversation with him wondering who he really is. He even refuses to give his age. Adding to his sense of mystery, when pressed, he sketches out a hazy background, which includes: time spent working in a “family importing business;” “a father who was an officer in the Air Force and worked in the aerospace industry, simultaneously;” “a mother originally from Europe.” Whatever the genesis of Baker’s disgust with the Bushes, few would deny that in the years following his Voice article, the trend towards weakening checks and balances—and towards manufacturing new bogeymen—went haywire.<br /><br />“You can be a reasonably good political reporter without ever coming across this stuff about Bush,” he says, charitably. But despite his dry demeanor, it is clear that his treatment at the hands of the mainstream media, especially the Times, stings him deeply, and his mood begins to visibly sink when the subject of his freeze-out is raised.<br /><br />Asked why the <span style="font-style:italic;">Times</span> gives so much space to conspiracy de-bunkers like Posner while ignoring <span style="font-style:italic;">Family of Secrets</span>, Baker says: “It’s a mind set.”<br /><br />He attributes the inability of his nominally liberal peers to even consider his findings to “cognitive dissonance.” In other words, it’s just too jarring for the average Manhattan liberal, who Baker says is primarily interested in “yoga, food and feng shui.” Journalists especially are almost by nature part of and ingratiating themselves into the Establishment, he explains. “When you’re in the status quo, you’re invited to a lot of dinner parties. Even if you watch Jon Stewart, you can still think things are OK,” he says. “If you have to stop and say ‘Oh my God, something scary,’ you can’t function”<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">“Journalism is not a moral business,” he says finally.</span><br /><br />But it is supposed to take its role as one of the checks and balances seriously, if this country is going to function properly.<br /><br />On December 22, 1963, a month after JFK’s assassination, the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post </span>published a confounding editorial by ex-President Harry Truman in which he attacked the power of the CIA. Truman was a beloved figure across the country—and yet even he couldn’t defeat the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post</span>’s censors. Incredibly, former President Truman’s piece was quickly yanked from subsequent editions of the <span style="font-style:italic;">Washington Post</span>, as if it hadn’t ever been published. But the record of it remains, and it is worth re-reading <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHwbOWLs82M">Truman’s ominous final sentence</a>, published one month after JFK’s murder, which reads: “There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.”<br /><br />According to Baker, that need has only grown more pressing.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-45507668361724396682011-02-15T20:53:00.000+02:002011-02-15T21:13:11.181+02:00The Girl on the Stairs: Yet Another Way Lee Harvey Oswald Was Framed<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51kezZgDq4L._SL500_AA266_PIkin3,BottomRight,-2,34_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 300px; height: 300px;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51kezZgDq4L._SL500_AA266_PIkin3,BottomRight,-2,34_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; "><h3 class="productDescriptionSource" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 1.23em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0.75em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.375em; margin-left: -15px; clear: both; ">P EVERYONE WHO HAS READ <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">ME & LEE</a></h3><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><span class="Apple-style-span" >KNOWS THAT KEY WITNESSES WERE MADE</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" ><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span> TO BE AFRAID: WE HID OURSELVES.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" > </span></div><div style="font-size: small; "><br /></div><div style="font-size: small; ">VICTORA ELIZABETH ADAMS WAS NO EXCEPTION.</div><div style="font-size: small; "><br /></div><div class="productDescriptionWrapper" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: small; ">On November 22, 1963, a young Victoria Elizabeth Adams stood behind a fourth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas. She watched as John Kennedy was murdered in the streets below. Then, with a co-worker in tow, she ran down the back stairs of the building in order to get outside and determine what had happened.<br />At that precise moment, her life changed forever.<br />Unbeknownst to her but certainly in the forefront of the government's thinking was the fact that if Miss Adams was telling the truth, then she had descended those stairs at the same time Lee Oswald would have been on them as he made his escape from the sixth floor sniper's nest.<br />Yet Miss Adams saw no one.<br />And even though the stairs were old, wooden, and very creaky under any weight, she heard no one on them.<br />Her story presented obvious problems for the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald was the sole assassin. When Miss Adams was called to testify before a Commission attorney, she was quickly discredited, humiliated, and eventually branded a liar. Behind closed doors she pleaded with the government to conduct time tests of her actions if she wasn’t believed. She begged the government to question her co-workers, particularly the woman who had accompanied her down the stairs, if she was felt to have been inaccurate.<br />But she was ignored.<br />And so, knowing the truth of what she had done and now fearing for her life because of it, she went into hiding and became willing to die with that private knowledge.<br />Intrigued by what little was available about Miss Adams, the author went in search of her. It took him 35 years to eventually find this elusive witness. Along the way, many of the rumors and speculations surrounding <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">the JFK assassination</a> were finally put to rest. And in the end, the truth of what Miss Adams did was discovered.<br />This is an important story, unique in this mess surrounding the Kennedy assassination and buried for decades. It is an account the government did not want us to hear, and actually went to the extreme of fabricating evidence in order to prevent us from hearing it.<br />This is more than just another book on the JFK assassination.</div><div class="productDescriptionWrapper" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: small; ">==As a witness to the truth about Lee Harvey Oswald, I applaud the many new books which are emerging that one and all point to Lee's innocence. From D<a href="http://www.doctormarysmonkey.com/">r.Mary's Monkey</a>, to <a href="http://www.meandlee.com/">Me & Lee,</a> to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/lola4jvb4lho#p/u/3/iHwbOWLs82M">JFK and the Unspeakable</a>, to Inside the ARRB--the more we learn the truth,the more we understand about our government's takeover and how lies can control a people, ruining a nation.</div><div class="productDescriptionWrapper" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: small; "><br /></div><div class="productDescriptionWrapper" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: small; ">JVB</div><div class="productDescriptionWrapper" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; font-size: small; "><br /></div></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-71189541601340749322010-12-16T23:50:00.000+02:002011-02-04T01:18:52.878+02:00SECRET SERVICE DETAIL: THE TRUTH WILL SHOCK YOU!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiImvYr4mDozXlviO351Qfqz70QUziAbSxVdzsoGXSFW3CHZPDQTDXlqj0Wdiei6VkcqbvTCH97RoCn90TJCHDBu1WYXIf6znrrLBi5nj_XBD7p_JrCDK293bmzSfJSAN5tF4KekYcjZqlh/s1600/jfk+assasination+clint+hill.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 191px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiImvYr4mDozXlviO351Qfqz70QUziAbSxVdzsoGXSFW3CHZPDQTDXlqj0Wdiei6VkcqbvTCH97RoCn90TJCHDBu1WYXIf6znrrLBi5nj_XBD7p_JrCDK293bmzSfJSAN5tF4KekYcjZqlh/s320/jfk+assasination+clint+hill.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5569601340615589954" /></a><br />Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for the death of<div>President John F. Kennedy, as can be seen <a href="http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com/">here.</a><br /><br />As the photo shows us here--so tragically--our slain President was left "wide open" on Nov. 22, 1963. The sole car ahead of the presidential limo is fully out of any danger, and the car behind Kennedy, stuffed with secret service "protectors" cannot be seen, instead of </div><div>decreasing the between the presidential limo and the car behind it stuffed wit SS agents. There was no instantaneous response to bring secret service agents closer to the President's limo, or that car would have been right on the limo's bumper.<br /><br />JFK was shot repeatedly, but ONLY when SS agent Clint Hill disobeyed an order not to leave the follow-up car and sprinted to the limo did any help</div><div> reach Kennedy -- too late,of course. Clint Hill was JACKIE's guard, not JFK's!<br /><br />JFK's doctor had also been removed from the car.</div><div><br /></div><div>Know what else had been removed from that car? The "privacy window."What was ghat?</div><div>A protecive sheet of glass between JFK and Jackie and John Connally and his wife in the photo below. The frame was still there--but <a href="http://www.mindspring.com/~pamelajfk/jfk.html">the window had been removed</a>. A photo of the privacy window can be seen just below the death -day photo of the JFK limo:</div><div><a href="http://www.mindspring.com/~pamelajfk/jfk.html">oved.</a></div><div><img src="http://www.mindspring.com/~pamelajfk/jfk.jpg" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 924px; height: 479px;" border="0" alt="" /><img src="http://www.mindspring.com/~pamelajfk/LIMO1961.jpg" style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 1973px; height: 1559px;" border="0" alt="" /><br /></div><div><br /><br /><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>With the glass removed,a shot from the front could hit Kennedy without a chance of getting deflected.</div><div><br /></div><div>Here's a photo showing that THREE people often sat in the limo seats --not just two:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixA856bMO_-2sgpS2UjLj0xr8JgaS-I8Sctp_R_2GqnoTUPc4picg8ZduihBmTJ4USdi-Iac7TMRD_LLaYj9RR8nYELTLu5bUGeEyqCzZbLXuQAWAsHJPHZ8ioIEhS3-mKvLP2KuORhLPc/s1600/limo+jfk+jackie+3+in+seat.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 205px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixA856bMO_-2sgpS2UjLj0xr8JgaS-I8Sctp_R_2GqnoTUPc4picg8ZduihBmTJ4USdi-Iac7TMRD_LLaYj9RR8nYELTLu5bUGeEyqCzZbLXuQAWAsHJPHZ8ioIEhS3-mKvLP2KuORhLPc/s320/limo+jfk+jackie+3+in+seat.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5551404868261524242" /></a><br /><br />Below is another photo showing three people in the <span style="font-weight:bold;">front</span> seat. </div><div>But on JFK's Death Day, there were only two SS men in the front seat. </div><div><br /></div><div>In the usual Presidential parades, a number of cars would precede Kennedy's. Not this time.JUST ONE CAR was ahead -- and you can</div><div>to see a single policeman on a motorcycle in the photo showing Clint Hill jumping onto a car that obviously is not going very fast.</div><div><br /></div><div>Think of it. Not only was there just ONE car in front of the President-- insufficient protection for a head of state---- but in a city known to be hostile to the President, we do not see three people in the front seat of his limo, as had been the case on some other occasions,and the glass window had been removed.<br /><br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsUjOnQo3OOFuW6-RlpYRoVDboDWgmwGiuZZQQrvfE1TibQFzMCztpr2CUSkoPYPowZKJdxD0_bF7vzTeh41MltHZ-zP7XStjfcvTfru02jfIwal6b7r32BNpq95P7GPiXj5qammOO0Ho/s1600-r/mexico.JPG"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 390px; height: 310px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsUjOnQo3OOFuW6-RlpYRoVDboDWgmwGiuZZQQrvfE1TibQFzMCztpr2CUSkoPYPowZKJdxD0_bF7vzTeh41MltHZ-zP7XStjfcvTfru02jfIwal6b7r32BNpq95P7GPiXj5qammOO0Ho/s1600-r/mexico.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><br /><div><br />VINCENT PALAMARA HAS MET AND INTERVIEWED MORE SECRET SERVICE AGENTS IN "THE KENNEDY DETAIL" THAN ANY OTHER PERSON. IT IS MY DUTY TO MAKE HIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO ALL, which can be found online at:<br /><br />http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v4n1/v4n1revelations.pdf<br /><br />ANYONE WHO PARROTS "LEE HARVEY OSWALD ASSASSINATED PRESIDENT KENNEDY" AS I'VE SAID BEFORE--EITHER HAS A DOUBLE-DIGIT IQ, IS INCREDIBLY TRUSTING OF OUR GOVERNMENT (DESPITE ITS HEINOUS TRACK RECORD ON LYING ABOUT THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION) OR IS A HENCHMAN FOR "THEM."<br /><br />BELOW IS AN INTRODUCTION TO PALAMARA'S WORK. YOU CAN VIEW MANY YOUTUBE VIDEOS HE HAS ALSO MADE, WHICH I HAVE FEATURED IN PREVIOUS BLOGS DUE TO THEIR PROBATIVE VALUE.<br /><br />I HAVE PLACED COMMENTS IN BOLD FACE THROUGHOUT.<br /><br /> Judyth Vary Baker<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">VINCENT MICHAEL PALAMARA / Survivor’s Guilt<br />Revelations</span><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">Survivor’s Guilt: The Secret Service and the Failure to Protect the President</span> by<br />Vincent Michael Palamara contains the following revelations:<br />• The fraudulent notion that JFK had ordered the agents off the rear of<br />his limousine in Dallas is conclusively debunked. Agents on or near<br />the rear of JFK’s car would have thwarted his death.<br /><br />• The popular and widespread myth that President Kennedy personally<br />ordered the bubbletop off his limousine in Dallas is likewise shown to<br />be a convenient exaggeration. An impossible multiplicity of responsibility is painstakingly demonstrated, as are multiple options involving<br />the bubbletop that were not used in Dallas.<br /><br />• The alarming and shocking behavior of perhaps the most important<br />agent connected to the Dallas trip, JFK’s driver, is explored in unprecedented detail.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">==JVB: Guess who the driver was who responded incorrectly in the Nixon trip to Caracas, Venezuela,allowing crowds to reach Nixon, attack his limo, and spit on him?<br /></span><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/us-relations/nixon-caracas2.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 401px; height: 550px;" src="http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/us-relations/nixon-caracas2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">JVB:</span> <span style="font-style:italic;">I was told in November, 1963 that a study had been made of William Greer's slow reaction to danger -- he had a habit of putting on the brakes when startled, I was told -- which would make him "the" ideal person to place in the driver's seat that day. He had many such previous assignments as driver. It was important to have the car slow down or even stop so Jackie Kennedy would not get hit. A rumor had spread that Aristotle Onassis (who was at the White House when Jackie returned with JFK's body) would have sought revenge on anyone who accidentally hit Jackie, should an assassination attempt be made on Kennedy with Jackie as a victim as well:</span><br /><br />"Onassis was a guest at the White House during the funeral. President Kennedy had told Onassis that he was not welcome in America until after the 1964 election, but his presence went unnoticed in the days of shock and mourning that gripped America and the world. He played the part of court jester at the funeral, drinking heavily and telling stories with Bobby and Teddy Kennedy. Nevertheless, the Kennedy brothers instinctively disliked him.<br />On December 3, a week after JFK's dramatic, televised funeral, Onassis and Maria Callas conspicuously celebrated her 40th birthday at Maxim's in Paris. But a close Onassis aide, Panaghis Vergottis, said that he knew Onassis' interest in the newly-widowed Jacqueline Kennedy would not quickly go away."<br /><span style="font-style:italic;">(REF: http://aristotle-onassis.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archive.html)</span><br /><br />• The long-standing and wide-reaching myth that President Kennedy<br />was difficult to protect and somehow, directly or indirectly, made his<br />own tragic death easier for an assassin or assassins is exploded for<br />the first time in devastating and authoritative detail.<br /><br />• The presence of unauthorized Secret Service agents in Dealey Plaza,<br />the site of the assassination, is exhaustively documented in devastating detail.<br /><br />• The media’s reporting of the death of a Secret Service agent the day of<br />the assassination is painstakingly examined.<br /><br />• The untimely death of a Secret Service agent shortly before the Texas<br />trip is revealed in context.<br /><br />• The Dallas police plan to use many flanking motorcycles, used to<br />shield the President during the motorcade, was changed shortly before the assassination by the Secret Service.<br /><br />• Disturbing sentiments regarding President Kennedy on the part of<br />several key Secret Service agents is revealed, as well as the justifiable<br />feelings of guilt and responsibility for the President’s death by others.<br />In addition, the surprising conspiratorial beliefs of several former<br />agents are chronicled.<br /><br />• The covert monitor of mortal threats to JFK’s life for the New York,<br />Florida, and Texas trips—the last three major Presidential forays—by<br />two members of the Secret Service’s Protective Research Section is revealed.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">comment by JVB:</span> AND TODAY THE SOLD-OUT MEDIA IS EXONERATING THESE MEN WITH THE USUAL FILMS AND TV SPECIALS THAT HAVE TRIED UNSUCCESSFULLY FOR YEARS TO BLAME OSWALD.THE PEOPLE MUST NOT BE FOOLED INTO THINKING THE SECRET SERVICE WAS NOT INVOLVED IN PLANS FOR KENNEDY'S ASSASSINATION.<br /><br />REF FOR PALAMA'S OUTLINE: <span style="font-style:italic;">ASSASSINATION RESEARCH </span>/ Vol. 4 No. 1 © Copyright 2006 Vincent M. Palamara<br />Survivor’s Guilt 2 Revelations<br /><br />• A little-known military intelligence presence is shown to have existed<br />in Dallas on November 22, 1963, yet another probable covert monitor<br />of mortal threats to the President that was covered up after the assassination.<br /><br />• The presence of a CIA agent at the hospital the dying President was<br />taken to is revealed.<br /><br />• For the first time ever an exhaustive account of all the recent prior<br />threats to Kennedy’s life just before the President’s journey to Texas is<br />revealed.<br /><br />• The premature approval of Kennedy’s speech site in Dallas by members of the Secret Service, over other options, which determined the type of security used for the site, the choice of the route used to get to the destination, and even the speed of JFK’s limousine, is detailed in<br />full.<br /><br />• Despite the rabid, right-wing environment in Dallas, it is shown that<br />there were allegedly no threats found by the agency in this troubled<br />city, a seeming impossibility. Like the choice of speech site, this failure determined the level of security—or lack thereof—used for JFK’s<br />mortal trip to ‘the Big D’.<br /><br />• The press and photographers, Kennedy’s personal physician, military<br />aides, and several important vehicles were moved from their normal<br />positions close to JFK at the last minute, again by the Secret Service.<br /><br />• The lack of proper local police and military involvement will be shown<br />to be Secret Service responsibilities and, ultimately, failures. In addition, the strange omission of key members of the Secret Service is investigated.<br /><br />• It is shown that overpasses, buildings, windows, and rooftops were<br />not properly monitored, due to Secret Service negligence (or worse). In<br />addition, the strange conduct of local police and the agents themselves is also investigated, along with the ramifications of this behavior. An unprecedented agent-by-agent examination is documented, with disturbing results.<br /><br />• Evidence that the fateful motorcade route Kennedy rode in Dallas was<br />changed at the eleventh hour by the Secret Service is detailed in full.<br />Also, like the speech site, it is conclusively documented that other options—and alternative routes—were availabble and not used that fatal<br />day in Dallas.<br /><br />• Palamara demonstrates convincingly that President Kennedy was actually very personable and friendly with the Secret Service and did not interfere with their actions at all. In addition, JFK’s oft-noted obsession with death will be shown to be a by-product of his knowledge of threats to his life just before Dallas.<br /><br />• Evidence of covert security tests and studies, as well as the destruction and altering of crucial documents, evidence, and testimony, is revealed. Also, disturbing FBI–Secret Service feuding is investigated in<br />context.<br /><br />• A mountain of lies and bureaucratic cover-up is investigated, along<br />with the ramifications of these falsehoods for the subsequent investigations into the assassination, the conduct of the Secret Service itself, and, ultimately, the writing of accurate history.<br /><br />• Gross negligence and, in some instances, seeming culpability on the<br />part of members of the Secret Service, sworn to protect the life of<br />John F. Kennedy, is detailed with many disturbing ramifications revealed.<br /><br />• Primary, first-hand accounts of over 70 former Secret Service agents,<br />White House aides, and family members, many of whom have never<br />spoken publicly before, are documented in revealing detail. No other<br />author or government investigative body has successfully interviewed<br />and contacted as many of these men as Palamara. No other book has<br />ever examined the conduct of the Secret Service in such voluminous<br />and authoritative detail..."<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjhXyAc5kCxUc0srgMf0dM_aNDn6o14Jp1oSmxdy24hS2_Z6_I"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 152px; height: 176px;" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjhXyAc5kCxUc0srgMf0dM_aNDn6o14Jp1oSmxdy24hS2_Z6_I" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">SURVIVOR’S GUILT: THE SECRET SERVICE AND THE FAILURE TO PROTECT THE<br />PRESIDENT</span> BY VINCENT MICHAEL PALAMARA.<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br />click to enlarge:<span style="font-weight:bold;"></span></span><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjo3lcdSsLDiMwPkMYKdmHXC28sn-fbLSjzBBxDGxVj3nhv_eSxt6eCkCrYDnlUNVT5B_L0ZCuk7GCst3kYBkxLSDlpsSohxtKdNIhgtD_3c72Qx6ZCqiNpz4hP7y2GqQIeuPb_&q=cache%3A3GrJiBwO5LsJ%3Awww.jfklancer.com%2Fpdf%2Fsecret.pdf%20secret%20service%20greer%20caracas&docid=e19bfbc38fd0fd5ed6d07caccff1fa9f&a=bi&pagenumber=1&w=800"><img style="float:left; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 517px;" src="http://docs.google.com/viewer?pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjo3lcdSsLDiMwPkMYKdmHXC28sn-fbLSjzBBxDGxVj3nhv_eSxt6eCkCrYDnlUNVT5B_L0ZCuk7GCst3kYBkxLSDlpsSohxtKdNIhgtD_3c72Qx6ZCqiNpz4hP7y2GqQIeuPb_&q=cache%3A3GrJiBwO5LsJ%3Awww.jfklancer.com%2Fpdf%2Fsecret.pdf%20secret%20service%20greer%20caracas&docid=e19bfbc38fd0fd5ed6d07caccff1fa9f&a=bi&pagenumber=1&w=800" border="0" alt="" /></a></div></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-6480247244402446572010-12-14T04:35:00.001+02:002010-12-14T04:42:33.958+02:00IMPORTANT FILM SHOWS US THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SECRET SERVICE AND ITS BETRAYAL OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href=" https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMEs1nsdvmZGEodDSBNYym-gTjwzOZKXzaVv2YyN8BzZ0Xm40kAutWO0ZKBHcab1gs1i_FAPgAk6Y2-tZGKrAFACz4Ehh8rFXHHNIWIBwLwdGWiei-Daf0OQvR51YgYcXbzTaFoeUNqvc/s660/bolden.JPG"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 600px; height: 600px;" src=" https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMEs1nsdvmZGEodDSBNYym-gTjwzOZKXzaVv2YyN8BzZ0Xm40kAutWO0ZKBHcab1gs1i_FAPgAk6Y2-tZGKrAFACz4Ehh8rFXHHNIWIBwLwdGWiei-Daf0OQvR51YgYcXbzTaFoeUNqvc/s660/bolden.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">DON'T MISS THIS!</span><br /><br />JFK and his Secret Service Detail: Preview of Mark Lane's new film featuring Abraham Bolden<br /><br /><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/px-7IRJpMZE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/px-7IRJpMZE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object><br /><br />VINCE PALAMARA,WHOSE WORK ABOUT THE SECRET SERVICE I ADMIRE, STATES THIS ABOUT THIS IMPORTANT NEW FILM'S TRAILER:<br /><br />VincePalamara<br />1 week ago 3 <br />Fantastic! I am most looking forward to this amazing feature. God Bless Mark Lane and Abraham Bolden!<br /><br />VincePalamara<br />1 week ago 2 <br />1:58 (to 2:10): my unique blog photo compilation used: outstanding! Thanks! :)<br /><br />covenstead<br />1 week ago<br />This is incredible stuff! I can't wait to see the entire movie. I've always had nothing less than the utmost respect for Mark Lane. "Rush To Judgment" was one of the first books I ever read about the assassination. It is second to none, and it totally unpolluted by anything which has come since, because it's one of the earliest to have been written.<br /><br /><br />presorted5678<br />1 week ago<br />@RepublicConstitution who shot Kennedy is not that important. What is in this documentary is and has been here since 22November1963 - that is the Secret Service Agents did nothing to help Kennedy when the shots rang out. That in addition to the lax security in general, the route, the other Agents inaction, Greers slowing of the limousine and the destruction of evidence. ( the limousine was immediately washed out )<br /><br />presorted5678<br />1 week ago<br />I am glad to see Mr. Mark Lane back to work. This comes at a good time with the Road show going on now with Hill and Blaine.<br /><br />The agent in the front seat should have moved - there is no excuse in the world for that and he needs to be remembered in history for what he did.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-89810404234324650122010-11-30T22:50:00.000+02:002010-11-30T23:08:53.536+02:00Jesse Ventura recognizes the Kennedy Assassination as the Key to Today's Government Corruption<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRgv0QWQOGlqa6AIUw7mlpDMmi2zvyMEqJE7BWSW5eCl_XasICW"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 201px; height: 251px;" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRgv0QWQOGlqa6AIUw7mlpDMmi2zvyMEqJE7BWSW5eCl_XasICW" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br />Jesse Ventura reported having problems due to "the nature of your television program..." with Army officials...not to mention mainstream media [with the exception of Larry King Live) ignoring whatever he finds out.<br />Jesse Ventura had trouble getting 'official'permission to get filmed at Kennedy's grave, though, as Alex Jones says in this piece, people are always filming the site.<br /><br />Jesse gives the phone number of the Army official who said Jesse couldn't film at Arlington National Cemetery. Good for you, Jesse!<br /><br /><object width="432" height="346"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3Wi5YWMX6I?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C3Wi5YWMX6I?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br /><br />Jesse was told it was "...contrary to the mission of the United states Army" to have a TV program that suggests the US government had anything to do with the assassination. He took umbrage with that,noting that our government is supposed to be our servant, not the other way around.<br /><br />"I pay this guy's salary, yet he has the ability to deny me getting photographed at...[Kennedy's] eternal flame...because some of us believe the Warren Commission is a crock of you-know-what?"<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">About his two-hour interview with Marina:</span><br /><br />"She would't get on the air...[she said] nobody cares anymore...I told her this [the Kennedy assassination]is the cornerstone of [our] corruption."<br /><br />"...certainly she feels there is still a threat somewhere out there...that's the way it was intimated to me...she's 69 years old now...."<br /><br />Jesse reports being trailed, stalked..."we tried to hire a boat...none of the fishermen would take us out on their boat..." He said they were afraid to lose their licenses, handled by Homeland security--Jesse then described Homeland Security as "the Gestapo."<br /><br />Well,that makes two Gestapo's---CIA (Harry Truman) and Homeland Security (Jesse Ventura).<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5GCpPeUn0XXPjxcac5Iar6EiOd75Y1P7tq4mxsBarlomxx6MlkSeYy_SD6YVYEaxm-w0JAQRIsKh_wxQQPrV-YXxQVifxNHi5VY6bgmpVWnKCd8lH69x6XHSJVxCuyITcrF1GkcnW58m5/s1600/TRUMAN+CIA+GESTAPO+STATEMENT.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 194px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5GCpPeUn0XXPjxcac5Iar6EiOd75Y1P7tq4mxsBarlomxx6MlkSeYy_SD6YVYEaxm-w0JAQRIsKh_wxQQPrV-YXxQVifxNHi5VY6bgmpVWnKCd8lH69x6XHSJVxCuyITcrF1GkcnW58m5/s320/TRUMAN+CIA+GESTAPO+STATEMENT.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5545452625465792098" /></a>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-38877997275880171002010-11-24T18:08:00.000+02:002010-11-24T18:36:33.882+02:00FBI'S ZACK SHELTON INTERVIEWED BY PLAYBOY....TIME TO LOOK AT JAMES FILES<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtAE5jZ0_jPp69my3czoUSkQdAnAcGncAL_E2iw8AX8h645rrZMw"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 239px; height: 180px;" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtAE5jZ0_jPp69my3czoUSkQdAnAcGncAL_E2iw8AX8h645rrZMw" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQvb61IRMG-XZX-btsxEwy4RM0zX5HMzJ56tegzzbbP2UJVqhzS"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 182px; height: 276px;" src="http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQvb61IRMG-XZX-btsxEwy4RM0zX5HMzJ56tegzzbbP2UJVqhzS" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT96Zn9Etv11OpEQDJ0CNhfAg5zURewdfsLFoVb8VY_e8CNPq0q7g"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 313px; height: 234px;" src="http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT96Zn9Etv11OpEQDJ0CNhfAg5zURewdfsLFoVb8VY_e8CNPq0q7g" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />ZACK SHELTON WAS INTERVIEWED IN NOVEMBER'S <span style="font-style:italic;">PLAYBOY</span>. BELOW: SHELTON WITH WELL-KNOWN FIGURE...<br /><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSaWuzdX8Pscg4wpxqcQYCW4mT21DBZQbW-TYQwLVVWF7bwCEONFA"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 387px; height: 179px;" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSaWuzdX8Pscg4wpxqcQYCW4mT21DBZQbW-TYQwLVVWF7bwCEONFA" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><br /><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">IF YOU THINK JAMES FILES IS TO BE IGNORED IN THE MATTER OF WHO KILLED JFK, IT'S TIME TO READ THE COMMENTS POSTED AT JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM --BELOW--</span></b><br /><br /><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Zack Shelton interviewed by Playboy</span><br />by tom jeffers on Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:57 pm</b><B></B><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><b>Zach was interviewed by Playboy and it appears in the November 2010 issue.</b><br /><br /><br /><br />...He does include opinions of other fbi retirees that feel he was right on track. One of the interesting items is the fact that he verifies that Tony Accordo was still in charge of the chicago outfit during this time. those who were inside knew it and those who thought they knew everything keep saying that giancana was the man. Accordo was a slippery devil and alluded everyone for years to make them think he was retired. this was a big issue because alot of people discredit jimmy because he kept saying the hit came down from Accardo.<br /><br />http://jfkmurdersolved.com/pdf/playboy.pdf<br />One man's trash is another mans treasure...<br /><br />tom jeffers<br /> <br />Posts: 763<br />Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:15 am<br />Location: Terre Haute, Indiana<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by ChristophMessner on Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:27 pm<br /><br />Acc"a"rdo. <br />Zacharias Shelton had an interview with Wim Dankbaar and Jan de Vries, too, maybe Wim can show it.<br />unjust peace is better than unjust war; just war is better than unjust peace; just peace is better than just war<br /><br />ChristophMessner<br /> <br />Posts: 1457<br />Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:11 am<br />Location: Germany<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by tom jeffers on Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:33 pm<br /><br />IT SEEMS YOU CANNOT UPLOAD A PDF FILE SO IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO READ THE INTERVIEW DROP ME AN EMAIL AND I WILL FORWARD IT TO YOU.<br /><br />tomjeffers@frontier.com<br />One man's trash is another mans treasure...<br /><br />tom jeffers<br /> <br />Posts: 763<br />Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:15 am<br />Location: Terre Haute, Indiana<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by Barney on Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:56 am<br /><br />Well, after much hoopla, Zack Shelton's Playboy interview left me feeling let down somewhat. He downplays the importance of James Files knowledge<br />of the assassination plans and carry thru on Kennedy, almost 50 years ago. 90% of the info developed in the article was contained in the dvds and the<br />interview and book by Jimmy Files and Wim Dankbaar.<br /><br />One must understand, that even up to this date, Jimmy Files refuses to discuss many of the plans, persons, and activities, involved with the Outfit and<br />his dealings with the CIA, before, during and long after the Kennedy thing. To Jimmy the K thing was a sideshow to other projects that he was working on<br />and worked on during his long career, and the K murder was not that important to him in the scheme of things, or the so-called Big Picture. Barney<br />Barney<br /> <br />Posts: 143<br />Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:03 pm<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by ChristophMessner on Tue Oct 26, 2010 8:05 am<br /><br />The playboy is certainly a place of truth-finding. <br />Jewish cabale and money orientation.<br />unjust peace is better than unjust war; just war is better than unjust peace; just peace is better than just war<br /><br />ChristophMessner<br /> <br />Posts: 1457<br />Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:11 am<br />Location: Germany<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by tom jeffers on Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:56 pm<br /><br />barney,<br /><br />i did not get the impression that you did when i read the article. he clearly states his facts that he gets from other fbi sources and contacts. In a way he states that jimmy might have embellished his role but he definately agrees that jimmy was there and I think that he was more inclined to believe him than not.<br /><br />tom<br />One man's trash is another mans treasure...<br /><br />tom jeffers<br /> <br />Posts: 763<br />Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:15 am<br />Location: Terre Haute, Indiana<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by j.j.c.bruinsma on Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:49 pm<br /><br />Thanks Tom.<br /><br />gr.<br />j.j.c.bruinsma<br /> <br />Posts: 76<br />Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:11 pm<br />Location: amsterdam<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by Barney on Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:42 pm<br /><br />Members; dont get me wrong here, I dont think Zack did a bad job on the interview. I just think he withheld a good bit of information he has access<br />to via his former FBI associates as federal agents at the time of the Kennedy assassination. Particularly since J Edgar Hoover put a major clamp down on<br />disclosure of important information readily available from the agency either to not embarass his agency as he thought of it, or out of utter hatred for the<br />three Kennedy brothers, the Triumvirate as he and Johnson called it.<br /><br />At this time, we all know with reasonable certainty from Agent James Hosty, that LHO was a paid informant, having a secret code number and being<br />paid between $200 and $300 per month. When LHO moved to Ft. Worth and Dallas area, Agent Hosty was assigned the job of keeping tabs on LHO, <br />seeking information on the Cuban and Russian community that he had contacts with. George DeMohrenschild was the CIA associate who was assigned to<br />keep tabs on Marina and Lee Oswald for the agency.<br /><br />It should be of interest, that George and Jackie Kennedy were very close friends, they visited often prior to her marriage to JFK, as her mother dated<br />George for a time, after her divorce from BlackJack Bouvier, her name being Janet Auchincloss I think it was. She and her sister and cousins called him,<br />our beloved Uncle George.<br /><br />Would it not be odd, that George may have played some role in enabling the murder years later of her husband, our President in 1963, on the streets of<br />Dallas, Tx. a place that both felt was rude, crude, and a wildwest town from a bygone era at best, but probably much worse.<br />Barney<br /> <br />Posts: 143<br />Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:03 pm<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by tom jeffers on Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:43 pm<br /><br />don't forget that although Zach is retired, "once an fbi agent, always an fbi agent". I am sure that playboy had its own agenda and cut much of Zach's information. Notice how Zach never mentions any alphabet soup agency? He is not going to jeopardize his pension. He will remain mum on many facts that he knows.<br />One man's trash is another mans treasure...<br /><br />tom jeffers<br /> <br />Posts: 763<br />Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:15 am<br />Location: Terre Haute, Indiana<br />Top<br />Familiar ground, blood-soaked<br />by Phil Dragoo on Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:14 pm<br /><br />There's a story here, but it's not in this article—which is out of focus, intentionally so, to, as Chauncey Holt put it, “muddy the waters.”<br /><br />We don't trust the FBI, not then, not now, not ever.<br /><br />We don't trust Robert Blakey—the liar—who lied that all Bethesda personnel agreed with the autopsy photos, and none did not—when, in fact, these witnesses agreed with the Parkland witnesses as to the large occipital exit wound.<br /><br />What DO we know?<br /><br />Working backwards, Charles Nicoletti and George DeMohrenschildt were killed ON THE SAME DAY, March 29, 1977.<br /><br />Before they could testify before Blakey's whitewash posse. Blakey was the CIA's punk, installed in lieu of Sprague, who rewrote the report to protect CIA.<br /><br />We are on firm ground affirming that Maheu of the Hughes group was used to bring in Roselli—who brought in Giancana, Nicoletti—who brought in Files.<br /><br />That it was the Roselli group tasked with the Castro hit, that this CIA op was used to get Kennedy.<br /><br />Holt and Plumlee are pilasters in this wall, buttressing the seeming anomaly of outfit people in the Dealey plan.<br /><br />Was it, as Holt said, “to muddy the waters”--we know Braden/Brading was nabbed in the Dal-Tex Building, the source for the back shot, the Tague shot, perhaps the EOP shot.<br /><br />Was it Files who did the frontal shot—he describes it accurately as it was seen at Bethesda, and by several at Parkland, over the eye, in the hairline, where it was excised.<br /><br />He describes the rear exit wound.<br /><br />And Ruby—what was he, chopped liver? On November 7, 1963, Jack Ruby received a collect call from George R. (Barney) Baker which lasted 17 minutes. Baker was an “associate” of James R. Hoffa.<br /><br />So, James Files is popped for murder in Laos in 1960, is training up Cubans for BOP in 1961, is racing stockcars and tapped by Charles Nicoletti as wheelman, winds up in Dallas with Nicoletti, and Rosetti, Oswald, and Ruby.<br /><br />But a couple of FBI agents “burn Dick Clark”--hey, we're shocked—ordinarily the FBI is all about truth, justice and the American way—suddenly they take time to blow up a hot lead in the JFK hit.<br /><br />And Katzenbach gets a mention—that would be the Katzenbach in on the decision to create the Warren Commission to “assure the American people that Oswald alone was responsible and would have been convicted at trial.”<br /><br />Point being, when the muddy water sits, and the sediment settles, we find LBJ was “good friends” with Hoover who turned a blind eye to “organized crime” which cooperated FULLY with the CIA which was running the wars, notably in Vietnam, later in Nicaragua, Afghanistan—wherever.<br /><br />It's not “either/or”--it's both/and, all-of-the-above, and the only rules are three can keep a secret if two are dead, or one is in jail and smeared with the label of liar, publicity-seeker, what-have-you.<br /><br />There is a trail of metal on the lateral X-ray from the right eye to the Harper fragment—which fragment has at its right edge a trace of lead.<br /><br />The signatures of Files and Nicoletti on the contract sent down from a council of concerned citizens, some in uniform, some in the shadows, all of them powerful and without scruple.<br /><br />Baddabing, baddaboom.<br /><br />Phil Dragoo<br /> <br />Posts: 511<br />Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:09 am<br />Top<br />Final section of article<br />by Phil Dragoo on Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:02 pm<br /><br />Three thoughts on the final segment of the article.<br /><br />Wacks’s superiors would not<br />permit him to take Marcello up on his offer.<br />“That really pissed me off,” says Wacks. “I<br />said to my boss, ‘What’s it going to harm<br />us?’ But he said, ‘We don’t want to go there.’<br />For some reason, the bureau wanted to close<br />the book on the assassination. That bugs me<br />to this day.”<br /><br />What! The FBI didn't want Special Agent Wacks to talk to Marcello about killing Kennedy?! I am just so shocked because you know how dogged and determined that Hoover was in leaving no stone unturned in his unstoppable pursuit of the truth in the murder of his good friend Kennedy.<br /><br />For G. Robert Blakey, now a professor at<br />the Notre Dame Law School, what Zack<br />Shelton and the other agents have found<br />adds weight to his thesis about organized<br />crime’s role in the assassination. “Little by<br />little, more pieces about organized crime’s<br />involvement keep coming out. Nothing of<br />substance has come out on the CIA other<br />than that it wanted to cover things up. The<br />stories of most substance are related to organized<br />crime.<br /><br />Well, yes, I would say that's why Blakey—not Sprague—ran that show: because he was the Agency's a word-that-rhymes-with-bitch. And Blakey was so truthful—like saying all witnesses agreed with the photos of the autopsy and none did not and so the Parkland witnesses were mistaken. Except that that's a lie and we know that from the work of the ARRB and the volumes of Doug Horne.<br /><br />Blakey is more skeptical about Files. “The<br />acoustical evidence does show a bullet was<br />fired from the grassy knoll, and it was fired<br />at a supersonic rate nearly simultaneous<br />with the third shot. But I believe that bullet<br />missed. If you look at the X-ray evidence of<br />the skull, it’s pretty conclusive the fatal shot<br />came from behind.”<br /><br />Except that the great genius Blakey is lying again. The phonied up x-rays have been taken apart by Gary Aguilar and David Mantik; and the latter shows the Harper Fragment fits midline occipital on the F8 photo in the Fox series—which Baden blew big time.<br /><br />And that fragment has at its right edge the lead trace from the EOP entry from the Dal-Tex (hello Roselli, Nicoletti, Braden/Brading) and was blown out by James Files with his XP-100 Remington Fireball.<br /><br />The truth interlocks; only lies and forgeries are contradictory.<br /><br />Excellent article providing reinforcement.<br /><br />Phil Dragoo<br /> <br />Posts: 511<br />Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:09 am<br />Top<br />Re: Zach Shelton interviewed by playboy<br />by Barney on Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:57 pm<br /><br />The so-named Warren Commission, Prof. Blakey, Senator Arlen Specter, and many others charged with an unbiased investigation of the Kennedy murder are<br />basically " traitors" or even worse. If every damned one of them still alive were hanged along the Lincoln Memorial Reflection Pool in long rows, it would suit<br />the hell out of me. Not because I admired or had such respect for Kennedy, especially after the shit starting to hit the fan about his private life, but that he was our elected President,and<br />as a Nation, we cannot permit the gun and bullets to determine our national future instead of the ballot boxes across this vast and great nation of ours. Millions<br />have paid with their lives for the freedom to vote, to participate in the election and voting process, so be forewarned, its in danger of extinction like the buggy whip, codes of honor, and<br />eons old dinosaurs, who just died out and nobody remembers just why. "Once freedoms are lost", they seldom appear again on their own short of a revolution to make it so again for future unborn generations. Must we endure a Third American Revolution????????Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-34448890247528806432010-11-16T12:32:00.000+02:002010-11-16T14:15:08.011+02:00SECRET SERVICE LIES--VINCE PALAMARA EXPOSES THE LIES-- RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSh7USa3oU5JgwxCqLLY8yM00G5boPIop0qWqG8vGCSemGe4V_2"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 209px; height: 241px;" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSh7USa3oU5JgwxCqLLY8yM00G5boPIop0qWqG8vGCSemGe4V_2" border="0" alt="" /></a><br /><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">LIES--RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES!</span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><br /></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span>THANK YOU, VINCENT PALAMARA, FOR GIVING US THE TRUTH !!!!!!!!!!</span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><br /></span></b></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;">A DISCOVERY CHANNEL DOCUMENTARY ABOUT THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION, FEATURING THE SECRET SERVICE'S "GLORY" THAT HORRIBLE DAY WHEN THEY STOOD DOWN AND FAILED THEIR PRESIDENT-- --IS COMING SOON TO A TRAITOROUS DISCOVERY CHANNEL NEAR YOU. THEY WILL ADVERTISE THEIR REWRITING-HISTORY BOOK TO BE SOLD ALONG WITH THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL'S SNAKE OIL PITCH TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><span class="Apple-style-span">INSTEAD, ASK EVERYONE TO LISTEN TO <i>COAST-TO-COAST</i> ON NOVEMBER 21. THERE. YOU'LL HEAR THE TRUTH!</span></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span">THE SECRET SERVICE BUNCH THAT LET KENNEDY GET KILLED ARE TELLING YOU KENNEDY DIDN'T WANT PROTECTION. PALAMARA (SEE BELOW) EXPLAINS THAT THEY'RE <b>LYING</b>. </span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span">HE'S THE EXPERT, HAVING PERSONALLY INTERVIEWED THESE PEOPLE BEFORE THEY GOT TOGETHER WITH THEIR DISCOVERY CHANNEL RE-WRITE OF HISTORY.</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;">KENNEDY DID</span><span class="Apple-style-span"> <b><i>NOT</i></b></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"> ORDER HIS PROTECTION OFF HIS CAR.</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;">AFTER JFK WAS KILLED, KENNEDY'S ENEMIES WERE IGNORED. THE ONE MAN WHO COULD TELL THE WORLD WHAT HAPPENED WAS SHOT DOWN IN COLD BLOOD AND THEN LABELED 'THE MAN WHO KILLED KENNEDY'! </span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span">SEE MY YOUTUBE VIDEO:</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tb46jE6xHrs?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tb46jE6xHrs?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></span></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><b>DALLAS</b></span><b> WAS A CITY SO HOSTILE THAT ADLAI STEVENSON GOT HIT ON THE HEAD WITH A SIGN AND SPAT ON ---JUST ONE MONTH EARLIER.</b></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><i>DALLAS IS WHERE '<span class="Apple-style-span">WANTED FOR TREASON' </span>POSTERS ABOUNDED.</i></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span">DALLAS IS WHERE LEE OSWALD SENT OUT MESSAGES WARNING JFK WOULD BE KILLED.</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span">VINCENT PALAMARA EXPOSES THE LIES OF THE SECRET SERVICE IN HIS STUNNING SERIES ON YOUTUBE. MAKE SURE EVERYBODY SEES THESE VIDEOS!</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPCc0rp_QlE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPCc0rp_QlE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; "><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"></span></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; "><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; ">BUT HERE IS WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL BE TOLD ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL:</span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><br /></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-weight: normal; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); line-height: 21px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">"Besides personal healing and an obligation to history, the agents said they had another reason for speaking out 47 years after Kennedy's assassination. With the book and the documentary, they hope to set the record straight -- and put assassination conspiracy theories to rest. "Most of history today has been written by what I call a cottage industry called 'conspiracy,' " Blaine said. "If we didn't speak up and give a balance to this, history would never know exactly what happened."</span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-weight: normal; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); line-height: 21px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px; font-size: medium;"><b>PALAMARA SHOWS US THE TRUTH:</b></span></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-weight: normal; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); line-height: 21px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-weight: normal; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); line-height: 21px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8</a></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; font-weight: normal; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); line-height: 21px; "><br /></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XY02Qkuc_f8?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XY02Qkuc_f8?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;">THE SECRET SERVICE AND MEDIA SHAMELESSLY REPEAT THE OLD LIES THAT KENNEDY CALLED OFF HIS PROTECTION.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;">BELOW ARE MORE VIDEOS FROM PALAMARA. NO MATTER WHAT HE THINKS OF ME, I OWE HIM FOR WHAT HE'S DOING -- HE'S NEVER MET ME--PERHAPS IF HE DID, HE'D CHANGE HIS MIND ... MEANWHILE, I PRAISE HIM FOR PRESERVING THIS ESSENTIAL PART OF THE <b>TRUE</b> STORY.</span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><b>COPY THESE YOUTUBE VIDEOS FOR POSTERITY-- BEFORE THEY GET REMOVED, WITH NOTHING REMAINING BUT THE USUAL LIES!</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/b3RsC6OAZoo?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/b3RsC6OAZoo?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><b>HERE'S WHAT VINCE HIMSELF WRITES UNDER HIS YOUTUBE VIDEOS:</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: normal; font-size: 12px; "><div class="metadata" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 6px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 0.9166em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; float: left; width: 123px; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; "><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 11px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; "><a class="author author-owner" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/VincePalamara" title="VincePalamara" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 3px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 1.0909em; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 51, 204); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; display: block; white-space: nowrap; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">VincePalamara</a></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 11px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; "><span class="time" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 11px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">1 month ago</span></div></div><div class="content" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 12px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; float: left; width: 300px; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; "><div class="comment-text" dir="ltr" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 12px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; "><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 12px; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; ">President Kennedy was a very nice man, was NOT difficult to protect, and NEVER ordered the agents off the rear of his limousine (nor did his staff). The buck stops with the Secret Service. Don't believe any books by former agents trying to say otherwise!</p></div></div></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px; "><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 21px;"><br /></span></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span><br /></span></b></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v0ntMfe95Js?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v0ntMfe95Js?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><i>'DON'T TRAVEL TO DALLAS' KENNEDY WAS WARNED...BUT HE WAS TOLD HE WOULD HAVE TERRIFIC PROTECTION...THIS WAS NOT TRUE. SMEARING KENNEDY'S REPUTATION IS FASHIONABLE TODAY TO COVER UP THE LACK OF SECURITY FOR KENNEDY.'</i></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><i><br /></i></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><i><br /></i></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">"IF THEY WOULD HAVE DONE THEIR JOB, KENNEDY WOULD HAVE LIVED TO SMILE AGAIN...INSTEAD, HE ENDED UP ON AN AUTOPSY TABLE...." 'HE TRUSTED EVERY ONE OF US' (quoting a Secret service Agent)...WHICH WAS [KENNEDY'S] DOWNFALL....IT'S BULLSHIT THAT THE AGENTS OBSCURED KENNEDY!...THE BUCK STOPS WITH THE SECRET SERVICE...DO NOT BELIEVE PROPAGANDA DECADES LATER FROM FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENTS...[WHO] WANT TO COVER THEIR ASS..."</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b> Vincent Palamara</b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><b><br /></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1PY90qRtugnlKYYnNVhLJ9gELdq0awIhZsBfhHtDYGVYJcIxKRA :</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPCc0rp_QlE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hPCc0rp_QlE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span">THEY DARE BLAME KENNEDY FOR HIS DEATH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-IwKfEFnzSI?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-IwKfEFnzSI?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span><br /></span></b></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; ">COPY THESE VIDEOS--- THINK ABOUT THE LIES ---DON'T LET THE MEDIA GET AWAY WITH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</span></div><div style="font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800;"><br /></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span">LIES---RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES!</span></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Georgia, serif; font-weight: normal; "><div style="font-size: 16px; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium; ">This URL shows you the list Palamara made of the secret service agents, one by one...</span></span></div><div style="font-size: 16px; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: 800; font-size: medium; "><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFALugIcQGs&feature=related">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFALugIcQGs&feature=related</a></span></span></div><div style="font-size: 16px; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div style="font-size: 16px; "><span class="Apple-style-span">==THE LIES ARE ROTTED OUT EVERY NOVEMBER, TO KEEP THE SHEEPLE UNAWARE THAT THEIR COUNTRY WAS VIOLENTLY TAKEN FORM THEM ON NOVEMBER 22, 1963. AND WE NEVER GOT IT BACK!</span></div><div style="font-size: 16px; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">EXAMPLES:</span></span></div></span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-size: medium; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium; "><b><span><br /></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">"LEE HARVEY OSWALD DOT NET" TELLS READERS THAT "THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY" SERIES IS "COMPLETE" <span class="Apple-style-span"><i>WHEN ONE THIRD OF IT HAS BEEN BANNED FROM VIEW!</i></span></span></span></b></span></div><div style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></b></span></div><b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> </span></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span">HERE'S WHAT THEY SAY:</span></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></span></div>The Complete Story in 6 Parts:</span></span></span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">The Coup d'Etat - A medical technician casts doubts on the official autopsy photographs, and photo analysis undermines the lone gunman theory.</span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">The Forces of Darkness - See two shadowy figures on the grassy knoll, and find out about the "lost" home movie that contained key evidence.</span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">The Cover-Up - An FBI agent confirms that evidence has been suppressed, and a notorious criminal is confronted about his possible role.</span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">The Patsy - Witness Oswald's reaction when charged with the shooting, and the mortician who buried the alleged assassin reveals what he discovered 18 years later.</span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; ">The Witnesses - The people who were there - but who the government chose to ignore - tell their versions of what happened at Dealey Plaza. The Truth Shall Set You Free - See conclusive proof that the official autopsy photos were faked, and hear from an Army Colonel who says he was trained to eliminate witnesses to the assassination.</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">--THAT'S ONLY FOUR--AND NOT A WHISPER ABOUT THE THREE BANNED DOCUMENTARIES--</span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><b>THE SMOKING GUNS</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b>THE LOVE AFFAIR</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><b>THE GUILTY MEN</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><b><br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "><b>go to http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com to see them!</b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">----THE BAD GUYS HAVE FILLED THE INTERNET WITH LIES---</span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span">what will you do about it?</span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><b><br /></b></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">1) VISIT http://www.lee-harvey-oswald.com TO LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD.</span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">2) read ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD</span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"> ---AVAILABLE AT THIS WEBSITE </span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">3) SPREAD THE WORD!</span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">WHEN YOU BUY MY BOOK AT THIS WEBSITE, OR AT LEE'S WEBSITE AT LEE-HARVEY-OSWALD.COM, YOU HELP KEEP MY VOICE ON THE INTERNET.</span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">YOUR DONATIONS AND BOOK PURCHASES WILL KEEP THE TRUTH ON THE INTERNET FROM BEING OVERWHELMED BY LIES.</span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></span></span></b></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium; "> <span class="Apple-style-span"> JVB</span></span></span></span></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></b></span></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-51306238800820173862010-08-19T01:41:00.000+03:002010-08-19T02:00:40.078+03:00FBI AGENT DON ADAMS AND THE FRAMING OF LEE OSWALD<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjF7KCJ4NwwRgm9mujZlIkpM6FI_TsrpaDrQRn7Biqk5jC8Z2wM14MT2OGQBi5Zz4otgBizfqVuuVVQB-f2aU9zJb-3TMWWZF-V-LAqwD_qADTWXI_fzrqUy3YfXcjUXI_gfAyqOd4CwdTq/s1600/don_webbanner.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 380px; height: 90px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjF7KCJ4NwwRgm9mujZlIkpM6FI_TsrpaDrQRn7Biqk5jC8Z2wM14MT2OGQBi5Zz4otgBizfqVuuVVQB-f2aU9zJb-3TMWWZF-V-LAqwD_qADTWXI_fzrqUy3YfXcjUXI_gfAyqOd4CwdTq/s320/don_webbanner.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5506887970341533602" /></a><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;"><br /><br />-----------------------------<br /><br />THE WEB BANNER ABOVE COMES FROM THE WEBSITE ABOUT FBI AGENT DON ADAMS, WHO WROTE REPORTS CONCERNING THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION. YOU NEED TO HEAR WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM!<br /><br />THE INFORMATION BELOW COMES FROM THE WEBSITE SENT TO MY ATTENTION BY RESEARCHER EDGAR TATRO.</span><br /><br />IT REITERATES WHAT ANYONE WITH BRAINS AND A DESIRE TO KNOW THE TRUTH -- AND A WILLINGNESS TO HONESTLY ASSESS THE TRUTH -- ALREADY KNOWS, OR SHOULD KNOW.<br /><br />UNDERSTANDING THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT MEANS OUR COUNTRY ENDURED A COUP D'ETAT. WE STILL FEEL THE EFFECTS OF THAT ILLEGAL AND BLOODY EXECUTIVE ACTION TODAY. TO DEFEAT EVIL FORCES IN OUR GOVERNMENT --AND TO PRETEND THEY DO NOT EXIST IS JUST PLAIN SILLY -- WE MUST KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE ROOTS OF POWER OF THOSE WHO GOVERN US. THEN WE HAVE TO CLEAN UP THE MESS--FROM THE BOTTOM UP. STARTING WITH YOUR OWN HOME TOWN, PLEASE!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">IT IS AMAZNG TO ME HOW MANY FBI, SECRET SERVICE AND CIA AGENTS HAVE COME FORTH AND PLAINLY STATED THAT LEE OSWALD WAS INNOCENT. SUCH AS IN THE ARTICLE BELOW....</span><br /><br />YET WE HAVE SOMEONE OF THE CALIBER OF TOM HANKS WHO, I HAVE HEARD, PLANS TO MAKE A MINISERIES OR MOVIE SHOWING OSWALD AS THE SOLE ASSASSIN--FOR 2013, THE FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY. HE WAS INFLUENCED BY MR. BUGLIOSI, WHO DISSED ME AND TRIVIALIZED ME AS A WITNESS--THOUGH HE NEVER MET ME. GOD KNOWS HOW HE TREATED/MISTREATED OTHERS.<br /><br /><br />WE NEED TO CONTACT TOM HANKS. I CAN'T FROM WHERE I AM LOCATED. WILL YOU?<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">BELOW IS INFORMATION TOM HANKS SHOULD READ.</span><br /><br />AND SO SHOULD YOU!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">JVB</span><br />Almost 50 years have gone by since President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was killed in Dallas, Texas, on Nov. 22, 1963. Yet, we are no closer to solving this murder today than we were back then.<br /> <br />We are beginning to elicit the truth, but that truth is being revealed in bits and pieces:<br /> <br />We KNOW that there were warnings that the President would be killed. <br />We KNOW that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot the President.<br />We KNOW that Oswald and Jack Ruby were associates.<br />We KNOW that the President was shot twice from the front.<br />We KNOW that there was no single “pristine” bullet that hit both the President and Texas Gov. John Connally.<br />We KNOW that a number of shots were fired from various positions around the Texas Book Depository.<br />We KNOW that four telephone calls were made to the Dallas Police, the FBI and to others in the early morning hours of Nov. 24, 1963, warning that Oswald would be killed when he was transferred to the County Jail.<br />We KNOW that lies were told to confuse the public and to hide the truth.<br /> <br />These few sentences may shock the average person who only read the headlines, who never dug into the details, who believed the Warren Commission Report. Many more facts have been uncovered in my research and are contained in my writings. Those facts will paint a different picture than what we have been led to believe happened.<br /> <br />There are very few people in the United States who have ever heard the name JOSEPH ADAMS MILTEER. Yet, on instructions of the FBI, Milteer’s name and documents detailing his ties to the Kennedy assassination were ordered to be stored in the National Archives and forgotten. Why? <br /> <br />Investigative information concerning Milteer was deliberately misplaced, destroyed or attributed to other persons. Why?<br /> <br />A comprehensive report written by FBI Special Agent Donald A. Adams was "hacked apart" and now does not exist in the National Archives, where most all papers concerning the Kennedy Assassination are stored. Why?<br /> <br />Only the one interview of Milteer by Special Agents Don Adams and Ken Williams exists in the archives. Why?<br /> <br />Where are all of the other documents prepared by Agent Adams? And why are they nowhere to be found?<br /> <br />The answers to those questions and many others are available now on two DVDs and will be examined in a soon-to-be-published book, “From an Office Building with a High-Powered Rifle,” by Donald A. Adams.<br /> <br />There are still so many unanswered questions and glaring inconsistencies about the Kennedy assassination.<br /> <br />After almost 50 years, isn’t it time for the truth to be known?<br /> <br /> WTAM Interviews with Mike Trivisonno and Don Adams on JFK <br /> <br />Part 1<br /> <br />Part 2<br /> <br />Part 3<br /><br />go to this website to hear the interviews:<br /><br />http://adamsjfk.com/Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-84013889141293457682010-08-16T01:58:00.000+03:002010-08-16T02:18:20.622+03:00<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1BgZOAmuqX6JuzfI4nqMrIiejWEG2YdfPhyphenhyphen9lO3SmHlUOqBYy0CwKu5d5wE7NmUxtEaSo1BKwFVVDy4jep2tbcNpAIySJSEomr_kp0x0LqQg9tqDzFSRDRn-KBFEDQTRinxWYy6zIGH3X/s1600/Lee+new+orleans+aug+63+feb+14_0002.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 285px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1BgZOAmuqX6JuzfI4nqMrIiejWEG2YdfPhyphenhyphen9lO3SmHlUOqBYy0CwKu5d5wE7NmUxtEaSo1BKwFVVDy4jep2tbcNpAIySJSEomr_kp0x0LqQg9tqDzFSRDRn-KBFEDQTRinxWYy6zIGH3X/s400/Lee+new+orleans+aug+63+feb+14_0002.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5505779356635222258" /></a><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha6lFydeeO3QOxIWxWmE6ten-Gp10IchQrzTf6zPhoeHq_k1RsVyLq1sbQXUjqI7RPBTEyxlLgcFXGXf71-0Br7TXk6T8fVaTEwgc1pnv6eo_4BBfF-4FCPxjahNSblYL6PVHYooggdskt/s1600/VOICE+STRESS+ANALYSIS+LEE+OSWALD.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 250px; height: 148px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEha6lFydeeO3QOxIWxWmE6ten-Gp10IchQrzTf6zPhoeHq_k1RsVyLq1sbQXUjqI7RPBTEyxlLgcFXGXf71-0Br7TXk6T8fVaTEwgc1pnv6eo_4BBfF-4FCPxjahNSblYL6PVHYooggdskt/s400/VOICE+STRESS+ANALYSIS+LEE+OSWALD.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5505775407934252690" /></a><br /><p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><br /></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><br /></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><br /></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><br /></u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><u>VOICE STRESS ANALYSIS SHOWS LEE OSWALD </u></b><b><u>TOLD THE TRUTH WHEN HE SAID HE DIDN'T KILL ANYBODY. </u></b><b><u>THAT'S THE KIND OF EVIDENCE THE GOVERNMENT NEVER MADE AVAILABLE TO YOU.</u></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span><span> </span><span> </span><b><u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#CC0000;">DO YOU WANT YOUR COUNTRY BACK?</span><o:p></o:p></u></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span> </span><span> </span><b><span style="line-height: 115%; color: rgb(192, 0, 0); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;">2013</span></span><span style="line-height:115%;mso-bidi- font-family:Aharoni;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;"> </span></span><span style="line-height:115%;mso-bidi- font-family:Aharoni;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">IS COMING!</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> A</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> FINAL SHOWDOWN FOR DEMOCRACY!</span><o:p></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;mso-bidi- font-family:Aharoni;color:#C00000;"> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;">LEE HARVEY OSWALD </span><i><u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;">versus</span></u></i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;"> THE CONSPIRATORS AND THEIR COUP</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">a head of state (Kennedy) is murdered by conspiracy, and<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">those who benefit cooperate to cover it up, because they gain </span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">power and wealth and/or will keep their jobs<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">somebody has to be blamed: a designated patsy (Oswald) was chosen<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> the conspirators were the ones who selected who ‘investigated’ the murder<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">(</span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The Warren Commission</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">)<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the Commission was ordered to convince the public that the </span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">designated patsy committed the murder (Katzenbach memo)<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the ‘investigation’ concluded that the designated patsy (Oswald)<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">committed the murder<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">: the Commission sealed the evidence-- and some witnesses died<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">as other assassinations occurred, due to public outcries the <o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">conspirators held a second investigation (</span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">HSCA</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">) that also <o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">concluded that the designated patsy committed the murder<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">more new evidence was sealed – and some more witnesses died<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">But:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> some evidence was released due to public outcries:<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the evidence pointed to a conspiracy and/or tended to absolve Oswald<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the conspirators and those who took their places renewed news<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">stories, etc. stressing that “Oswald acted alone.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Oliver Stone then released the film </span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">JFK </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">for a new generation<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">: Due to public outcries, the ARRB was formed to try to get evidence </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">released – much released was ‘redacted’ (blacked out) for ‘security reasons’</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">much new evidence was made available, though some is hard to find or access<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the new evidence, and new witnesses who stand forth, now provide convincing </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">data and information that Oswald did not kill Kennedy</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">BUT:</span></span></b><b><span style=" line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the conspirators --and those who took their places-- are now repeating old news stories, </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">etc., stressing “Oswald acted alone” and providing massive support for writers to </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">produce books “proving” this is the case, ignoring or disparaging the new evidence</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><o:p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><o:p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><o:p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><o:p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></o:p></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">British producer Nigel Turner filmed </span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The Men Who Killed Kennedy</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> series, including </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">“The Final Chapter”</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">(</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The Smoking Guns, The Love Affair, The Guilty Men</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">)</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">in 2003</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Next:</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span></span></b><b><span style=" line-height:115%;mso-themecolor:text1;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Turner is disgraced: a panel of pro-Official Version historians quickly advises that the </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;mso-themecolor:text1;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">series be banned; however, the Internet provides access to the series and its witnesses</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> a </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">well-financed disinfo campaign through media of all </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">kinds is now in motion, hoping to change public opinion before 2013, the 50</span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">th</span></sup></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">anniversary </span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">of Kennedy’s public execution by the government and other responsible </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">parties: great care is taken to misquote the facts, and to discredit all witnesses defending Oswald. </span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">DISINFO EFFORTS (AKA SPIN CITY) include:<o:p></o:p></span></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span style="color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">TV specials <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">New government-funded websites declaring Oswald killed Kennedy and labeling those </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">who state otherwise ‘conspiracy theorists’ who are seen as unpatriotic disrupters</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Computerized re-enactments ,using skewed statistics and faked situations<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Arresting dissenters in Dealey Plaza (Dallas) who offer alternaive books/films/guided tours <o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The banning of dissenting books, films, and voices at the 6</span><sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">th</span></sup><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> Floor Museum, Dallas<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Media-push of books written by cooperative writers (e.g. Bugliosi, Posner) who make </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">millions promoting the “Official Version” –note that Bugliosi calls American who don’t </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">agree with him ‘morons’</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Wikipedia and other encyclopedias promote “Official Version” dogma, ignoring new </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">evidence and placing dissenting witnesses in a special “conspiracy theory” category</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Well-financed, fancy websites with outright distortions/lies receive top search engine attention, while dissenting websites are buried or even fail to 'come up' at all<o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><u><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">But:</span></span></u></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The Internet can still show you the banned documentaries, witness statements, and the </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">new, compelling evidence of Oswald’s innocence, and that he was framed</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><u><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">However</span></span></u></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">: </span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Internet findings are being ignored by mainstream media (can the media cry out </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">‘CONSPIRACY’ to a government in office whose roots trace back to a Coup?)</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><u><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider</span></span></u></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the conspirators and those standing with them, seeing that <o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">the Internet is revealing that the country was taken over through a Coup D’etat, has </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">decided to label “conspiracy theorists” as dangerous to the country.</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> Obama info Czar Cass Sunstein suggests taxing dissenters, infiltrating their groups, and placing false information among them and on their websites to divide and harass them. </span></span></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">The few remaining living </span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">witnesses, such as myself, are harassed and discredited. Some of us have been forced into exile.</span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><u><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">Consider</span></span></u></b><b><span style="line-height:115%;color:#C00000;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">:</span></span></b><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> if you love your country and want the right to elect people of your choice, not those who inherited their power illegally, spread the word:</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;"><i>2013 is coming!</i> </span></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;"></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">PUBLIC OUTCRIES HAVE THEIR EFFECT.</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">WILL FREEDOM OF SPEECH SURVIVE </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:x-large;">2013?</span><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;">ONLY IF YOU ACT!</span></u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"> </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:large;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="line-height:115%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:#000099;">It's time to ask yourself, "How did my country get like this?"</span></span></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 55px; font-size: large;">DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 55px; font-size: large;"></span>GET THE BOOK <i><span style="color:#C00000;">ME & LEE</span>: <span style="color:#C00000;">How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald.</span></i></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><i><span style="color:#C00000;"> Make sure everybody reads it.</span></i></b></p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>Visit <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span><a href="http://www.judythvarybaker.com/">http://www.judythvarybaker.com</a> today.<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><br /></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b>Thank you!</b></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1029221144554875471.post-64077841323964611222010-06-28T12:59:00.000+03:002010-07-03T03:31:39.547+03:00WANT TO GET ARRESTED? SELL "OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT" BOOKS AT DEALEY PLAZA!<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhr-UL-7b87prmhFioMjKRTav3PIwbiJqwKK_MdaN-EeFlmFGQ4t5Q9sOgMcF4l4_60LcsGGty_s9kje4f6kIYilOyxa2wdKLO3sKpow2-WKRXA3z4AKnE0WySuMa_MLf3_FgmtRHjsEBj6/s1600/mayor+ruth+paine+irving+key+to+city+june+2010.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 350px; height: 246px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhr-UL-7b87prmhFioMjKRTav3PIwbiJqwKK_MdaN-EeFlmFGQ4t5Q9sOgMcF4l4_60LcsGGty_s9kje4f6kIYilOyxa2wdKLO3sKpow2-WKRXA3z4AKnE0WySuMa_MLf3_FgmtRHjsEBj6/s400/mayor+ruth+paine+irving+key+to+city+june+2010.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5487786743172551010" /></a><br /><br /><em>-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />RUTH PAINE IS AWARDED THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING, JUNE, 2010: STORY BELOW</em><br /><br /><strong>WANT TO GET ARRESTED? SELL "OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT" BOOKS AT DEALEY PLAZA!</strong><br /><br /> THAT'S THE QUICK WAY TO MISERY.<br /> OR WRITE A BOOK ABOUT OSWALD'S INNOCENCE WHILE LIVING IN DALLAS, AND LAND IN THE HOSPITAL A FEW TIMES, WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME. <br /><br /> THERE WERE TWO TROUBLING EVENTS THAT OCCURRED THIS MONTH IN THE DALLAS AREA. THE FIRST WAS THE ARREST OF 'VENDORS' ON 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' --THAT 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' BEING DEALEY PLAZA, WHERE THOUSANDS CONGREGATE TO VIEW WHERE JOHN F. KENNEDY WAS MURDERED. OVERLOOKING THE PLACE WHERE IT HAPPENED, BESIDE THE OH-SO-UPON-IT GRASSY KNOLL, IS THE TEXAS SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDING AND THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM, WHERE FOR YOUR BURNISHED PENNIES AND HARD-EARNED CASH, YOU CAN HEAR THE OFFICIAL VERSION--THAT OSWALD DID IT.<br /><br /> IT'S THE ONLY VERSION THAT'S POLITICALLY CORRECT IN THE DALLAS AREA. <br /><br /> THAT'S <em>DESPITE </em>THE FACT THAT WE NOW KNOW THE BACK OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S HEAD WAS DELIBERATELY PAINTED IN BLACK TO HIDE A SHOT FROM THE FRONT IN THE FAMOUS ZAPRUDER FILM.<br /> THAT'S <em>DESPITE</em> THE FACT THAT WE KNOW THE AUTOPSY PHOTOS WERE RIGGED TO TRY TO SHOW A SHOT FROM THE BACK (SEE DOUG HORNE'S <em>INSIDE THE ARRB</em>).<br /> THAT'S <em>DESPITE</em> THE FACT THAT FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT FOR JFK, ABRAHAM BOLDEN, HAS TESTIFIED THAT AN INFORMANT NAMED "LEE" SAVED KENNEDY'S LIFE IN CHICAGO.<br /> THAT'S <em>DESPITE</em> THE FACT THAT WE KNOW LEE OSWALD COULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN THE 'SNIPER'S NEST' ACCORDING TO SOLID WITNESS TESTIMONY.<br /> THAT'S <em>DESPITE</em> THE FACT THAT THE "MAGIC BULLET" IS BASED ON MOVING A BULLET HOLE 'UPWARDS' BY GERALD FORD, WHO ADMITTED IT, SO THAT A TRAJECTORY COULD BE CREATED TO ALLOW FOR THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH A BULLET. A BULLET THAT HAS <em>TOO MUCH NOT MISSING FROM IT </em>TO ACCOUNT FOR PIECES OF BULLET LODGED IN BONES THAT CLEARLY SHOW UP IN X=RAYS OF GOV. JOHN CONNALLY'S WRIST. <br /> A BULLET THAT LOOKS JUST LIKE BULLETS FIRED THROUGH COTTON--ALMOST PRISTINE, THOUGH IT SUPPOSEDLY SHATTERED A RIB AND WRIST BONES AFTER PASSING THROUGH KENNEDY'S BACK, AND THROAT AND OTHER PARTS OF CONNALLY'S BODY AS WELL. <br /> A BULLET SHOT, SUPPOSEDLY, FROM A RIFLE IN SUCH POOR CONDITION THAT PEOPLE ARE AFRAID TO TEST FIRE IT TO THIS VERY DAY.<br /> <strong>THESE FACTS, AND MANY MORE, SCREAM OUT THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD, JUST AS HE SAID, DID NOT KILL JFK.</strong><br /><br /> BUT IN JUNE, 2010 IN DALLAS, THE SAME OLD STORY IS STILL BEING REPEATED AS IF THESE WERE BEADS ON A ROSARY: THAT LEE OSWALD SHOT KENNEDY. <br /> AND THE VERY WOMAN WHO SUPPLIED MUCH EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD HAS JUST RECEIVED THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING. YOU CAN READ THE ARTICLE BELOW, AFTER I FINISH RANTING A BIT ABOUT HER.<br /> IT'S NOT WISE TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINION THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT IN A PLACE LIKE DALLAS, TEXAS, WHICH APPARENTLY WANTS TO KEEP ITS REPUTATION AS A CITY WHERE UNJUST SENTENCES HAVE BEEN METED OUT FOR MANY YEARS UPON THE HEADS OF INNOCENT VICTIMS.<br /> THE DALLAS POLICE RECENTLY ARRESTED 'VENDORS' IN DEALEY PLAZA, STATING THAT THE CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. A STORY WAS FRONTED THAT SOME VENDORS ARE IN YOUR FACE AND SCARE PEOPLE. <em>HUH?</em> ANYBODY WHO'S BEEN TO DEALEY PLAZA KNOWS THAT A TROUBLEMAKER CAN BE PLANTED EASILY AMONG THOSE WHO ARE CONDUCTING TOURS, SELLING BOOKS, AND HAWKING SOUVENIRS.<br /> <strong>GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE 'VENDORS' ARE LARGELY THERE TO EDUCATE VISITORS HUNGRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR GOOD SENSE TELLS THEM IS OBVIOUS: THAT GRASSY KNOLL IS SO CLOSE --THE BUILDING WHERE THE SNIPER'S NEST IS --IN COMPARISON--AS IF A MILE AWAY. STANDING THERE IN THE PLAZA, IT'S VERY HARD TO IGNORE THE GRASSY KNOLL. </strong><br /> BUT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM DOES A GREAT JOB OF SELLING THE STORY THAT ITS SNIPER'S NEST OCCUPANT WAS OSWALD --NOBODY ELSE -- EVEN THOUGH PHOtOS SHOW BOXES WERE MOVED TO CREATE THE SO-CALLED SNIPER'S NEST AFTER THE SHOTS WERE FIRED. <br /> YOU WON'T SEE THOSE PHOTOS IN THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.<br /> NOR ARE YOU ALLOWED TO ACUALLY PEER FROM THE NEST SITE, ITSELF. TO DO SO WOULD SHOW YOU HOW AWFULLY HARD SUCH A SERIES OF SHOTS WOULD HAVE BEEN TO MAKE. THE SNIPER'S NEST AREA IS CONVENIENTLY WALLED OFF WITH CLEAR PLASTIC. NOBODY CAN GET INTO POSITION WITH A RIFLE THERE, NOW, TO SEE IF THE RIFLE BUTT WOULD HIT THE WALL WHEN TURNED TO AIM AT JFK. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CONTENT WITH PHOTOS SHOWING THE FBI USING A TEST RIFLE-- MOUNTED ON A TRIPOD, NO LESS.<br /> WHAT NEXT? <br /> WILL MONEY-HUNGRY DALLAS END UP CHARGING ADMISSION TO DEALEY PLAZA ITSELF -- THOUGH IT WAS THE VERY PUBLIC SITE OF OUR PRESIDENT'S EXECUTION?<br /> WHY NOT? <br /> THOUGH HE BELONGS TO THE AGES, AND TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR SLAIN PRESIDENT IS CLEARLY REJECTED BY DALLAS, WHO NEVER ERECTED A DECENT MONUMENT TO OUR FALLEN LEADER. INSTEAD, WITH THE HELP OF SUCH CHARACTERS AS GARY MACK OF THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM -- A MAN WHO USED TO SAY OSWALD DID NOT KILL JFK, BUT WHO NOW SAYS THAT IT'S LIKELY OSWALD DID THE JOB. HIS POCKETS COMFORTABLY BULGING WITH HIS HEFTY SALARY, GARY MACK NOW ADDS HIS VOICE TO THE MUSEUM'S AND THE ESTABLISHMENT IN HELPING TO DESTROIY KENNEDY'S REPUTATION.<br /> AFTER ALL, WHO WILL CARE IF THEY ARE CONVINCED THAT KENNEDY WAS JUST ANOTHER CORRUPT CREEP IN THE WHITE HOUSE?<br /> JFK'S MEMORY IS BEING SYSTEMATICALLY DESTROYED BY OUR SOLD-OUT MEDIA, WHICH CONCENTRATES ON JFK'S WOMANIZING AND PAINKILLER USE RATHER THAN ON HIS PROVEN COURAGE, HIS BATTLES WITH CONSTANT PAIN, AND A DEVOTION TO COUNRY THAT PROVED KENNEDY, TURNED ERSATZ PLAYBOY, CARED MORE ABOUT AMERICA THAN ABOUT HIS OWN LIFE--AS JAMES DOUGLASS MAKES ABUNDANTLY CLEAR IN HIS FINE BOOK, <span style="font-weight:bold;">JFK</span> <em>AND THE UNSPEAKABLE--WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS.</em> <br /> DALLAS MAKES A HEFTY BUNDLE ITSELF OFF THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.<br /><br /> YOU CAN PAY YOUR FEE FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING SOLD THE OFFICIAL VERSION AT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM, WHICH PUSHES OSWALD-DID-IT TO ALL, WHILE SELLING BOOKS THAT ONLY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL VERSION. <br /><br /> THE MUSEUM WON'T SELL HORNE'S BOOKS THERE, THAT TELL YOU THE ARRB DISCOVERED THAT THE AUTOPSY PHOTOS HAD BEEN RIGGED TO TRY TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE KENNEDY HAD BEEN SHOT FROM BEHIND -- AND THAT THE ZAPRUDER FILM WAS ACTUALLY PAINTED OVER TO HIDE A SHOT FROM THE FRONT -- A DISCOVERY MADE BY SYDNEY WILKINSON'S HOLLYWOOD RESTORATION FILM EXPERTS ON A TRUE COPY OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM IN 2009.<br /> <strong>THEY WILL NOT SELL THE BOOK <em>ME & LEE </em>THERE, EITHER.</strong> THEY WILL NOT SELL JIM MARRS' <span style="font-weight:bold;">CROSSFIRE </span>THERE.<br /> <strong>THEY WILL NOT SELL HASLAM'S <span style="font-weight:bold;">DR. MARY'S MONKEY </span>THERE.<br /> THEY WILL NOT SELL JAMES DOUGLASS' <span style="font-weight:bold;">JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE</span>THERE.<br /> THEY WILL NOT SELL DR. JIM FETZER'S <span style="font-weight:bold;">THE GREAT ZAPRUDER FILM HOAX</span> THERE.</strong><br /> <br />THEY <em>WILL</em> SELL YOU VINCE BUGLIOSI'S HUGE BOOK--WHEREIN BUGLIOSI TRASHES ME, THOUGH HE NEVER INTERVIEWED ME. HE COPIED HIS INFORMATION FROM OTHERS WHO NEVER MET ME. SO MUCH FOR BUGLIOSI'S RESEARCH METHODS.<br /> THEY <em>WILL</em> SELL YOU GERALD POSNER'S BOOK, THOUGH POSNER'S BOOK HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE RIDDLED WITH ERRORS AND OMISSIONS.<br /> MEANWHILE, ROBERT GRODEN, STANDING IN DEALEY PLAZA AS HE HAS FOR DECADES, WAS ARRESTED. WHY? BECAUSE HE WAS A 'VENDOR' SELLING ON 'PRIVATE PROPERTY.'<br /> SOMEBODY NEEDS TO TELL DALLAS THAT DEALEY PLAZA BELONGS TO AMERICA AND AMERICANS.<br /> SOMEBODY NEEDS TO REMIND THE DALLAS POLICE THAT THEY HELPED FRAME OSWALD. ANYBODY EVER WATCH <em>'DALLAS DNA'? </em><br /> <strong>ATOP THAT DISTURBING AND PORTENTOUS ACT THIS JUNE BY THE DALLAS POLICE, IN THE SAME MONTH, WE SEE IN THE PAPERS AN OUTRIGHT STATEMENT FROM THE CITY OF IRVING (JUST INCHES FROM DALLAS)THAT LEE OSWALD TOOK A RIFLE FROM RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE AND THEN SHOT KENNEDY. </strong><br /> THE STORY WAS ABOUT RUTH PAINE RECEIVING A KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING.<br /> MY OPINION OF RUTH PAINE CAN FIT INSIDE THE DOT AT THE END OF THIS SENTENCE.<br /> I BELIEVE THAT MARINA OSWALD WOULD AGREE WITH ME.<br /> MOST OF THE DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST LEE OSWALD CAME FROM RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE OR FROM HER VERY MOUTH. <br /> IT WAS NOT LEE OSWALD BUT RUTH PAINE WHO, BY HER OWN TESTIMONY, WAS LAST SEEN IN THE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE JFK WAS SHOT. WHERE THE KILLER RIFLE WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE LAIN ON THE SAWDUST-LITTERED FLOOR, WRAPPED IN A BLANKET, FOR TWO MONTHS.<br /> A BLANKET THAT HAD NO SAWDUST ON IT WHEN PHOTOGRAPHED. <br /> A NICE, CLEAN BLANKET. <br /> LAUNDRY HAD BEEN DONE THAT NIGHT. THE BLANKET HAD BEEN DESCRIBED BY MARINA AS HER TODDLER JUNE'S FAVOPRITE BLANKET. WHAT WAS IT DOING, THEN, IN THE PAINE GARAGE, SUPPOSEDLY LYING ON THE DIRTY GARAGE FLOOR FOR TWO MONTHS? SUPPOSEDLY PUSHED ASIDE, STEPPED ON? SUPPOSEDLY HOLDING A RIFLE ALL THAT TIME, THOUGH WE HAVE OSWALD IMPOSTERS OUT THERE FIRING AT RIFLE RANGES. WITH WHAT RIFLES?<br /> YET THAT NIGHT, OSWALD WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE SNEAKED IN AND PULLED OUT THE RIFLE AND WRAPPED IT UP IN PAPER -- THOUGH THE BUNDLE OBSERVED BY OTHERS THAT MORNING WAS WAY TOO SMALL TO HAVE HELD ANY RIFLE.<br /> NEVERTHELESS, THE BLANKET WAS EMPTY WHEN POINTED OUT BY RUTH PAINE TO THE POLICE THE NEXT AFTERNOON. THAT NICE, CLEAN BLANKET THAT HAD BEEN JUNE'S FAVORIE BLANKET...SUPPOSEDLY IGNORED AND STEPPED ON FOR TWO MONTHS, I REPEAT.<br /> OSWALD, SUPPOSEDLY FIRING OTHER RIFLES AT RIFLE RANGES FOR PRACTICE, DOESN'T USE 'OTHER RIFLES' FOR THE MURDER.<br /> HE PULLS OUT A RIFLE THAT HASN'T BEEN FIRED FOR MONTHS -- A RIFLE MARINA OSWALD AT FIRST DENIED THAT HER HUSBAND OWNED -- A RIFLE THAT IS WELL-OILED BUT LEFT NO OIL INSIDE THE PAPER BAG THAT SUPPOSEDLY HELD IT -- AND, MOST TROUBLING OF ALL -- A RIFLE THAT HAD NO BLANKET FIBERS ON IT! THAT'S RIGHT. NO FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET CLUNG TO THE WELL-OILED RIFLE. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HAIRY WITH FIBERS.<br /> WHAT A JOKE!<br /> THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL VERSION MUST HAVE DOUBLE-DIGIT IQ'S. THOSE WHO DEFEND IT HAVE TO FACE GOD SOMEDAY. PERHAPS THEY UNDERSTAND THAT THEY WILL NOT MEET OSWALD IN HELL AND THAT THEY WILL NOT, THEREFORE, HAVE TO APOLOGIZE TO HIM THERE.<br /> RUTH PAINE SAID SHE WENT INTO THAT GARAGE WELL AFTER MIDNIGHT --AND FOUND THE LIGHT ON. SHE SAYS OSWALD MUST HAVE GONE IN THERE TO GET HIS RIFLE. THAT HE FORGOT TO TURN OFF THE LIGHT. NOT TOO BRIGHT, OSWALD...<br /> BUT WAIT. MAYBE HE IS A BIT BRIGHT....FOR WHERE DID HE PUT THE RIFLE THAT NIGHT, THEN? WHEN DID HE WRAP IT? HE WAS LATE GETTING UP THE NEXT MORNING. VERY LATE. IN A HURRY.<br /> HOW ODD, THOUGH, THAT RUTH PAINE DECIDED TO STAY UP LATE THAT NIGHT, AFTER SHE AND MARINA FINISHED FOLDING CLOHES THEY HAD WASHED AND DRIED...COULD ANY FAVORITE BLANKET OF JUNE'S HAD BEEN WASHED THAT NIGHT, AND THUS AVAILABLE?<br /> AT ANY RATE, WITH A BLANKET IN HER ARMS OR NOT, RUTH PAINE WELL AFTER MIDNIGHT DECIDED TO GO PAINT BLOCKS IN THE GARAGE. AND SHE IS THUS ABLE TO TELL US THAT OSWALD HAD TO HAVE BEEN IN THAT GARAGE THAT NIGHT. <br /> HOW VERY ODD, THEN, WHEN WE READ TESIMONY FROM BOTH RUTH PAINE AND MARINA OSWALD THAT SHOWS OSWALD HAD NO OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER THE GARAGE BEFORE HE WENT TO BED. HE WATCHED TELEVISION! MARINA SAYS SHE WAS AWAKE, AND SO WAS HE, THAT NIGHT, IN THEIR BEDROOM THERE. ONLY SHORTLY BEFORE DAWN DID OSWALD FINALLY FALL ASLEEP.<br /> RUTH PAINE WAS THE KEY SUPPLIER OF DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST OSWALD.<br /> HER HOME IS NOW GOING TO BECOME A MUSEUM. MORE FEES TO BE CHARGED...MORE INCOME FOR A CITY BLAMING OSWALD FOR KENNEDY'S MURDER...<br /> RUTH PAINE, HAVING DONATED MATERIALS FOR THE NEW MINI-MUSEUM, THIS MONTH WAS GIVEN THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING BY ITS MAYOR.<br /> AT THE SAME TIME, ON SACRED GROUND THAT SHOULD BE FREE AND OPEN TO ALL AMERICANS, VENDORS ARE ARRESTED AT DEALEY PLAZA, AND CONCURRENTLY, LEE OSWALD IS DESCRIBED AS KENNEDY'S KILLER IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS: A MUSEUM DIRECTOR AKIN TO GARY MACK WILL BE HIRED TO PUSH THE OSWALD-DID-IT MANTRA TO THE VISITORS --- FOR A PRICE, OF COURSE -- IN THE FACE OF A MOUNTAIN OF FACTS THAT TELL US OSWALD DIDN'T KILL KENNEDY.<br /> TELL YOUR FRIENDS. <br /> PLEASE. <br /> AND TELL THEM ABOUT MY BOOK, <em>ME & LEE.</em> <br /> THE MEDIA WON'T BE THERE TO TELL PEOPLE --IT'S ONLY THROUGH YOUR EFFORTS THAT THE BOOK WILL MAKE ITS POINTS.<br /> IT WILL BE RELEASED AS SOON AS IT GETS PRINTED IN AUGUST. GREAT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO VERIFY AND CHECK WHAT I WROTE IN THAT BOOK.<br /> GREAT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN, TOO, TO PERPETUATE A MYTH THAT HIDES THE TRUTH FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE--THAT THE COUNTRY WAS TAKEN OVER BY AN ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT THAT HAD LED US INTO WARS AND ECONOMIC HARD TIMES. IT IS A LEGACY BASED ON CRIMINAL ACTS THAT HAVE GONE UNPUNISHED, WHILE THE TRUTH TELLERS THAT ARE STILL ALIVE GET ARRESTED OR ARE FORCED, AS AM I, INTO EXILE.<br /> RUIH PAINE AND HER HUSBAND WERE CAUGHT IN A TAPED CONVERSATION SAYING THEY KNEW WHO WAS BEHIND THE ASSASSINATION, AND THAT IT WASN'T LEE OSWALD. BUT THERE'S MORE.<br /> <br />To find out more about the Paines, and why they might not be as wonderful as the media presents them, read<br /> <strong>A Certain Arrogance: The Sacrificing of Lee Harvey Oswald and the Wartime Manipulation of Religious Groups by U.S. Intelligence</strong> by George Michael Evica. The curageous publishers at trine day have again come through with a fine book that should be on your "must read" list. <br /><br /><strong>researcher Carol Hewett had remarks of importance to make at a Lancer Conference regarding the Paines:</strong><br /><br />"Another reason the Paines are important is that their home was one of two major sources of evidence seized against Oswald, the other being, of course, the Texas School Book Depository. Evidence implicating Oswald "simply oozed out of the Paine household, like a seeping wound," Hewett said, and included the Walker photos, the blanket that allegedly held the assassination weapon, the fake Hidell documents, the negative used to fake Hidell identification, and some, but not all, of the infamous "backyard" photos.<br /><br />Two other important pieces of evidence seized from the Paine house on the assassination weekend were the Minox camera and the November 9 embassy letter, although their existence was not learned of until later."<br /><br /><strong>John Kelin, who reported on the Lancer Conference where Hewett spoke,had more to share from her remarks about the Paines:</strong><br /><br /> "Another reason the Paines are important is that their home was one of two major sources of evidence seized against Oswald, the other being, of course, the Texas School Book Depository. Evidence implicating Oswald "simply oozed out of the Paine household, like a seeping wound," Hewett said, and included the Walker photos, the blanket that allegedly held the assassination weapon, the fake Hidell documents, the negative used to fake Hidell identification, and some, but not all, of the infamous "backyard" photos.<br /><br />Two other important pieces of evidence seized from the Paine house on the assassination weekend were the Minox camera and the November 9 embassy letter, although their existence was not learned of until later.<br /><br />It is difficult for researchers to categorize the Paines, Hewett said. While there are plenty of suspicious circumstances surrounding them, what does it mean? Some plainly suggest a CIA connection, as with the evidence presented by Steve Jones. But, Hewett continued, "the facts surrounding the circumstances of these two items of evidence have led me to believe Ruth Paine may have had some FBI affiliation."<br /><br />The question of the Minox camera is rather problematic. It was discovered among Oswald's possessions by the Dallas police. But according to research by John Armstrong, this camera and hundreds of other items were seized by the FBI on the evening November 22, 1963. By manipulating police records, it appears, knowledge of the camera's existence was suppressed.<br /><br />By early 1964, word of the camera's existence began to leak out. "An article appeared in The Nation magazine, in January of 1964, highly critical of the FBI, and accusing the FBI of suppressing evidence," Hewett said. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover ordered Dallas agents to find the camera. But, she said, "This was a camera they had all along in their possession."<br /><br />FBI Agent Bardwell Odum contacted Ruth Paine, Hewett said, and asked her to "check into this matter. And Ruth calls Bardwell back, and says, 'Oh, yes, we have a Minox camera. I just called my husband at work and he reminded me that we have one, rusting away, in an old coffee can in the garage. We'll be happy to get it for you.'" Agent Odum soon showed up at the Paine's house and picked up a Minox camera.<br /><br />According to Odum's report, Michael Paine said he offered the camera to the Dallas police, but they weren't interested in it. "This is a blatant lie," Hewett said. "This conversation --- this alleged conversation between Michael Paine and Bardwell Odum --- was recorded on a January 30, 1964 memo. We now have an internal memo dated January 25, 1964, generated by the highest officers and officials of the FBI, in which they acknowledge they had been in possession of the Minox camera all along. And in fact, they were comparing the film in that camera with some film in a New York City counter-espionage file."<br /><br />It now appears, Hewett said, that there were two Minox cameras. Michael Paine said the camera he gave to Bardwell Odum was returned to him after the Warren Commission finished its work. It was later stolen, he said. But in 1978, a camera said to be the same one was presented to Marina Oswald for identification --- along with a second Minox camera. Mrs. Oswald could not identify either one.<br /><br />One of those cameras is still in the National Archives, Hewett said, but the other one is missing. But she said it isn't known which camera it is because the serial number, printed on the inside of the camera, is not accessible. Hewett wrote the Archives asking about this, but "they wrote back claiming the camera was stuck shut." Informed of this, the ARRB expressed no interest in pursuing the matter. (See Reactions to the Board, in this issue, for more on the ARRB's lack of interest in the Paines.)<br /><br />"The other thing that made me consider that perhaps Ruth and Michael were FBI informants was the November 9 embassy letter that Oswald wrote," Hewett said. There are actually three versions --- Oswald's handwritten version, a more polished typed version, and a third in Ruth Paine's hand, which she told the Warren Commission she copied from Oswald's typed version. This last version is missing from the National Archives collection, Hewett said.<br /><br />The typewritten version has the initials of FBI agent James Hosty on it --- dated November 22, although the FBI did not officially assume jurisdiction in the case until November 26. Although Dallas police investigators were searching the Paine home for evidence against Oswald on November 22 and 23, and although Ruth was fully aware of this, Hewett said, "she is providing the FBI with critical documentation behind the backs of the Dallas police."<br /><br />Ruth Paine may also have alerted the FBI that a postal notice to Oswald arrived at her home, directing them to the post office to pick up a package. "What we have here," Hewett summarized, "is Ruth furnishing the FBI with leads, while simultaneously vacating [her] house to let the Dallas police have access to whatever it is they can find."<br /><br />As she neared the conclusion of her talk, Carol Hewett went over some facts which she felt demonstrated incongruitites in Ruth Paine's personality. "Ruth Paine is described by almost all of her friends in the northeast as a charitble individual. And yet, not once did anyone ever describe a single act of charity. There are no indications that she donated money, took in stray dogs, or that she'd ever taken in any other forlorn women and children. We have no specific acts --- the only act is her act of her taking in Marina Oswald.<br /><br />"Repeatedly, throughout her own testimony and the testimony of all her friends, they said that her motive were so that she could learn the Russian language. Now, Ruth Paine studied the Russian language non-stop, from the mid-1950s. And in Dallas, she was studying it not only through the Berlitz school, but she had a personal tutor who was a native-speaking Russian, Dorothy Gravitis. And so what did she need Marina Oswald for?"<br /><br />So it seems, Hewett said, like a phony excuse. "And the phoniness carries over towards Ruth's care of Marina, in both the spring of '63 and the fall of '63. Ruth is very indignant when she testifies that Oswald would not permit Marina to speak English. Yet at no time did Ruth and Marina speak English. Ruth had ample opportunity to teach Marina English, and yet, just like Oswald, Ruth insisted on talking to Marina in the Russian language in the privacy of their home --- where Oswald wasn't there to interfere. And so this doesn't seem right."<br /><br />Both Paines were active in the Dallas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. "And yet, when it came to obtaining counsel for Lee Harvey Oswald, Ruth didn't try very hard. And she was very annoyed that Oswald even had the audacity to ask her to call John Abt." There are no indications she actually tried to contact Abt on Oswald's behalf, Hewett said. "This doesn't seem to ring true to the civil libertarian that Ruth claims to be."<br /><br />The most disturbing incongruity, in Hewett's view, had to do with Ruth's reaction to Oswald's murder. "We have this pious Quaker who, when interviewed by a journalist for Redbook magazine in the summer of 1964, told this journalist that she was glad that Ruby shot Oswald. She was glad that Oswald was dead --- these are exact quotes. And this journalist was just appalled that this very religious woman would say such a thing. Because even if Oswald had done the murder, this was a man who was deprived of his civil liberties, was not given the opportunity to have a trial or be defended by counsel. And there was this widow, and two little girls that Ruth was supposed to be attached to, and there was no offer of condolence. Ruth did not go to Oswald's funeral. Even Jackie Kennedy had the good graces to offer condolences to Marina Oswald."<br /><br />SOURCE: http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/26th_Issue/paine.html<br /><br /> I HAVE MY OWN REASONS FOR DISTRUSTING RUTH AND MICHAEL PAINE: LEE DID NOT TRUST THEM AND TOLD ME NEVER TO TRUST THEM. I REALIZE THAT BY SPEAKING OUT LIKE THIS, I MAKE ENEMIES, FOR RUTH PAINE IS ALIVE. FURTHERMORE, PEOPLE DO CHANGE. THEY MAY REGRET THEIR ACTIONS IN THE PAST. I,MYSELF, HAVE SOME CHILDREN WHO HAVE JUDGED ME FOR WHAT HAPPENED IN 1963, AND FOR LATER PRECIPITATING A DIVORCE (AFTER 24 YEARS) FROM THEIR FATHER.<br /> IT IS NOT MY INTENTION TO PILLORY RUTH PAINE, BUT I DO NOTE SHE ESCAPED QUESTIONING BY NOT ONLY THE HSCA, BUT ALSO BY THE ARRB. WHY? THEY SAID SHE HAD BEEN QUESTIONED ENOUGH. HOWEVER, SO MUCH MORE NEW INFORMATION HAS EMERGED.<br /> ONLY PEOPLE WHO SWALLOW THE OFFICIAL VERSION WHOLE, WITHOUT BLINKING, CAN BE UNAWARE THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS FRAMED, THAT HE WAS INNOCENT OF KENNEDY'S MURDER.<br /><br /> HENCE, TO READ THAT LEE OSWALD TOOK A RIFLE FROM PAINE'S GARAGE AND USED IT TO SHOOT KENNEDY --WRITEN IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2010 -- IS PARTICULARLY DISHEARTENING AND INDICATIVE OF THE KIND OF ATMOSPHERE THAT EXISTS IN DALLAS AND NEARBY IRVING --THE SAME ATMOSPHERE THAT PROVOKED THE ARREST OF 'VENDORS' EARLIER THIS MONTH -- IMAGINE--THEY ARRESTED ROBERT GRODEN, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE!--- CLAIMING THAT DEALEY PLAZA, OWNED BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, IS 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' WHERE OTHER VIEWPOINTS CANNOT BE LEGALLY OFFERED TO THE THOUSANDS WHO VISIT THERE YEARLY. <br /> AS LONG AS DALLAS ARRESTS 'VENDORS' AND PROMOTES "OSWALD-DID-IT" FAIRY TALES SO BLATANTLY AND WITHOUT RESERVATION, I AM OBLIGED TO SPEAK UP.<br /> AND SO ARE YOU.<br /> YOU SAW THE LIST OF BOOKS THAT AREN'T SOLD AT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.<br /> TELL OTHERS ABOUT THEM. TELL OTHERS THAT PEOPLE SELLING THEM GET ARRESTED AT DEALEY PLAZA.<br /> THE FICTION THAT OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY MUST BE LABELED AS FICTION EVERYWHERE IT RAISES ITS UGLY HEAD.<br /> BELOW IS THE ARTICLE--IN BOLD FACE, I'VE NOTED THE MOST OFFENSIVE PASSAGES. I WRITE FROM EXILE. I CAN'T SEE MY LOVED ONES. IT'S GETTING TO ME, FRANKLY. BUT THE TRUTH IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN MY FEELINGS. I WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK.<br /> I HOPE YOU FEEL THE SAME WAY. <br /> THIS 4TH OF JULY, DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR YOUR COUNTRY.<br /> SPREAD THE TRUTH. OUR FREEDOM AND OUR FUTURES DEPEND ON IT.<br /><br />Mayor Herbert Gears and wife Christina welcomed Ruth Paine to their home today<br />4:01 PM Fri, Jun 18, 2010 | Permalink<br />Deborah Fleck/News Assistant<br /><br />Ruth Paine speaks with a heavy heart when asked about the tragic events that touched her life when she lived in Irving. Her small home on West Fifth Street became tied to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Her warmth and friendship led to inviting a lonely Russian mother to stay with her. That mother turned out to be Marina Oswald, wife of Lee Harvey Oswald. It was from Ruth's house that fateful morning in 1963 that Lee Harvey took a rifle, headed downtown and shot the president.<br /><br />Now, Irving hopes to turn her former home into a museum. Mayor Herbert Gears invited Ruth to his home today to hear the city's plans. Paul Gooch, director of Community Services, talked about the options the city is considering. One was to move the house to a park in the neighborhood to accommodate traffic.<br /><br />Ruth said she was glad to donate the items she had to the city. "I'm not going to live forever and my children didn't seem interested," Ruth said about parting with now-historic items from that time.<br /><br />Ruth made the trip to Irving along with her friend, Lou Falkenstein, to participate in a Juneteeth celebration Saturday that will honor the West Irving Improvement Association. The two women were very involved in that community during the 1960s.<br /><br />Ruth now lives in California. She'll return home with a special memento--a key to Irving presented to her by the mayor.<br />=======<br />http://irvingblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/06/mayor-herbert-gears-and-wife-c.htmlUnknownnoreply@blogger.com