WANT TO GET ARRESTED? SELL "OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT" BOOKS AT DEALEY PLAZA!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
RUTH PAINE IS AWARDED THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING, JUNE, 2010: STORY BELOW

WANT TO GET ARRESTED? SELL "OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT" BOOKS AT DEALEY PLAZA!

THAT'S THE QUICK WAY TO MISERY.
OR WRITE A BOOK ABOUT OSWALD'S INNOCENCE WHILE LIVING IN DALLAS, AND LAND IN THE HOSPITAL A FEW TIMES, WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENED TO ME.

THERE WERE TWO TROUBLING EVENTS THAT OCCURRED THIS MONTH IN THE DALLAS AREA. THE FIRST WAS THE ARREST OF 'VENDORS' ON 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' --THAT 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' BEING DEALEY PLAZA, WHERE THOUSANDS CONGREGATE TO VIEW WHERE JOHN F. KENNEDY WAS MURDERED. OVERLOOKING THE PLACE WHERE IT HAPPENED, BESIDE THE OH-SO-UPON-IT GRASSY KNOLL, IS THE TEXAS SCHOOL BOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDING AND THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM, WHERE FOR YOUR BURNISHED PENNIES AND HARD-EARNED CASH, YOU CAN HEAR THE OFFICIAL VERSION--THAT OSWALD DID IT.

IT'S THE ONLY VERSION THAT'S POLITICALLY CORRECT IN THE DALLAS AREA.

THAT'S DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE NOW KNOW THE BACK OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY'S HEAD WAS DELIBERATELY PAINTED IN BLACK TO HIDE A SHOT FROM THE FRONT IN THE FAMOUS ZAPRUDER FILM.
THAT'S DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE KNOW THE AUTOPSY PHOTOS WERE RIGGED TO TRY TO SHOW A SHOT FROM THE BACK (SEE DOUG HORNE'S INSIDE THE ARRB).
THAT'S DESPITE THE FACT THAT FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT FOR JFK, ABRAHAM BOLDEN, HAS TESTIFIED THAT AN INFORMANT NAMED "LEE" SAVED KENNEDY'S LIFE IN CHICAGO.
THAT'S DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE KNOW LEE OSWALD COULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN THE 'SNIPER'S NEST' ACCORDING TO SOLID WITNESS TESTIMONY.
THAT'S DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE "MAGIC BULLET" IS BASED ON MOVING A BULLET HOLE 'UPWARDS' BY GERALD FORD, WHO ADMITTED IT, SO THAT A TRAJECTORY COULD BE CREATED TO ALLOW FOR THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH A BULLET. A BULLET THAT HAS TOO MUCH NOT MISSING FROM IT TO ACCOUNT FOR PIECES OF BULLET LODGED IN BONES THAT CLEARLY SHOW UP IN X=RAYS OF GOV. JOHN CONNALLY'S WRIST.
A BULLET THAT LOOKS JUST LIKE BULLETS FIRED THROUGH COTTON--ALMOST PRISTINE, THOUGH IT SUPPOSEDLY SHATTERED A RIB AND WRIST BONES AFTER PASSING THROUGH KENNEDY'S BACK, AND THROAT AND OTHER PARTS OF CONNALLY'S BODY AS WELL.
A BULLET SHOT, SUPPOSEDLY, FROM A RIFLE IN SUCH POOR CONDITION THAT PEOPLE ARE AFRAID TO TEST FIRE IT TO THIS VERY DAY.
THESE FACTS, AND MANY MORE, SCREAM OUT THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD, JUST AS HE SAID, DID NOT KILL JFK.

BUT IN JUNE, 2010 IN DALLAS, THE SAME OLD STORY IS STILL BEING REPEATED AS IF THESE WERE BEADS ON A ROSARY: THAT LEE OSWALD SHOT KENNEDY.
AND THE VERY WOMAN WHO SUPPLIED MUCH EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD HAS JUST RECEIVED THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING. YOU CAN READ THE ARTICLE BELOW, AFTER I FINISH RANTING A BIT ABOUT HER.
IT'S NOT WISE TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINION THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT IN A PLACE LIKE DALLAS, TEXAS, WHICH APPARENTLY WANTS TO KEEP ITS REPUTATION AS A CITY WHERE UNJUST SENTENCES HAVE BEEN METED OUT FOR MANY YEARS UPON THE HEADS OF INNOCENT VICTIMS.
THE DALLAS POLICE RECENTLY ARRESTED 'VENDORS' IN DEALEY PLAZA, STATING THAT THE CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. A STORY WAS FRONTED THAT SOME VENDORS ARE IN YOUR FACE AND SCARE PEOPLE. HUH? ANYBODY WHO'S BEEN TO DEALEY PLAZA KNOWS THAT A TROUBLEMAKER CAN BE PLANTED EASILY AMONG THOSE WHO ARE CONDUCTING TOURS, SELLING BOOKS, AND HAWKING SOUVENIRS.
GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE 'VENDORS' ARE LARGELY THERE TO EDUCATE VISITORS HUNGRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR GOOD SENSE TELLS THEM IS OBVIOUS: THAT GRASSY KNOLL IS SO CLOSE --THE BUILDING WHERE THE SNIPER'S NEST IS --IN COMPARISON--AS IF A MILE AWAY. STANDING THERE IN THE PLAZA, IT'S VERY HARD TO IGNORE THE GRASSY KNOLL.
BUT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM DOES A GREAT JOB OF SELLING THE STORY THAT ITS SNIPER'S NEST OCCUPANT WAS OSWALD --NOBODY ELSE -- EVEN THOUGH PHOtOS SHOW BOXES WERE MOVED TO CREATE THE SO-CALLED SNIPER'S NEST AFTER THE SHOTS WERE FIRED.
YOU WON'T SEE THOSE PHOTOS IN THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.
NOR ARE YOU ALLOWED TO ACUALLY PEER FROM THE NEST SITE, ITSELF. TO DO SO WOULD SHOW YOU HOW AWFULLY HARD SUCH A SERIES OF SHOTS WOULD HAVE BEEN TO MAKE. THE SNIPER'S NEST AREA IS CONVENIENTLY WALLED OFF WITH CLEAR PLASTIC. NOBODY CAN GET INTO POSITION WITH A RIFLE THERE, NOW, TO SEE IF THE RIFLE BUTT WOULD HIT THE WALL WHEN TURNED TO AIM AT JFK. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CONTENT WITH PHOTOS SHOWING THE FBI USING A TEST RIFLE-- MOUNTED ON A TRIPOD, NO LESS.
WHAT NEXT?
WILL MONEY-HUNGRY DALLAS END UP CHARGING ADMISSION TO DEALEY PLAZA ITSELF -- THOUGH IT WAS THE VERY PUBLIC SITE OF OUR PRESIDENT'S EXECUTION?
WHY NOT?
THOUGH HE BELONGS TO THE AGES, AND TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR SLAIN PRESIDENT IS CLEARLY REJECTED BY DALLAS, WHO NEVER ERECTED A DECENT MONUMENT TO OUR FALLEN LEADER. INSTEAD, WITH THE HELP OF SUCH CHARACTERS AS GARY MACK OF THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM -- A MAN WHO USED TO SAY OSWALD DID NOT KILL JFK, BUT WHO NOW SAYS THAT IT'S LIKELY OSWALD DID THE JOB. HIS POCKETS COMFORTABLY BULGING WITH HIS HEFTY SALARY, GARY MACK NOW ADDS HIS VOICE TO THE MUSEUM'S AND THE ESTABLISHMENT IN HELPING TO DESTROIY KENNEDY'S REPUTATION.
AFTER ALL, WHO WILL CARE IF THEY ARE CONVINCED THAT KENNEDY WAS JUST ANOTHER CORRUPT CREEP IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
JFK'S MEMORY IS BEING SYSTEMATICALLY DESTROYED BY OUR SOLD-OUT MEDIA, WHICH CONCENTRATES ON JFK'S WOMANIZING AND PAINKILLER USE RATHER THAN ON HIS PROVEN COURAGE, HIS BATTLES WITH CONSTANT PAIN, AND A DEVOTION TO COUNRY THAT PROVED KENNEDY, TURNED ERSATZ PLAYBOY, CARED MORE ABOUT AMERICA THAN ABOUT HIS OWN LIFE--AS JAMES DOUGLASS MAKES ABUNDANTLY CLEAR IN HIS FINE BOOK, JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE--WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS.
DALLAS MAKES A HEFTY BUNDLE ITSELF OFF THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.

YOU CAN PAY YOUR FEE FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING SOLD THE OFFICIAL VERSION AT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM, WHICH PUSHES OSWALD-DID-IT TO ALL, WHILE SELLING BOOKS THAT ONLY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL VERSION.

THE MUSEUM WON'T SELL HORNE'S BOOKS THERE, THAT TELL YOU THE ARRB DISCOVERED THAT THE AUTOPSY PHOTOS HAD BEEN RIGGED TO TRY TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE KENNEDY HAD BEEN SHOT FROM BEHIND -- AND THAT THE ZAPRUDER FILM WAS ACTUALLY PAINTED OVER TO HIDE A SHOT FROM THE FRONT -- A DISCOVERY MADE BY SYDNEY WILKINSON'S HOLLYWOOD RESTORATION FILM EXPERTS ON A TRUE COPY OF THE ZAPRUDER FILM IN 2009.
THEY WILL NOT SELL THE BOOK ME & LEE THERE, EITHER. THEY WILL NOT SELL JIM MARRS' CROSSFIRE THERE.
THEY WILL NOT SELL HASLAM'S DR. MARY'S MONKEY THERE.
THEY WILL NOT SELL JAMES DOUGLASS' JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLETHERE.
THEY WILL NOT SELL DR. JIM FETZER'S THE GREAT ZAPRUDER FILM HOAX THERE.

THEY WILL SELL YOU VINCE BUGLIOSI'S HUGE BOOK--WHEREIN BUGLIOSI TRASHES ME, THOUGH HE NEVER INTERVIEWED ME. HE COPIED HIS INFORMATION FROM OTHERS WHO NEVER MET ME. SO MUCH FOR BUGLIOSI'S RESEARCH METHODS.
THEY WILL SELL YOU GERALD POSNER'S BOOK, THOUGH POSNER'S BOOK HAS BEEN FOUND TO BE RIDDLED WITH ERRORS AND OMISSIONS.
MEANWHILE, ROBERT GRODEN, STANDING IN DEALEY PLAZA AS HE HAS FOR DECADES, WAS ARRESTED. WHY? BECAUSE HE WAS A 'VENDOR' SELLING ON 'PRIVATE PROPERTY.'
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO TELL DALLAS THAT DEALEY PLAZA BELONGS TO AMERICA AND AMERICANS.
SOMEBODY NEEDS TO REMIND THE DALLAS POLICE THAT THEY HELPED FRAME OSWALD. ANYBODY EVER WATCH 'DALLAS DNA'?
ATOP THAT DISTURBING AND PORTENTOUS ACT THIS JUNE BY THE DALLAS POLICE, IN THE SAME MONTH, WE SEE IN THE PAPERS AN OUTRIGHT STATEMENT FROM THE CITY OF IRVING (JUST INCHES FROM DALLAS)THAT LEE OSWALD TOOK A RIFLE FROM RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE AND THEN SHOT KENNEDY.
THE STORY WAS ABOUT RUTH PAINE RECEIVING A KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING.
MY OPINION OF RUTH PAINE CAN FIT INSIDE THE DOT AT THE END OF THIS SENTENCE.
I BELIEVE THAT MARINA OSWALD WOULD AGREE WITH ME.
MOST OF THE DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST LEE OSWALD CAME FROM RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE OR FROM HER VERY MOUTH.
IT WAS NOT LEE OSWALD BUT RUTH PAINE WHO, BY HER OWN TESTIMONY, WAS LAST SEEN IN THE GARAGE THE NIGHT BEFORE JFK WAS SHOT. WHERE THE KILLER RIFLE WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE LAIN ON THE SAWDUST-LITTERED FLOOR, WRAPPED IN A BLANKET, FOR TWO MONTHS.
A BLANKET THAT HAD NO SAWDUST ON IT WHEN PHOTOGRAPHED.
A NICE, CLEAN BLANKET.
LAUNDRY HAD BEEN DONE THAT NIGHT. THE BLANKET HAD BEEN DESCRIBED BY MARINA AS HER TODDLER JUNE'S FAVOPRITE BLANKET. WHAT WAS IT DOING, THEN, IN THE PAINE GARAGE, SUPPOSEDLY LYING ON THE DIRTY GARAGE FLOOR FOR TWO MONTHS? SUPPOSEDLY PUSHED ASIDE, STEPPED ON? SUPPOSEDLY HOLDING A RIFLE ALL THAT TIME, THOUGH WE HAVE OSWALD IMPOSTERS OUT THERE FIRING AT RIFLE RANGES. WITH WHAT RIFLES?
YET THAT NIGHT, OSWALD WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE SNEAKED IN AND PULLED OUT THE RIFLE AND WRAPPED IT UP IN PAPER -- THOUGH THE BUNDLE OBSERVED BY OTHERS THAT MORNING WAS WAY TOO SMALL TO HAVE HELD ANY RIFLE.
NEVERTHELESS, THE BLANKET WAS EMPTY WHEN POINTED OUT BY RUTH PAINE TO THE POLICE THE NEXT AFTERNOON. THAT NICE, CLEAN BLANKET THAT HAD BEEN JUNE'S FAVORIE BLANKET...SUPPOSEDLY IGNORED AND STEPPED ON FOR TWO MONTHS, I REPEAT.
OSWALD, SUPPOSEDLY FIRING OTHER RIFLES AT RIFLE RANGES FOR PRACTICE, DOESN'T USE 'OTHER RIFLES' FOR THE MURDER.
HE PULLS OUT A RIFLE THAT HASN'T BEEN FIRED FOR MONTHS -- A RIFLE MARINA OSWALD AT FIRST DENIED THAT HER HUSBAND OWNED -- A RIFLE THAT IS WELL-OILED BUT LEFT NO OIL INSIDE THE PAPER BAG THAT SUPPOSEDLY HELD IT -- AND, MOST TROUBLING OF ALL -- A RIFLE THAT HAD NO BLANKET FIBERS ON IT! THAT'S RIGHT. NO FIBERS FROM THE BLANKET CLUNG TO THE WELL-OILED RIFLE. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HAIRY WITH FIBERS.
WHAT A JOKE!
THOSE WHO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL VERSION MUST HAVE DOUBLE-DIGIT IQ'S. THOSE WHO DEFEND IT HAVE TO FACE GOD SOMEDAY. PERHAPS THEY UNDERSTAND THAT THEY WILL NOT MEET OSWALD IN HELL AND THAT THEY WILL NOT, THEREFORE, HAVE TO APOLOGIZE TO HIM THERE.
RUTH PAINE SAID SHE WENT INTO THAT GARAGE WELL AFTER MIDNIGHT --AND FOUND THE LIGHT ON. SHE SAYS OSWALD MUST HAVE GONE IN THERE TO GET HIS RIFLE. THAT HE FORGOT TO TURN OFF THE LIGHT. NOT TOO BRIGHT, OSWALD...
BUT WAIT. MAYBE HE IS A BIT BRIGHT....FOR WHERE DID HE PUT THE RIFLE THAT NIGHT, THEN? WHEN DID HE WRAP IT? HE WAS LATE GETTING UP THE NEXT MORNING. VERY LATE. IN A HURRY.
HOW ODD, THOUGH, THAT RUTH PAINE DECIDED TO STAY UP LATE THAT NIGHT, AFTER SHE AND MARINA FINISHED FOLDING CLOHES THEY HAD WASHED AND DRIED...COULD ANY FAVORITE BLANKET OF JUNE'S HAD BEEN WASHED THAT NIGHT, AND THUS AVAILABLE?
AT ANY RATE, WITH A BLANKET IN HER ARMS OR NOT, RUTH PAINE WELL AFTER MIDNIGHT DECIDED TO GO PAINT BLOCKS IN THE GARAGE. AND SHE IS THUS ABLE TO TELL US THAT OSWALD HAD TO HAVE BEEN IN THAT GARAGE THAT NIGHT.
HOW VERY ODD, THEN, WHEN WE READ TESIMONY FROM BOTH RUTH PAINE AND MARINA OSWALD THAT SHOWS OSWALD HAD NO OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER THE GARAGE BEFORE HE WENT TO BED. HE WATCHED TELEVISION! MARINA SAYS SHE WAS AWAKE, AND SO WAS HE, THAT NIGHT, IN THEIR BEDROOM THERE. ONLY SHORTLY BEFORE DAWN DID OSWALD FINALLY FALL ASLEEP.
RUTH PAINE WAS THE KEY SUPPLIER OF DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST OSWALD.
HER HOME IS NOW GOING TO BECOME A MUSEUM. MORE FEES TO BE CHARGED...MORE INCOME FOR A CITY BLAMING OSWALD FOR KENNEDY'S MURDER...
RUTH PAINE, HAVING DONATED MATERIALS FOR THE NEW MINI-MUSEUM, THIS MONTH WAS GIVEN THE KEY TO THE CITY OF IRVING BY ITS MAYOR.
AT THE SAME TIME, ON SACRED GROUND THAT SHOULD BE FREE AND OPEN TO ALL AMERICANS, VENDORS ARE ARRESTED AT DEALEY PLAZA, AND CONCURRENTLY, LEE OSWALD IS DESCRIBED AS KENNEDY'S KILLER IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPERS: A MUSEUM DIRECTOR AKIN TO GARY MACK WILL BE HIRED TO PUSH THE OSWALD-DID-IT MANTRA TO THE VISITORS --- FOR A PRICE, OF COURSE -- IN THE FACE OF A MOUNTAIN OF FACTS THAT TELL US OSWALD DIDN'T KILL KENNEDY.
TELL YOUR FRIENDS.
PLEASE.
AND TELL THEM ABOUT MY BOOK, ME & LEE.
THE MEDIA WON'T BE THERE TO TELL PEOPLE --IT'S ONLY THROUGH YOUR EFFORTS THAT THE BOOK WILL MAKE ITS POINTS.
IT WILL BE RELEASED AS SOON AS IT GETS PRINTED IN AUGUST. GREAT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN TO VERIFY AND CHECK WHAT I WROTE IN THAT BOOK.
GREAT CARE HAS BEEN TAKEN, TOO, TO PERPETUATE A MYTH THAT HIDES THE TRUTH FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE--THAT THE COUNTRY WAS TAKEN OVER BY AN ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT THAT HAD LED US INTO WARS AND ECONOMIC HARD TIMES. IT IS A LEGACY BASED ON CRIMINAL ACTS THAT HAVE GONE UNPUNISHED, WHILE THE TRUTH TELLERS THAT ARE STILL ALIVE GET ARRESTED OR ARE FORCED, AS AM I, INTO EXILE.
RUIH PAINE AND HER HUSBAND WERE CAUGHT IN A TAPED CONVERSATION SAYING THEY KNEW WHO WAS BEHIND THE ASSASSINATION, AND THAT IT WASN'T LEE OSWALD. BUT THERE'S MORE.

To find out more about the Paines, and why they might not be as wonderful as the media presents them, read
A Certain Arrogance: The Sacrificing of Lee Harvey Oswald and the Wartime Manipulation of Religious Groups by U.S. Intelligence by George Michael Evica. The curageous publishers at trine day have again come through with a fine book that should be on your "must read" list.

researcher Carol Hewett had remarks of importance to make at a Lancer Conference regarding the Paines:

"Another reason the Paines are important is that their home was one of two major sources of evidence seized against Oswald, the other being, of course, the Texas School Book Depository. Evidence implicating Oswald "simply oozed out of the Paine household, like a seeping wound," Hewett said, and included the Walker photos, the blanket that allegedly held the assassination weapon, the fake Hidell documents, the negative used to fake Hidell identification, and some, but not all, of the infamous "backyard" photos.

Two other important pieces of evidence seized from the Paine house on the assassination weekend were the Minox camera and the November 9 embassy letter, although their existence was not learned of until later."

John Kelin, who reported on the Lancer Conference where Hewett spoke,had more to share from her remarks about the Paines:

"Another reason the Paines are important is that their home was one of two major sources of evidence seized against Oswald, the other being, of course, the Texas School Book Depository. Evidence implicating Oswald "simply oozed out of the Paine household, like a seeping wound," Hewett said, and included the Walker photos, the blanket that allegedly held the assassination weapon, the fake Hidell documents, the negative used to fake Hidell identification, and some, but not all, of the infamous "backyard" photos.

Two other important pieces of evidence seized from the Paine house on the assassination weekend were the Minox camera and the November 9 embassy letter, although their existence was not learned of until later.

It is difficult for researchers to categorize the Paines, Hewett said. While there are plenty of suspicious circumstances surrounding them, what does it mean? Some plainly suggest a CIA connection, as with the evidence presented by Steve Jones. But, Hewett continued, "the facts surrounding the circumstances of these two items of evidence have led me to believe Ruth Paine may have had some FBI affiliation."

The question of the Minox camera is rather problematic. It was discovered among Oswald's possessions by the Dallas police. But according to research by John Armstrong, this camera and hundreds of other items were seized by the FBI on the evening November 22, 1963. By manipulating police records, it appears, knowledge of the camera's existence was suppressed.

By early 1964, word of the camera's existence began to leak out. "An article appeared in The Nation magazine, in January of 1964, highly critical of the FBI, and accusing the FBI of suppressing evidence," Hewett said. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover ordered Dallas agents to find the camera. But, she said, "This was a camera they had all along in their possession."

FBI Agent Bardwell Odum contacted Ruth Paine, Hewett said, and asked her to "check into this matter. And Ruth calls Bardwell back, and says, 'Oh, yes, we have a Minox camera. I just called my husband at work and he reminded me that we have one, rusting away, in an old coffee can in the garage. We'll be happy to get it for you.'" Agent Odum soon showed up at the Paine's house and picked up a Minox camera.

According to Odum's report, Michael Paine said he offered the camera to the Dallas police, but they weren't interested in it. "This is a blatant lie," Hewett said. "This conversation --- this alleged conversation between Michael Paine and Bardwell Odum --- was recorded on a January 30, 1964 memo. We now have an internal memo dated January 25, 1964, generated by the highest officers and officials of the FBI, in which they acknowledge they had been in possession of the Minox camera all along. And in fact, they were comparing the film in that camera with some film in a New York City counter-espionage file."

It now appears, Hewett said, that there were two Minox cameras. Michael Paine said the camera he gave to Bardwell Odum was returned to him after the Warren Commission finished its work. It was later stolen, he said. But in 1978, a camera said to be the same one was presented to Marina Oswald for identification --- along with a second Minox camera. Mrs. Oswald could not identify either one.

One of those cameras is still in the National Archives, Hewett said, but the other one is missing. But she said it isn't known which camera it is because the serial number, printed on the inside of the camera, is not accessible. Hewett wrote the Archives asking about this, but "they wrote back claiming the camera was stuck shut." Informed of this, the ARRB expressed no interest in pursuing the matter. (See Reactions to the Board, in this issue, for more on the ARRB's lack of interest in the Paines.)

"The other thing that made me consider that perhaps Ruth and Michael were FBI informants was the November 9 embassy letter that Oswald wrote," Hewett said. There are actually three versions --- Oswald's handwritten version, a more polished typed version, and a third in Ruth Paine's hand, which she told the Warren Commission she copied from Oswald's typed version. This last version is missing from the National Archives collection, Hewett said.

The typewritten version has the initials of FBI agent James Hosty on it --- dated November 22, although the FBI did not officially assume jurisdiction in the case until November 26. Although Dallas police investigators were searching the Paine home for evidence against Oswald on November 22 and 23, and although Ruth was fully aware of this, Hewett said, "she is providing the FBI with critical documentation behind the backs of the Dallas police."

Ruth Paine may also have alerted the FBI that a postal notice to Oswald arrived at her home, directing them to the post office to pick up a package. "What we have here," Hewett summarized, "is Ruth furnishing the FBI with leads, while simultaneously vacating [her] house to let the Dallas police have access to whatever it is they can find."

As she neared the conclusion of her talk, Carol Hewett went over some facts which she felt demonstrated incongruitites in Ruth Paine's personality. "Ruth Paine is described by almost all of her friends in the northeast as a charitble individual. And yet, not once did anyone ever describe a single act of charity. There are no indications that she donated money, took in stray dogs, or that she'd ever taken in any other forlorn women and children. We have no specific acts --- the only act is her act of her taking in Marina Oswald.

"Repeatedly, throughout her own testimony and the testimony of all her friends, they said that her motive were so that she could learn the Russian language. Now, Ruth Paine studied the Russian language non-stop, from the mid-1950s. And in Dallas, she was studying it not only through the Berlitz school, but she had a personal tutor who was a native-speaking Russian, Dorothy Gravitis. And so what did she need Marina Oswald for?"

So it seems, Hewett said, like a phony excuse. "And the phoniness carries over towards Ruth's care of Marina, in both the spring of '63 and the fall of '63. Ruth is very indignant when she testifies that Oswald would not permit Marina to speak English. Yet at no time did Ruth and Marina speak English. Ruth had ample opportunity to teach Marina English, and yet, just like Oswald, Ruth insisted on talking to Marina in the Russian language in the privacy of their home --- where Oswald wasn't there to interfere. And so this doesn't seem right."

Both Paines were active in the Dallas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. "And yet, when it came to obtaining counsel for Lee Harvey Oswald, Ruth didn't try very hard. And she was very annoyed that Oswald even had the audacity to ask her to call John Abt." There are no indications she actually tried to contact Abt on Oswald's behalf, Hewett said. "This doesn't seem to ring true to the civil libertarian that Ruth claims to be."

The most disturbing incongruity, in Hewett's view, had to do with Ruth's reaction to Oswald's murder. "We have this pious Quaker who, when interviewed by a journalist for Redbook magazine in the summer of 1964, told this journalist that she was glad that Ruby shot Oswald. She was glad that Oswald was dead --- these are exact quotes. And this journalist was just appalled that this very religious woman would say such a thing. Because even if Oswald had done the murder, this was a man who was deprived of his civil liberties, was not given the opportunity to have a trial or be defended by counsel. And there was this widow, and two little girls that Ruth was supposed to be attached to, and there was no offer of condolence. Ruth did not go to Oswald's funeral. Even Jackie Kennedy had the good graces to offer condolences to Marina Oswald."

SOURCE: http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/26th_Issue/paine.html

I HAVE MY OWN REASONS FOR DISTRUSTING RUTH AND MICHAEL PAINE: LEE DID NOT TRUST THEM AND TOLD ME NEVER TO TRUST THEM. I REALIZE THAT BY SPEAKING OUT LIKE THIS, I MAKE ENEMIES, FOR RUTH PAINE IS ALIVE. FURTHERMORE, PEOPLE DO CHANGE. THEY MAY REGRET THEIR ACTIONS IN THE PAST. I,MYSELF, HAVE SOME CHILDREN WHO HAVE JUDGED ME FOR WHAT HAPPENED IN 1963, AND FOR LATER PRECIPITATING A DIVORCE (AFTER 24 YEARS) FROM THEIR FATHER.
IT IS NOT MY INTENTION TO PILLORY RUTH PAINE, BUT I DO NOTE SHE ESCAPED QUESTIONING BY NOT ONLY THE HSCA, BUT ALSO BY THE ARRB. WHY? THEY SAID SHE HAD BEEN QUESTIONED ENOUGH. HOWEVER, SO MUCH MORE NEW INFORMATION HAS EMERGED.
ONLY PEOPLE WHO SWALLOW THE OFFICIAL VERSION WHOLE, WITHOUT BLINKING, CAN BE UNAWARE THAT LEE HARVEY OSWALD WAS FRAMED, THAT HE WAS INNOCENT OF KENNEDY'S MURDER.

HENCE, TO READ THAT LEE OSWALD TOOK A RIFLE FROM PAINE'S GARAGE AND USED IT TO SHOOT KENNEDY --WRITEN IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2010 -- IS PARTICULARLY DISHEARTENING AND INDICATIVE OF THE KIND OF ATMOSPHERE THAT EXISTS IN DALLAS AND NEARBY IRVING --THE SAME ATMOSPHERE THAT PROVOKED THE ARREST OF 'VENDORS' EARLIER THIS MONTH -- IMAGINE--THEY ARRESTED ROBERT GRODEN, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE!--- CLAIMING THAT DEALEY PLAZA, OWNED BY THE CITY OF DALLAS, IS 'PRIVATE PROPERTY' WHERE OTHER VIEWPOINTS CANNOT BE LEGALLY OFFERED TO THE THOUSANDS WHO VISIT THERE YEARLY.
AS LONG AS DALLAS ARRESTS 'VENDORS' AND PROMOTES "OSWALD-DID-IT" FAIRY TALES SO BLATANTLY AND WITHOUT RESERVATION, I AM OBLIGED TO SPEAK UP.
AND SO ARE YOU.
YOU SAW THE LIST OF BOOKS THAT AREN'T SOLD AT THE SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM.
TELL OTHERS ABOUT THEM. TELL OTHERS THAT PEOPLE SELLING THEM GET ARRESTED AT DEALEY PLAZA.
THE FICTION THAT OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY MUST BE LABELED AS FICTION EVERYWHERE IT RAISES ITS UGLY HEAD.
BELOW IS THE ARTICLE--IN BOLD FACE, I'VE NOTED THE MOST OFFENSIVE PASSAGES. I WRITE FROM EXILE. I CAN'T SEE MY LOVED ONES. IT'S GETTING TO ME, FRANKLY. BUT THE TRUTH IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN MY FEELINGS. I WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK.
I HOPE YOU FEEL THE SAME WAY.
THIS 4TH OF JULY, DO SOMETHING GOOD FOR YOUR COUNTRY.
SPREAD THE TRUTH. OUR FREEDOM AND OUR FUTURES DEPEND ON IT.

Mayor Herbert Gears and wife Christina welcomed Ruth Paine to their home today
4:01 PM Fri, Jun 18, 2010 | Permalink
Deborah Fleck/News Assistant

Ruth Paine speaks with a heavy heart when asked about the tragic events that touched her life when she lived in Irving. Her small home on West Fifth Street became tied to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Her warmth and friendship led to inviting a lonely Russian mother to stay with her. That mother turned out to be Marina Oswald, wife of Lee Harvey Oswald. It was from Ruth's house that fateful morning in 1963 that Lee Harvey took a rifle, headed downtown and shot the president.

Now, Irving hopes to turn her former home into a museum. Mayor Herbert Gears invited Ruth to his home today to hear the city's plans. Paul Gooch, director of Community Services, talked about the options the city is considering. One was to move the house to a park in the neighborhood to accommodate traffic.

Ruth said she was glad to donate the items she had to the city. "I'm not going to live forever and my children didn't seem interested," Ruth said about parting with now-historic items from that time.

Ruth made the trip to Irving along with her friend, Lou Falkenstein, to participate in a Juneteeth celebration Saturday that will honor the West Irving Improvement Association. The two women were very involved in that community during the 1960s.

Ruth now lives in California. She'll return home with a special memento--a key to Irving presented to her by the mayor.
=======
http://irvingblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/06/mayor-herbert-gears-and-wife-c.html

JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn’t -- with Comments by Judyth Vary Baker

I RARELY POST AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY SOMEBODY ELSE ON THIS BLOG, BUT IN THIS CASE, I MAKE AN EXCEPTION. BESIDES, IN THIS ARTICLE DR. FETZER, THE AUTHOR, MENTIONS ANOTHER ARTICLE HE WROTE WITH JIM MARRS -- AND WHICH I HELPED SUPPORT WITH MY OWN RESEARCH --ABOUT THE INFAMOUS DARTMOUTH PROFESSOR WHO CLAIMED THE BACKYARD PHOTOS WERE NOT FAKED --A FLAWED ANALYSIS USING PIXELATION ANALYSIS OF ORIGINALLY NON-PIXELATED PHOTOS (YES, HE DID!) USING A PORTION OF A COPY OF A COPY OF A SINGLE PHOTO (YES, HE DID!)-- RATHER LIKE PUBLISHING WHAT AN ICE CREAM BAR IS MADE OF BY TAKING PICTURES OF THE WOODEN STICK THAT HELD IT. THAT THE FELLOW HAPPENED TO HAVE HIS LAB FUNDED BY A U.S. GOVERNMENT SECRET AGENCY SHOULD COME AS NO SURPRISE.

THE STORY BELOW IS A GOOD SUMMARY OF THE COVER-UP EFFORTS IN THE JFK AND RFK ASSASSINATION CASES. TODAY, THE FBI RELEASED INFORMATION PROVING THAT TED KENNEDY RECEIVED NUMEROUS DEATH THREATS DURING HIS LIFE, AS WELL:

New FBI Docs Show Kennedy Death Threats
Most of the secret FBI files on the late Sen. Edward Kennedy being released Monday concern death threats against the longtime senator.

Alex Brown of the FBI's records management division said the FBI would post some 2,000 pages of previously secret pages about the Massachusetts Democrat on the agency's website.

The release of the documents has been highly anticipated by historians, scholars and others interested in the life and long public career of one of America's most prominent and powerful politicians.

The Associated Press and other media organizations requested the documents through Freedom of Information Act requests.

Kennedy faced death threats when he ran for president in 1980 and before that in the years following the assassinations of his older brothers.

President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. U.S. Sen. Robert F. Kennedy was slain in Los Angeles on June 6, 1968.

The deaths of his two older brothers cast a long shadow on Kennedy's life, and prompted fears he too would be targeted by an assassin's bullet.

After his brothers' assassinations, Kennedy wrote in his memoir "True Compass" released last year, that he was easily startled at loud sounds, and would hit the deck whenever a car backfired.

Kennedy, who served in the Senate for nearly half a century, died in August 2009 after a yearlong struggle with brain cancer. He was 77 and the last surviving brother of the famed political family.

===========================================================


I HAVE PLACED A FEW COMMENTS OF MY OWN IN CAPS HERE AND THERE IN THIS FINE PIECE BY DR. FETZER.

ENJOY!


JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn’t
by James Fetzer*
Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated 42 years ago in the midst of his campaign for the U.S. presidency. Largely overshadowed by the death of his brother, President John F. Kennedy, the official account of RFK’s tragic end, allegedly shot down by a lone gunman, like his brother, has received vastly less attention. In both instances, we are looking at staged events that fit into a recurrent pattern in U.S. and world history where innocent individuals (or “patsies”) are baited and framed for cover-up purposes. Professor James H. Fetzer, an expert in the scientific study of assassinations, provides a sketch of how we know what happened to them and why, where RFK’s assassination was in part intended to prevent a reinvestigation into his brother’s death.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
13 June 2010


A persistent myth of American history is that lone assassins were responsible for the deaths of Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert Francis Kennedy. But four of the Lincoln conspirators were hanged from the same gallows at the same time [1].


===YET ALL YOU EVER HEAR IS THE NAME "JOHN WILKES BOOTH." JVB===

On June 5, 1968, after RFK won the Democratic primary in California, he was shot down as he passed through the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel. The official account maintains that he was taken out by a lone, demented gunman, Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian who had written, “RFK must die!”, over and over in a notebook. Like the lone, demented gunman accused of assassinating his brother, John, both murders were products of conspiracies, where Sirhan Sirhan, like Lee Harvey Oswald, was designated as the patsy.

===SIRHAN'S LAWYER, MR. LAWRENCE TEETER, CALLED ME ONE NIGHT IN DECEMBER, 2003, EXHAUSTED AND WORRIED. HE TOLD ME HE HAD EVIDENCE THAT SIRHAN WAS INNOCENT, BUT THAT HE COULD NOT GET A RETRIAL. HE DIED TWO YEARS LATER OF LYMPHOMA CANCER. WILLIAM KELLY WROTE THIS ABOUT TEETER:

After Teeter died, a group of people entered his home, evicted his live-in housekeeper, and ransacked the house for three days before Teeter's girlfriend and mother could get the local Bar Association to intervene and take custody of his papers.

When the housekeeper and Teeter's girlfriend first complained to the LAPD, they considered it a domestic issue and not a criminal one, especially when told it was SBS's attorney, and only acted with the Bar Association, who now has custody of the hard copy documents and records. Teeter's computer disapeared, and was probably sold.

If any attorney would like to inquire about this further, I can provide names and numbers. I also have the auto license plate numbers, descriptions of cars and names of those who did this, which the LAPD considers a petty crime.

BK
bkjfk3@yahoo.com ===========


In spite of their history, most Americans continue to believe that their nation is “an exception” and that, while conspiracies occur elsewhere, including Europe and the Middle East, especially, they do not occur at home. The truth, of course, is that conspiracies are as American as apple pie. All that they require is collaboration between two or more individuals to bring about an illegal end. Most American conspiracies are economic, but many are political, too. Franklin Delano Roosevelt observed long ago that, if something important happened in politics, you could bet it was not by accident. And that is certainly the case regarding the brothers.

The assassinations of RFK and JFK were both conspiracies. Both involved the destruction of evidence. Both involved the fabrication of evidence. Both involved framing their patsies. Both involved complicity by local officials. Both involved planning by the CIA. Both were used to deny the American people of the right to be governed by leaders of their own choosing. My purpose here is to outline how these things are done, because the agencies responsible for these events continue to employ the same techniques, not only of killing their targets but of covering them up. The more we understand how these things are done, the less likely we are to be deceived again.

Some Basic Facts

RFK:

Robert F. Kennedy was shot in Los Angeles on June 5, 1968. More bullets were fired in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel than could have come from Sirhan Sirhan’s gun.
RFK was shot behind the right ear from about 1.5 inches, but Sirhan was never that close and always in front of him.
The coroner’s report did not support the Los Angeles’ Police Department’s assassination scenario.
The Los Angeles Police Department engaged in massive destruction of evidence from the pantry of the hotel because "it would not fit into a card file".


JFK:

JFK's throat wound had changed from what it was at Parkland Hospital, where it was a small, clean puncture wound of entry with a straight-line incision. November 22, 1963. It was now a large, gaping 'exit wound."

The shot to JFK’s back - the “magic” bullet - was too low to have exited from his throat.
The “magic bullet” theory is provably untrue and was not even anatomically possible.
JFK was hit four times - in the throat from in front, in the back from behind and in the head from in front and behind
X—rays were altered, a brain was substituted, and photos and films were faked to conceal the true causes of his death.

The assassination of RFK completed the decapitation of the left wing in the United States, which had begun with the termination of JFK’s presidency but continued with the gunning down of Malcolm X, who was the most progressive voice on the far left. With the deaths of Martin Luther King (April 4, 1968) and Robert F. Kennedy, the country shifted strongly to the right, in part from the despair induced by the loss of inspiring leaders.

The conditions required for movements capable of historic changes include intelligent, charismatic, and inspirational leaders, of whom there are very few like these. While the execution of Czar Nicholas II and his family in Russia and of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette in France meant there was “no turning back”, removing liberal leaders cements the status quo with its distribution of wealth and power.


Sirhan Bishara Sirhan was convicted and sentenced to the gas chamber on May 21, 1969. In 1972, his sentence was commuted to life in prison. Years later, a forensic investigation concluded that Sirhan Sirhan was not the lone shooter. The weapon removed from Sirhan Sirhan was a .22 caliber, eight-round revolver, with serial number H-53725 [2]. Sirhan emptied his weapon from a location in front of Bobby Kennedy. The autopsy performed by Dr. Thomas Noguchi, however, showed RFK was hit by four bullets, all of which were fired from behind at upward angles. And five others were wounded by separate shots [3].

Bullets were removed from holes in the walls and ceiling of the pantry. Since there were as many as thirteen shots—some of which even hit the ceiling behind his location—Sirhan could not have fired them all. And with more than one shooter, a conspiracy had to have been involved [4]. Autopsy reports are usually “the best evidence” about a crime of this kind. Dr. Noguchi’s medical report, however, did not agree with the Los Angeles Police report. The evidence did not point to Sirhan as the killer [5]. In particular, the fatal shot entered behind his right ear from about an inch and a half away, but Sirhan had not been closer than several feet in front of RFK.

Although Sirhan cannot have fired the bullets that killed Kennedy, his defense attorney, Grant Cooper, did not defend him on the ground that he wasn’t guilty but argued instead for “diminished capacity” [6]. Another witness, DeWayne Wofler, even testified that the bullets fired at RFK had come from an entirely different gun [7].


Thane Eugene Cesar, security guard, a prime suspect in the shooting of Robert F. Kennedy. As it happened, a security guard named Thane Eugene Cesar had a weapon with the same caliber and was right behind RFK when the shooting began. Remarkably, even though he admitted having drawn his gun and many witnesses reporting hearing shots from more than one weapon, no one ever asked to examine his gun [8].

Acoustics expert Van Praag tested an H&R 922 of the kind Cesar had and determined that an H&R 922 had been fired at the same time as Sirhan’s [9]. Further indications of conspiracy extended to a couple, including a woman in a polka dot dress, who rushed away from the scene shouting, “We shot him! We shot him! We shot Kennedy!” [10].

RFK: Evidence of Conspiracy

William Turner and Jonn Christian [11] have produced a powerful case indicting Cesar for the crime. They concluded that Sirhan may have been firing blanks, which they support on the basis of witness testimony that his shots created long, visible flames, which are commonly produced by blanks, to insure that those in his field of fire — who actually killed Kennedy — would not be hit by a stray bullet.

That would mean that none of the bullet holes were made by shots from Sirhan’s gun and, indeed, at least one witness reported seeing yet a third shooter in the pantry, perhaps as a back-up if Cesar failed. And the LAPD was very accommodating in destroying evidence that might have exposed those who shot him.

In fact, there are multiple indications that the CIA was involved. A hypnotist named William Joseph Bryan, was on the radio suggesting the assassin was probably “mind controlled” before Sirhan had been identified as a suspect. Bryan later boasted to several hookers that he worked for the CIA and had hypnotized Sirhan [12].

Sirhan’s defense attorney, moreover, had just finished representing the CIA’s contact with organized crime, Johnny Roselli, which may have been why he was so accommodating with respect to his client’s guilt [13]. One way to insure a patsy will be convicted is to have your own man represent him.

Cesar himself had worked at Lockheed and Hughes Aircraft, both of which have extensive connections with the agency [14]. And even more strikingly, three prominent CIA officials—George Joannides, David Sanchez Morales, and Gordon Campbell—have been identified as present at the Ambassador.

Bradley Ayers, an Army captain assigned to the CIA at JM/Wave in Miami from May 1962 to December 1964, had met all three and identified them in film footage from the Ambassador [15]. Gordon Campbell had even been Ayer’s case officer while he was working for the agency.


CIA operative David Sánchez Morales, who is suspected of having participated in the murder of both brothers. Wayne Smith, who served as an ambassador with the Department of of State from 1957-1982 with JFK’s Latin American Task Force, also knew Morales [16]. When he viewed the same footage as Ayers, he immediately recognized Morales. As he later told Shane O’Sullivan, “Bobby Kennedy is assassinated [and] David Morales is there? The two things have to be related” [17].

RFK: The Cover-Up

Ayers and Smith both confirmed the person in the film as Morales [18]. They were both emphatic. Ayers noticed his body language (his way of moving). James Richards, an expert on the CIA, provided me with a photo of Morales, who looks exactly like the Morales-look-alike at the Ambassador. I don’t even think it’s a difficult call [19] [20].

The George Joannides figure seems to be wearing a wig. Richards also sent me a photo of Joannides, which makes it obvious why he would have been wearing one: the man was virtually bald! While it has been claimed that Cambell died on September 19, 1962, he was Ayers’ case officer from 1963-1964. Faking a death certificate would be far easier for the CIA than having an impostor working with Ayers.

The LAPD was not subtle in the destruction of evidence related to the crime. It destroyed the ceiling panels and door frames from the pantry on the ground they were “too large to fit into a card file” and burned some 2,400 photographs, including those taken by 15-year old Scott Enyart, who was standing on a table and took three roles of film [21].

When the department created a Special Unit Senator (SUS) to look into the case, it chose two officers who had ties to the CIA. They badgered witnesses who did not support the official line. One, Manuel Pena, had worked in Special Ops for the CIA. He was responsible for approving SUS interviews [22].


=== World Affairs Brief gives us a brief history of what happened to the evidence in the RFK case (see http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/RFK.shtml)
"Researchers into the RFK Assassination finally forced the Report and the LAPD's files to be released, in 1988. Compare this to 1964 for the Warren Commission Report (the year after JFK's assassination) and it becomes obvious why the official version of the assassination has been unchallenged, despite the obvious complications.

After the release of the files, it became clear to what extent the cover-up had been carried out. Evidence which contradicted the official version was destroyed. The more extreme acts of destruction included:
2,400 photographs burned because they were "duplicates." In fact, there were no lists precise enough to show that all the photos destroyed were indeed duplicates.
Ceiling tiles and the door frame from the pantry were destroyed, because, according to then Assistant Chief Daryl Gates, they wouldn't fit into card files.
In addition, LAPD records showed that they had recorded 3,470 interviews during the course of the investigation. Only 301 interviews were released. Examination by researchers showed that for 51 key "conspiracy" witnesses, there were no interviews.

The LAPD were not alone in conducting this cover-up. The Los Angeles District Attorney's Office was also involved. The scope of this involvement was seen in the files released to researchers in 1985, due mainly to the inclusion of a box of tapes, videos and documents sent from the LADA branch at Van Nuys. This box contained evidence which went against the official version. The most graphic examples were the video reconstructions from 1968 and 1977, which prove that Sirhan could not have inflicted the wounds on Senator Kennedy. However, by using selected stills from the reconstructions, the official version was supported.

The coverup of the RFK assassination has been maintained because the facts are simply not known. Whereas the Warren Commission report was released the year following the JFK assassination, LAPD's "Summary Report" was not released until 1986. The files were released two years later. Both of these achievements were made despite strong LAPD/LADA resistance, for obvious reasons.

The RFK assassination was not investigated by the House Select Commitee on Assassinations because of the seemingly open and shut nature of the case. Now that the facts are known, perhaps it is time that the RFK assassination was investigated.



The Shadow of Dallas

David Sanchez Morales also appears to have been involved in the assassination of RFK's brother, John, on November 22, 1963. He said to friends while drinking heavily that he had been in Dallas (“We took care of that son-of-a-bitch!”) and in Los Angeles (where “We got the little bastard!”) [23].

His involvement was confirmed by E. Howard Hunt, who told his son, St. John, that those who were responsible for the assassination of the 35th president included LBJ and CIA officials Cord Meyer, David Atlee Philips, William Harvey, and Morales [24]. Others who knew Lyndon well have also implicated him [25] [26]. And high-level involvement by the government has been confirmed by multiple lines of investigation.

There are more than 15 indications of Secret Service complicity in setting JFK up for the hit [27]. Two agents assigned to the limousine were left behind at Love Field. The flat-bed truck for reporters to that should have preceded the limo was cancelled. The motorcycle escort was cut down to four and was instructed not to ride ahead of the rear wheels. Open windows were not covered, the manhole covers not welded, and the crowd was allowed to spill into the street.


Dubbed as the “Moorman Polaroid”, the picture captures the moment when President Kennedy was shot. Most strikingly, the vehicles were in the wrong order, with the Lincoln first, when it should have been in the middle. This was such a blatant violation of protocol that any security expert could have detected it, which is undoubtedly why, when the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) asked for the Presidential Protection Records for other JFK motor-cades, the agency, instead of providing them, destroyed them [28].

The route was changed just days before the event and included a turn of more than 90°, in violation of Secret Service protocol. After bullets began to be fired, the driver, William Greer, pulled the limo to the left and to a halt [29]. At Parkland Hospital, agents got a bucket of water and a sponge and washed brains and blood from the crime scene [30].

The limousine was taken back to Ford and on Monday, November 25, the day of the formal state funeral, it was stripped to bare metal and rebuilt, including replacing the windshield, which had a through-and-through bullet hole, which spectators had noticed at Parkland and the Ford official responsible for its replacement confirmed, where the Secret Service would later produce yet a third windshield which had only interior cracks [31].

JFK: The “Magic Bullet”

Two wounds were widely reported on radio and television that day, a wound to the throat and a massive wound at the back of the cranium, which was caused by a shot that entered his right temple [32]. Both wounds were observed by many experienced physicians at Parkland Hospital. Charles Crenshaw, M.D., who closed JFK’s eyes before he was placed into the bronze ceremonial casket, sent me drawings of the wound to the throat and of the exit wound to the head [33].

Malcolm Perry, M.D., who had made the incision, described the throat wound as a “wound of entry” three times during the Parkland press conference, which began at 2:16 PM [34]. The Warren Commission would cope with these problems by simply reversing the trajectories, turning the throat wound into a wound of exit, where the damage to the cranium was altered to make it look more like the effect of a bullet fired from above and behind [35].

The greatest problem arose from the discovery that, of the three shots it claimed to have been fired, one had missed and injured a bystander named James Tague. The FBI and Secret Service had concluded that each of the alleged shots had hit: that JFK had been hit in the back, that Texas Governor John Connally had been hit in the back, and that JFK had been hit in the head, which killed him.

Since one shot had missed, the commission now had to create an alternative explanation, claiming the bullet that hit JFK in the back had passed through his neck and exited from his throat, then entered the back of Connally, shattering a rib, existing his chest, damaging his right wrist and finally embedding itself in his left thigh, a most unlikely scenario that is known as the “magic bullet” theory [36].

To make the “magic bullet” theory remotely plausible, Gerald Ford (R-MI), a member of the commission, had the description of the wound to the back changed from “his uppermost back”, which was already an exaggeration, to “the back of his neck”, which would not become known to the public until the first releases from the ARRB [37].

Even The Warren Report (1964) located the hole in the jacket 5 3/8” below the collar and 1 1/8” to the right of its center seam and the hole in the shirt was 5 ¾” below the collar and 1 1/8” right of its center seam [38] — a location that corresponds to an autopsy sketch, an FBI sketch, the death certificate by the president’s personal physician and even reenactment photographs by the commission’s own staff.

JFK: The Cover-Up
A downward bullet at this location means that the throat wound and Connally’s had been caused by other shots and other shooters [39]. Michael Baden, M.D., who chaired the medical panel for the the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), when it reinvestigated the crime in 1977-78, said, on the 40th observance of the assassination, that if the “magic bullet” theory were false, then there had to have been at least six shots from three directions [40].

It is not only false and provably false but turns out to be anatomically impossible, since cervical vertebrae intervene [41]. David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., has shown JFK was hit four times—in the throat from in front, in the back from behind, and twice in the head both from in front and behind [42]. Connally was hit at least once from the side — as he was turning to the left — and at least one shot had missed. So Baden was right for the wrong reasons.

Mantik, moreover, studied the autopsy X-rays using the method of optical densitometry to determine the relative density of the objects whose exposure to X-rays had created the images [43]. He found an area at the back of the head that had been “patched” using material that was too dense to be human bone and that a 6.5mm metallic slice had been added to other X-rays in an apparent effort to connect the shooting with an obscure Italian weapon Lee Oswald was alleged to have used.

===Note that "The Hollywood Seven," top film restoration experts in Hollywood, led by post-production specialist and researcher Sydney Wilkinson, worked with a true copy of the Zapruder film. Douglas Horne in his excellent books, Inside the ARRB, describes how the analysis made by "The Hollywood Seven" under Wilkinson's direction determined that the back of Kennedy's head had been painted black, hiding the blow-out evidence of a bullet striking him from THE FRONT. Oswald, of course, was located BEHIND JFK's car. In addition, the paint job was "crude," said the experts. Red paint was also splotched over the right front of JFK's head to make it seem that blood erupted, caused by a shot from behind. But nothing could hide JFK's back-and-to-the-left motion, for which a "jet effect" was concocted, saying the impact of the shot from behind created the opposite of the expected reaction --despite the personal experiences of innumerable soldiers and hunters who know better. It is now perfectly clear that the Zapruder film was used to destroy the truth, not present it. US government agencies were in charge of the handling of that film.===


Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for the assassination of JFK, where "the backyard photos" were part of the operation. See Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs, "The Dartmouth JFK-Photo Fiasco" (google).

Ironically, while the death certificates and the autopsy report state that JFK was killed by high-velocity bullets, the Mannlicher-Carcano only has a muzzle velocity of 2,000 fps [44]. Since high velocities are above 2,600 fps, the Mannlicher-Carcano does not qualify [45]. So the weapon that Oswald is alleged to have used cannot have fired the bullets that killed JFK.


===Some researchers protest that "high velocity" descriptions have changed over the years. However, there is no doubt that a muzzle velocity of 2,000 fps was not impressive.===

JFK: The Controversy Endures


==But this may be the year that everything changes! DO read the book Me & Lee, as well as Ed Haslam's Dr. Mary's Monkey -- along with James Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable --Whe He Died and Why It Matters-- and spread the word! Let us see no more assassinations of our elected leaders. Let us never again hear the roll of drums, see the riderless horse, watch the black caisson draped with the American flag as a president or great leader is taken for burial, felled by a supposed -- but likely fake 'lone nut' that so conveniently hides a conspiracy. Do not allow disinfo czars to tell you that "conspiracy theorists" are nut jobs. If we are silenced, then what cassandra will rise to warn you?

We have been warned three times now that in America, this is the tactic to be used. The official version is always to be believed -- without a single doubt. The official verdict for those who do not believe is that they are crazy. No conspirators are ever supposed to have ever existed in our country. God forbid, bankers and oil companies never conspire, either! Only in other countries do conspiracies "sometimes" exist. Really?==

The Weapon and the Wounds

Even if the weapon had been far better, such as the M-1 on which he had been trained, the shots themselves were highly improbable. The interactive internet game, “JFK: Reloaded”, which used a superior weapon with a properly aligned sight, a smooth trigger action, and no recoil and allowed endless practice sessions before attempting to hit the target, was won by a shooter who scored only a .782 out of 1.000, so he only scored a "C+" in attempting to replicate the shots [46].

That the simple expedient of locating where the bullet hit JFK’s back is enough to establish the existence of a conspiracy has not inhibited those who want to obfuscate the facts. A controversy over neutron activation analysis persisted for years, as if discovering that bullet fragments found in the car had come from the same lot as those used by the alleged “assassination weapon” would show either the location from which they were fired or the identity of who had fired them [47].

One pseudo-documentary after another continues to be broadcast over the major networks based upon a film whose revision makes it impossible to reconstruct what actually happened in a determined effort to persuade the public that JFK was killed by a lone, demented gunman, even though the authentic evidence, once separated from the fabricated, refutes it [48], [49], [50] and [51]. The demise of the “magic bullet” alone establishes conspiracy.

What it Means

Creating a false photographic record of the assassination was crucial to the cover-up. Had JFK been killed in a non-public setting, no one would have believed he had not been taken out by a conspiracy. As much thought was given to concealing the truth from the public as was given to executing the assassination itself. By removing some events and adding others, the home movie known as the Zapruder film became the backbone of the cover-up [52]. As long as it was taken to be authentic, it would be impossible to reconstruct the crime.

Among the most important reasons for recreating the film—which was done using original footage and sophisticated techniques of optical printing and of special effects—was removing the limo stop, which was such an obvious indication of Secret Service complicity. There were conflicts with the film from the beginning [53]. Today, evidence of fabrication is simply overwhelming [54], [55] and [56].

These discoveries have considerable impact on alternative theories of the assassination. The Mafia, which no doubt put up some of the shooters, could not have extended its reach into the Bethesda Naval Hospital to alter X-rays under the control of medical officers of the US Navy, Secret Service agents, and the president’s personal physician.

Neither pro- nor anti-Castro Cubans could have substituted the brain of someone else for that of JFK. And even if the KGB had an ability to alter films equal to that of the CIA and Hollywood, it had no way to gain access to the Zapruder film. Nor could these things have been done by Lee Harvey Oswald, who was incarcerated or already dead.

Political implications

As Martin Shotz has observed, the purpose of the disinformation operation in the death of JFK is not really to convince the public of the official account but to create enough uncertainty that everything is believable and nothing is knowable [57]. The reasons are not difficult to discern for those who understand why he was taken out. He had evolved in office from a traditional cold warrior into a statesman for peace, which threatened the status quo.

JFK was threatening to cut the oil depletion allowance, which the Texas men regarded as their divine right. He had not invaded Cuba against the unanimous recommendation of the Joint Chiefs. He had signed an above ground test ban treaty with the Soviets against their unanimous opposition. And he was initiating the removal of American forces from Vietnam, where the chiefs believed that a stand had to be taken against the expansion of communism.

Bobby, JFK’s Attorney General, was aggressively cracking down on organized crime. Jack was going to reform or abolish the FED and, perhaps most of all, he was going to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces. Lyndon wanted to be president of all the people and J. Edgar Hoover wanted to stay on as Director of the FBI. No one could have explained all of this as well as has James Douglass [58].

The policies he represented would have brought about significant change in the distribution of wealth and power, which they were unwilling to accept [59]. Once committed to the crime, they were intent that no one should ever pay for it, lest the public learn the truth about the institutions of their own government. When Bobby allowed that he was going to use the powers of the presidency to uncover the truth about his brother [60], it sealed his fate. And the lies continue.



James Fetzer

McKnight Professor Emeritus in the philosophy of science at the University of Minnesota Duluth; he taught logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning for 35 years; founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.


In addition to other activities, James H. Fetzer is also the editor of assassinationscience.com and the co-editor of assassinationresearch.com. He has a blog at jamesfetzer.blogspot.com and his academic web site is found at http://www.d.umn.edu/ jfetzer/.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[1] Jesse Ventura (with Dick Russell), American Conspiracies, Skyhorse Publishing, 2010.

[2] Shane O’Sullivan, Who Killed Bobby?, Sterling Publishing, 2008.

[3] Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease, eds., The Assassinations, Feral House, 2003.

[4] Jesse Ventura (with Dick Russell), Op. cit.

[5] Robert Geringer, The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy.

[6] Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease, eds., Op.cit.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Jesse Ventura (with Dick Russell), Op. cit.

[10] Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease, eds., Op. cit.

[11] Jonn Christian and William Turner, The Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, Thunder’s Mouth Press, 1978.

[12] Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease, eds. Op. cit.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Robert F. Kennedy, Spartacus Educational.

[15] Bradley Earl Ayers, The Zenith Secret, Vox Pop, 2006.

[16] Shane O’Sullivan, Op. cit.

[17] Ibid.

[18] Shane O’Sullivan, RFK Must Die: The Assassination of Bobby Kennedy, DVD (2007).

[19] David Sánchez Morales, Spartacus Educational.

[20] Bradley Ayers, Spartacus Educational.

[21] Jesse Ventura (with Dick Russell), Op. cit.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Noel Twyman, Bloody Treason, Laurel Publishing, 1997.

[24] Erik Hedegaard, The Last Confessions of E. Howard Hunt, rollingstone.com, April 5, 2007.

[25] Madeleine Duncan Brown, Texas in the Morning, Conservatory Press, 1997.

[26] Billie Sol Estes, A Texas Legend, BSE Productions, 2005.

[27] James H. Fetzer, ed., Murder in Dealey Plaza, Open Court, 2000, “Prologue”.

[28] Final Report of the Assassination Records Review Board, 1998.

[29] Vince Palamara et al. in Murder in Dealey Plaza, A Book Review, 2000.

[30] Richard Trask, Pictures of the Pain, Yeoman Press,1994.

[31] Douglas Weldon et al. in Murder in Dealey Plaza, 2000; and James H. Fetzer, ed., Assassination Science, Open Court, 1998.

[32] "NOVEMBER 22, 1963: The Kennedy Assassination", NBC News DVD, Parts 1 and 2.

[33] Charles Crenshaw, M.D., in Murder in Dealey Plaza, 2000, Appendix A.

[34] Malcolm Perry, M.D., Ibid, Appendix C.

[35] The Warren Report, Government Printing Office, 1964; and Douglas Horne, Inside the ARRB, 2009.

[36] The “magic bullet” is lampooned in Oliver Stone’s film, “JFK”.

[37] Ford Made Key Change in Kennedy Death Report, The New York Times (3 July 1997), p. A8.

[38] The Warren Report, Op. cit., page 92.

[39] James H. Fetzer, Reasoning about Assassinations, International Journal of the Humanities 3, (2005/2006).

[40] Beyond Conspiracy, ABC documentary, 2003 (YouTube).

[41] David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., in Stewart Galanor, Cover-Up, Kestrel Book, 1998.

[42] David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., et al. in Murder in Dealey Plaza, 2000.

[43] David W. Matiik, M.D., Ph.D., in Assassination Science, 2000.

[44] As even Gerald Posner, Case Closed, Random House, 1993, Appendix A, has acknowledged.

[45] See, for example, Bullet Trajectory: Fact and Myth, by Mike Nelson.

[46] JFK: Reloaded, Wikipedia.

[47] Single Bullet Story, Wikipedia.

[48] James H. Fetzer, Distorting the Photographic Record: Death in Dealey Plaza, in The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003).

[49] David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., and James H. Fetzer, Another Attempted Reenactment of the Death of JFK, November 21, 2008.

[50] David S. Lifton, in Moorman in the Street Revisited, Appendix, January 2009.

[51] James H. Fetzer, Dealey Plaza Revisited: What Happened to JFK?

[52] James H. Fetzer, ed., The Great Zapruder Film Hoax, Op. cit., “Prologue”.

[53] See, for example, Jim Marrs, Surveyor: More than 1 man shot Kennedy, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (14 April 1978).

[54] John P. Costella, The JFK Assassination Film Hoax: A Tutorial.

[55] James H. Fetzer, Zapruder JFK Film impeached by Moorman JFK Polaroid, March 28, 2009.

[56] James H. Fetzer, US Government Official: JFK Cover-Up, Film Fabrication, April 7, 2010.

[57] E. Martin Schotz, History will Not Absolve Us, Kurtz, Ulmer, and DeLuca Book Publishers, 1996.

[58] James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why he Died and Why it Matters, Abis Books, 2008.

[59] Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, University of California Press, 1996.

[60] David Talbot, Brothers: The Hidden History of the Kennedy Years, The Free Press, 2007.

to see this article with photographs, go to:

http://www.voltairenet.org/article165721.html

DR. JIM FETZER, JUDYTH VARY BAKER, AND EFFORTS TO DISCREDIT AN INCONVENIENT WITNESS WHO DELAYED A WRITER'S BOOK

STATEMENT CONCERNING "THE LIFTON MANIFESTO" TO BE USED AGAINST JUDYTH VARY BAKER, AND LIFTON'S ACCUSATIONS AGAINST DR. JAMES FETZER (FOR FETZER'S READING "ANTI-SEMITIC" MATERIAL VIA FETZER'S 9-11 PODCASTS).


Researcher David Lifton has written good material supporting the fact that Lee Oswald was innocent of killing JFK, but how he treats witnesses leaves something to be desired. We know that he has given other researchers instruction as to what to tell the press, should the name "Judyth Vary Baker" come to be mentioned (a name Debra Conway and David Lifton have worked on, together, to be kept from being mentioned at conferences, etc.). Lifton's and Conway's thrust in censorship was largely successful for nearly a decade. Consider that I, JVB, first spoke out in 1999...). "The Lifton Manifesto" -- written by Lifton in 2003 -- urges researchers to tell members of the press that I, Judyth Vary Baker, am "looney" --should my name come up --- along with other strategies to discredit me and to keep my story under wraps.


THE LIFTON MANIFESTO WAS CREATED TO HAVE AN EXCUSE TO DISCREDIT ME. WHAT COULD BE EASIER THAN TO SIMPLY HAVE A PSYCHIATRIC 'DIAGNOSIS' PRONOUNCED ON ME, WHENEVER MY NAME WAS RAISED IN A SERIOUS DISCUSSION FORMAT?

IN MARCH, 2010, DR. JIM FETZER EXPERIENCED AN EXAMPLE OF THE "LIFTON TREATMENT" HIMSELF, FROM RESEARCHER JACK WHITE, AFTER FETZER PLACED A TOPIC, "JUDYTH VARY BAKER IN EXILE" ON THE EDUCATION FORUM. THAT THREAD WOULD PROVE TO BE THE LONGEST THREAD IN THE FORUM'S HISTORY.

SADLY, THE EDUCATION FORUM'S MODERATORS ALLOWED THE "LOONEY" CHARGE AGAINST ME TO BE POSTED MORE THAN ONCE, AND TO STAND, DESPITE THE FACT THAT I WAS A MEMBER OF THE FORUM, AND SUCH NEGATIVE SATEMENTS ARE FORBIDDEN. BLOCKED FROM DIRECTLY RESPONDING TO MY CRITICS, FETZER PASSED MY REPLIES ON TO THE FORUM. HE WAS ALSO ACCUSED OF WRITING THE REPLIES HIMSELF ON MORE THAN ONE OCCASION, AND IN OTHER WAYS, HIS INTEGRITY WAS IMPUGNED.

All members of the Education Forum are supposed to supply profile information on themselves. If not, they are banned from posting. But, just as in Orwell's "Animal Farm," some Education Forum members turn out to have rights that are "more equal" than others: here is Mr. Lifton's profile:

Personal Statement
David Lifton doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Personal Info
David Lifton
Experienced Member
Age Unknown years old
Gender Not Set
Location Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Interests
No Information
Statistics
Joined: 24-May 06
Profile Views: 4497*
Last Seen: Today, 12:26 PM
Local Time: Jun 6 2010, 06:21 PM
106 posts (0.07 per day)
Contact Information
No Information
No Information
No Information
No Information
Send Message
Send an Email

As of this date, almost 5,000 people have looked at Mr. Lifton's profile, only to find nothing.

THE "LIFTON MANIFESTO" PROVED USEFUL IN CREATING SOME NEGATIVE PRESS COVERAGE OF MY STATEMENTS AND TESTIMONY. THE BOOK "ME & LEE" WILL SOON BE PUBLISHED BY TRINE DAY. WE EXPECT A FEW NASTY REVIEWS FROM THE USUAL FEW PEOPLE WHO HIDE THEMSELVES UNDER LOTS OF FAKE NAMES. THEY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BECAUSE THEY USE AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS AND NEVER USE DIRECT QUOTES OR SUPPLY REAL INFORMATION. IT'S ALL DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER. STATING THAT I AM INSANE, UGLY, OLD, OR HAVE BLUE EYES, THEY SPEW OUT THEIR ACCUSATIONS, WHICH HAVE RECENTLY AKEN ON RAHER DESPERATE TONES. THEY SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE FINALLY GOING TO GET A GOOD PORTRAIT OF THE REAL LEE HARVEY OSWALD.

I FEEL SORRY FOR MARINA OSWALD PORTER. POOR WOMAN! WHAT SHE WENT THROUGH! I DO NOT FAULT HER AT ALL FOR ANYTHING SHE SAID. SHE HAD HER LITTLE TODDLER AND SMALL BABY TO PROTECT, AND LEE WAS DEAD. I AM SORRY I HAVE TO SAY SOME THINGS ABOUT HER IN THE BOOK THAT MIGHT HURT HER FEELINGS. MASRINA OSWALD PORTER TODAY IS NOT THE YOUNG WOMAN WHO LEFT THE USSR WITH HER AMERICAN HUSBAND. SHE HAS CHANGED. SO HAVE I. WE MUST LIVE WITH OUR PAST, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE HAVE NOT EVOLVED AND MATURED. I READ HOW MUCH HER CHILDREN RESPECT THEIR MOTHER. I KNOW SHE'S WORKED VERY HARD IN HER LIFE TO PROTEC HER CHILDREN, AND I PRAY HAT SMEDAY WE WILL MEET AS FRIENDS, FOR EXONERATING HER HUSBAND WLL LIFT THE GREAT BURDEN HAT HAS BEEN ON MARINA'S SHOULDERS. IN A WAY, SOME OF THAT BURDEN HAS BEEN NOW PLACED ON ME.
THE "LIFTON MANIFESTO" IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THE BURDEN I HAVE TO CARRY.

EVERYONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THAT A MEMBER OF AN INTERNET NEWSGROUP SUPPORTING THE "OFFICIAL VERSION" --THAT OSWALD WAS GUILTY -- WROTE AN EXCORIATING, NASTY REVIEW OF "THE LOVE AFFAIR " -- THA DOCUMENTARY ON HE HISORY CHANNEL THAT AIRED AS PART OF THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY SERIES, IN 2003 -- A NASTY REVIEW WHICH WAS POSTED HALF A DAY BEFORE "THE LOVE AFFAIR" ACTUALLY AIRED.
THERE WILL NO DOUBT ALWAYS BE SOME POSS OUT THERE WITH NASY THINGS TO SAY ABOUT ME. I NO LONGER CARE: THE BOOK IS FINISHED, I HAVE DONE WHAT I COULD.
MY GOAL NOW IS TO TRY TO HELP PEOPLE ANY WAY I CAN TO NAVIGATE THROUGH THE CHALLENGES THAT LIFE THROWS A ALL OF US WHO HAVE CARING HEARTS AND COMPASSION FOR ALL THAT LIVES. I KNOW THAT EVIL PEOPLE WALK AMONG US AND DO GREAT HARM: THEY HAVE NO SOUL. POLITICAL PONEROLOGY IS A BOOK WITH FLAWS, BUT ONE FACT STANDS OUT: SOME PEOPLE WHO LOOK NORMAL AND ACT NORMAL AND MIGHT SEEM FRIENDLY CAN ACUALLY BE DOWNRIGHT EVIL. THEY COME FIRST. SACRIFICE IS FOR OTHERS. USING HATE AND POWER ARE WHAT THEY EXCEL AT. IF I STAND FOR ANYTHING AT ALL, I STAND FOR LOVE.
LOVE TRULY CAN CONQUER ALL. IN MY CASE, IT FINALLY GAVE ME THE COURAGE TO SAND UP AND SPEAK FOR LEE HARVEY OSWALD.
I'M NO HERO. MY HANDS SHOOK AS I LAID OUT THE PIECES OF EVIDENCE I HAD AND WONDERED IF THERE WAS ENOUGH. I WAS SO VERY MUCH AFRAID. I TURNED OUT I HAD A RIGHT TO BE AFRAID. YOU WOULD NOT WANT TO BE IN MY SHOES.
BUT THROUGH IT ALL, I HAVE FELT A GREAT HAND UPON ME THAT DID NOT SHAKE WITH FEAR: I FELT THE HAND OF GOD STEADYING ME. POOR AS I AM SPIRITUALLY, I KNOW GOD HAS USED ME. IT HAS MADE UP FOR MY PAST ERRORS, THE ERRORS OF A YOUTH WHO BELIEVED THAT ALL IN AUTHORITY OVER ME SURELY WERE 'GOOD.'
REMEMBER THAT HITLER WAS ALMOST WORSHIPPED. SIMILARLY, I ALL BUT WORSHIPPED THE GREAT SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS, INCLUDING NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS, WHO GUIDED AND MENTORED ME, WITHOUT DISTINGUISHING AMONG THEM AS TO THE MOTIVES OF THEIR HEARTS.
WHEN ALL IS SAID AND DONE, A PURE HEART IS WORTH MORE THAN DIAMONDS.
BUT BACK IN 1963, I DID NOT REALIZE THAT POWER AND GLORY AND EVIL MIGHT BE FOUND TOGETHER IN WHAT SEEMED TO BE GREAT MEN.
THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE FINDINGS OF THE WARREN COMMISSION ARE DEVOTEES OF UNTRUTH, FOR THEY'RE TOO INTELLIGENT NOT TO SEE HOW OSWALD WAS FRAMED AND USED TO HIDE THE COUP THAT DISGRACED OUR COUNTRY'S LEADERS.
FOR THE YOUTH OF TODAY, AUTOR DEAN HARTWELL HAS WRITTEN A FINE BOOK HA WON;T WASTE YOUR TIME, BUT WILL SET YOU ON THE RIGHT PATH AS TO UNDERSANDING WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR GOVERNMENT: THE BOOK IS CALLED DEAD MEN TALKING.
IN ITS PAGES, YOU WHO WILL INHERIT WHAT EVIL MEN DID TO THIS WONDERFL COUNRY, AMERICA, WILL SEE, LAID OUT BEFORE YOU, WHAT'S WRONG WITH AMERICA TODAY. IT LIES IN THE PEOPLE'S ACCEPTANCE OF EVIL. AN EVIL DEEP AND TREACHEROUS AND PERVADING. AN EVIL THAT CAN ONLY BE HANDLED THROUGH KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH.
PEOPLE, YOU MUST START CARING ABOUT THIS COUNTRY!
ONLY YOU--THE PEOPLE--- CAN CHANGE THINGS.
IT HAS TO BE FROM THE BOTTOM UP--THE TOP IS CORRUPT AND NEEDS TO BE CUT OFF, LIKE A HYDRA'S HEAD.
A GOOD EXAMPLE OF A GREAT STATESMAN AND PATRIOT IS DR. DANIEL ELLSBERG.
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THAT IS, FIND OUT ABOUT HIM NOW!
AND IF YOU READ ANYTHING BAD ABOUT HIM, YOU CAN MARK OFF THE WRITER AS ONE OF "THEM."
IT'S TIME TO GET YOUR HANDS ON THE BOOKS I LIST BELOW, AS WELL AS HARTWELL'S BOOK, DEAD MEN TALKING:

REMEMBER --ANYTIME YOU FIND A NEGATIVE REVIEW OF ANY OF THE BOOKS I'VE LISTED BELOW, JUST AS IN THE CASE OF ELLSBERG, JUST AS IN MY CASE, TOO, YOU CAN BE SURE YOU'RE LOOKING AT ONE OF THE PROTECTORS OF THE EVIL POLITICAL SYSTEM UNDER WHICH WE ARE CURRENTLY SUFFERING.
CAN YOU IMAGINE? WE'VE LOST SO MANY HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHS. THE SUPREME COURT SAID CORPORATIONS CAN BUY POLITICAL CANDIDATES THROUGH HUGE "DONATIONS." PEOPLE ARE READING YOUR EMAILS AND LISTENING TO YOUR PHONE CALLS IF THEY WISH--WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION. PRIVACY IS A THING OF THE PAST. A MAN'S HOME IS NOT HIS CASLE--IT CAN BE INVADED BY POLICE AT ANY TIME. KICK IN THE DOOR AND ROUND 'EM UP....
IF YOU WANT MORE OF THE SAME, IGNORE THE BOOKS BELOW AND WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY. THEY WLL CONVINCE YOU THAT A GOVERNMENT THAT THE PEOPLE DID NOT ELECT TOOK OVER OUR COUNTRY.
THAT GOVERNMENT GAVE US OUR FIRS PRESIDENT APPOINTED, NOT ELECTED: GERALD FORD--A MEMBER OF THE WARREN COMMISSION! THAT GOVERNMENT GAVE US OUR FIRST PRESIDENT WHO WAS FORCED TO RESIGN BECAUSE HE WAS SO CORRUPT--RICHARD NIXON. HAT GOVERNMENT TOOK FROM US JOHN KENNEDY, BOBBY KENNEDY, AND MARTIN LUTHER KING. THAT GOVERNMENT THRUST US INTO THE VIETNAM WAR, THE GULF WAR, THE IRAQ WAR, AND THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN. IT THRUIST US INTO A BOGUS 'WAR ON TERROR' GAVE US POLLUTION UNIMAGINED IN OIL DRILLING, GAVE US BANK FAILURES AND LET THE GREEDY CROOKS GO FREE, SADDLING YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN WITH THE BILLS. YOU ARE CONFRONTED WITH ORDERS TO TAKE FLU VACCINES, YOU ARE NOT GIVEN A CURE FOR CANCER, BUT YOU'RE GIVEN HUGE MEDICAL BILLS--THE MOST EXPENSIVE IN THE WORLD.
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU FELT SAFE IN YOUR CITY?
IF YOU WANT CHANGE, GET THE BOOKS I LIST FOR YOU, BELOW, INTO THE HANDS OF YOUR FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS.
HELP US HELP YOU.

THE 90% WHO LET EVERYBODY ELSE DO ALL THE WORK OF PROTECTING THE REST OF US FROM THE 'BAD GUYS' IN POLITICS WILL REAP THE LEAN HARVEST OF SORROW, UNLESS THEY ARE MOVED TO ACTION. HELP US, THE TEN PERCENT WHO ARE DOING ALL WE CAN TO EFFEC CHANGE, TRUE CHANGE. AND DON'T BLAME OBAMA. WHAT CAN ONE MAN DO IN A SYSTEM WHERE EVERYTHING HAS BEEN SET UP TO RUN FOR YEARS JUS AS THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT WANTS?
DO YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY? PROBABLY, THE YOUNG PEOPLE DO NOT. THEY'VE BEEN AUGHT TO SEE THE FALTS AND FLAWS OF OUR GREAT FORMER PRESIDENTS. THEY'VE BEEN TAGHT TO THINK ONLY OF 'ME FIRST.' THEY HAVE NOT LEARNED THE CLASSIC LESSONS. THEY ARE ALMOS ILLITERATE.
DUMB AND SELFISH IS THE GOAL, SO THEY WON;T CARE ABOUT ANYTHING BUT BREAD AND CIRCUSES. WE CAN ONLY CHANGE OUR CHILDREN THROUGH A GOOD EDUCATION THAT INCLUDES A RENEWED RESPECT FOR CHAMPIONS OF LIBERY, LIFE, AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS.
STEP FORWARD, BUY THE BOOKS I'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT: DOUG HORNE'S INSIDE THE ARRB, JIM MARRS' CROSSFIRE,THE PLOT THAT KILLED KENNEDY, EDWARD HASLAM'S DR.MARY'S MONKEY, MY OWN BOOK--ME & LEE, HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD, AND JAMES DOUGLASS' MASTERPIECE, JFK AND THE UNSPEAKABLE--WHY HE DIED AND WHY IT MATTERS.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT DEBRA CONWAY OF LANCER REFUSED TO INVITE AGING GREEN BERET HERO DAN MARVIN TO SPEAK AT LANCER. HE HAS PROVIDED EVIDENCE THAT WITNESSES IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION MATTER WERE BEING KILLED OFF BY THE GOVERNMENT.
NOR WOULD CONWAY ALLOW MARVIN'S BOOK, EXPENDIBLE ELITE, TO BE SOLD BY HER LANCER ORGANIZATION, DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE AND TRINE DAY PUBLISHERS WON THEIR LAWSUIT, AGAINST GOVERNMENT-SUPPORTED CHARGES, PROVING THAT DAN MARVIN TELLS THE TRUTH. BOTH MARVIN AND I HAVE EXPRESSED OUR WLLINGNESS TO TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
AT ONE TIME, THE LANCER ORGANIZATION WAS PRESSING TO HAVE AMNESTY SECURED FOR ALL JFK ASSASSINATION WITNESSES (1999). WE STILL BELIEVE THAT WITH AMNESTY, A NUMBER OF WITNESSES BESIDES DAN MARVIN AND MYSELF WOULD STEP FORWARD TO PROVE OSWALD'S INNOCENCE AND THE REALITY OF A COUP D'ETAT AGAINST JOHN F. KENNEDY.

THOSE WITH AGENDAS CAN SOMETIMES CAUSE AS MUCH TROUBLE FOR WITNESSES (WHO HAVE LAID SO MUCH ON THE LINE) AS OUTRIGHT ENEMIES OF THE TRUTH. DAVID LIFTON SAYS HE IS STILL WORKING ON HIS LONG-DELAYED BIOGRAPHY OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD, WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO BE PUBLISHED IN 2000. BUT LIFTON ADMITTED HE NEVER DETECTED MY NEW ORLEANS-BASED LIASON WITH LEE OSWALD. IF HE DID ADMIT TO IT, HE WOULD HAVE HAD TO REWRITE HIS ALREADY LONG-DELAYED BOOK (HE WAS HELPED IN WRITING IT BY CONWAY)AND WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE MADE EXTENSIVE CONTACTS WITH ME TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE LIASON AND THE EVIDENCE FOR IT.

INSTEAD, LIFTON DECIDED IT WOULD BE MORE TO HIS ADVANAGE, IT SEEMS, TO WORK TO DISCREDIT ME, PARTIALLY BASED, ACCORDING TO HIS OWN WORDS, ON WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS MY FAILURE TO DESCRIBE OSWALD'S ATTIRE ON APRIL 26, 1963, ACCURATELY. HOWEVER, DR. JAMES FETZER, EXAMINING THE SO-CALLED 'FAILURE,' PUBLISHED INFORMATION SHOWING I COULD BE CORRECT, SINCE OSWALD'S AUNT STATED HE HAD NOTHING 'DECENT' TO WEAR FOR ANY INTERVIEWS WHEN HE FIRST CAME TO TOWN, WHICH DATE WAS ESTABLISHED AS APRIL 25, 1963, THE DAY BEFORE OSWALD MET ME, MUCH AGAINST LIFTON'S OBJECTIONS (WHICH TURNED OU TO BE UNTENABLE).

SINCE LEE AND I PARTED EARLY ON THE 26TH BECAUSE LEE HAD TO BE ELSEWHERE (LIKELY, HE HAD TO DRESS UP FOR THE JOB INTERVIEW), AS I HAD LONG REPORTED, THERE IS NO CONFLICT IN DRESS, SINCE OSWALD WOULD HAVE TO HAVE GONE TO HIS AUNT'S HOME TO OBTAIN CLOTHES TO WEAR TO THE INTERVIEW. ON A MAP, IT CAN BE SEEN THAT "OSWALD MET BAKER AT THE MAIN POST OFFICE AND ESCORTED HER TO THE DOWNTOWN YWCA." FROM THERE, HE COULD TAKE A BUS TO HIS AUNT'S HOME ON 757 FRENCH STREET. THE SO-CALLED CONFLICT DID NOT EXIST, SINCE FOR THE REST OF THAT DAY -- THE GREATER PART OF IT, IN FACT--OSWALD WAS NOT WITH JUDYTH BAKER. HOWEVER, LIFTON REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I COULD HAVE SEEN OSWALD WEARING WHAT LIFTON TERMED "SHABBY" CLOTHES.

I SOON REALIZED THAT I HAD NEVER STATED THE WORDF "SHABBY" IN MY SINGLE TELEPHONE INTERVIEW WITH LIFTON EARLY IN 2000. IT'S A WORD I NEVER USE IN MY SPEAKING VOCABULARY. THEREFORE, I KNEW LIFTON WAS NOT QUOTING FROM THE TAPE RECORDING HE MADE OF OUR CONVERSATION. HE WAS QUOTING, INSTEAD, FROM A PURLOINED VERSION OF AN UNAUTHORIZED 'TEASER' BOOK TO WHICH HE SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD LEGAL ACCESS AT THE TIME HE QUOTED THE WORD "SHABBY."
THAT WORD HAD BEEN INSERTED -- IT WAS WHAT I CALLSED A "FLAG"--A DELIBERATELY INSERTED WORD THAT HAD BEEN INTENDED TO STOP THE BOOK FROM BEING PUBLISHED AS "AUTHORITATIVE." THE ORIGINAL 'TEASER' BOOK WAS OVERSIMPLIFIED, HAD MUCH INFORMATION MISSING, AND WAS HEAVILY MARKED WITH 'FLAGS' TO STOP PIRATING. AN HONEST PUBLISHER WOULD HAVE BEEN PROMISED THE DEFNITIVE VERSION. HOWEVER, IT SEEMS LIFTON GOT HIS HANDS ON A PIRATED VERSION ANYWAY.

LIFTON WENT SO FAR AS TO REJECT DR. FETZER'S POSTED INFORMATION, CORRECTING HIS QUOTE ABOUT OSWALD'S ATTIRE, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS LOGICAL.

INSEAD, LIFTON PERSISTED IN HIS ATTEMPTS TO DISCREDIT ME, OFFERING OTHER OBJECTIONS, ON OTHER ISSUES, NONE OF WHICH HELD WATER.

UPON BEING CORRECTED, INSTEAD OF AGREEING THAT HE MIGHT HAVE ERRED, LIFTON LEFT THE DISCUSSION FORUM.

WITHIN WEEKS, HOWEVER, HE PUBLISHED A WHOLESALE ATTACK AGAINST FETZER, ESSENTIALLY ACCUSING HIM OF ANTI-SEMITIC LEANINGS IN FETZER'S ONGOING SERIES OF NINE-ELEVEN INVESTIGATIONS.

LIFTON ALSO COULD NOT FORBEAR MENTIONING FETZER'S SUPPORT OF ME AS EVIDENCE OF FETZER'S POOR REASONING ABILITIES AND POOR JUDGMENT IN FETZER'S NINE-ELEVEN INVESTIGATIVE WORK.

WAS LIFTON BEING HONEST?

LIFTON STATED HE WAS FRIENDS WITH MARINA OSWALD AND HER DAUGHTERS. THAT TURNED OUT TO BE UNTRUE: I PRODUCED AN EMAIL FROM RACHEL OSWALD WHERE SHE AVERRED THAT SHE DESISED LIFTON, ASKING IF I AGREED THAT LIFTON WOULD SELL HIS OWN MOTHER. LIFTON, TOO, HAD REFUSED TO SEND DR. FETZER A COPY OF HIS TAPE OF OUR CONVERSATION MADE IN EARLY 2000. THAT TAPE HAD BEEN MADE WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR PERMISSION, A FELONY IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
I SAID I WOULD NOT PRESS CHARGES AGAINST LIFTON IF HE RELEASED A TRUE COPY OF THE TAPE TO FETZER. THIS LIFTON REFUSED TO DO, POSSIBLY BECAUSE HE HAD INDICATED THAT I HAD SAID "SHABBY" ON THE TAPE WHEN I KNEW I NEVER DID --MEANING THAT HE HAD LIED AS TO WHAT I HAD SAID ON THE TAPE.

BECAUSE NOW SO MUCH TIME HAS PASSED, ANY COPY OF THE TAPE THAT LIFTON NOW MIGHT RENDER COULD HAVE BEEN ELECTRONICALLY MANIPULATED, AND THAT INCLUDES THE ORIGINAL.

TO CLARIFY: LIFTON'S RENDERING OF ONLY SELECT FRAGMENTS OF THAT TAPE, AND HIS ERRONEOUS INTERPRETATIONS OF THE STATEMENTS HE DID SELECT FROM IT, DISPLAYED AN INACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF MY STATEMENTS, WHICH DR. FETZER HAD POINTED OUT CLEARLY TO LIFTON, WHO THEN FLED THE JOUSTING FIELD.

"THE LIFTON MANIFESTO"

"THE LIFTON MANIFESTO" WAS CREATED BY DAVID LIFTON IN 2003 TO USE TO DISCREDIT ME SHOULD ANYONE IN THE MEDIA ASK A RESEACHER ABOUT ME.

IT IS OBVIOUS THAT LIFTON WROTE MORE THAN WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED IN THE "LIFTON MANIFESTO." THE MANIFESTO IS A 'FINAL WORD' ON HOW TO HANDLE THE 'BAKER PROBLEM.' WHAT LIFTON SAID CONCERNING THE 'BAKER PROBLEM' CAN ONLY BE GUESSED. HOW ACCURATE OR TRUTHFUL THOSE STATEMENTS MAY HAVE BEEN CAN BE JUDGED BY WHAT LIFTON HAS REVEALED AS HIS OBJECTIONS ON THE ILLEGAL APING HE MADE OF OUR CONVERSATION -- OBJECTIONS THAT TURNED OUT TO BE POORLY FOUNDED.

THE "LIFTON MANIFESTO" -- SO NAMED BY RESEARCHER PAMELA McELWAIN-BROWN -- WHO HAS COME OUT AGAINST IT AS A PROPAGANDA WEAPON AGAINST ME, IS SHOWN BELOW, WITH SOME HISTORY AND REMARKS ABOUT THE MANIFESTO, FOLLOWING. RESEARCHER PAMELA McELWAIN-BROWN AND RESEARCHER MARTIN SHACKELFORD PRESENTED COMMENTS TO A NEWSGROUP REGARDING THE MANIFESTO AND ITS GOALS:

from David Lifton e-mail, July 19, 2003:
"ADVICE FOR ANYONE CONTACTED BY A REPORTER. . .


"* Ask: what pieces of evidence or narrative history impress
you?
Inform them that most are not original with Judyth ; tell them where
they have previously been published and what's wrong with them.
Explain
existence of publicly available chronologies, and how Judyth "inserts"
herself.


"* She's a loony. Provide phone numbers of people who have
dealt with her and know that.


"(Don't argue that her evidence and narrative are wrong
*because* she is a loony. That is the ad hominem fallacy. But
pointing out that she is in fact a loony is not.


"Regarding Shackelford: Point out his relationship with Harrison
Livingstone, and the $ 100 million lawsuit he filed accusing fellow
researcher of murder conspiracy; and multi-year co-dependent
relationship he has had with Judyth. (Refer to contact at 60 minutes
for how Shackelford was pushing this phony story, etc.)"


This is the email I have defined as the "Lifton Manifesto".


Pamela :-)


Pamela had been quoted on the McAdams newsgroup for her observations that their disdain of my story may have been fueled by their hatred of Jim Garrison (McAdams & Co. such as Barb Junk. belong to an anti-Garrison email group. Garrison was the only person to ever bring any aspec of the JFK assassination to a trial. The film JFK (director's uncut version) portrays what Garrison went through trying to find a way to uncover the Coup d'etat against Kennedy, using Clay Shaw as his excuse for the investigation.


WROTE PAMELA:

"...I think they may have been comfortable in their little worlds thinking
Garrison had been sufficiently buried until Judyth came along. Then, it
seems the outrage began to intensify, and to be focused on her.
Just look at Lifton's outrage, for example. Did Judyth really push all
his buttons on her own, or is his reaction also from his fury at Garrison?
Then there's also Reitzes, whose web pages on Garrison may appear at first
glance to be objective, but in fact are quite negative. His outrage over
Judyth's coming forward is reflected in the tone of his page on Judyth. Is
there a connection? Of course, Judyth is referencing David Ferrie, David
Lewis, Jack Martin, and the entire cast of the Garrison investigation, so
perhaps she's dumping salt in their old wounds." Pamela McElwain-Brown
1/13/08


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/tree/browse_frm/...


"So now Barb is compelled to jump in and play shrink ? Why not answer
candidly from your own experience? Is your posting to each and every
Judyth thread fueled only by antagonism toward her, or toward Garrison as
well? Pamela McElwain-Brown 1/14/08


MARTIN SHACKELFORD EXPLAINED A BIT ABOUT THE MANIFESTO. WE HAVE SINCE LEARNED THAT IT ALSO WENT TO other newsgroups.

MARCH 6, 2008:


What I've said is that Lifton, through a handful of close associates, fed
material they believed make Judyth look bad, to McAdams, knowing that he
already considered her a fraud, and would likely take whatever they sent
him at face value (as we are accused of doing with anything Judyth says).


In addition, I've noted that Lifton sent out a "guidance" telling people
how they should respond to press inquiries. No animals or ETs required.


Martin


(TO WHICH ENEMIES IN THE NEWSGROUP ADDED PARTIAL AND EVEN FAKED QuOTES FROM EMAILS, SOME OF WHICH I NEVER WROTE:)

You seem to forget the e-mails from others in which they claim to be
quoting Judyth--but don't provide the full source.

Martin

ON SEPT. 6, 2004, RESEARCHER ANTHONY MARSH COMMENTED:


Gee, I wonder where Lifton learned that tactic? I seem to remember seeing a memo describing ways to counter WC critics.


IT TURNED OUT THAT MARTIN SHACKELFORD ALSO RECEIVED A COPY OF THE LIFTON MANIFESTO.
A LOT OF PEOPLE DID. PAMELA SUMMARIZED EVERYTHING IN A POST TO THE NEWSGROUP THA TOUGHT THE MANIFESO WAS JUS FINE:

>>But then that seems to be the issue with those following the Lifton
>>Manifesto -- they have already decided not to have an open mind regarding
>>Judyth's statements and then create a strawman and claim that her
>>statements are not credible.

>--->ONE REPLY WAS: Is Mr. Duffy of US News and World Report aware that he is also apparently
>following the "Lifton Manifesto"?
BUT DUFFGY HAS WRITTEN SOME 15 PAGES IN USN&WR PRAISING GERALD POSNER OF 'CASE CLOSED' FAME WHO SAID 'OSWALD DID IT.' HE WAS PROTECING HIS REPUATION BY DAMAGING MINE. IT IS NOW CLEAR THAT POSNER CLAIMED TO INERVIEW SOME PEOPLE HE NEVER INERVIEWED, MISREPORTED SOME EVIDENCE, AND IN MANY OTHER WAYS SLANTED THE EVIDENCE IN FVAOR OF THE WARREN COMMISSION AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TRUTH.
A LOOK AT THE PIECES ABOUT POSNER'S FAILURES TO TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH CAN EASILY BE FOUND ON THE INTERNET.
HOWEVER, DUFFY DID ME NO FAVORS BY DISSING ME AND THEREBY COVERING HIS OWN DERRIERE. HE TOLD SIXY MINUTES THAT I HAD 'NO EVIDENCE' ACCORDING TO CBS SIXY MINUTES PRODUCER DON HEWITT, WHO COMPLAINED TO C-SPAN THAT 'WE HAD THE DOOR SLAMMED IN OUR FACES' OVER THE STORY HE, MIKE WALLACE AND PHIL SCHEFFLER TRIED TO FILM THREE TIMES OVER A PERIOD OF FOURTEEN MONTHS.

PAMELA ENDED THE NEWSGROUP ARGUMENT ABOUT HE LIFTON MANIFESO, WHICH NOT A SINGLE ANTI-OSWALD NEWSGROUP MEMBER OBJECTED TO, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS ALL DIRTY TRICKS, AND LIES, KJNENDED TO RIN MY REPUAION, WITH THIS COMMENT:

Are you refusing to acknowledge the email that Lifton sent to some
researchers describing which tactics to use to discredit Judyth? 　That has
nothing to do with me; it has everything to do with the fact that Judyth
was not allowed an open forum right from the start.

Pamela :-)

BELOW IS YESTERDAY'S MEMO FROM DAVID LIFTON INSINUATING THAT FETZER IS ANTI-SEMITIC. INTERESTINGLY, THE EMAIL BEGINS WITH THE WORDS "I REGRET" --THE SAME TWO WORDS THAT BEGAN THE SO-CALLED "MARY FERRELL DENOUNCES JUDYTH VARY BAKER" EMAIL THAT WAS SENT TO THE SAME HOSTILE NEWSGROUP.
IN ADDITION, THE OPENING STATEMENT IS ENTIRELY SEPARATED FROM THE LENGTHY 'MEMO' THAT FOLLOWS AS A "FOERARDED MESSAGE"--EERIELY RESEMBLING THE 'ATTACHMENT' IN THE "MARY FERRELL" EMAIL UNDER DISPUTE THAT ATTACKS ME ON MANY FALSE GROUNDS. BELOW, WE CAN SEE THE SAME STYLE IS USED AS WAS FOUND IN THE "MARY FERRELL" EMAIL, AN EMAIL THAT HAS SO MANY PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH ITS INACCURATE STATEMENTS, ITS BELONGING TO DEBRA CONWAY INSTEAD OF TO THE NEWSGROUP ADMINISTRATOR, ITS SUSPICIOUS HEADER, WHICH INCLUDED EFFORTS TO CHANGE THE TIME STAMPS, ETC.
IS THE FORMAT AND OPENING STATEMENT ALL A MERE COINCIDENCE?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 03:39:44 -0700
> Subject: FW: DSL Memo on Jim Fetzer, Israel, and 9/11
> From: dlifton@earthlink.net
> To: dlifton@gmail.com
>
> I regret having to send out this memo, but the line has to be drawn
> somewhere.
>
> While I believe certain critical evidence was falsified in the JFK case (and
> that pursuing that constitutes a legitimate area for research and debate), I
> cannot be associated in any way whatsoever with the views of Prof. Jim
> Fetzer in the area described below.
>
> DSL
>
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: "David S. Lifton"
> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:57:49 -0700
> To: David Lifton
>
> Subject: DSL Memo on Jim Fetzer, Israel, and 9/11
>
> * * * FROM THE MEMO I WROTE THAT IS IN THE ATTACHED FILE* * *
>
> DSL Memo to file:
>
> RE: Jim Fetzer, Israel, and 9/11
>
> In connection with his 9/11 activities, Jim Fetzer enthusiastically
> promotes a book titled ³Stranger than Fiction², by one Albert D. Pastore
> Ph.D. (a pseudonym). The book is available at a website called
> ³WhatReallyHappened.com²
>
> I just learned about the book‹and Fetzer¹s podcasts (which apparently have
> been around for some months)‹this morning. Fetzer sent me, and several
> others, an email in which he was highly critical of Jim DiEugenio¹s review
> of Doug Horne, and was giving me, and my work, high praise.
>
> So I of course clicked on the link(s) he provided, and was pretty surprised
> (to put it mildly) at what came up (links about 9/11) and then where one of
> them led‹to Fetzer¹s Internet radio broadcasts on his show ³The Real Deal.²
>
> In a series of podcasts, Fetzer reads the entire book‹³Stranger than
> Fiction²-- in about five segments.
>
> Below find a group of links to this book, i.e., to Fetzer¹s podcasts, etc.
>
> I listened to several of the podcasts‹it is the ³Israel did it² line, but
> much more: a rather broadbased revisionist history going back to the early
> 20th century, about the creation of Israel, how the Jews are responsible for
> the financial woes of the world (and the U.S.); for U.S. financial policy;
> how the Jews are responsible for World War II (which Hitler did not want, at
> all, according to this author‹i.e., it was all the fault of the Jews)‹and
> finally, of course, how Israel is responsible for 9/11.
>
> As Fetzer reads the book, there is an assortment of anti-Jewish and
> anti-Israel illustrations‹some might call it anti-Semitic political
> pornography. Each person will have to judge this for himself (or herself).
>
> I have to say (at this point) ­and just to clear the air‹that I do not think
> Jim Fetzer is anti-Semetic. What I do believe (and most unfortunately) that
> he is not sufficiently discriminating (some would say indiscriminating) in
> choosing what to believe. In this issue, I do not think he is an
> enlightened radical; I think he is behaving like a complete fool.
>
> I do not know 20th century history as much as I¹d like, but I sure as hell
> know the JFK case, and I have watched Fetzer do this once before‹I have
> watched him journey down this ³Judyth² path, entering, subscribing to, and
> promoting a world of make-believe.
>
> This whole anti-Israeli line is another example of Fetzer¹s ability (if not
> propensity) to ³connect the dots² in some way that I find not just illogical
> but‹frankly‹just plain ridiculous.
>
> I have no idea what provokes Fetzer to go down this path‹but then, I have no
> idea why (in the area of the JFK case) Fetzer believes in Judyth, which I
> believe to be another case of subscribing to something that is part of the
> world of ³make believe.²
>
> In the next page of this document, I am listing the various links (but they
> are not ³live² because I am going to put this document in pdf format).
>
> Then, on the following pages, come the Amazon dot com page about this
> bizarre book; and a page with the major pro and con review. And then another
> book that is advertised as a ³cousin² of sorts (i.e., ³those who bought this
> book Œalso bought¹ that one² etc.). That book is titled ³The Life of an
> American Jew in Racist, Marxist Israel²; and, as one rstates, it is ³Crude
> anti-semetic nonsense. . .strictly propaganda for the right wing loonies.²
>
> And then, finally, on the remaining pages, I am inserting the various
> imagery that is shown, on Fetzer¹s podcast, as he reads from ³Stranger than
> Fiction.² It is all virulently anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic
> propaganda‹really low class junk. Yet there is Jim Fetzer, reading from
> this book, while all this inflammatory anti-Semitic imagery is flashing on
> the screen.
>
> Of course, a collateral mystery (or ³mystery²) is just who is ³Albert D.
> Pastore, Ph.D.² who, as Fetzer points out, has ³some connection² (I think
> his words were) with philosophy.
>
> The imagery used by Fetzer appears at the end of the attached memo. It is
> violently anti-semitic and highly inflammatory.
>
> DSL
>
>
> * * * MORE FROM THE ATTACHED MEMO * * *
>
> What this is: Basic links I have been surfing re Jim Fetzer and 9/11, the
> book he is promoting on his podcasts, and the graphics he is using to
> promote the thesis that Israel is responsible for much of the woes of the
> 20th century, for provoking Hitler to start World War II, and that Israel is
> responsible for 9/11.
>
> Immediately below are some links‹especially to the book, ³Stranger than
> Fiction,² which Fetzer strongly recommends (and is promoting).
>
> In Section two of this document are the Amazon pages pertaining to this
> book.
>
> In Section three of this document are the graphics Fetzer uses in connection
> with his podcasts, reading from the book, and promoting the thesis that Jews
> are responsible for many of the woes of the 20th century, and that Israel is
> responsible for 9/11.
>
> http://article.wn.com/view/2010/06/04/Fetzers_endorsement_puts_tea_party_on_
> boil/
>
> Albert D. Pastore Ph.D.
>
> Link to the book ³Stranger Than Fiction ­Part 1²
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/stf1.html?q=stf1.html
>
> To part 2:
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/stf2.html?q=stf2.html
>
> To parts 3, 4, and 5:
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/stf3.html
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/stf4.html
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/stf5.html
>
> HOME PAGE FOR ³What Really Happened . com²
>
> http://whatreallyhappened.com/