Oswald Framed: Dallas Police and the Killer Rifle

GREETINGS TO EVERY ONE OF YOU GREAT PATRIOTS WHO ARE STANDING UP FOR LEE OSWALD. AS YOU KNOW, THE INTERNET IS HELPING PROVE HIS INNOCENCE. THAT MEANS THE 'GUILTY MEN' MUST BE EXPOSED. THE ARTICLE BELOW FOCUSES ON THE DALLAS POLICE AND HOW THEY COOPERATED WITH THE 'GUILTY MEN'--

NOTE THAT WIKI ANSWERS, WHERE DISINFO ABOUT OSWALD HAS BEEN RAMPANT, HAS BEEN CHANGED TO THE TRUTH BY MY FRIEND J FITZ.
THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO!

==LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND THE ITALIAN RIFLE==
WIKI Answers has been pervaded by official version propaganda, and one recent example was a question worded: What rifle did Lee Harvey oswald Use to Kill President Kennedy? The answer stated the usual--the talian rifle. It was twi sentences long. By singing up through ba friend, the two of us 'improved' the answer. I urge you to check WIKI Questions and Answers, and if you see a lie about Oswald there, as occurred in this case, that you write to me at voice4vindication@yahoo.com. You may also visit http://www.judythvarybaker.com if you'd like to help support the fACEBOOK cause! Below is the answer we gave to the public to the Wiki Question.
We hope to provide THE TRUTH to the people. WE NEED ONLY 3 MORE MEMBERS TO REACH 100! SPREAD THE WORD AND PASS THE INFORMATION BELOW ON TO YOUR FRIENDS. IF ANYONE WRITES ME, I PROMISE TO ANSWER THEM, UNLESS I GET HACKED AGAIN...!
JVB (SEE BELOW)

Controversy in the case resides in the fact that Oswald, and the rifle associated with the murder of JFK, cannot be decisively linked to each other. Lee Harvey Oswald indeed was accused of using a 6.5 x 52 mm Italian Carcano M91/38 bolt-action rifle, serial number C2766. And it is true that the rifle was sold as military surplus through Klein's Sporting Goods Company. However, records indicate that Oswald was at work at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall at the time he supposedly mailed a money order and order form to obtain the rifle. Oswald kept a meticulous work sheet, accounting for what he was doing every fifteen mnutes or so. The order for the rifle was sent from a post office over 6 miles distant. Oswald's lunch period was too short to have made the trip there and back, as he had no car and bus service to there did not exist. Further, Oswald never left his workplace with others. The order was sent from Dallas to Chicago, IL but arrived, somehow, the very next day, even though it was not sent air mail. Atop that, the order was filled that same day and the rifle was shipped the same day --we are talking about some 24 hours of elapsed time between Dallas and the rifle getting shipped out-- a physical impossibility at the time.
The serial number of the money order form used shows it was issued late in 1963, not in 1962. The order form was also sloppily written, when Oswald, in fact, due to problems with dyslexia, always carefully printed out such forms. A second order form, for a revolver 'discovered' later, is carefully printed, as if forgers finally learned how to create a better forgery. Belief that the order form was manufactured to frame Oswald is also based on the fact that no box of cartridges was ever found in Oswald's possessions, and that only four bullets could be found. It implies that Oswald never fired the rifle before Nov. 22nd because he had no ammunition. Complicating the matter is the fact that several Dallas police officers originally found a MAUSER, not an Italian rifle, on the 6th floor. See the Youtube videos below: as so many others, the man who made this video "committed suicide." He was honored as Officer of the Year before he got in trouble for testifying, after which he found himself treated badly, and finally, out of a job with the Dallas police.

Roger Craig is attacked on the Internet by official version defenders, but look at the man and decide for yourself. Documents signed by the other officers present who saw the Mauser substantiate the truthfulness of Craig's testimony:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPIo8B...
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AqqNK...

The Mauser vanished. Why? Was it because the casings found in "the sniper's nest" were from an Italian rifle and did not match the Mauser's bullets? You can see another rifle outlined in the video taken when the Mauser was photographed in the video.

Researcher Gil Jesus posted the following information at The Education Forum on Jan. 20,2010 listing reasons why the rifle attributed to Oswald was, in fact, a frame-up:

By Gil Jesus ( 2010 )


Reason #1: MORE THAN ONE 6.5 MANNLICHER-CARCANO RIFLE EXISTED WITH THE
SERIAL NUMBER C2766

The 40" rifle currently in evidence is not the only 6.5 Mannlicher-
Carcano with the serial number of C2766. On page 250 of his book,
Kennedy and Lincoln, the late Dr. John K. Lattimer said the following:

"In l974 and l975, my sons and I had conducted a series of experiments
using a 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano carbine,
model 91-38, serial number C2766, equipped with an Ordinance Optics
Company four power telescope exactly like Oswald's."

http://i45.tinypic.com/2hmingh.jpg

But Lattimer's wasn't the only 6.5 Mannlicher Carcano with serial
number C2766.

Reason #2. KLEIN'S SPORTING GOODS BOUGHT MORE THAN ONE 6.5 ITALIAN
RIFLE WITH THE SERIAL NUMBER C2766

In volume 11, page 205 of the Warren Commission Hearings, Louis
Feldsott, president of Crescent Firearms, in a sworn affidavit to the
Commission, claimed that he was contacted by the FBI on the evening of
November 22, 1963. They requested that he check his files to see if he
had any records concerning the sale of an Italian-made 6.5 mm. rifle
with the serial number C2766. When he checked, he found that he had
records indicating the rifle was sold to Klein's Sporting Goods on
June 18, 1962. This information of the 6.5 rifle with the serial
number C2766, he said, was conveyed to the FBI on the evening of
November 22, 1963 and all records of the purchase, sale and
transportation of the weapon were given to the FBI.

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol11_0108a.htm

In their tracing of the shipping records of the C 2766 rifle, however,
the FBI makes no mention of the June 1962 sale. They cite, instead,
the February, 1963 sale of 100 rifles from the same dealer, Crescent
Firearms, to Klein's. In that shipment is a list of the rifles' serial
numbers. Included in the list is a 6.5 rifle serial number C 2766.

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol21_0361b.htm

But thanks to the affidavit of Louis Feldsott, we have evidence that
Klein's bought two C 2766 rifles from Crescent Firearms: one in June
1962 and the other in February 1963.

I'll get back to the June 1962 rifle later. Right now I'd like to
concentrate on the February, 1963 rifle.



Reason #3. THE FEBRUARY 1963 RIFLE SHIPMENT WAS FOR THE 36" RIFLE, NOT
THE 40" RIFLE.

The FBI traced the sale of the 40" C2766 rifle backward and claimed
that it was a part of a shipment of 100 rifles weighing 750 lbs. that
was sent to Klein's from Crescent Firearms in February, 1963.

But one researcher found evidence that the shipment was for 36" rifles
ONLY.

In researching for her excellent article on the Oswald rifle, JFK
assassination researcher Martha Moyer checked on wooden shipping
containers used in transporting weapons, and found that all the
containers weighed between 16 and 20 pounds. The 36-inch weapon
allegedly ordered by "Hidell" was advertised as weighing 5 1/2 pounds.
The total weight of 100 such weapons would be 550 pounds. Added to the
weight range of ten wooden shipping containers the result would be a
total of between 710 and 750 pounds.

The delivery receipt from Lifschultz Fast Freight listed the freight
as 10 crates/cartons of guns/rifles and listed the weight at 750 lbs.

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol21_0359a.htm

Had the shipment been of the 40" rifles, at 7 lbs. each, the total
weight including 160-200 lbs. for the crates would have been in the
860-900 lb. range.

Instead, the 750 lbs. consisted of 10 crates at 20 lbs each ( 200 )
and 100 rifles at 5.5 lbs. each ( 550 ) In other words, the shipment
received by Klein's in February, 1963 was indeed a shipment of 36-inch
weapons.

http://www.jfklancer.com/pdf/moyer.pdf

Reason #4. THE RIFLE "HIDELL" ORDERED WAS THE 36" RIFLE
Waldman Exhibit 8 is a copy of the order blank used by "A.Hidell " to
order the rifle from Klein's. On that order form, taken from the
February, 1963 edition of American Rifleman, one can see that Oswald
ordered catalog # C20-T750,

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol21_0364b.htm

which is the 36" rifle as advertised.

http://i46.tinypic.com/15p0k7k.jpg

One can also see that the 40" rifle had a different catalog number,
C20-750.

http://i45.tinypic.com/1z6gjnb.jpg


Reason #5. THE SHIPPING MANIFEST INDICATED THAT THE RIFLE THAT WAS
SHIPPED TO "HIDELL" WAS THE 36" RIFLE

Waldman Exhibit 7 is the copy of the shipping manifest that
accompanies the rifle when shipped. It clearly states that the catalog
number of the shipped item is C20-T750 and not C20-750.

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol21_0364a.htm

The ONLY difference in the catalog numbers is the difference between
the 36" rifle and the 40" rifle.

http://i45.tinypic.com/1z6gjnb.jpg

How important was the catalog number to the folks doing the shipping ?
William Waldman, VP of Klein's Sporting Goods, told the WC that the
catalog numbers for rifles ordered with scopes were different than for
the same rifle without a scope and that the different number described
"the rifle, scope and mount". ( 7 H 362-363 )


Reason #6. THE SHIPPING MANIFEST INDICATED THAT THE COST FOR SHIPPING
WAS FOR THE 36" RIFLE.

The shipping cost is noted in two places, where it says "PP=1.50" for
the cost of Parcel Post, and again in the handwritten column where it
says 150. This is exactly the amount sent by "Hidell" to ship the 36 "
rifle.

http://www.history-matters.com/archiv......Vol21_0364a.htm


Reason #7. KLEIN'S DIDN'T RUN OUT OF THE 36" RIFLE UNTIL NOVEMBER,
1963

Klein's 36-inch Italian "carbine" was advertised in Field and Stream
from January, 1962 through November, 1963.

http://www.jfklancer.com/pdf/moyer.pdf

Which means, folks, that Klein's hadn't run out of them at the time of
the "Hidell" order.


Reason # 8. KLEIN'S DIDN'T START SELLING THE 40" RIFLE UNTIL APRIL,
1963

No 40" Italian rifle was advertised by Klein's in The American
Rifleman magazine from October 1962 through February 1963. According
to assassination researcher/author and former detective Ian Griggs,
the 40" "carbine" began to be advertised in The American Rifleman in
April, 1963. Field and Stream did not begin advertising the 40-inch
Italian weapon until September, 1963. It was from the November issue
that Dallas Postal Inspector Harry Holmes submitted his exhibit # 2 as
a "duplicate" to the ad "Hidell" ordered from . ( 20 H 174 )

Many of the Warren Commission apologists contend that Klein's shipped
a 40" rifle in lieu of the advertised rifle because they had run out
of the 36's. But the evidence so far indicates otherwise. In order to
believe that the 40" rifle was shipped to "A. Hidell", you must
believe ALL of the following:

a.) That Klein's shipped a different rifle without notifying the
customer that the rifle he ordered was out of stock.
b.) That Klein's shipped a different rifle than ordered without giving
the customer the option of a refund.
c.) That Klein's shipped a different rifle than ordered and used the
wrong catalog number.
d.) That Klein's shipped a rifle that was 40% heavier for the same
price as the rifle ordered and absorbed any additional shipping
charges and
e.) That Klein's shipped a rifle that had not yet been advertised yet
for sale and continued to advertise a rifle that they no longer had.

In my opinion, that's quite a stretch.


Reason #9. KLEIN'S NEVER MOUNTED SCOPES ON THE 40 " RIFLE

The Klein's employee who originated the idea of mounting a scope on
the rifle was Mitchell Westra. He told the House Select Committee on
Assassinations (HSCA) that Klein's only mounted the scope on the 36
inch MC. (HSCA interview of Westra 2/20/78)

The man who actually mounted the scopes for Klein's was William Sharp,
their in-house gunsmith. He confirmed what Westra testified to: the
package deal with the scope and MC rifle was used by Klein's to market
the 36 inch MC. (HSCA interview of Sharp, 2/21/78)

http://www.ctka.net/2008/von_pein.html

In addition, FBI expert Robert Frazier testified to the WC that in
order to ascertain whether or not Klein's mounted the scope on the
rifle, the FBI asked them to supply a duplicate rifle with a scope and
then had to tell Klein's where on the frame to mount the scope.

Mr. FRAZIER. We contacted the firm, Klein's Sporting Goods in Chicago,
and asked them concerning this matter to provide us with a similar
rifle mounted in the way in which they normally mount scopes of this
type on these rifles, and forward the rifle to us for examination. In
this connection, WE DID INFORM THEM THAT THE SCOPE SHOULD BE IN
APPROXIMATELY THIS POSITION ON THE FRAME OF THE WEAPON.

Mr. EISENBERG. Pardon me, Mr. Frazier. When you say "this position,"
so that the record is clear could you--

Mr. FRAZIER. Oh, yes; in the position in which it now is,
approximately three-eighths of an inch to the rear of the receiver
ring.
( 3 H 396 )

So the FBI told Klein's what "position on the frame" "the scope should
be in". Information that Klein's would not have needed had they
normally mounted "scopes of this type on these rifles".

It's clear from their ads that Klein's was offering the 40" rifle with
a scope. But the evidence indicates that the scopes were not mounted
"in-house".


Reason #10. THE SLING MOUNTS ON THE "BACKYARD" RIFLE ARE NOT THE SAME
AS THE SLING MOUNTS ON THE DEPOSITORY CARCANO

If the rifle depicted in the famous "backyard photographs" is the
rifle that "A.Hidell" ordered, then the rifle removed from the Texas
School Book Depository is not. The reason is that the rifle in CE 134
( an enlargement of CE 133-A ) shows a rifle with a front bottom sling
mount, whereas the rifle removed from the Depository is a rifle with
side sling mounts.

This list of evidentiary comments by Gil Jesus was Posted at http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?s=7014426ac28cba9212a766f803318374&showtopic=15318&pid=181317&start=0&#entry181317


Marina Oswald, Oswald's wife, at first denied that Oswald owned a rifle. Sequestered and kept incommunicado from the public by the Secret Service, this Russian citizen feared deportation and had a new baby only six weeks old, plus a little toddler born in Russia. If deported, the American-born baby might well have remained behind in the USA. Marina, alone and isolated, soon said Oswald owned a rifle. Later, she said she saw him firing it at leaves. At one point, she said he buried it in the ground to hide it on two occasions. Next, she said he fired at general Walker in Dallas, though the bullet found there was steel-jacketed. Though it could fit the 'killer rifle' it was incorrect ammo and might have jammed in the rifle. te bullet did not match any of the casings found in the TSBD. Though some seven months had passed with no leads in the case, Oswald was charged within a day of is arrest of also attempting to kill Walker. He denied all charges. despite Oswald's denials, the Warren Commission concluded that Oswald sought fame as the reason for killing Kennedy. Interestingly, Walker and Kennedy were ideological enemies, poar opposites politically. Marina oswald's testimony regarding the walker incident had to be discarded because she also mentioned that she locked Oswald in the bathroom to try to stop him from going out to try to kill a non-present Richard Nixon, who was not in dallas that day. Also, bathroom doors do not lock from the outside. Only portions of Marina Oswald's story that the Warren Commission found believable to them -- concerning Walker-- were therefore used, even though a witness tstified that he saw more thanone person at the Walker crime scene that night.

Still later, Marina said Oswald sat on a porch in full view of Magazine Street, New Orleans, dry-firing the rifle for hours. She said he cleaned it with "pipe cleaners." In the end, when shown the rifle, she said she could not identify it. Witness Judyth Vary Baker stated Oswald knew enough about rifles that he would never have ordered a cheap rifle, sight unseen, that had the reputation the Carcano had. Oswald was linked to the rifle by a fake ID card with the name A Hidell. But we now know that other persons also used this fake name. They were all associated with the CIA.
Oswald's links to the CIA are now well-known, since the ARRB forced the release of thousands of new pages of evidence. However, many hundreds of thousands of documents remain censored and hidden. The official versions as supported on some websites focus on the evidence provided by the Warren Commission and are rarely updated to include evidence released since that casts doubts on the conclusion reached by the Warren Commisson, which based its conclusions largely on information collected by the FBI, CIA and Dallas police, though witnesses also gave information and evidence in abundance to te Cmmission.
Interestingly, the Italian rifle was supposed to have been kept in Ruth Paine's garage for several months wrapped in a blanket on a concrete floor where there was a lot of sawdust. No sawdust can be seen on the blanket, however, that was photographed. Ruth Paine's home is where Marina Oswald stayed -- her husband, Lee Oswald, lived in a boarding house much closer to Dallas. How the rifle got into the garage can only be imagined, as Oswald was known not to have it on his peson when he arrived, by himself, later, after a trip to Mexico City involving only two suitcases and a small bag, none large enough to hold the rifle even if disassembled.

We do know that Ruth Paine drove the car containing Oswald famly belongings from New Orleans, along with Marina and her baughter June, to the Paine house in irving, Texas in early September, 1963, supposedly also including the rifle, but the Paines and Marina claimed they never saw it. This is the rifle that was supposed to have been brought by Oswald into the TSBD the day of the assassination, Nov. 22, 1963, but nobody saw it brought in, and a witness, Wesley B. Frazier, stated that a small package too short to hold a rifle was the only one he saw with Oswald that day. He had driven Oswald to work that morning.

A large paper bag that was described as the bag that held the rifle was never photographed at the crime scene. It was indicated with dotted lines on photos later. This paper bag, supposedly 'found' at the sniper's nest (though never photographed there, despite dozens of photos taken that day by officer Studebaker) was analyzed as having come from paper cut from a roll at the TSBD, but no gun pressure marks were on the bag, nor were there proper fold marks, though the bag was far too large to have been sneaked out to take to the Paine garage without being otherwise noticed. The bag was almost pristine, as if it had never had the rifle carried inside it. Also, no gun oil was found inside the bag, although the rifle was described as "well oiled." A few fibers of blanket were supposedly found inside the bag, that could have proven the rifle had been wrapped in the blanket, but the rifle itself did not have a single blanket fibre on its surface. If the blanket had held the rifle, as claimed, the rifle would have had hundreds of blanket fibres sticking to its varous surfaces. There were none.
A palmprint was announced publically as found inside a part of the unassembled rifle by the Dallas police ONLY AFTER it was returned to them by the FBI, which had found NO fingerprints or palmprints on the rifle whatsoever, though there is no doubt that the FBI had the best forensic crime laboratory in the nation at the time. The Dallas police were better: they now said they had formerly found a partial palmprint, and also a partial print on the trigger guard. They said they knew of this before the rfle went to the FBI, and that their scotch tape had removed the latent prints. However, they did not announce any of these prints as in existence until after Oswald was shot and killed, even though much other false information was released to the public, such as a statement that a map showing Oswald's plans to murder Kennedy had been found. This turned out to be a lie, which has now been all but forgotten.
Another lie involved telling the public that Oswald, the purported killer, coldly and evilly ate a chicken dinner and drank a soft drink whle waiting for the motorcade. People wanted Oswald's stomach pumped to prove he had done this, but this lie, too, faded away when it was found that a black man had eaten the meal there only fifteen minutes before Kennedy was shot, leaving the bag at the so-called sniper's nest.
Since there was then not enough time for Oswald to have eaten any lunch, as the black man would have seen him there, the chicken lunch story vanished. but between selecting ugly photos of Oswald for newspapers (he looks much better on film), and telling these stories that had to enrage the public, Oswald was immediately considered guilty by the public--it was set in their heads from all that they had been told, true or not.
Concerning the fingerprints, it was later learned that a funeral director stated that the FBI came to the mortuary and took palmprints and fingerprints from Oswald's dead body, and that he had to clean up after them. He said the FBI were there for hours. Only after that were the prints announced to the public and described as having been found on the rifle.
As for the paper sack that supposedly held the rifle when it was 'sneaked' into the TSBD bulding, the employee in charge of the rolls of paper --used to wrap book cartons--that supposedly supplied the material for the bag, said he never left his area and denied that Oswald ever took any of the paper. However, we have a second bag, as Dallas police ARE on record as having made a 'duplicate' of the bag, as the 'original' was messed up with fingerprint detecting solution. In other words, the only people to have certainly obtained such paper from the paper roll were the Dallas police.
The blanket that supposedly held this rifle was found to have "Oswald's pubic hairs" on it. When examined, the pubic hairs shown in official photos have no bulbs. That is, they are 'cut' hairs. We have to imagine Oswald sitting on the blanket and shaving or cutting with scissors at his pubic area to get the hairs on the blanket! For some time, Oswald was covertly accused of perhaps being a homosexual because autopsy photos showed that his public area was entirely shaved off, but records have now been made public showing the Dallas police shaved his entire pubic area (how humiliating). The police record shows that Oswald's pubic area, chest, and arms were shaved by police to get 'samples.' These 'samples' existed BEFORE the blanket's "Oswald pubic hairs" were 'found.'
Troubling is the fact that a paraffin test for nitrates was also administered to Oswald, with distressing results for a case against him. Those who say paraffin tests are 'no good' for 'proving' that somebody fired a gun or rifle must ask also, "Why, then, did the Dallas police use the test on Oswald?"
The paraffin test, still used today all over the world, showed nitrates on Oswald's hands. This was reported to the public, and the public was told that Oswald had 'fired a gun' without explaining that there were no traces of nitrates on Oswald's cheeks. A rifle such as the Carcano must be held close to the cheek to line it properly for aiming and firing. The rifle was notorious for emitting a lot of nitrates that would have plastered Oswald's face with the residue. The fact is that the public was not told that the paraffin test was negative on Oswald's cheeks and that it was positive that he 'fired a gun' because of residues on his hands (which also can come from handling books -- Oswald's job at the Book Depository). These misleading statements were unconscionable. Boxes stacked at the "sniper's nest" were found to have Oswald's palmprints on several, but he moved boxes there as part of his work. Interestingly, the only unidentified fingerprint was identified only in this century by a certified and experienced fingerprint expert as belonging to Malcolm Wallace, a friend of Vice President Lyndon Johnson who had been charged and found guilty of murder (but Lyndon's influence resulted in a suspended sentence for Wallace-- this was the state of affairs in a corrupt Texas in the mid-20th century). Fingerprints last only a very sort time on cardboard boxes such as were in the sniper's nest, s we must ask ourselves what was Wallace doing there?

Wallace has been linked to several assassinations for corrupt friends of Johnson. He was indicated as having murdered at least one other person who was a threat to Johnson. You can access The Men Who Killed Kennedy series (TMWKK) numbers 7-8-9 (The Smoking Guns, The Love Affair-Baker, and The Guilty Men) to see the banned History Channel documentaries that show the viewer Malcolm Wallace's murderous role, and other unsettling facts, that have been banned by the US media since 2003.
GO to YouTube and view:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search...

Place TMWKK into the search line and then plug in one of the three titles above. Each title is available in 5 segments. They are scattered, but can be found by searching. You can also access them together, in one place, at http://www.doctormarysmonkey.com and at http://www.judythvarybaker.com, as well as at other sites, such as at AOL Video, Filestube.com, etc.

Oswald, also accused of killing Officer Tippit withthe other firearm he supposedly ordered from Kleins later (tough both wepaons supposedly arrived in Ossald's post office box THE SAME DAY-- and by the way, the post office 'lost' the pickup receipt that wuld prove it was Oswald who picked up the packages--though they were supposed to hold on to them for some two years.)...You can view eye-opening information about Oswald's ablity to reach Tippit's location in time to kill Tippit HERE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf8D6N...

on YouTube to see "


"Did Oswald have time to make it to the Tippit murder scene ?"
Thanks to the Internet, we have information available that casts doubt on Lee Harvey Oswald as Kennedy's killer. There is every indication that the question, as worded,
"What kind of rifle did Lee Harvey Oswald use to kill President Kennedy?"
is yet another way to influence readers to assume that Oswald killed Kennedy, when in fact, we cannot link the rifle directly to Oswald due to evidence that cannot stand the scrutiny of time with the information we now have. And we have not even mentioned "the Magic Bullet" or the fact the the Zapruder film has been substantially altered. We now know, thanks to the research of Doug Horne, who was an appointed member of the ARRB created by Congress, that the Zapruder film, when blown up to high pixel counts, shows that the back of Kennedy's head was painted in black. Yes, painted in black! Right on the film! This hides the explosion of blood and brains that came from the back of Kennedy's head when he was struck by a bullet from the Grassy Knoll. Oswald's building was located behind Kennedy's car, not in front of it. Horne's testimony and much more information about how oswald was framed for this murder can be found at Black Op radio in a broadcast available for free on the Internet in late 2009.

OSWALD FRAMED: THE MAGIC BULLET LIES!

OSWALD:FRAMED!

THE MAGIC BULLET: LIES THE FBI TOLD TO THE PEOPLE!
Look at the bold face portions of the article below for a quick review, then read it and weep: Lee Harvey Oswald was framed. AN INNOCENT MAN TOO THE BLAME. Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, we learn once again, and was framed -- we learn once again. Anyone who tells you there is no evidence available that refutes the accusation that Oswald killed Kennedy doesn't read, is stupid, or is being paid, as was V. Bugliosi (a million dollars) to write fancy stuff and create elaborate documentaries to perpetrate the old lies.

IF OSWALD IS INNOCENT, THAT MEANS OUR GOVERNMENT WAS NOT! THERE WAS A COUP.
EVERYBODY IN EUROPE SEEMS TO KNOW THIS. THEY GOT UNFILTERED NEWS. THEY GOT MORE OF THE TRUTH. THEY WONDER HOW WE CAN BE SO BLIND. THEY'RE USED TO COVER-UPS ON COUPS. AMERICANS TRUSTED THE NEW PRESIDENT NOT TO LIE TO THEM. WHAT A MISTAKE! LBJ WAS THE SAME FELLOW WHO LIFTED BEAGLES BY THEIR EARS AND HUMILIATED HIS WIFE REGULARLY IN PUBLIC. LBJ'S MISTRESS, MADELEINE BROWN, CAN BE SEEN ON YOUTUBE TELLING YOU ALL ABOUT THAT WONDERFUL MAN WHO LED US INTO THE VIETNAM WAR AND MADE HIS TEXAS OIL FRIENDS AND CONSTRUCTION FRIENDS RICH. TEXAS BASICALLY RAN ALL OUR WARS EVER SINCE.

NOW PLEASE READ THE TRUTH ABOUT "THE MAGIC BULLET" -- AND ASK YOURSELF IF THE SAME BULLET SHOWN SO PRISTINE AND SCARCELY HARMED COULD HAVE CREATED ALL THOSE WOUNDS AND BROKEN BONES. THE PHOTO SHOWS THE 'PRUSTINE' BLLET WITH OTHE R'PRISTINE ' BULLETS THAT WERE SHOT THROUGH COTTON. THE MASHED BULLET HIT 'ONE' BONE. NOT SEVERAL, AS IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION.

WHY ARE 'CONSPIRACY THEORISTS' CONSISTENTLY PUT DOWN, WHILE THOSE WHO PUSH THE GOVERNMENT'S OFFICIAL VERDICT ARE SUPPORTED IN THE MEDIA? WHY DO I HAVE TO LIVE IN EXILE?

GET THE BOOK "ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD" BY JUDYTH VARY BAKER, THE BOOK "DR. MARY'S MONKEY" BY EDWARD T. HASLAM, AND THE BOOK "CROSSFIRE-- THE PLOT THAT KILLED KENNEDY" AND YOU DON;T NEED ANY OTHER BOOKS TO SETTLE THE QUESTIONS ONCE AND FOR ALL ABOUT OSWALD'S INNOCENCE AND THE GOVERNMENT'S GUILT. GO TO TRINE DAY: HTTP://WWW.TRINEDAY.COM TO SEE OTHER BOOKS ABOUT WHO'S RUNNING OUR GOVERNMENT. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. LET'S GET OUR COUNTRY BACK! JVB
------


===THE MAGIC BULLET LIES: THE ARTICLE THAT PROVES OSWALD WAS FRAMED=====

This is part of an article written by Gary L. Aguilar and Josiah Thompson. The full article, with illustrations, can be found here:

http://www.history-matters.com/essays/fram...MoreMagical.htm

Among the myriad JFK assassination controversies, none more cleanly divides Warren Commission supporter from skeptic than the “Single Bullet Theory.” The brainchild of a former Warren Commission lawyer, Mr. Arlen Specter, now the senior Senator from Pennsylvania, the theory is the sine qua non of the Warren Commission’s case that with but three shots, including one that missed, Lee Harvey Oswald had single handedly altered the course of history.

Mr. Specter’s hypothesis was not one that immediately leapt to mind from the original evidence and the circumstances of the shooting. It was, rather, born of necessity, if one sees as a necessity the keeping of Oswald standing alone in the dock. The theory had to contend with the considerable evidence there was suggesting that more than one shooter was involved.

For example, because the two victims in Dealey Plaza, President Kennedy and Governor John Connally, had suffered so many wounds – eight in all, it had originally seemed as if more than two slugs from the supposed “sniper’s nest” would have been necessary to explain all the damage. In addition, a home movie taken by a bystander, Abraham Zapruder, showed that too little time had elapsed between the apparent shots that hit both men in the back for Oswald to have fired, reacquired his target, and fired again. The Single Bullet Theory neatly solved both problems. It posited that a single, nearly whole bullet that was later recovered had caused all seven of the non-fatal wounds sustained by both men. [1]

But the bullet that was recovered had one strikingly peculiar feature: it had survived all the damage it had apparently caused virtually unscathed itself. The shell’s near-pristine appearance, which prompted some to call it the “magic bullet,” left many skeptics wondering whether the bullet in evidence had really done what the Commission had said it had done. Additional skepticism was generated by the fact the bullet was not found in or around either victim. It was found instead on a stretcher at the hospital where the victims were treated.
Mr. Specter’s idea was that, after passing completely through JFK and Governor Connally, the bullet had fallen out of the Governor’s clothes and onto a stretcher at Parkland Hospital. But it was never unequivocally established that either victim had ever lain on the stretcher where the bullet was discovered. [2] Nevertheless, studies done at the FBI Laboratory seemed to unquestionably link the missile to Oswald’s rifle, and the FBI sent the Warren Commission a memo on July 7, 1964 detailing how it had run down the bullet’s chain of possession, which looked pretty solid. According to the FBI, the two hospital employees who discovered the bullet originally identified it as the same bullet six months later in an FBI interview

That a bullet, fired from Oswald’s weapon and later identified by hospital witnesses, had immediately turned up on a stretcher in the hospital where the victims were treated struck some as perhaps a little too convenient. Suspicions it had been planted ensued. But apart from its peculiar provenance, there was little reason in 1964 to doubt the bullet’s bona fides. But then in 1967, one of the authors reported that one of the two hospital employees who had found the bullet, Parkland personnel director O.P. Wright, had told him that the bullet he saw and held on the day of the assassination did not look like the bullet that later turned up in FBI evidence. That claim was in direct conflict with an FBI memo of July 7, 1964, which said that Wright had told an FBI agent that the bullet did look like the shell he’d held on the day of the murder.

For thirty years, the conflict lay undisturbed and unresolved. Finally, in the mid 1990s, the authors brought this conflict to the attention of the Assassinations Records Review Board, a federal body charged with opening the abundant, still-secret files concerning the Kennedy assassination. A search through newly declassified files led to the discovery of new information on this question. It turns out that the FBI’s own, once-secret files tend to undermine the position the FBI took publicly in its July, 1964 memo to the Warren Commission, and they tend to support co-author Josiah Thompson. Thompson got a further boost when a retired FBI agent, in a recorded telephone interview and in a face-to-face meeting, flatly denied what the FBI had written about him to the Warren Commission in 1964.

The story begins in a ground floor elevator lobby at the Dallas hospital where JFK and John Connelly were taken immediately after being shot. According to the Warren Commission, Parkland Hospital senior engineer, Mr. Darrell C. Tomlinson, was moving some wheeled stretchers when he bumped a stretcher “against the wall and a bullet rolled out.” [3] He called for help and was joined by Mr. O.P. Wright, Parkland’s personnel director. After examining the bullet together, Mr. Wright passed it along to one of the U.S. Secret Service agents who were prowling the hospital, Special Agent Richard Johnsen. [4]

Johnsen then carried the bullet back to Washington, D. C. and handed it to James Rowley, the chief of the Secret Service. Rowley, in turn, gave the bullet to FBI agent Elmer Lee Todd, [5] who carried it to agent Robert Frazier in the FBI’s Crime Lab. [6] Without exploring the fact that the HSCA discovered that there may have been another witness who was apparently with Tomlinson when the bullet was found, what concerns us here is whether the bullet currently in evidence, Commission Exhibit #399, is the same bullet Tomlinson found originally.
The early history of the bullet, Commission Exhibit #399, is laid out in Warren Commission Exhibit #2011. This exhibit consists of a 3-page, July 7, 1964 FBI letterhead memorandum that was written to the Warren Commission in response to a Commission request that the Bureau trace “various items of physical evidence,” among them #399. #2011 relates that, in chasing down the bullet’s chain of possession, FBI agent Bardwell Odum took #399 to Darrell Tomlinson and O.P. Wright on June 12, 1964. The memo asserts that both men told Agent Odum that the bullet “appears to be the same one” they found on the day of the assassination, but that neither could “positively identify” it.
Positive identification” of a piece of evidence by a witness means that the witness is certain that an object later presented in evidence is the same one that was originally found. The most common way to establish positive identification is for a witness to place his initials on a piece of evidence upon first finding it. The presence of such initials is of great help later when investigators try to prove a link through an unbroken chain of possession between the object in evidence and a crime.

Understandably, neither Tomlinson nor Wright inscribed his initials on the stretcher bullet. But that both witnesses told FBI Agent Odum, so soon after the murder, that CE 399 looked like the bullet they had found on a stretcher was compelling reason to suppose that it was indeed the same one.
However, CE #2011 included other information that raised questions about the bullet. As first noted by author Ray Marcus, [7] it also states that on June 24, 1964, FBI agent Todd, who received the bullet from Rowley, the head of the Secret Service, returned with presumably the same bullet to get Secret Service agents Johnsen and Rowley to identify it. #2011 reports that both Johnsen and Rowley advised Todd that they “could not identify this bullet as the one” they saw on the day of the assassination. # 2011 contains no comment about the failure being merely one of not “positively identifying” the shell that, otherwise, “appeared to be the same” bullet they had originally handled.

Thus, in #2011 the FBI reported that both Tomlinson and Wright said #399 resembled the Parkland bullet, but that neither of the Secret Service Agents could identify it. FBI Agent Todd originally received the bullet from Rowley on 11/22/63 and it was he who then returned on 6/24/64 with supposedly the same bullet for Rowley and Johnsen to identify. Given the importance of this case, one imagines that by the time Todd returned, they would have had at least a passing acquaintance. Had it truly been the same bullet, one might have expected one or both agents to tell Todd it looked like the same bullet, even if neither could “positively identify” it by an inscribed initial. After all, neither Tomlinson nor Wright had inscribed their initials on the bullet, and yet #2011 says that they said they saw a resemblance.

And there the conflicted story sat, until one of the current authors published a book in 1967.Two Different Accounts from One Witness
Six Seconds in Dallas reported on an interview with O.P. Wright in November 1966. Before any photos were shown or he was asked for any description of #399, Wright said: “That bullet had a pointed tip.”
“Pointed tip?” Thompson asked.“Yeah, I’ll show you. It was like this one here,” he said, reaching into his desk and pulling out the .30 caliber bullet pictured in Six Seconds.”[8]
As Thompson described it in 1967, “I then showed him photographs of CE’s 399, 572 (the two ballistics comparison rounds from Oswald’s rifle) (sic), and 606 (revolver bullets) (sic), and he rejected all of these as resembling the bullet Tomlinson found on the stretcher. Half an hour later in the presence of two witnesses, he once again rejected the picture of 399 as resembling the bullet found on the stretcher.”[9]
Thus in 1964 the Warren Commission, or rather the FBI, claimed that Wright believed the original bullet resembled #399. In 1967, Wright denied there was a resemblance. Recent FBI releases prompted by the JFK Review Board support author Thompson’s 1967 report.

A declassified 6/20/64 FBI AIRTEL memorandum from the FBI office in Dallas (“SAC, Dallas” – i.e., Special Agent in Charge, Gordon Shanklin) to J. Edgar Hoover contains the statement, “For information WFO (FBI Washington Field Office), neither DARRELL C. TOMLINSON [sic], who found bullet at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, nor O. P. WRIGHT, Personnel Officer, Parkland Hospital, who obtained bullet from TOMLINSON and gave to Special Service, at Dallas 11/22/63, can identify bullet … .” Whereas the FBI had claimed in CE #2011 that Tomlinson and Wright had told Agent Odum on June 12, 1964 that CE #399 “appears to be the same” bullet they found on the day of the assassination, nowhere in this previously classified memo, which was written before CE #2011, is there any corroboration that either of the Parkland employees saw a resemblance. Nor is FBI agent Odum’s name mentioned anywhere in the once-secret file, whether in connection with #399, or with Tomlinson or with Wright.

A declassified record, however, offers some corroboration for what CE 2011 reported about Secret Service Agents Johnsen and Rowley. A memo from the FBI’s Dallas field office dated 6/24/64 reported that, “ON JUNE TWENTYFOUR INSTANT RICHARD E. JOHNSEN, AND JAMES ROWLEY, CHIEF … ADVISED SA ELMER LEE TODD, WFO, THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO INDENTIFY RIFLE BULLET C ONE (# 399, which, before the Warren Commission had logged in as #399, was called “C ONE”), BY INSPECTION (capitals in original).

Convinced that we had overlooked some relevant files, we cast about for additional corroboration of what was in CE # 2011. There should, for example, have been some original “302s ” – the raw FBI field reports from the Agent Odum’s interviews with Tomlinson and Wright on June 12, 1964. There should also have been one from Agent Todd’s interviews with Secret Service Agents Johnsen and Rowley on June 24, 1964. Perhaps somewhere in those, we thought, we would find Agent Odum reporting that Wright had detected a resemblance between the bullets. And perhaps we’d also find out whether Tomlinson, Wright, Johnsen or Rowley had supplied the Bureau with any additional descriptive details about the bullet.

In early 1998, we asked a research associate, Ms. Cathy Cunningham, to scour the National Archives for any additional files that might shed light on this story. She looked but found none. We contacted the JFK Review Board’s T. Jeremy Gunn for help. [Fig. 7] On May 18, 1998, the Review Board’s Eileen Sullivan, writing on Gunn’s behalf, answered, saying: “[W]e have attempted, unsuccessfully, to find any additional records that would account for the problem you suggest.”[10] [Fig. 8] Undaunted, one of us wrote the FBI directly, and was referred to the National Archives, and so then wrote Mr. Steve Tilley at the National Archives.

On Mr. Tilley’s behalf, Mr. Stuart Culy, an archivist at the National Archives, made a search. On July 16, 1999, Mr. Culy wrote that he searched for the FBI records within the HSCA files as well as in the FBI records, all without success. He was able to determine, however, that the serial numbers on the FBI documents ran “concurrently, with no gaps, which indicated that no material is missing from these files.”[11] [Fig. 10] In other words, the earliest and apparently the only FBI report said nothing about either Tomlinson or Wright seeing a similarity between the bullet found at the hospital and the bullet later in evidence, CE #399. Nor did agent Bardwell Odum’s name show up in any of the files.[editor's note: Dr. Aguilar followed up in 2005 with the National Archives, asking them in letters dated March 2 and March 7 to search for any FBI "302" reports that would have been generated from CE399 being shown to those who handled it. On March 17, 2005 David Mengel of NARA wrote back reporting that additional searches had not uncovered any such reports.]

Stymied, author Aguilar turned to his co-author. “What does Odum have to say about it?” Thompson asked.
“Odum? How the hell do I know? Is he still alive?”

“I’ll find out,” he promised.

Less than an hour later, Thompson had located Mr. Bardwell Odum’s home address and phone number. Aguilar phoned him on September 12, 2002. He was still alive and well and living in a suburb of Dallas. The 82-year old was alert and quick-witted on the phone and he regaled Aguilar with fond memories of his service in the Bureau. Finally, the Kennedy case came up and Odum agreed to help interpret some of the conflicts in the records. Two weeks after mailing Odum the relevant files – CE # 2011, the three-page FBI memo dated July 7, 1964, and the “FBI AIRTEL” memo dated June 12, 1964, Aguilar called him back.
Mr. Odum told Aguilar, “I didn’t show it [#399] to anybody at Parkland. I didn’t have any bullet … I don’t think I ever saw it even.” [Fig. 11] Unwilling to leave it at that, both authors paid Mr. Odum a visit in his Dallas home on November 21, 2002. The same alert, friendly man on the phone greeted us warmly and led us to a comfortable family room. To ensure no misunderstanding, we laid out before Mr. Odum all the relevant documents and read aloud from them.

Again, Mr. Odum said that he had never had any bullet related to the Kennedy assassination in his possession, whether during the FBI’s investigation in 1964 or at any other time. Asked whether he might have forgotten the episode, Mr. Odum remarked that he doubted he would have ever forgotten investigating so important a piece of evidence. But even if he had done the work, and later forgotten about it, he said he would certainly have turned in a “302” report covering something that important. Odum’s sensible comment had the ring of truth. For not only was Odum’s name absent from the FBI’s once secret files, it was also it difficult to imagine a motive for him to besmirch the reputation of the agency he had worked for and admired.

Thus, the July 1964 FBI memo that became Commission Exhibit #2011 claims that Tomlinson and Wright said they saw a resemblance between #399 and the bullet they picked up on the day JFK died. However, the FBI agent who is supposed to have gotten that admission, Bardwell Odum, and the Bureau’s own once-secret records, don’t back up #2011. Those records say only that neither Tomlinson nor Wright was able to identify the bullet in question, a comment that leaves the impression they saw no resemblance. That impression is strengthened by the fact that Wright told one of the authors in 1966 the bullets were dissimilar. Thus, Thompson’s surprising discovery about Wright, which might have been dismissed in favor of the earlier FBI evidence in #2011, now finds at least some support in an even earlier, suppressed FBI memo, and the living memory of a key, former FBI agent provides further, indirect corroboration.
But the newly declassified FBI memos from June 1964 lead to another unexplained mystery. Neither are the 302 reports that would have been written by the agents who investigated #399’s chain of possession in both Dallas and Washington. The authors were tempted to wonder if the June memos were but expedient fabrications, with absolutely no 302s whatsoever backing them up.

But a declassified routing slip turned up by John Hunt seems to prove that the FBI did in fact act on the Commission’s formal request, as outlined in # 2011, to run down #399s chain of possession. The routing slip discloses that the bullet was sent from Washington to Dallas on 6/2/64 and returned to Washington on 6/22/64. Then on 6/24/64, it was checked out to FBI Agent Todd. What transpired during these episodes? If the Bureau went to these lengths, it seems quite likely that Bardwell Odum, or some other agent in Dallas, would have submitted one or more 302s on what was found, and so would Agent Elmer Todd in Washington. But there are none in the files. The trail ends here with an unexplained, and perhaps important, gap left in the record.
Besides this unexplained gap, another interesting question remains: If the FBI did in fact adjust Tomlinson and Wright’s testimonies with a bogus claim of bullet similarity, why didn’t it also adjust Johnsen and Rowley’s? While it is unlikely a certain answer to this question will ever be found, it is not unreasonable to suppose that the FBI authors of #2011 would have been more reluctant to embroider the official statements of the head of the Secret Service in Washington than they would the comments of a couple of hospital employees in Dallas.

In a memo to the Warren Commission [C. E. #2011] concerning its investigation of the chain of possession of C.E. #399, the FBI reported that two Parkland Hospital eyewitnesses, Darrell Tomlinson and O. P. Wright, said C.E. #399 resembled the bullet they discovered on the day JFK died. But the FBI agent who is supposed to have interviewed both men and the Bureau’s own suppressed records contradict the FBI’s public memo. Agent Odum denied his role, and the FBI’s earliest, suppressed files say only that neither Tomlinson nor Wright was able to identify the bullet in question. This suppressed file implies the hospital witnesses saw no resemblance, which is precisely what Wright told one of the authors in 1967.
What we are left with is the FBI having reported a solid chain of possession for #399 to the Warren Commission. But the links in the FBI’s chain appear to be anything but solid. Bardwell Odum, one of the key links, says he was never in the chain at all and the FBI’s own, suppressed records tend to back him up. Inexplicably, the chain also lacks other important links: FBI 302s, reports from the agents in the field who, there is ample reason to suppose, did actually trace #399 in Dallas and in Washington. Suppressed FBI records and recent investigations thus suggest that not only is the FBI’s file incomplete, but also that one of the authors may have been right when he reported in 1967 that the bullet found in Dallas did not look like a bullet that could have come from Oswald’s rifle.

Notes

[1] The eighth wound, JFK’s head wound, accounted for one of the bullets. And evidence from the scene and from a home movie taken of the murder by a bystander, Abraham Zapruder, suggests that a third bullet had missed entirely.

[2] Josiah Thompson. Six Seconds in Dallas. Bernard Geis Associates for Random House, 1967, p. 161 – 164.

[3] The President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy – Report. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1964, p. 81. See also 6H130 – 131.

[4] 18H800. See also: Thompson, J. Six Seconds in Dallas. New York: Bernard Geis Associates for Random House, 1967, p. 155.

[5] 24H412.

[6] 3H428; 24H412.

[7] See Ray Marcus monograph, The Bastard Bullet.

[8] Text of email message from Josiah Thompson to Aguilar, 12/10/99.

[9] Thompson, Josiah. Six Seconds in Dallas. New York: Bernard Geis Associates for Random House, 1967, p. 175.

[10] 5/11/98 email message from Eileen Sullivan re: “Your letter to Jeremy Gunn, April 4, 1998.”

[11] Personal letter from Stuart Culy, archivist, National Archives, July 16, 1999.



FOURTEEN WITNESSES WHO WERE DOCTORS AND NURSES AT PARKLAND HOSPITAL SHOWED THAT A BULLET HIT KENNEDY FROM THE FRONT, NOT BACK, AS CLAIMED BY THE WARREN COMMISSION--AND EXITED IN THE BACK OF KENNEDY'S HEAD, CREATING A GAPING WOUND. EACH WITNESS POINTED TO WHERE THEY SAID THE SKULL WAS BLOWN OUT. NONE OF THE WITNESSES AT PARKLAND WERE INTERVIEWED. ONLY GOVERNMENT DOCTORS WHERE THE AUTOPSY (REDESIGNING OF THE WOUNDS) WAS CONDUCTED WERE INTERVIEWED. THE AUTOPSY DRAWINGS AND FAKED AUTOPSY PHOTOS SHOW A SMALL HOLE IN THE BACK OF KENNEDY'S HEAD, TO INDICATE OSWALD SHOT KENNEDY. GO TO http://www.JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM AND CLICK ON "JFK II" TO SEE MORE SHOCKING INFORMATION. THANKS FOR VISITING MY WEBSITE http://www.JUDYTHVARYBAKER.COM. Also check out http://www.judyth.freehomepage.com to see my works of art.